Porous Titanium-6 Aluminum-4 Vanadium Cage Has Better Osseointegration and Less Micromotion Than a Poly-Ether-Ether-Ketone Cage in Sheep Vertebral Fusion

Artificial Organs

Volumn 37, Issue 12, 2013, Pages

  Wu, Su Hua ^a   Li, Yi ^a   Zhang, Yong Quan ^a   Li, Xiao Kang ^a   Yuan, Chao Fan ^a   Hao, Yu Lin ^b   Zhang, Zhi Yong ^c   Guo, Zheng ^a  

^a FOURTH MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

^c National Tissue Engineering Center of China   (China)

Author keywords

Electron beam melting; Fusion cage; Intervertebral fusion; Porous material; Titanium 6 Aluminum 4 Vanadium

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM; ALUMINUM ALLOYS; BONE; ELASTIC MODULI; ELECTRON BEAM MELTING; ELECTRON BEAMS; ETHERS; KETONES; MECHANICAL STABILITY; METAL IMPLANTS; POROUS MATERIALS; TERNARY ALLOYS; TITANIUM; TITANIUM ALLOYS; VANADIUM ALLOYS;

BONE INGROWTH; FUSION CAGES; INTERVERTEBRAL FUSION; MICRO MOTION; NATURAL BONE; OSSEOINTEGRATION; POLY ETHER ETHER KETONES; POLY(ETHER ETHER KETONES); POROUS TITANIA; TITANIA-6 ALUMINUM-4 VANADIUM;

VANADIUM;

KETONE; POLY ETHER ETHER KETONE; TITANIUM 6 ALUMINUM 4 VANADIUM; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VANADIUM;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE CONDUCTION; BONE MASS; BONE REGENERATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRON BEAM; FEMALE; IN VIVO STUDY; MORPHOMETRICS; NONHUMAN; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPINE FUSION;

OVIS ARIES;

ELECTRON BEAM MELTING; FUSION CAGE; INTERVERTEBRAL FUSION; POROUS MATERIAL; TITANIUM-6 ALUMINUM-4 VANADIUM;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; ELASTIC MODULUS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; KETONES; OSSEOINTEGRATION; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POROSITY; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SHEEP; SPINAL FUSION; TIME FACTORS; TITANIUM; X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 84890215367     PISSN: 0160564X     EISSN: 15251594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/aor.12153     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Dennis S, Watkins R, Landaker S, Dillin W, Springer D. Comparison of disc space heights after anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1989;14:876-878.
2. McAfee PC. Interbody fusion cages in reconstructive operations on the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81:859-880.
3. Kandziora F, Pflugmacher R, Scholz M, Eindorf T, Schnake KJ, Haas NP. Bioabsorbable interbody cages in a sheep cervical spine fusion model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:1845-1855; discussion 1856.
4. Banwart JC, Asher MA, Hassanein RS. Iliac crest bone graft harvest donor site morbidity. A statistical evaluation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20:1055-1060.
5. Baramki HG, Steffen T, Lander P, Chang M, Marchesi D. The efficacy of interconnected porous hydroxyapatite in achieving posterolateral lumbar fusion in sheep. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:1053-1060.
6. Janssen ME, Lam C, Beckham R. Outcomes of allogenic cages in anterior and posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 2001;10(Suppl. 2):S158-168.
7. Bagby GW. Arthrodesis by the distraction-compression method using a stainless steel implant. Orthopedics 1988;11:931-934.
8. Matge G. Cervical cage fusion with 5 different implants: 250 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2002;144:539-549; discussion 550.
9. Bruner HJ, Guan Y, Yoganandan N, Pintar FA, Maiman DJ, Slivka MA. Biomechanics of polyaryletherketone rod composites and titanium rods for posterior lumbosacral instrumentation. Presented at the 2010 Joint Spine Section Meeting. Laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg Spine 2010;13:766-772.
10. Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials 2007;28:4845-4869.
11. Lied B, Roenning PA, Sundseth J, Helseth E. Anterior cervical discectomy with fusion in patients with cervical disc degeneration: a prospective outcome study of 258 patients (181 fused with autologous bone graft and 77 fused with a PEEK cage). BMC Surg 2010;10:10.
12. Chou YC, Chen DC, Hsieh WA, et al. Efficacy of anterior cervical fusion: comparison of titanium cages, polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages and autogenous bone grafts. J Clin Neurosci 2008;15:1240-1245.
13. Mastronardi L, Ducati A, Ferrante L. Anterior cervical fusion with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in the treatment of degenerative disc disease. Preliminary observations in 36 consecutive cases with a minimum 12-month follow-up. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2006;148:307-312; discussion 312.
14. Santos ER, Goss DG, Morcom RK, Fraser RD. Radiologic assessment of interbody fusion using carbon fiber cages. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:997-1001.
15. Olivares-Navarrete R, Gittens RA, Schneider JM, et al. Osteoblasts exhibit a more differentiated phenotype and increased bone morphogenetic protein production on titanium alloy substrates than on poly-ether-ether-ketone. Spine J 2012;12:265-272.
16. Sousa SR, Lamghari M, Sampaio P, Moradas-Ferreira P, Barbosa MA. Osteoblast adhesion and morphology on TiO2 depends on the competitive preadsorption of albumin and fibronectin. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008;84:281-290.
17. Rapuano BE, Lee JJ, MacDonald DE. Titanium alloy surface oxide modulates the conformation of adsorbed fibronectin to enhance its binding to alpha(5) beta(1) integrins in osteoblasts. Eur J Oral Sci 2012;120:185-194.
18. Bonfield W, Wang M, Tanner KE. Interfaces in analogue biomaterials. Acta Mater 1998;46:2509-2518.
19. Li X, Wang C, Zhang W, Li Y. Fabrication and characterization of porous Ti6Al4V parts for biomedical applications using electron beam melting process. Mater Lett 2009;63:403-405.
20. Ryan G, Pandit A, Apatsidis DP. Fabrication methods of porous metals for use in orthopaedic applications. Biomaterials 2006;27:2651-2670.
21. Assad M, Jarzem P, Leroux MA, et al. Porous titanium-nickel for intervertebral fusion in a sheep model: part 1. Histomorphometric and radiological analysis. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2003;64:107-120.
22. Heinl P, Muller L, Korner C, Singer RF, Muller FA. Cellular Ti-6Al-4V structures with interconnected macro porosity for bone implants fabricated by selective electron beam melting. Acta Biomater 2008;4:1536-1544.
23. Zhang ZY, Teoh SH, Chong MS, et al. Neo-vascularization and bone formation mediated by fetal mesenchymal stem cell tissue-engineered bone grafts in critical-size femoral defects. Biomaterials 2010;31:608-620.
24. Zhou J, Lin H, Fang T, et al. The repair of large segmental bone defects in the rabbit with vascularized tissue engineered bone. Biomaterials 2010;31:1171-1179.
25. Zhou M, Peng X, Mao C, Xu F, Hu M, Yu GY. Primate mandibular reconstruction with prefabricated, vascularized tissue-engineered bone flaps and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 implanted in situ. Biomaterials 2010;31:4935-4943.
26. Van Bael S, Kerckhofs G, Moesen M, Pyka G, Schrooten J, Kruth JP. Micro-CT-based improvement of geometrical and mechanical controllability of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V porous structures. Mater Sci Eng A Struct Mater 2011;24:7423-7431.
27. Van Bael S, Chai YC, Truscello S, et al. The effect of pore geometry on the in vitro biological behavior of human periosteum-derived cells seeded on selective laser-melted Ti6Al4V bone scaffolds. Acta Biomater 2012;8:2824-2834.
28. Parthasarathy J, Starly B, Raman S, Christensen A. Mechanical evaluation of porous titanium (Ti6Al4V) structures with electron beam melting (EBM). J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2010;3:249-259.
29. Hrabe NW, Heinl P, Flinn B, Korner C, Bordia RK. Compression-compression fatigue of selective electron beam melted cellular titanium (Ti-6Al-4V). J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2011;99:313-320.
30. Ponader S, Vairaktaris E, Heinl P, et al. Effects of topographical surface modifications of electron beam melted Ti-6Al-4V titanium on human fetal osteoblasts. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008;84:1111-1119.
31. Slivka MA, Spenciner DB, Seim HB 3rd, Welch WC, Serhan HA, Turner AS. High rate of fusion in sheep cervical spines following anterior interbody surgery with absorbable and nonabsorbable implant devices. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:2772-2777.
32. Kandziora F, Pflugmacher R, Scholz M, et al. Comparison between sheep and human cervical spines: an anatomic, radiographic, bone mineral density, and biomechanical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:1028-1037.
33. Weiner BK, Fraser RD. Spine update lumbar interbody cages. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998;23:634-640.
34. Stamboulis AG, Boccaccini AR, Hench LL. Novel biodegradable polymer/bioactive glass composites for tissue engineering applications. Adv Eng Mater 2002;4:105-109.
35. van Dijk M, Smit TH, Sugihara S, Burger EH, Wuisman PI. The effect of cage stiffness on the rate of lumbar interbody fusion: an in vivo model using poly(l-lactic Acid) and titanium cages. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002;27:682-688.
36. Svehla M, Morberg P, Zicat B, Bruce W, Sonnabend D, Walsh WR. Morphometric and mechanical evaluation of titanium implant integration: comparison of five surface structures. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;51:15-22.
37. Bobyn JD, Stackpool GJ, Hacking SA, Tanzer M, Krygier JJ. Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999;81:907-914.
38. Levine BR, Sporer S, Poggie RA, Della Valle CJ, Jacobs JJ. Experimental and clinical performance of porous tantalum in orthopedic surgery. Biomaterials 2006;27:4671-4681.
39. Bai F, Wang Z, Lu J, et al. The correlation between the internal structure and vascularization of controllable porous bioceramic materials in vivo: a quantitative study. Tissue Eng Part A 2010;16:3791-3803.
40. Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials 2005;26:5474-5491.
41. Kuboki Y, Jin Q, Takita H. Geometry of carriers controlling phenotypic expression in BMP-induced osteogenesis and chondrogenesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83-A(Suppl. 1):S105-115.
42. Turner IG. Ceramics and glasses. In: Narayan R, ed. Biomedical Materials. New York: Springer US, 2009;3-39.
43. Frosch KH, Barvencik F, Viereck V, et al. Growth behavior, matrix production, and gene expression of human osteoblasts in defined cylindrical titanium channels. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004;68:325-334.
44. Kujala S, Ryhanen J, Danilov A, Tuukkanen J. Effect of porosity on the osteointegration and bone ingrowth of a weight-bearing nickel-titanium bone graft substitute. Biomaterials 2003;24:4691-4697.