Evaluations of sexy women in low- and high-status jobs

Psychology of Women Quarterly

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 389-395

  Glick, Peter ^a,b   Larsen, Sadie ^a   Johnson, Cathryn ^a   Branstiter, Heather ^a  

^a LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 30344488756     PISSN: 03616843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00238.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ashmore, R. D., DelBoca, F. K., & Titus, D. (1984). Types of women and men: Yours, mine, and ours. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Convention, Toronto, Canada.
2. Biernat, M., & Manis, M. (1994). Shifting standards and stereotype-based judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 5-20.
3. Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Click, P. (2004). When professionals become mothers, warmth doesn't cut the ice. Journal of Social Issues, 4, 701-718.
4. Deaux, K., Winton, W., Crowley, M., & Lewis, L. L. (1985). Level of categorization and content of gender stereotypes, Social Cognition, 3, 145-167.
5. Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171-1178.
6. Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but . . .; A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 109-128.
7. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A, J. C., Glick, P. S., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.
8. Frieze, I. H., Olson, J. E., & Russell, J. (1991). Attractiveness and income for men and women in management. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 1039-1057.
9. Glick, P., Wilk, K., & Perreault, M. (1995), Images of occupations: Components of gender and status in occupational stereotypes. Sex Roles, 32, 565-582.
10. Gutek, B. A., & Cohen, A. G. (1987). Sex ratios, sex role spillover, and sex at work: A comparison of men's and women's experiences. Human Relations, 40, 97-115.
11. Heilman, M. E. (1983). Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. In B. Staw & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 5, pp. 269-298). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
12. Heilman, M. E., & Saruwatari, L. R. (1979). When beauty is beastly: The effects of appearance and sex on evaluations of job applicants for managerial and nonmanagerial jobs. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 360-372.
13. Heilman, M. E., & Stopek, M. H. (1985a). Being attractive, advantage or disadvantage? Performance-based evaluations and recommended personnel actions as a function of appearance, sex, and job type. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 202-215.
14. Heilman, M. E., & Stopek, M. H. (1985b). Attractiveness and corporate success: Different causal attributions for males and females. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 379-388.
15. Hosoda, M., Stone-Romero, E. F., & Coats, G. (2003). The effects of physical attractiveness on job-related outcomes: A metaanalysis of experimental studies. Personnel Psychology, 56, 431-462.
16. Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 26, 390-423.
17. Marlowe, C. M., Schneider, S. S., & Nelson, C. E. (1996). Gender and attractiveness biases in hiring decisions: Are more experienced managers less biased? Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 11-21.
18. Rudman, L. A., & Borgida, E. (1995). The afterglow of construct accessibility: The behavioral consequences of priming men to view women as sexual objects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 493-517.
19. Six, B., & Eckes, T. (1991). A closer look at the complex structure of gender stereotypes. Sex Roles, 24, 57-71.