The effect of static bone strain on implant stability and bone remodeling

Bone

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 783-789

  Halldin, Anders ^a,b   Jimbo, Ryo ^a,d   Johansson, Carina B ^c   Wennerberg, Ann ^a,d   Jacobsson, Magnus ^a,b   Albrektsson, Tomas ^d,e   Hansson, Stig ^b  

^a MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b Astra Tech AB   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^e MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Biomechanical FE simulation; Bone remodeling; In vivo experiment; Removal torque; Static bone strain

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY; BIOMECHANICS; BONE REMODELING; BONE STRESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; IMPLANT; IMPLANT STABILITY; IMPLANTATION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; METAPHYSIS; NONHUMAN; RABBIT; RAT; STATIC BONE STRAIN; TIBIA; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION; TORQUE;

EID: 80052295295     PISSN: 87563282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Wolff J. Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen 1892, Verlag von August Hirschwald, Berlin.
2. Huiskes R., Ruimerman R., van Lenthe G.H., Janssen J.D. Effects of mechanical forces on maintenance and adaptation of form in trabecular bone. Nature 2000, 405:704-706.
3. Qin Y.X., Rubin C.T., McLeod K.J. Nonlinear dependence of loading intensity and cycle number in the maintenance of bone mass and morphology. J Orthop Res 1998, 16:482-489.
4. Mosley J.R., Lanyon L.E. Strain rate as a controlling influence on adaptive modeling in response to dynamic loading of the ulna in growing male rats. Bone 1998, 23:313-318.
5. Rubin C.T., Lanyon L.E. Regulation of bone formation by applied dynamic loads. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984, 66:397-402.
6. Lanyon L.E., Hampson W.G., Goodship A.E., Shah J.S. Bone deformation recorded in vivo from strain gauges attached to the human tibial shaft. Acta Orthop Scand 1975, 46:256-268.
7. Stanford C.M., Brand R.A. Toward an understanding of implant occlusion and strain adaptive bone modeling and remodeling. J Prosthet Dent 1999, 81:553-561.
8. Rubin C.T., Sommerfeldt D.W., Judex S., Qin Y. Inhibition of osteopenia by low magnitude, high-frequency mechanical stimuli. Drug Discov Today 2001, 6:848-858.
9. Turner C.H., Owan I., Takano Y. Mechanotransduction in bone: role of strain rate. Am J Physiol 1995, 269:E438-E442.
10. Gotfredsen K., Berglundh T., Lindhe J. Bone reactions adjacent to titanium implants subjected to static load. A study in the dog (I). Clin Oral Implants Res 2001, 12:1-8.
11. Szmukler-Moncler S., Salama H., Reingewirtz Y., Dubruille J.H. Timing of loading and effect of micromotion on bone-dental implant interface: review of experimental literature. J Biomed Mater Res 1998, 43:192-203.
12. Adell R., Lekholm U., Rockler B., Branemark P.I. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981, 10:387-416.
13. Attard N.J., Zarb G.A. Immediate and early implant loading protocols: a literature review of clinical studies. J Prosthet Dent 2005, 94:242-258.
14. Schincaglia G.P., Marzola R., Scapoli C., Scotti R. Immediate loading of dental implants supporting fixed partial dentures in the posterior mandible: a randomized controlled split-mouth study-machined versus titanium oxide implant surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007, 22:35-46.
15. Donati M., La Scala V., Billi M., Di Dino B., Torrisi P., Berglundh T. Immediate functional loading of implants in single tooth replacement: a prospective clinical multicenter study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008, 19:740-748.
16. Schincaglia G.P., Marzola R., Giovanni G.F., Chiara C.S., Scotti R. Replacement of mandibular molars with single-unit restorations supported by wide-body implants: immediate versus delayed loading. A randomized controlled study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008, 23:474-480.
17. Testori T., Galli F., Capelli M., Zuffetti F., Esposito M. Immediate nonocclusal versus early loading of dental implants in partially edentulous patients: 1-year results from a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007, 22:815-822.
18. Lindeboom J.A., Frenken J.W., Dubois L., Frank M., Abbink I., Kroon F.H. Immediate loading versus immediate provisionalization of maxillary single-tooth replacements: a prospective randomized study with BioComp implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006, 64:936-942.
19. Merli M., Merli A., Bernardelli F., Lombardini F., Esposito M. Immediate versus early non-occlusal loading of dental implants placed flapless in partially edentulous patients. One-year results from a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 2008, 1:207-220.
20. Cannizzaro G., Leone M. Restoration of partially edentulous patients using dental implants with a microtextured surface: a prospective comparison of delayed and immediate full occlusal loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003, 18:512-522.
21. Cannizzaro G., Leone M., Esposito M. Immediate versus early loading of two implants placed with a flapless technique supporting mandibular bar-retained overdentures: a single-blinded, randomised controlled clinical trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 2008, 1:33-43.
22. Ostman P.O., Hellman M., Sennerby L. Direct implant loading in the edentulous maxilla using a bone density-adapted surgical protocol and primary implant stability criteria for inclusion. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005, 7(SUPPL 1):S60-9.
23. Misch C.M. Immediate loading of definitive implants in the edentulous mandible using a fixed provisional prosthesis: the denture conversion technique. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004, 62:106-115.
24. Bashutski J.D., D'Silva N.J., Wang H.L. Implant compression necrosis: current understanding and case report. J Periodontol 2009, 80:700-704.
25. Svindland A.D., Nordsletten L., Reikeras O., Skjeldal S. Periosteal response to transient ischemia. Histological studies on the rat tibia. Acta Orthop Scand 1995, 66:468-472.
26. Kalebo P., Johansson C., Albrektsson T. Temporary bone tissue ischemia in the hind limb of the rabbit. A vital microscopic study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1986, 105:321-325.
27. Lanyon L.E., Rubin C.T. Static vs dynamic loads as an influence on bone remodelling. J Biomech 1984, 17:897-905.
28. Perren S.M., Huggler A., Russenberger M., et al. The reaction of cortical bone to compression. Acta Orthop Scand SUPPL 1969, 125:19-29.
29. Carter D.R., Caler W.E., Spengler D.M., Frankel V.H. Fatigue behavior of adult cortical bone: the influence of mean strain and strain range. Acta Orthop Scand 1981, 52:481-490.
30. Winwood K., Zioupos P., Currey J.D., Cotton J.R., Taylor M. The importance of the elastic and plastic components of strain in tensile and compressive fatigue of human cortical bone in relation to orthopaedic biomechanics. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2006, 6:134-141.
31. McElhaney J.H. Dynamic response of bone and muscle tissue. J Appl Physiol 1966, 21:1231-1236.
32. Currey J.D. Tensile yield in compact bone is determined by strain, post-yield behaviour by mineral content. J Biomech 2004, 37:549-556.
33. McCalden R.W., McGeough J.A., Barker M.B., Court-Brown C.M. Age-related changes in the tensile properties of cortical bone. The relative importance of changes in porosity, mineralization, and microstructure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993, 75:1193-1205.
34. Wennerberg A., Albrektsson T. Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000, 15:331-344.
35. Johansson C.B., Jimbo R., Stefenson P. Ex vivo and in vivo biomechanical test of implant attachment to various materials: introduction of a new user-friendly removal torque equipment. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010, doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00296.x.
36. Donath K., Breuner G. A method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissues. The sage-schliff (sawing and grinding) technique. J Oral Pathol 1982, 11:318-326.
37. Johansson C.B., Morberg P. Importance of ground section thickness for reliable histomorphometrical results. Biomaterials 1995, 16:91-95.
38. Reilly D.T., Burstein A.H. Review article. The mechanical properties of cortical bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1974, 56:1001-1022.
39. Goodship A.E., Lanyon L.E., McFie H. Functional adaptation of bone to increased stress. An experimental study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979, 61:539-546.
40. Albrektsson T., Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: part 1-review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 2004, 17:536-543.
41. Eriksson R.A., Albrektsson T., Magnusson B. Assessment of bone viability after heat trauma. A histological, histochemical and vital microscopic study in the rabbit. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1984, 18:261-268.
42. Slaets E., Carmeliet G., Naert I., Duyck J. Early cellular responses in cortical bone healing around unloaded titanium implants: an animal study. J Periodontol 2006, 77:1015-1024.
43. McKibbin B. The biology of fracture healing in long bones. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1978, 60-B:150-162.
44. Sedlin E.D. A rheologic model for cortical bone. A study of the physical properties of human femoral samples. Acta Orthop Scand SUPPL 1965, SUPPL 83:1-77.
45. Roberts W.E., Turley P.K., Brezniak N., Fielder P.J. Implants: bone physiology and metabolism. CDA J 1987, 15:54-61.
46. Cordey J., Blumlein H., Ziegler W., Perren S.M. Study of the behavior in the course of time of the holding power of cortical screws in vivo. Acta Orthop Belg 1976, 42(SUPPL 1):75-87.
47. Perren S.M., Rahn B.A. Biomechanics of fracture healing. Can J Surg 1980, 23:228-232.