Artificial intelligence vs. Classical approaches: A new look at the prediction of flux decline in wastewater treatment

Desalination and Water Treatment

Volumn 51, Issue 40-42, 2013, Pages 7476-7489

  Mashhadi Meighani, Hossein ^a   Dehghani, Amin ^a   Rekabdar, Fatemeh ^b   Hemmati, Mahmood ^b   Goodarznia, Iraj ^a  

^a SHARIF UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^b RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF PETROLEUM INDUSTRY RIPI   (Iran)

Author keywords

Artificial neural network; Flux decline prediction; Genetic programming; Pore blocking model

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; DESALINATION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; MEASUREMENT METHOD; NUMERICAL MODEL; PH; PREDICTION; WASTEWATER; WATER TREATMENT;

EID: 84890020619     PISSN: 19443994     EISSN: 19443986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2013.773861     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. J.Y. Seo, A. Vogelpohl, Membrane choice for wastewater treatment using external cross flow tubular membrane filtration. Desalination 249 (2009) 197-204.
2. B.K. Nandi, A. Moparthi, R. Uppaluri, M.K. Purkait, Treatment of oily wastewater using low cost ceramic membrane: Comparative assessment of pore blocking and artificial neural network models. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 88 (2010) 881-892.
3. T. Mohammadi, M. Kazemimoghadam, M. Saadabadi, Modeling of membrane fouling and flux decline in reverse osmosis during separation of oil in water emulsions. Desalination 157 (2003) 369-375.
4. H. Strathmann, L. Giorno, E. Drioli, An Introduction to Membrane Science and Technology, Institute on Membrane Technology, CNR-ITM, Consiglio nazionale delle ricerche, Rome, 2006.
5. G.B. Sahoo, C. Ray, Predicting flux decline in cross flow membranes using artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms. J. Membr. Sci. 283 (2006) 147-157.
6. S. Ghandehari, M.M. Montazer Rahmati, M. Asghari, A comparison between semi theoretical and empirical modeling of cross flow microfiltration using ANN. Desalination 277 (2011) 348-355.
7. M. Abbasi, M.R. Sebzari, A. Salahi, S. Abbasi, T. Mohammadi, Flux decline and membrane fouling in cross flow microfiltration of oil-in-water emulsions. Desalin. Water Treat. 28 (2011) 1-7.
8. M.C.V. Vela, S.A. Blanco, J.L. Garcia, E.B. Rodriguez, Analysis of membrane pore blocking models applied to the ultrafiltration of PEG. Sep. Purif. Technol. 62 (2008) 489-498.
9. J. Sargolzaei, M. Haghighi Asl, A. Hedayati Moghaddam, Membrane permeate flux and rejection factor prediction using intelligent systems. Desalination 284 (2012) 92-99.
10. C. Aydiner, I. Demir, E. Yildiz, Modeling of flux decline in crossflow microfiltration using neural networks: The case of phosphate removal. J. Membr. Sci. 248 (2005) 53-62.
11. M. Tan, G. He, X. Li, Y. Liu, C. Dong, J. Feng, Prediction of the effects of preparation conditions on pervaporation performances of polydimethylsiloxane(PDMS)/ceramic composite membranes by backpropagation neural network and genetic algorithm. Sep. Purif. Technol. 89 (2012) 142-146.
12. 2 using a synthesized PDMS membrane: Experimental and neural network modeling. J. Membr. Sci. 346 (2010) 59-70.
13. S. Curcio, V. Calabr'o, G. Iorio, Reduction and control of flux decline in cross-flow membrane processes modeled by artificial neural networks. J. Membr. Sci. 286 (2006) 125-132.
14. I. Gómez, L. Franco, J.L. Subirats, J.M. Jerez, Neural network architecture selection: Size depends on function complexity artificial neural networks-ICANN 2006, in: S. Kollias, A. Stafylopatis, W. Duch, E. Oja (Eds.), vol. 4131, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2006, pp. 122-129.
15. Y.S. Hong, R. Bhamidimarri, Evolutionary self-organising modelling of a municipal wastewater treatment plant. Water Res. 37 (2003) 1199-1212.
16. T.M. Hwang, H. Oh, Y.K. Choung, S. Oh, M. Jeon, J.H. Kim, S.H. Nam, S. Lee, Prediction of membrane fouling in the pilot-scale microfiltration system using genetic programming. Desalination 247 (2009) 285-294.
17. H. Shokrkar, A. Salahi, N. Kasiri, T. Mohammadi, Prediction of permeate flux decline during MF of oily wastewater using genetic programming, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2011.10.002.
18. A. Okhovat, S.M. Mousavi, Modeling of arsenic, chromium and cadmium removal by nanofiltration process using genetic programming. Appl. Soft Comp. 12 (2011) 793-799.
19. C. Suh, B. Choi, S. Lee, D. Kim, J. Cho, Application of genetic programming to develop the model for estimating membrane damage in the membrane integrity test using fluorescent nanoparticle. Desalination 281 (2011) 80-87.
20. A. Salahi, M. Abbasi, T. Mohammadi, Permeate flux decline during UF of oily wastewater: Experimental and modeling. Desalination 251 (2010) 153-160.
21. J. Hermia, Constant pressure blocking filtration laws: Application to power-law non-newtonian fluids. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 60 (1982) 183-187.
22. T. Mohammadi, A. Esmaeelifar, Wastewater treatment of a vegetable oil factory by a hybrid ultrafilteration-activated carbon process. J. Membr. Sci. 254 (2005) 129-137.
23. S.W. Lee, S.E. Park, S.J. Park, Effect of electrostatic force on surface charges of colloidal particles and retardation of membrane fouling. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 13 (2007) 395-399.
24. S.M. Kumar, G.M. Madhu, S. Roy, Fouling behaviour, Regeneration options and on-line control of biomass-based power plant effluents using microporous ceramic membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 57 (2007) 25-36.
25. K.J. Hwang, T.T. Lin, Effect of morphology of polymeric membrane on the performance of cross-flow microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 199 (2002) 41-52.
26. S. Jhaes, F. Raza, Improving Gas Load Forecast Accuracy-A practical Approach. Paper PSIG-06B1 presented at the PSIG Annual Meeting, October 2003, Williamsburg, Virginia, pp. 11-13.
27. M. Rucha, P. Cortez, J. Neves, Evolution of Neural Networks for Classification and Regression. Universidade do Minho, Dep. Informática, Portugal, 2004.
28. B. Kröse, P. Van der Smagt, An Introduction to Neural Networks, eighth ed., The University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1996.
29. I. Ferreira, A. Gammiero, M. Llamedo, Design of a Neural Network Model for Predicting Well Performance after Water Shutoff Treatments using Polymer Gels, Mexico, 2012 SPE 153908.
30. M. Al-Abri, N. Hilal, Artificial neural network simulation of combined humic substance coagulation and membrane filtration. Chem. Eng. J. 141 (2008) 27-34.
31. N. García-Pedrajas, D. Ortiz-Boyer, C. Hervás-Martínez, An alternative approach for neural network evolution with a genetic algorithm: crossover by combinatorial optimization. Neural Netw. 19 (2006) 514-528.
32. I. Dalkiran, K. Danisman, Artificial neural network based chaotic generator for cryptology, Turk. J. Elec. Eng. Comp. Sci. 18 (2) (2010) 225-240.
33. J.H. Garrett, D.J. Gunaratham, N. Ivezic, in: N. Kartam, I. Flood (Eds.), Artificial Neural Networks for Civil Engineers: Fundamentals and Applications, ASCE, New York, 1997, pp. 1-17.
34. A.G. El-Din, D.W. Smith, A neural network model to predict the wastewater inflow incorporating rainfall events. Water Res. 36 (2002) 1115-1126.
35. E. Toth, A. Brath, A. Montanari, Comparison of short-term rainfall prediction models for real-time flood forecasting. J. Hydrol. 239 (2000) 132-147.
36. R. Hetch-Nielsen, Kolmogorov's mapping neural network existence theorem, Proceedings of the First IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, San Diego, 1987, pp. 11-14.
37. J.R. Koza, Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by means of Natural Selection, MIT press, Massachusetts, 1992.
38. H. Iba, T.K. Paul, Y. Hasegawa, Applied genetic programming and machine learning, (Crc press international series on computational intelligence). Taylor and Francis group, LLC, New York, 2010.
39. S.G.O. Silva, Controlling Bloat: Individual and Population Based Approaches in Genetic Programming, University of Coimbra Faculty of Sciences and Technology Department of Informatics Engineering, 2008.