A review of the South American cichlid genus Cichla, with descriptions of nine new species (Teleostei: Cichlidae)

Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 289-398

  Kullander, Sven O ^a   Ferreira, Efrem J G ^b  

^a SWEDISH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (Sweden)

^b INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS DA AMAZÔNIA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CICHLA; CICHLA INTERMEDIA; CICHLA MONOCULUS; CICHLA OCELLARIS; CICHLA ORINOCENSIS; CICHLA TEMENSIS; CICHLASOMA; CICHLIDAE; CYCLOPIA INTERMEDIA; TELEOSTEI;

EID: 33845761548     PISSN: 09369902     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (89)

1. Andrade, F., H. Schneider, I. Farias, E. Feldberg & I. Sampaio. 2001. Análise filogenética de duas espécies simpátricas de tucunaré (Cichla, Perciformes), com registro de hibridizaç ão em diferentes pontos da bacia da Amazônica. Revista Virtual de Iniciação Acadêmica da UFPA, 1 (1): 1-11.
2. Araújo Moreira Neto, C. 1983. Introdução. Pp. 13 -37 in A. R. Ferreira, Viagem filosófica ao rio Negro. Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Belém, 775 pp.
3. Bezerra e Silva, J. W., J. de Oliveira Chacon, E. P. dos Santos, J. T. C. de Mello & E. de A. Duarte. 1980. Curva de rendimento do tucunaré pinima, Cichla temensis (Humboldt, 1833), do açude público "Estevam Marinho" (Curemas, Paraíba, Brasil). Revista Brasileira de Biologia, 40: 203-206.
4. Bleher, H. 2006. Bleher's discus. Volume 1. Aquapress Publishers, Miradolo Terme.
5. Braga, R. A. 1952. Ninhos de tucunarés, "Cichla temensis" Humboldt e "- Cichla ocellaris" Bloch & Schneider. Revista Brasileira de Biologia, 12: 273-278
6. _ 1953. Crescimento de tucunaré pinima, Cichla temensis Humboldt, em cativeiro. Dusenia, 4: 41-46.
7. Brinn, M. N. A., J. I. R. Porto & E. Feldberg. 2004. Karyological evidence for interspecific hybridization between Cichla monoculus and C. temensis (Perciformes, Cichlidae) in the Amazon. Hereditas, 141: 252-257.
8. Casciotta, J. & G. Arratia. 1993. Tertiary cichlid fishes from Argentina and reassessment of the phylogeny of New World cichlids. Kaupia, 2:195-240.
9. Castelnau, F. de. 1855. Animaux nouveaux ou rares recueillis pendant l'expédition dans les parties centrales de l'Amérique du sud, de Rio de Janeiro à Lima, et de Lima au Para exécutée par ordre du gouvernement français pendant les années 1843 à 1847 sous la direction du Comte Francis de Castelnau. Poissons. Paris, xii+112 pp.
10. Chellappa, S., M. R. Câmara & N. T. Chellappa. 2003. Ecology of Cichla monoculus (Osteichthyes: Cichlidae) from a reservoir in the semi-arid region of Brazil. Hydrobiologia, 504: 267-273.
11. Costi, C. G., C. C. Bello Rodrigues, D. L. Paiva Filho & J. B. Rozas Rodrigues. 1977. Estudo preliminar daictiofauna do Polo Araguaia-Tocantins. Brasilia, 177 pp
12. Eigenmann, C. H. 1912. The freshwater fishes of British Guiana, including a study of the ecological grouping of species and the relation of the fauna of the plateau to that of the lowlands. Memoirs of the Carnegie Museum, 5: xxii+578 pp.
13. Eigenmann, C. H. & W. L. Bray. 1894. A revision of the American Cichlidae. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 7: 607-624.
14. Farias, I. P., G. Ortí, I. Sampaio, H. Schneider & A. Meyer. 2001. The cytochrome b gene as a phylogenetic marker: the limits of resolution for analyzing relationships among cichlid fishes. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 53: 89-103
15. Fontenele, O. 1948. Um caráter sexual secundário extragenital nos tucunarés (Actinopterygii, Cichlidae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia, 8:185-188.
16. Freihofer, W. C. 1978. Cranial nerves of a percoid fish, Polycentrus schomburgkii, a contribution to the morphology and classification of the order Perciformes. Occasional Papers of the California Academy of Sciences, 128:1-78.
17. Günther, A. 1862. Catalogue of the fishes in the British Museum. Volume fourth. British Museum, London, 534 pp.
18. Heckel, J. 1840. Johann Natterer's neue Flussfische Brasilien's nach den Beobachtungen und Mittheilungen des Entdeckers beschrieben. (Erste Abtheilung, die Labroiden.) Annalen des Wiener Museums der Naturgeschichte, 2: 327-470.
19. Holmberg, E. L. 1891. Sobre algunos peces nuevos o poco conocidos de la República Argentina. Revista Argentina de Historia Natural, 1:180-193.
20. Humboldt, A. von. 1819. Voyage aux régions équinoxiales du Nouveau Continent: fait en 1799, 1800, 1801, 1803 et 1804 par Al. de Humboldt et A. Bonpland. Tome second. 722 pp.
21. _ 1907. Personal narrative of travels to the equinoctial regions of South America during the years 1799-1804, vol. 2. [Translation]. George Bell & Sons, London. Project Gutenberg Ebook http://www.gutenberg.net/etext04/qnct210. txt
22. Humboldt, [A.] de, [A.] Valenciennes & [Gay-Lussac. 1821.] Recherches sur les poissons fluviatiles de l'Amérique équinoxiale. Pp. 145-216 in [A.] de Humboldt & [A.] Bonpland (1813-1832), Voyage de Humboldt et Bonpland. Deuxième partie. Observations de Zoologie et d'Anatomie comparée. Paris.
23. th ed. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London, 306 pp.
24. Ismail, M. H., W. Verraes & A. Huysseune. 1982. Developmental aspects of the pharyngeal jaws in Astatotilapia elegans (Trewavas, 1933) (Teleostei: Cichlidae). Netherlands Journal of Zoology, 32: 513-543.
25. Jardine, W. (ed.). 1843. The naturalist's library [vol. 38], Ichthyology Vol. V. Fishes of Guiana. Part II. Edinburgh, 214 pp.
26. [Also as Vol. XXXI. Ichthyology. Fishes of British Guiana. Part 2nd. Two pi. 18 listed in text and Contents, but only one present.]
27. Jégu, M., G. M. dos Santos & E. Ferreira. 1989. Une nouvelle espèce du genre Mylesinus (Pisces, Serrasalmidae), M. paraschomburgkii, décrite des bassins du Trombetas et du Uatumã (Brésil, Amazonie). Revue d'Hydrobiologie Tropicale, 22: 49-62.
28. Jepsen, D. B., K. O. Winemiller, D. C. Taphorn & D. Rodriquez O. 1999. Age structure and growth of peacock cichlids from rivers and reservoirs of Venezuela. Journal of Fish Biology, 55: 433-450.
29. Keith, P., P.-Y. Le Bail & P. Planquette. 2000. Atlas des poissons d'eau douce de Guyane, Tome 2, Fascicule I. Batrachoidiformes, Mugiliformes, Beloniformes, Cyprinodontiformes, Synbranchiformes, Perciformes, Pleuronectiformes, Tetraodontiformes. Patrimoines Naturels (Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Service du Patrimoine Naturel), 43 (1): 1-286.
30. Kelber, D. 1999. Tucunaré uma paixão internacional. Coleção pescarte 02, Editora Arte & Ciencia, São Paulo, 96 pp.
31. Kottelat, M. 1984. Catalogue des types du Musée d'Histoire naturelle de Neuchâtel. I. Pisces. Bulletin de la Société Neuchâteloise des Sciences Naturelles, 107:143-153.
32. _ 1988. Authorship, dates of publication, status and types of Spix and Agassiz's Brazilian fishes. Spixiana, 11: 69-93.
33. Kullander, S. O. 1981. Cichlid fishes from the La Plata basin. Part I. Collections from Paraguay in the Muséum d'Histoire naturelle de Genève. Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 88: 675-692.
34. _ 1983. A revision of the South American cichlid genus Cichlasoma. Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, 296 pp.
35. _ 1986. Cichlid fishes of the Amazon River drainage of Peru. Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, 431 pp.
36. _ 1997. Crenicichla rosemariae, a new species of pike cichlid (Teleostei, Cichlidae) from the upper Rio Xingu drainage, Brazil. Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters, 7: 279-281.
37. _ 1998. A phylogeny and classification of the South American Cichlidae (Teleostei: Perciformes). Pp. 461-498 in L. R. Malabarba, R. E. Reis, R. P. Vari, Z. M. S. Lucena & C. A. S. Lucena (eds.), Phylogeny and classification of Neotropical fishes. Edipucrs, Porto Alegre.
38. _ 1999. Fish species - how and why. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 9: 325-352.
39. _ 2003. Family Cichlidae (Cichlids). Pp. 605-656 in R. E. Reis, S. O. Kullander & C. J. Ferraris (eds.), Check list of the freshwater fishes of South and Central America. Edipucrs, Porto Alegre, xi + 729 pp.
40. _ 2004. Apistogramma alacrina, a new species of cichlid fish (Teleostei: Cichlidae) from Colombia. Ichthyo-logical Exploration of Freshwaters, 15: 41-48.
41. Kullander, S. O. & E. J. G. Ferreira. 2005. Two new species of Apistogramma Regan (Teleostei: Cichlidae) from the rio Trombetas, Pará State, Brazil, Neotropical Ichthyology, 3: 361-371.
42. Kullander, S. O. & H. Nijssen. 1989. The cichlids of Surinam. Brill, Leiden, xxxiii+256 pp.
43. Kullander, S. O. & A. M. C. Silfvergrip. 1991. Review of the South American cichlid genus Mesonauta Günther with descriptions of two new species. Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 98:407-448.
44. Lòpez-Fernández, H., R. L. Honeycutt & K. O. Winemiller. 2004. Molecular phylogeny and evidence for an adaptive radiation of geophagine cichlids from South America (Perciformes: Labroidei). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 34: 227-244.
45. López-Fernández, H., R. L. Honeycutt, M. L. J. Stiassny & K. O. Winemiller. 2005. Morphology, molecules, and character congruence in the phylogeny of South American geophagine cichlids (Perciformes, Labroidei). Zoologica Scripta, 34: 627-651.
46. Lowe-McConnell, R. H. 1969. The cichlid fishes of Guyana, South America, with notes on their ecology and breeding behaviour. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 48: 255-302.
47. _ 1991. Natural history of fishes in Araguaia and Xingu Amazonian tributaries, Serra do Roncador, Mato Grosso, Brazil, Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters, 2: 63-82.
48. Machado-Allison, A. 1971. Contribución al conocimiento de la taxonomía del género Cichla en Venezuela. Parte I. Acta Biológica Venezuelica, 7: 459-497.
49. _ 1973. Contribución al conocimiento de la taxonomía del género Cichla en Venezuela. Parte II. Osteologia comparada. Acta Biológica Venezuelica, 8: 155-205.
50. Magalhães, A. Couto de. 1931. Monographia brazileira de peixes fluviaes. São Paulo, 260 pp.
51. Marques, D. K. S. & E. K. Resende. 2005. Distribuição do Tucunaré Cichla cf. monoculus (Osteichthyes, Cichlidae) no Pantanal. Boletim de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento, Embrapa Pantanal, 60:1-24
52. Meijide, F. K. & G. A. Guerrero. 2000. Embryonic and larval development of a substrate-brooding cichlid Cichlasoma dimerus (Heckel, 1840) under laboratory conditions. Journal of Zoology, London, 252: 481-493.
53. Menezes, R. S. de. 1953. Listas dos nomes vulgares de peixes de aguas doces e salobras da zona seca do Nordeste e Léste do Brasil. Arquivos do Museu Nacional, 42: 343-388.
54. Müller, J. & F. H. Troschel. 1849. Horae Ichthyologicae. Beschreibung und Abbildung neuer Fische. Drittes Heft. Von Veit, Berlin, 28 pp.
55. Nakashima, S. 1941. Algunos peces del Oriente peruano. Boletín del Museo de Historia Natural Javier Prado, 5: 61-78.
56. Nascimento, F. L., A. C. Catella & A. S. Moraes. 2001. Distribuição espacial do tucunaré, Cichla sp (Pisces, Cichlidae), peixe amazônico introduzido no Panta nal, Brasil. Boletim de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento, Embrapa Pantanal, 24:1-17.
57. Newsome, Y. L. 1971. Comparative osteology and relationships of Neotropical cichlid fishes. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois, Chicago, 303 pp.
58. Nomura, H. 1984. Dicionário dos peixes do Brasil. Brasília, 482 pp.
59. Ogilvie, V. E. 1966. Report on the Peacock Bass Project including Venezuelan trip report and a description of five Cichla species. Florida Game and Fresh Water fish Commission, 42 pp, unpaginated.
60. Page, R. D. M. 2001. NEXUS Data Editor for Windows, version 0.5.0.
61. Pellegrin, J. 1904. Contribution à l'étude anatomique, biologique et taxinomique des poissons de la famille des Cichlidés. Mémoires de la Société Zoologique de France, 16: 41-399.
62. Pinna, M. C. C. de. 1999. Species concepts and phylogenetics. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 9: 353-373.
63. Regan, C. T. 1906. A revision of the fishes of the South-American cichlid genera Cichla, Chaetobranchus, and Chaetobranchopsis, with notes on the genera of American Cichlidae. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Ser. 7, 17: 230-239.
64. Ringuelet, R. A., R. H. Arámburu & A. A. de Arámburu. 1967. Los peces argentinos de agua dulce. Provincia de Buenos Aires, Comisión de Investigación Científica, La Plata, 602 pp.
65. Román, B. 1981. Los pavones. Colección: Los peces de los llanos de Venezuela I. Fundación Científica Fluvial de los Llanos, Caracas, 143 pp.
66. Santos, E. 1981. Peixes da agua doce. Belo Horisonte, 267 pp. (Zoologia brasilica, vol. 2* reprint of 1954 ed., with new colour plates).
67. Sawaya, P. 1946. Sobre o consumo de oxigenio por alguns peixes fluviais neotropicos (Cichlidae - gen. Cichla e Astronotus). Boletim da Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras da Universidade de São Paulo, Zoologia, 11: 335-355.
68. Sawaya, P. & A. de Albuquerque Maranhão. 1946. A construção dos ninhos e a reprodução de alguns peixes neotrópicos (Cichlidae - gen. Cichla e Astronotus). Boletim da Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras da Universidade de São Paulo, Zoologia, 11: 357-372
69. Schneider, J. G. (ed.). 1801. M. E. Blochii systema ichthyologiae. Berolini, 1x+584 pp.
70. Schultz, H. 1962. Komdu and the Suya indians. Tropical Fish Hobbyist Magazine, 1962 (March): 19-20, 23-24, 26, 29-31, 34-37.
71. Shafland, P. L. 1995. Introduction and establishment of a successful butterfly peacock fishery in southeast Florida canals. American Fisheries Society Symposium, 15: 443-451.
72. Silfvergrip, A. M. C. 1996. A systematic revision of the neotropical catfish genus Rhamdia (Teleostei, Pimelodidae). Department of Zoology, Stockholm Uni versity and Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, 156 pp.
73. Spix, J. B. & L. Agassiz. 1829-1831. Selecta genera et species piscium quos in itinere per Brasiliam annis MDCCCXVII-MDCCCXX jussu et auspiciis Maximiliani Josephi I. Bavariae regis augustissimi peracto collegit et pingendos curavit Dr. J. B. de Spix. Monachii, 138 pp. [1829, pp. 1-82, 1831, pp. 83-138].
74. SPSS. 2005. SPSS 14.0 for Windows. SPSS Inc., Chicago.
75. Stawikowski, R. & U. Werner. 2004. Die Buntbarsche Amerikas. Band 3: Erdfresser, Hecht- und Kammbuntbarsche. Ulmer, Stuttgart, 478 pp.
76. Steindachner, F. 1875. Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Chromiden des Amazonenstromes. Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschafliehe Classe, 71: 61-137.
77. _ 1883. Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Flussfische Südamerika's. (IV.). Denkschriften der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschafliche Classe, 46:1-44.
78. Stiassny, M. L. J. 1982. The relationships of the neotropical genus Cichla: a phyletic analysis including some functional considerations. Journal of Zoology, London, 197: 427-453.
79. _ 1987. Cichlid familial intrarelationships and the placement of the neotropical genus Cichla. Journal of Natural History, 21:1311-1331.
80. _ 1992. Atavisms, phylogenetic character reversals, and the origin of evolutionary novelties. Netherlands Journal of Zoology, 42: 260-276.
81. Swofford, D. L. 2001. PAUP* 4.0 beta 10 for 32-bit Microsoft Windows. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
82. Webb, J. F. 1990. Ontogeny and phylogeny of the trunk lateral line system in cichlid fishes. Journal of Zoology, London, 221: 405-418.
83. Williams, J. D., K. O. Winemiller, D. C. Taphorn & L. Balbas. 1998. Ecology and status of piscivores in Guri, an oligotrophic tropical reservoir. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 18: 274-285.
84. Winemiller, K. O. 1990. Caudal eyespots as deterrents against fin predation in the neoptropical [sic] cichlid Astronotus ocellatus. Copeia, 1990: 665-673.
85. _ 2001. Ecology of peacock cichlids (Cichla spp.) in Venezuela. Journal of Aquariculture and Aquatic Sciences, 9: 93-112.
86. Zaret, T. M. 1977. Inhibition of cannibalism in Cichla ocellaris and hypothesis of predator mimicry among South American fishes. Evolution, 31: 421-437.
87. _ 1980. Life history and growth relationships of Cichla ocellaris, a predatory South American cichlid. Biotropica, 12:144-157.
88. Zaret, T. M. & R. T. Paine. 1973. Species introduction in a tropical lake. Science, 182: 449-455.
89. Zuccon A. & D. Zuccon. 2006. MrEnt v1.2. Department of Vertebrate Zoology & Molecular Systematics Laboratory, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm.