Adding teacher-created motivational video to an ITS

FLAIRS 2013 - Proceedings of the 26th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 503-508

  Kelly, Kim ^a   Heffernan, Neil ^a   D'Mello, Sidney ^b   Namais, Jeffrey ^a   Strain, Amber Chauncey ^c  

^a WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMOTIONAL STATE; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM; LEARNING SESSIONS; MAIN EFFECT; PEDAGOGICAL AGENTS; STUDENT EMOTIONS; YOUTUBE;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION COMPUTING; RESEARCH; TEACHING;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84889817985     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Arroyo, I., Woolf, B., Cooper, D., Burleson, W., Muldner, K., & Christopherson, R. (2009). Emotion sensors go to school. In V. Dimitrova, R. Mizoguchi, B. Du Boulay & A. Graesser (Eds.), Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence In Education (pp. 17-24). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
2. Burleson, W. & Picard, R. W. (2007) Affective Learning Companions. Special Issue on Pedagogical Agents, Educational Technology, Saddle Brook, N.J., Vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 28-32, ISSN 0013-1962.
3. Calvo, R., D'Mello, S. (2010). Affect Detection: An Interdisciplinary Review of Models, Methods, and Their Applications, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, v.1 n.1, p.18-37
4. CEM (2013). Accessed 1/28/13 at http://www.cemcentre.org/evidence-based- education/effect-size-calculator.
5. Chaffar, S,, Derbali, L., Frasson, C. (2009). Inducing positive emotional state in Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Proceedings of the 2009 conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Building Learning Systems that Care: From Knowledge Representation to Affective Modeling, p.716-718, July 20, 2009
6. Conati, C., & Maclaren, H. (2009). Empirically building and evaluating a probabilistic model of user affect. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 19(3), 267-303.
7. D'Mello, S., Lehman, B., Sullins, J, Daigle, R., Combs, R., Vogt, K., Perkins, L., Graesser, A. (2010). A time for emoting: when affect-sensitivity is and isn't effective at promoting deep learning, Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, June 14-18, 2010, Pittsburgh, PA
8. De Vicente, A., & Pain, H. (2002). Informing the detection of the students' motivational state: An empirical study. In S. A. Cerri, G. Gouarderes & F. Paraguacu (Eds.), 6th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 933-943). San Sebastian, Spain.
9. Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology; Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087.
10. Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset. New York: Random House.
11. Forbes-Riley, K., & Litman, D. J. (2011). Benefits and challenges of real-time uncertainty detection and adaptation in a spoken dialogue computer tutor. Speech Communication, 53(9-10), 1115-1136. doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2011.02. 006
12. Fredricks, J., McColskey, W., Meli, J., Mordica, J., Montrosse, B., and Mooney, K. (2011). Measuring student engagement in upper elementary through high school: a description of 21 instruments. (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2011-No. 098). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs.
13. Graesser, A., Jeon, M., & Dufty, D. (2008). Agent technologies designed to facilitate interactive knowledge construction. Discourse Processes, 45 (4-5), 298-322.
14. Kelly, K. (2012a-f). sites.google.com/site/flairsdata/ (study materials, data, and tables) Study 1 Materials. Accessed 11/1/12.
15. a. Pre-Test: http://www.webcitation.org/6CCmWVad5
16. b. Control Video: http://www.webcitation.org/6CCmq7KpZ & Value Video: http://www.webcitation.org/6CCmiK5pb
17. c. Homework Assignment: http://tinyurl.com/cbze4nr
18. d. Post-Test: http://www.webcitation.org/6CCoZrovS Study 2 Materials. Accessed 11/15/12
19. e. Homework Assignment: http://tinyurl.com/c6k64ys
20. f. Post-Test: http://www.webcitation.org/6CCoqgspN
21. Kelly, K., Heffernan, N., Heffernan, C., Goldman, S., Pellegrino, J., & Soffer Goldstein, D. (Submitted). Estimating the effect of web-based homework. The Artificial Intelligence in Education Conference. Memphis 2013.
22. Mendicino, M., Razzaq, L. & Heffernan, N. T. (2009). Comparison of Traditional Homework with Computer Supported Homework. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(3), 331-359.
23. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2005). Academic Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). User's Manuel. Department of Psychology, University of Munich.
24. Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315-341.
25. Robison, J., McQuiggan, S., & Lester, J. (2009). Evaluating the consequences of affective feedback in intelligent tutoring systems. Paper presented at the International Conference on Affective Computing & Intelligent Interaction, Amsterdam.
26. Shores, M. L., & Smith, T. (2010). Attribution in Mathematics: A Review of Literature. School Science and Mathematics, 110(1), 24-30.
27. Sao Pedro, M., Baker, R., Gowda, S., & Heffernan, N. (submitted). Towards an Understanding of Affect and Knowledge from Student Interaction with an Intelligent Tutoring System. The Artificial Intelligence in Education Conference. Memphis. 2013.