From the Laboratory to the Bench: Gender Stereotyping Research in the Courtroom

Beyond Common Sense: Psychological Science in the Courtroom

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 83-101

  Rudman, Laurie A ^a   Glick, Peter ^b   Phelan, Julie E ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Female applicants; Gender roles; Gender stereotyping; Scientific knowledge; Sex discrimination

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889277776     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470696422.ch5     Document Type: Chapter

References (84)

1. Babcock, L. & Laschever, S. (2003). Women don't ask. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
2. Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (1995). Implicit gender stereotyping in judgments of fame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 181-198.
3. Barrett, G. V., & Morris, S. B. (1993). Sex stereotyping in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins American Psychologist, 48, 54-55.
4. Bielby, W. T., & Baron, J. N. (1986). Men and women at work: Sex segregation and statistical discrimination. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 759-799.
5. Biernat, M. (2003). Toward a broader view of social stereotyping. American Psychologist, 58, 1019-1027.
6. Biernat, M., & Fuegen, K. (2001). Shifting standards and the evaluation of competence: Complexity in gender-based judgment and decision making. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 707-724.
7. Biernat, M., & Ma, J. E. (2005). Stereotypes and the confirmability of trait concepts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 483-495.
8. Bodenhausen, G. V., Macrae, C. N., & Sherman, J. W. (1999). On the dialectics of discrimination. Dual processes in social stereotyping. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 271-290). New York: Guilford Press.
9. Borgida, E., Rudman, L. A., & Manteufel, L. L. (1995). On the courtroom use and misuse of gender stereotyping research. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 181-192.
10. Boyce, L. A., & Herd, A. M. (2003). The relationship between gender role stereotypes and requisite military leadership characteristics. Sex Roles, 49, 365-378.
11. Brewer, M. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In T. K. Skrull & R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Burgess, D., & Borgida, E. (1999). Who women are, who women should be:Descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotyping in sex discrimination. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 665-692.
13. Cameron, J. A., & Trope, Y. (2004). Stereotyped-biased search and processing of information about group members. Social Cognition, 22, 650-672.
14. Crosby, F., J., Williams, J., & Biernat, M. (2004). The maternal wall. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 675-682.
15. Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2004). When professionals become mothers, warmth doesn't cut the ice. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 701-718.
16. Deaux, K., & LaFrance, M. (1998). Gender. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 788-827). New York: McGraw-Hill.
17. Deaux, K., & Taylor, J. (1973). Evaluation of male and female ability: Bias works two ways. Psychological Reports, 32, 261-262.
18. Dovidio, J. F., Glick, P., & Rudman, L. A. (Eds.) (2005). On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
19. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573-598.
21. Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3-22.
22. Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1989). Gender stereotypes and attitudes toward women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 543-558.
23. Eagly, A. H., Mladinic, A., & Otto, S. (1994). Cognitive and affective bases of attitudes toward social groups and social policies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 113-137.
24. Ely, R. J. (1994). The effects of organizational demographics and social identity on relationships among professional women. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 203-238.
25. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 628 F. Supp. 1264 (N.D. Ill. 1986) aff'd, 839 F.2d 302 (7th Cir. 1988).
26. Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice and discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 357-414). New York: McGraw-Hill.
27. Fiske, S. T., Bersoff, D. N., Borgida, E., Deaux, K., & Heilman, M. E. (1991). Social science research on trial: Use of sex stereotyping research in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins. American Psychology, 46, 1049-1060.
28. Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). New York:Academic Press.
29. Fiske, S. T., & Stevens, L. E. (1993). What's so special about sex? Gender stereotyping and discrimination. In S. Oskamp, & M. Costanzo (Eds.), Gender issues in contemporary society (pp. 173-196). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications, Inc.
30. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York:McGraw-Hill.
31. Gawronski, B., Ehrenberg, K., Banse, R., Zukova, J., & Klauer, K. C. (2003). It's in the mind of the beholder: The impact of stereotypic associations on category-based and individuating impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 16-30.
32. Giele, J. Z. (1988). Gender and sex roles. In N. J. Smelser (Ed.), Handbook of sociology (pp. 291-323). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33. Gill, M. J. (2004). When information does not deter stereotyping: Prescriptive stereotyping can foster bias under conditions that deter descriptive stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 619-632.
34. Glick, P. (1991). Trait-based and sex-based discrimination in occupational prestige, occupational salary, and hiring. Sex Roles, 25, 351-378.
35. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory:Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
36. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (in press). Sex discrimination: The psychological approach. To appear in: F. J. Crosby, M. S. Stockdale, & S. A. Ropp (Eds.), Sex discrimination in the workplace. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
37. Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763-775.
38. Glick, P., Lameiras, M., Fiske, S. T., Eckes, T., Masser, B., Volpato, C., et al. (2004). Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 713-728.
39. Glick, P., Larsen, S., Johnson, C., & Branstiter, H. (2005). Evaluations of sexy women in low and high status jobs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 389-395.
40. Glick, P., Zion, C., & Nelson. C. (1988). What mediates sex discrimination in hiring decisions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 178-186.
41. Goodwin, S. A., Fiske, S. T., Rosen, L. D., & Rosenthal, A. M. (2002). The eye of the beholder: Romantic goals and impression biases. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 232-241.
42. Gutek, B. A. (1985). Sex and the workplace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
43. Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, J. W. (1994). Stereotypes. In R. S. Wyer, Jr., & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., pp. 1-68). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. Hebl, M. R., King, E., Glick, P., Singletary, S. L., & Kazama, S. M. (in press).Hostile and benevolent reactions toward pregnant women: Complementary interpersonal punishments and rewards that maintain traditional roles. Journal of Applied Psychology.
45. Heilman, M. E. (1983). Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 269-298.
46. Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657-674.
47. Heilman, M. E., Block, C. J., & Martell, R. F. (1995). Sex stereotypes:Do they influence perceptions of managers? Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 10, 1995.
48. Heilman, M. E., & Haynes, M. C. (2005). No credit where credit is due:Attributional rationalization of women's success in male-female teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 905-916.
49. Heilman, M. E., & Stopek, M. H. (1985). Being attractive: advantage or disadvantage? Performance-based evaluations and recommended personnel actions as a function of appearance, sex, and job type. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 202-215.
50. Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D., & Tamkins, M. M., (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gendertyped tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 416-427.
51. Heim, P. (1990). Keeping the power dead even. Journal of American Medical Women's Association, 45, 232-243.
52. Huffman v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of Minneapolis-St. Paul, et al., Hennepin County Trial Court, File # MC 92-10995. Decided June 20, 1994.
53. Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
54. Jensen v. Eveleth Taconite Mining Co. 824 F. Supp. 847 (D. Minn 1993).
55. Jussim, L., Eccles, J., & Madon, S. (1996). Social perception, social stereotypes, and teacher expectations: Accuracy and the quest for the powerful self-fulfilling prophecy effect. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 281-388). San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
56. Kilianski, S. E., & Rudman, L. A. (1998). Wanting it both ways: Do women approve of benevolent sexism? Sex Roles, 39, 333-352.
57. Krueger, J., & Rothbart, M. (1988). Use of categorical and individuating information in making inferences about personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 187-195.
58. Kunda, Z., & Sherman-Williams, B. (1993). Stereotypes and the construal of individuating information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 90-99.
59. Kunda, Z., & Thagard, P. (1996). Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: A parallel-constraint-satisfaction theory. Psychological Review, 103, 284-308.
60. Locksley, A., Borgida, E., Brekke, N., & Hepburn, C. (1980). Sex stereotypes and social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 821-831.
61. Miller, D. T., & Turnbull, W. (1986). Expectancies and interpersonal processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 37, 233-256.
62. Prentice, D. A., & Carranza, E. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn't be, are allowed to be, and don't have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 269-281.
63. Price-Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 109 S. Ct. 1775 (1989).
64. Reskin, B. F., & Padavic, I. (2002). Women and men at work (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
65. Reskin, B. F., & Ross, C. E. (1992). Jobs, authority, and earnings among managers: The continuing significance of sex. Work and Occupations, 19, 342-365.
66. Roos, P. A., & Gatta, M. L. (1999). The gender gap in earnings: Trends, explanations, and prospects. In Powell, G. N. (Ed), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 95-123). Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.
67. Robinson v. Jacksonville Shipyards, Inc., 760 F. Supp 1486 (M. D. Fla 1991).
68. Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 629-645.
69. Rudman, L. A., & Borgida, E. (1995). The afterglow of construct accessibility: The behavioral consequences of priming men to view women as sexual objects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 493-517.
70. Rudman, L. A., & Fairchild, K. (2004). Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 157-176.
71. Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle-managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1004-1010.
72. Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743-762.
73. Rudman, L. A., & Goodwin, S. A. (2004). Gender differences in automatic ingroup bias: Why do women like women more than men like men? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 494-509.
74. Rudman, L. A., & Kilianski, S. E. (2000). Implicit and explicit attitudes toward female authority. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1315-1328.
75. Schein, V. E. (2001). A global look at psychological barriers to women's progress in management. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 675-688.
76. Snyder, M. (1984). When belief creates reality. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 248-305). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
77. Sonnert, G., & Holton, G. (1995). Who succeeds in science? The gender dimension. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
78. Spence, J. T., & Buckner, C. E. (2000). Instrumental and expressive traits, trait stereotypes, and sexist attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 44-62.
79. Swim, J. K., & Sanna, L. J. (1996). He's skilled, she's lucky: A meta-analysis of observers' attributions for women's and men's successes and failures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 507-519.
80. Trope, Y., & Thompson, E. P. (1997). Looking for truth in all the wrong places? Asymmetric search of individuating information about stereotyped group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 229-241.
81. Uhlmann, E. L., & Cohen, G. L. (2005). Constructed criteria: Redefining merit to justify discrimination. Psychological Science, 16, 474-480.
82. Vescio, T. K., Gervais, S. J., Snyder, M., & Hoover, A. (2005). Power and the creation of patronizing environments: The stereotype-based behaviors of the powerful and their effects on female performance in masculine domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 658-672.
83. Walton, M. D., Sachs, D., Ellington, R., Hazlewood, A., Griffin, S., & Bass, D. (1988). Physical stigma and the pregnancy role: Receiving help from strangers. Sex Roles, 18, 323-311.
84. Weinstock v. Columbia University, 224 F.3d 33 2nd Cir. (2000).