Closing the (nuclear) envelope on the genome: How nuclear lamins interact with promoters and modulate gene expression

BioEssays

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 75-83

  Collas, Philippe ^a   Lund, Eivind G ^a   Oldenburg, Anja R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Adipose stem cell; Chromatin; Differentiation; Gene expression; Lamina associated domain; Nuclear lamin; Promoter

Indexed keywords

DNA ADENINE METHYLTRANSFERASE; LAMIN A; LAMIN B;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL DIVISION; CELL LINEAGE; CELL NUCLEUS MEMBRANE; CHROMATIN; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE LOCUS; GENOME ANALYSIS; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR LAMINA; PROMOTER REGION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; STEM CELL; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION;

ADIPOSE STEM CELL; CHROMATIN; DIFFERENTIATION; GENE EXPRESSION; LAMINA ASSOCIATED DOMAIN; NUCLEAR LAMIN; PROMOTER;

CELL NUCLEUS; CHROMATIN; GENE EXPRESSION; HUMANS; LAMINS; NUCLEAR ENVELOPE; PROMOTER REGIONS, GENETIC;

EID: 84889671469     PISSN: 02659247     EISSN: 15211878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bies.201300138     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Beaudouin J, Gerlich D, Daigle N, Eils R, et al. 2002. Nuclear envelope breakdown proceeds by microtubule-induced tearing of the lamina. Cell 108: 83-96.
2. Salina D, Bodoor K, Eckley DM, Schroer TA, et al. 2002. Cytoplasmic dynein as a facilitator of nuclear envelope breakdown. Cell 108: 97-107.
3. Dechat T, Gesson K, Foisner R. 2010. Lamina-independent lamins in the nuclear interior serve important functions. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 75: 533-43.
4. Butin-Israeli V, Adam SA, Goldman AE, Goldman RD. 2012. Nuclear lamin functions and disease. Trends Genet 28: 464-71.
5. Gerace L, Huber MD. 2012. Nuclear lamina at the crossroads of the cytoplasm and nucleus. J Struct Biol 177: 24-31.
6. Worman HJ. 2012. Nuclear lamins and laminopathies. J Pathol 226: 316-25.
7. Burke B, Stewart CL. 2013. The nuclear lamins: flexibility in function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 14: 13-24.
8. Schreiber KH, Kennedy BK. 2013. When lamins go bad: nuclear structure and disease. Cell 152: 1365-75.
9. Guilly MN, Bensusan A, Bourge JF, Bornens M, et al. 1987. A human T lymphoblastic cell line lacks lamins A and C. EMBO J 6: 3795-9.
10. Guilly MN, Kobl JP, Gosti F, Godeau F, et al. 1990. Lamins A and C are not expressed at early stages of human lymphocyte differentiation. Exp Cell Res 189: 145-7.
11. Rober RA, Weber K, Osborn M. 1989. Differential timing of nuclear lamin A/C expression in the various organs of the mouse embryo and the young animal: a developmental study. Development 105: 365-78.
12. Stewart C, Burke B. 1987. Teratocarcinoma stem cells and early mouse embryos contain only a single major lamin polypeptide closely resembling lamin B. Cell 51: 383-92.
13. Rober RA, Sauter H, Weber K, Osborn M. 1990. Cells of the cellular immune and hemopoietic system of the mouse lack lamins A/C: distinction versus other somatic cells. J Cell Sci 95: 587-98.
14. Solovei I, Wang AS, Thanisch K, Schmidt CS, et al. 2013. LBR and lamin A/C sequentially tether peripheral heterochromatin and inversely regulate differentiation. Cell 152: 584-98.
15. Dechat T, Adam SA, Taimen P, Shimi T, et al. 2010. Nuclear lamins. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2: a000547.
16. Adam SA, Butin-Israeli V, Cleland MM, Shimi T, et al. 2013. Disruption of lamin B1 and lamin B2 processing and localization by farnesyltransferase inhibitors. Nucleus 4: 142-50.
17. Kolb T, Maass K, Hergt M, Aebi U, et al. 2011. Lamin A and lamin C form homodimers and coexist in higher complex forms both in the nucleoplasmic fraction and in the lamina of cultured human cells. Nucleus 2: 425-33.
18. Stewart CL, Roux KJ, Burke B. 2007. Blurring the boundary: the nuclear envelope extends its reach. Science 318: 1408-12.
19. Gundersen GG, Worman HJ. 2013. Nuclear positioning. Cell 152: 1376-89.
20. Hutchison CJ, Worman HJ. 2004. A-type lamins: guardians of the soma? Nat Cell Biol 6: 1062-7.
21. Zastrow MS, Vlcek S, Wilson KL. 2004. Proteins that bind A-type lamins: integrating isolated clues. J Cell Sci 117: 979-87.
22. Andres V, Gonzalez JM. 2009. Role of A-type lamins in signaling, transcription, and chromatin organization. J Cell Biol 187: 945-57.
23. Dauer WT, Worman HJ. 2009. The nuclear envelope as a signaling node in development and disease. Dev Cell 17: 626-38.
24. Dechat T, Adam SA, Goldman RD. 2009. Nuclear lamins and chromatin: when structure meets function. Adv Enzyme Regul 49: 157-66.
25. Kind J, van Steensel B. 2010. Genome-nuclear lamina interactions and gene regulation. Curr Opin Cell Biol 22: 320-5.
26. Zuleger N, Robson MI, Schirmer EC. 2011. The nuclear envelope as a chromatin organizer. Nucleus 2: 339-49.
27. Lund E, Oldenburg A, Delbarre E, Freberg C, et al. 2013. Lamin A/C-promoter interactions specify chromatin state-dependent transcription outcomes. Genome Res 23: 1580-9.
28. Zuleger N, Boyle S, Kelly DA, de Las Heras JI, et al. 2013. Specific nuclear envelope transmembrane proteins can promote the location of chromosomes to and from the nuclear periphery. Genome Biol 14: R14.
29. Bonne G, di Barletta MR, Varnous S, Becane HM, et al. 1999. Mutations in the gene encoding lamin A/C cause autosomal dominant Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy. Nat Genet 21: 285-8.
30. Shimi T, Butin-Israeli V, Adam SA, Goldman RD. 2010. Nuclear lamins in cell regulation and disease. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 75: 525-31.
31. Mattout A, Pike BL, Towbin BD, Bank EM, et al. 2011. An EDMD mutation in C. elegans lamin blocks muscle-specific gene relocation and compromises muscle integrity. Curr Biol 21: 1603-14.
32. Choi JC, Worman HJ. 2013. Reactivation of autophagy ameliorates LMNA cardiomyopathy. Autophagy 9: 110-1.
33. Pickersgill H, Kalverda B, de Wit E, Talhout W, et al. 2006. Characterization of the Drosophila melanogaster genome at the nuclear lamina. Nat Genet 38: 1005-14.
34. Guelen L, Pagie L, Brasset E, Meuleman W, et al. 2008. Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions. Nature 453: 948-51.
35. Peric-Hupkes D, Meuleman W, Pagie L, Bruggeman SW, et al. 2010. Molecular maps of the reorganization of genome-nuclear lamina interactions during differentiation. Mol Cell 38: 603-13.
36. van Bemmel JG, Pagie L, Braunschweig U, Brugman W, et al. 2010. The insulator protein SU(HW) fine-tunes nuclear lamina interactions of the Drosophila genome. PLoS One 5: e15013.
37. Meuleman W, Peric-Hupkes D, Kind J, Beaudry JB, et al. 2012. Constitutive nuclear lamina-genome interactions are highly conserved and associated with A/T-rich sequence. Genome Res 23: 270-80.
38. Kind J, Pagie L, Ortabozkoyun H, Boyle S, et al. 2013. Single-cell dynamics of genome-nuclear lamina interactions. Cell 153: 178-92.
39. van Steensel B, Henikoff S. 2000. Identification of in vivo DNA targets of chromatin proteins using tethered dam methyltransferase. Nat Biotechnol 18: 424-8.
40. Greil F, Moorman C, van Steensel B. 2006. DamID: mapping of in vivo protein-genome interactions using tethered DNA adenine methyltransferase. Methods Enzymol 410: 342-59.
41. Vogel MJ, Peric-Hupkes D, van Steensel B. 2007. Detection of in vivo protein-DNA interactions using DamID in mammalian cells. Nat Protoc 2: 1467-78.
42. Kubben N, Adriaens M, Meuleman W, Voncken JW, et al. 2012. Mapping of lamin A- and progerin-interacting genome regions. Chromosoma 121: 447-64.
43. Euskirchen GM, Auerbach RK, Davidov E, Gianoulis TA, et al. 2011. Diverse roles and interactions of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex revealed using global approaches. PLoS Genet 7: e1002008.
44. McCord R, Nazario-Toole A, Zhang H, Chines P, et al. 2013. Correlated alterations in genome organization, histone methylation, and DNA-lamin A/C interactions in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. Genome Res 23: 260-9.
45. Sadaie M, Salama R, Carroll T, Tomimatsu K, et al. 2013. Redistribution of the Lamin B1 genomic binding profile affects rearrangement of heterochromatic domains and SAHF formation during senescence. Genes Dev 27: 1800-8.
46. Shah PP, Donahue G, Otte GL, Capell BC, et al. 2013. Lamin B1 depletion in senescent cells triggers large-scale changes in gene expression and the chromatin landscape. Genes Dev 27: 1787-99.
47. Deniaud E, Bickmore WA. 2009. Transcription and the nuclear periphery: edge of darkness? Curr Opin Genet Dev 19: 187-91.
48. Bukata L, Parker SL, D'Angelo MA. 2013. Nuclear pore complexes in the maintenance of genome integrity. Curr Opin Cell Biol 25: 378-86.
49. Steglich B, Sazer S, Ekwall K. 2013. Transcriptional regulation at the yeast nuclear envelope. Nucleus 4: 379-89.
50. Gerace L, Blobel G. 1980. The nuclear envelope lamina is reversibly depolymerized during mitosis. Cell 19: 277-87.
51. Yang L, Guan T, Gerace L. 1997. Integral membrane proteins of the nuclear envelope are dispersed throughout the endoplasmic reticulum during mitosis. J Cell Biol 137: 1199-210.
52. Zaidi SK, Young DW, Montecino MA, Lian JB, et al. 2010. Mitotic bookmarking of genes: a novel dimension to epigenetic control. Nat Rev Genet 11: 583-9.
53. Bickmore WA, van Steensel B. 2013. Genome architecture: domain organization of interphase chromosomes. Cell 152: 1270-84.
54. Gibcus JH, Dekker J. 2013. The hierarchy of the 3D genome. Mol Cell 49: 773-82.
55. Cremer T, Cremer M, Dietzel S, Muller S, et al. 2006. Chromosome territories - a functional nuclear landscape. Curr Opin Cell Biol 18: 307-16.
56. Cremer T, Cremer M. 2010. Chromosome territories. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2: a003889.
57. Heride C, Ricoul M, Kieu K, von Hase J, et al. 2010. Distance between homologous chromosomes results from chromosome positioning constraints. J Cell Sci 123: 4063-75.
58. Markaki Y, Smeets D, Fiedler S, Schmid VJ, et al. 2012. The potential of 3D-FISH and super-resolution structured illumination microscopy for studies of 3D nuclear architecture: 3D structured illumination microscopy of defined chromosomal structures visualized by 3D (immuno)-FISH opens new perspectives for studies of nuclear architecture. Bioessays 34: 412-26.
59. Bickmore WA. 2013. The spatial organization of the human genome. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 14: 67-84.
60. Chambers EV, Bickmore WA, Semple CA. 2013. Divergence of mammalian higher order chromatin structure is associated with developmental loci. PLoS Comput Biol 9: e1003017.
61. Nagano T, Lubling Y, Stevens TJ, Schoenfelder S, et al. 2013. Single-cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure. Nature 502: 59-64.
62. Strickfaden H, Zunhammer A, van Koningsbruggen S, Kohler D, et al. 2010. 4D chromatin dynamics in cycling cells: Theodor Boveri's hypotheses revisited. Nucleus 1: 284-97.
63. Boveri T. 1909. Die Blastomerenkerne von Ascaris megalocephala und die Theorie der Chromosomenindividualität. Arch Zellforsch 3: 181-268.
64. Wen B, Wu H, Shinkai Y, Irizarry RA, et al. 2009. Large histone H3 lysine 9 dimethylated chromatin blocks distinguish differentiated from embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet 41: 246-50.
65. Towbin BD, Gonzalez-Aguilera C, Sack R, Gaidatzis D, et al. 2012. Step-wise methylation of histone H3K9 positions heterochromatin at the nuclear periphery. Cell 150: 934-47.
66. Towbin BD, Meister P, Gasser SM. 2009. The nuclear envelope - a scaffold for silencing? Curr Opin Genet Dev 19: 180-6.
67. Reddy KL, Zullo JM, Bertolino E, Singh H. 2008. Transcriptional repression mediated by repositioning of genes to the nuclear lamina. Nature 452: 243-7.
68. Zullo JM, Demarco IA, Pique-Regi R, Gaffney DJ, et al. 2012. DNA sequence-dependent compartmentalization and silencing of chromatin at the nuclear lamina. Cell 149: 1474-87.
69. Kosak ST, Skok JA, Medina KL, Riblet R, et al. 2002. Subnuclear compartmentalization of immunoglobulin loci during lymphocyte development. Science 296: 158-62.
70. Ragoczy T, Bender MA, Telling A, Byron R, et al. 2006. The locus control region is required for association of the murine beta-globin locus with engaged transcription factories during erythroid maturation. Genes Dev 20: 1447-57.
71. Zink D, Amaral MD, Englmann A, Lang S, et al. 2004. Transcription-dependent spatial arrangements of CFTR and adjacent genes in human cell nuclei. J Cell Biol 166: 815-25.
72. Meister P, Towbin BD, Pike BL, Ponti A, et al. 2010. The spatial dynamics of tissue-specific promoters during C. elegans development. Genes Dev 24: 766-82.
73. Kohwi M, Lupton JR, Lai SL, Miller MR, et al. 2013. Developmentally regulated subnuclear genome reorganization restricts neural progenitor competence in Drosophila. Cell 152: 97-108.
74. Yokochi T, Poduch K, Ryba T, Lu J, et al. 2009. G9a selectively represses a class of late-replicating genes at the nuclear periphery. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 19363-8.
75. Dekker J, Rippe K, Dekker M, Kleckner N. 2002. Capturing chromosome conformation. Science 295: 1306-11.
76. Dekker J, Marti-Renom MA, Mirny LA. 2013. Exploring the three-dimensional organization of genomes: interpreting chromatin interaction data. Nat Rev Genet 14: 390-403.
77. Lieberman-Aiden E, van Berkum NL, Williams L, Imakaev M, et al. 2009. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326: 289-93.
78. Phillips-Cremins JE, Corces VG. 2013. Chromatin insulators: linking genome organization to cellular function. Mol Cell 50: 461-74.
79. Dixon JR, Selvaraj S, Yue F, Kim A, et al. 2012. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485: 376-80.
80. Hou C, Li L, Qin ZS, Corces VG. 2012. Gene density, transcription, and insulators contribute to the partition of the Drosophila genome into physical domains. Mol Cell 48: 471-84.
81. Nora EP, Lajoie BR, Schulz EG, Giorgetti L, et al. 2012. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 485: 381-5.
82. Sexton T, Yaffe E, Kenigsberg E, Bantignies F, et al. 2012. Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila Genome. Cell 148: 458-72.
83. Andrey G, Montavon T, Mascrez B, Gonzalez F, et al. 2013. A switch between topological domains underlies HoxD genes collinearity in mouse limbs. Science 340: 1234167.
84. Zhang Y, McCord RP, Ho YJ, Lajoie BR, et al. 2012. Spatial organization of the mouse genome and its role in recurrent chromosomal translocations. Cell 148: 908-21.
85. Nemeth A, Conesa A, Santoyo-Lopez J, Medina I, et al. 2010. Initial genomics of the human nucleolus. PLoS Genet 6: e1000889.
86. Bussolati G, Marchio C, Gaetano L, Lupo R, et al. 2008. Pleomorphism of the nuclear envelope in breast cancer: a new approach to an old problem. J Cell Mol Med 12: 209-18.
87. Johnson N, Krebs M, Boudreau R, Giorgi G, et al. 2003. Actin-filled nuclear invaginations indicate degree of cell de-differentiation. Differentiation 71: 414-24.
88. Fricker M, Hollinshead M, White N, Vaux D. 1997. Interphase nuclei of many mammalian cell types contain deep, dynamic, tubular membrane-bound invaginations of the nuclear envelope. J Cell Biol 136: 531-44.
89. van Koningsbruggen S, Gierlinski M, Schofield P, Martin D, et al. 2010. High-resolution whole-genome sequencing reveals that specific chromatin domains from most human chromosomes associate with nucleoli. Mol Biol Cell 21: 3735-48.
90. Henikoff S. 2008. Nucleosome destabilization in the epigenetic regulation of gene expression. Nat Rev Genet 9: 15-26.
91. Noer A, Sørensen AL, Boquest AC, Collas P. 2006. Stable CpG hypomethylation of adipogenic promoters in freshly isolated, cultured and differentiated mesenchymal stem cells from adipose tissue. Mol Biol Cell 17: 3543-56.
92. Mikkelsen TS, Xu Z, Zhang X, Wang L, et al. 2010. Comparative epigenomic analysis of murine and human adipogenesis. Cell 143: 156-69.
93. Apostolou E, Ferrari F, Walsh RM, Bar-Nur O, et al. 2013. Genome-wide chromatin interactions of the Nanog locus in pluripotency, differentiation, and reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 12: 699-712.
94. Narita M, Nunez S, Heard E, Narita M, et al. 2003. Rb-mediated heterochromatin formation and silencing of E2F target genes during cellular senescence. Cell 113: 703-16.
95. Kubben N, Voncken JW, Misteli T. 2010. Mapping of protein- and chromatin-interactions at the nuclear lamina. Nucleus 1: 460-71.
96. van Steensel B, Dekker J. 2010. Genomics tools for unraveling chromosome architecture. Nat Biotechnol 28: 1089-95.
97. Sato Y, Mukai M, Ueda J, Muraki M, et al. 2013. Genetically encoded system to track histone modification in vivo. Sci Rep 3: 2436.
98. Muramoto T, Cannon D, Gierlinski M, Corrigan A, et al. 2012. Live imaging of nascent RNA dynamics reveals distinct types of transcriptional pulse regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 7350-5.