Prediction of permeation flux decline during MF of oily wastewater using genetic programming

Chemical Engineering Research and Design

Volumn 90, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 846-853

  Shokrkar, H ^a   Salahi, A ^a   Kasiri, N ^a   Mohammadi, T ^a  

^a IRAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Genetic programming; Microfiltration; Modeling; Oily wastewater

Indexed keywords

AVERAGE ERRORS; CROSSFLOW VELOCITIES; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; FILTRATION TIME; INDEPENDENT VARIABLES; INPUT PARAMETER; MATHEMATICAL FUNCTIONS; MEMBRANE FLUXES; MULLITE CERAMIC; OIL CONCENTRATION; OILY WASTEWATER; OPERATING CONDITION; PERMEATION FLUXES; TERMINATION CRITERIA; TRANSMEMBRANE PRESSURES;

FUNCTIONS; MICROFILTRATION; MODELS; SILICATE MINERALS; WATER FILTRATION;

GENETIC PROGRAMMING;

EID: 84861981320     PISSN: 02638762     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2011.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Abbasi M., Salahi A., Mirfendereski M., Mohammadi T., Pak A. Dimensional analysis of permeation flux for microfiltration of oily wastewaters using mullite ceramic membranes. Desalination 2010, 252:113-119.
2. Abbasi M., Mirfendereski M., Nikbakht M., Golshenas M., Mohammadi T. Performance study of mullite and mullite-alumina ceramic MF membranes for oily wastewaters treatment. Desalination 2010, 259:169-178.
3. Aydiner C., Demira I., Yildiz E. Modeling of flux decline in crossflow microfiltration using neural networks: the case of phosphate removal. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 248:53-62.
4. Chellam S. Artificial neural network model for transient crossflow microfiltration of polydispersed suspensions. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 258:35-42.
5. Cheryana M., Rajagopalan N. Membrane processing of oily streams wastewater treatment and waste reduction. J. Membr. Sci. 1998, 151:13-285.
6. Das A., Abdel-Aty M. A genetic programming approach to explore the crash severity on multi-lane roads. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2010, 42:548-557.
7. Day P., Nandi A.K. Robust text-independent speaker verification using genetic programming. IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2007, 15:1.
8. Grenier A., Meireles M., Aimar P., Carvin P. Analysing flux decline in dead-end filtration. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 86:1281-1293.
9. Grosman B., Lewin D.R. Automated nonlinear model predictive control using genetic programming. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2002, 26:631-640.
10. Hinchliffe M.P., Willis M.J. Dynamic systems modeling using genetic programming. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2003, 27:1841-1854.
11. Huotari H.M., Huisman I.H. Electrically enhanced crossflow membrane filtration of oily wastewater using the membrane as a cathode. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 156:9-60.
12. Hwang T.M., Oh H., Choung Y.K., Oh S., Jeon M., Kim J.H., Nam H.N., Lee S. Prediction of membrane fouling in the pilot-scale microfiltration system using genetic programming. Desalination 2009, 247:285-294.
13. Koza J.R Genetic Programming 1992, MIT press Publishers Inc., pp. 73-289.
14. Li W.X., Dai L.F., Hou X.B., Lei W. Fuzzy genetic programming method for analysis of ground movements due to underground mining. Int. J. Rock Mech. Mining Sci. 2007, 44:954-961.
15. Liu Q.F., Kim S.H., Sangho L. Prediction of microfiltration membrane fouling using artificial neural network models. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2009, 70:96-102.
16. Ma C.Y., Wang X.Z. Inductive data mining based on genetic programming: automatic generation of decision trees from data for process historical data analysis. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2009, 33:1602-1616.
17. Madaeni S.S., Kurdian A.R. Fuzzy modeling and hybrid genetic algorithm optimization of virus removal from water using microfiltration membrane. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 10.1016/j.cherd.2010.07.009.
18. Mulder M. Basic Principles of Membrane Technology 2002, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 1-21. second edition.
19. Muller M., Robert M.K. Chemical Waste Handing and Treatment 1985, Wiley, pp. 56-87. second ed.
20. Nandi B.K., Moparthi A., Uppaluri R., Purkait M.K. Treatment of oily wastewater using low cost ceramic membrane: comparative assessment of pore blocking and artificial neural network models. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 88:881-892.
21. Peng H., Tremblay A.Y. Membrane regeneration and filtration modeling in treating oily wastewaters. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 324:59-662.
22. Salahi A., Abbasi M., Mohammadi T. Permeate flux decline during UF of oily wastewater: experimental and modeling. Desalination 2010, 251:153-160.
23. Silva C., Moura E., Cavalcanti B., daSilva S., Carvalho M., Goncalves M. An evolutionary approach for combining different sources of evidence in search engines. Inf. Syst. 2009, 34:276-289.
24. Wang X.H., Li Y.G., Hu Y.G., Ying-Long Wang Y.G. Synthesis of heat-integrated complex distillation systems via genetic programming. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2008, 32:1908-1917.
25. Yuana W., Odjo A., Sammons N.E., Caballero J., Eden M.R. Process structure optimization using a hybrid disjunctive-genetic programming approach. 10th International Symposium on Process Systems Engineering 2009, 669-674.