Principal component analysis: A novel analysis to evaluate the characteristics of osseointegration of different implant surfaces

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 364-368

  Jimbo, Ryo ^a,b   Fernandez Rodriguez, Julia ^b   Sul, Young Taeg ^b   Johansson, Carina B ^b  

^a MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

implant; osseointegration; principle component analysis

Indexed keywords

ALIZARIN COMPLEXONE; ANTHRAQUINONE DERIVATIVE; CALCEIN GREEN; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; FLUORESCEIN DERIVATIVE; FLUORESCENT DYE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; ELECTROCHEMICAL ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RABBIT; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIBIA; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; VIBRATION;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ANIMALS; ANTHRAQUINONES; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; ELECTROCHEMICAL TECHNIQUES; FLUORESCEINS; FLUORESCENT DYES; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RABBITS; SOFTWARE; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIBIA; VIBRATION;

EID: 80053560317     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31822b9c39     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI, Hansson HA, et al. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52:155-170. (Pubitemid 11157048)
2. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. On implant surfaces: A review of current knowledge and opinions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25:63-74.
3. De Bruyn H, Atashkadeh M, Cosyn J, et al. Clinical outcome and bone preservation of single TiUnite implants installed with flapless or flap surgery. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. [Published online ahead of print September 9, 2009] doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00200.x.
4. Gokcen-Rohlig B, Yaltirik M, Ozer S, et al. Survival and success of iti implants and prostheses: Retrospective study of cases with 5-year follow-up. Eur J Dent. 2009;3:42-49.
5. Jemt T. Single implants in the anterior maxilla after 15 years of follow-up: Comparison with central implants in the edentulous maxilla. Int J Prosthodont. 2008;21:400-408.
6. Ostman PO, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Immediate occlusal loading of nanotite prevail implants: A prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010;12:39-47.
7. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, et al. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and pro-posed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986;1:11-25.
8. Misch CE, Perel ML, Wang HL, et al. Implant success, survival, and failure: The International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. Implant Dent. 2008;17:5-15.
9. Johansson CB, Jimbo R, Stefenson P. Ex vivo and in vivo biomechanical test of implant attachment to various materials: Introduction of a new user-friendly removal torque equipment. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. [Published online ahead of print July 17, 2010] doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208-2010-00296.x.
10. Stenport VF, Johansson CB. Evaluations of bone tissue integration to pure and alloyed titanium implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008;10:191-199.
11. Carlsson C, Johannson CB, Holmgren-Peterson K, et al. Comparing light and fluorescence microscopic data: A pilot study of titanium and magnesium oxide implant integration in rabbit bone. Int Sci J Dent Implants Biomater. 2008;1:Ti-08-002.
12. Kon K, Shiota M, Ozeki M, et al. Bone augmentation ability of autogenous bone graft particles with different sizes: A histological and micro-computed tomography study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20:1240-1246.
13. Sul YT, Johansson C, Albrektsson T. Which surface properties enhance bone response to implants? Comparison of oxidized magnesium, TiUnite, and Osseotite implant surfaces. Int J Prosthodont. 2006; 19:319-328. (Pubitemid 44197783)
14. Sul YT, Jönsson J, Yoon GS, et al. Resonance frequency measurements in vivo and related surface properties of magnesium-incorporated, micropatterned and magnesium-incorporated TiUnite, Osseotite, SLA and TiOblast implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:1146-1155.
15. Hilsenbeck SG, Friedrichs WE, Schiff R, et al. Statistical analysis of array expression data as applied to the problem of tamoxifen resistance. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;91:453-459. (Pubitemid 29128282)
16. Vohradsky J, Li XM, Thompson CJ. Identification of procaryotic developmental stages by statistical analyses of twodimensional gel patterns. Electrophoresis. 1997;18:1418-1428. (Pubitemid 27371443)
17. Rahn BA. Polychrome fluorescence labelling of bone formation. Instrumental aspects and experimental use. Zeiss Inform. 1997;22:36-39.
18. Johansson CB, Morberg P. Importance of ground section thickness for reliable histomorphometrical results. Biomaterials. 1995;16:91-95.
19. Jolliffe I. Principal Component Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 2005.