Disciplinary voices: Interactions in research writing

English Text Construction

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 5-22

  Hyland, Ken ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 56949088804     PISSN: 18748767     EISSN: 18748775     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/etc.1.1.03hyl     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bakhtin, M. 1986. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Ed. by M. Holquist. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.
2. Biber, D. & Finegan, E. 1989. Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text 9(1): 93-124.
3. Bondi, M. 1999. English across Genres: Language Variation in the Discourse of Economics. Modena: Edizioni Il Fiorino.
4. Chafe, WL. & Nichols, J. (eds). 1986. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood NJ: Ablex.
5. Conrad, S. & Biber, D. 2000. Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing. In Hunston & Thompson (eds), 56-73.
6. Hunston, S. 1994. Evaluation and organisation in a sample of written academic discourse. In Advances in Written Text Analysis, M. Coulthard (ed.), 191-218. London: Routledge.
7. Hunston, S. & Thompson, G. (eds). (2000) Evaluation in Text. Oxford: OUP.
8. Hyland, K. 1998. Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
9. Hyland, K. 2000. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. London: Longman.
10. Hyland, K. 2001a. Bringing in the reader: Addressee features in academic writing. Written Communication 18(4): 549-574.
11. Hyland, K. 2001b. Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes 20: 207-226.
12. Hyland, K. 2002a. Directives: Power and engagement in academic writing. Applied Linguistics 23(2): 215-239.
13. Hyland, K. 2002b. What do they mean? Questions in academic writing. TEXT 22(4): 529-557.
14. Hyland, K. 2005. Metadiscourse. London: Continuum.
15. Hyland, K. & Bondi, M. (eds). 2006. Academic Discourse across Disciplines. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
16. Ivanic, R. 1998. Writing and Identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
17. Kuo, C-H. 1999. The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles. English for Specific Purposes 18(2): 121-138.
18. Labov, W. 1984. Intensity. In Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, D. Schiffrin (ed.), 43-70. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
19. Martin, J. 2000. Beyond exchange: APPRAISAL systems in English. In Hunston & Thompson (eds). Ochs, E. (ed.). 1989. The Pragmatics of Affect. Specialissue of Text, Vol. 9.
20. Swales, J. 2004. Research Genres. Cambridge: CUP.
21. Thompson, G. & Ye, Y. 1991. Evaluation of the reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied Linguistics 12: 365-382.
22. White, P. 2003. Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance. Text 23(2): 2594-2598.