Morphometric and mechanical evaluation of titanium implant integration: Comparison of five surface structures

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 15-22

  Svehla, M ^a   Morberg, P ^a,b,c   Zicat, B ^d   Bruce, W ^e   Sonnabend, D ^a   Walsh, W R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^c SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^d NEWCASTLE MATER HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^e Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases   (Australia)

Author keywords

Bone; Hydroxyapatite; Ingrowth ongrowth; Porous surface; Push out

Indexed keywords

BONE; FRACTURE FIXATION; GROWTH KINETICS; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); MATHEMATICAL MODELS; POROUS MATERIALS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TITANIUM ALLOYS;

BONE IMPLANT INTERFACE; HISTOLOGY; HYDROXYAPATITE; JOINT ARTHROPLASTY; PUSH-OUT TESTING; TITANIUM IMPLANT;

IMPLANTS (SURGICAL);

HYDROXYAPATITE; TITANIUM;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; FRACTURE HEALING; HISTOLOGY; IMPLANT; MORPHOMETRICS; NONHUMAN; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

ALLOYS; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; DURAPATITE; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; MALE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; POROSITY; SHEEP; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS; TITANIUM;

EID: 0034038825     PISSN: 00219304     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(200007)51:1<15::AID-JBM3>3.0.CO;2-9     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bowers KT, Keller JC, Randolph BA, Wick DC, Michaels CM. Optimization of surfaces morphology for enhanced osteoblast responses in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:307-310.
2. Brunette DM. The effects of implant surface topography on the behaviour of cells. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:231-246.
3. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants: A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:889-901.
4. Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid etched surface: A histometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40:1-11.
5. Feighan JE, Goldberg VM, Davy D, Parr JA, Stevenson S. The influence of surface-blasting on the incorporation of titanium-alloy implants in a rabbit intramedullary model. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77:1380-1395.
6. Urban RM, Jacobs JJ, Sumner DR, Peters CL, Voss FR, Galante JO. The bone-implant interface of femoral stems with noncircumferential porous coating. J Bone Joint Surg AM 1996;78: 1068-1081.
7. Bloebaum RD, Milhalopoulus NL, Jensen JW, Dorr LD. Postmortem analysis of bone growth into porous-coated acetabular components. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79:1013-1022.
8. Heekin RD, Callaghan JJ, Hopkinson WJ, Savory CG, Xenos JS. The porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis, inserted without cement: Results after five to seven years in a prospective study. [Published erratum appears in J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993;75:791]. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993;75:77-91.
9. Engh CA, Hooten JP Jr, Zettl-Schaffer KF, Ghaffarpour M, McGovern TF, Bobyn JD. Evaluation of bone ingrowth in proximally and extensively porous-coated anatomic medullary locking prostheses retrieved at autopsy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995; 77:903-910.
10. Bloebaum RD, Merrell M, Gustke K, Simmons M. Retrieval analysis of a hydroxyapatite-coated hip prosthesis. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1991;267:97-102.
11. Nakashima Y, Hayashi K, Inadome T, Uenoyama K, Hara T, Kanemaru T, Sugioka Y, Noda I. Hydroxyapatite-coating on titanium arc sprayed titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;35:287-298.
12. Soballe K, Hansen ES, Brockstedt-Rasmussen H, Hjortdal VE, Juhl GI, Pedersen CM. Gap healing enhanced by hydroxyapatite coating in dogs. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1991;272:300-307.
13. Cook SD, Thomas KA, Kay JF, Jarcho M. Hydroxyapatite-coated titanium for orthopedic implant applications. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1988;232:225-243.
14. Burr DB, Mori S, Boyd RD, Sun TC, Blaha JD, Lane L, Parr J. Histomorphometric assessment of the mechanisms for rapid ingrowth of bone to HA/TCP coated implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1993;27:645-653.
15. Huracek J, Spirig P. The effect of hydroxyapatite coating on the fixation of hip prostheses: A comparison of clinical and radiographic results of hip replacement in a matched-pair study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1994;113:72-77.
16. Dhert WJ, Verheyen CC, Braak LH, de Wijn JR, Klein CP, de Groot K, Rozing PM. A finite element analysis of the push-out test: Influence of test conditions. J Biomed Mater Res 1992;26: 119-130.
17. Maniatopoulos C, et al. An improved method for preparing histological sections of metallic implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987;1:31-37.
18. Cook SD, Thomas KA, Kay JF, Jarcho M. Hydroxylapatite coating of porous implants improves bone ingrowth and interface attachment strength. J Biomed Mater Res 1992;26:989-1001.
19. Cook SD, et al. Hydroxyapatite-coated titanium for orthopedic implant applications. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1988;26:225-243.