Researching quality in teaching: Enduring and emerging challenges

Teachers College Record

Volumn 114, Issue 4, 2012, Pages

  Croninger, Robert G ^a   Valli, Linda ^a   Chambliss, Marilyn J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887979020     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Alexander, P. A., & Fives, H. (2000). Achieving expertise in teaching reading. In L. Baker, M.J. Dreher, & J. T. Guthrie (Eds.), Engagingyour readers: Promoting achievement and motivation (pp. 285-308). New York: Guilford Press.
2. Alexander, P. A., & Murphy, P. K. (1998). The research base for APA's learner-centered psy-chological principles. In N. M. Lambert & B. L. McCombs (Eds.), Issues in school reform: A sampler of psychological perspectives on learner-centered schools (pp. 25-60). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
3. Baker, E. L., Barton, P. E., Darling-Hammond, L., Haertel, E., Ladd, H. F., Linn, R. L. et al. (2010). Problems with the use of student test scores to evaluate teachers. Economic Policy Institute Briefing Paper (No. 278). Washington DC: Economic Policy Institute.
4. Balfanz, R. (2006). Closing the mathematics achievement gap in high-poverty middle schools: Enablers and constraints. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 11(2), 143-159.
5. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes, Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3-32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Ball, D. L., & Rowan, B. (2004). Introduction: Measuring instruction. Elementary School Journal, 105(1), 3-10.
7. Boardman, A. G., & Woodruff, A. L. (2004). Teacher change and "high-stakes" assessment: What happens to professional development? Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(6), 545-557.
8. Booher-Jennings, J. (2005). Below the bubble: "Educational triage" and the Texas accountability system. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 231-268.
9. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school Washington DC: National Academy of Science.
10. Center for Education Policy. (2006, March). From the capital to the classroom: Year 4 of the No Child Left Behind Act. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.
11. Chall, J. S., & Jacobs, L. E. (2003). Poor children's fourth-grade slump. American Educator, 27, 14-17.
12. Chall, J. S., Jacobs, V. A., & Baldwin, L. E. (1991). The reading crisis: Why poor children fall behind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Chambliss, M. J., Alexander, P. A., & Price, J. N. (2012). Epistemological threads in the fabric of pedagogical research. Teachers College Record, 114(4), 35 pages.
14. Chambliss, M., & Graeber, A. (2003, April). Does subject matter matterf Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
15. Chambliss, M., & Valli, L. (2011). Upper elementary reading lessons: Case studies of real teaching. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
16. Croninger, R. G., Buese, D., & I .arson, J. (2012). A mixed-methods look at teaching quality: Challenges and possibilities from one study. Teachers College Record, 114(4), 36 pages.
17. Croninger, R., Valli, L., & Price, J. (2003. April). Mapping the policy environment for high-quality teaching: Can we get there from here? Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
18. Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). The right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19. Fenstermacher, G. D., & Richardson, V. (2005). On making determination of quality in teaching. Teachers College Record, 107, 186-213.
20. Floden, R. E. (2001). Research on effects of teaching: A continuing model for research on teaching. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 3-16). Washington, DC: AERA.
21. Graeber, A. O., Newton, K. J., & Chambliss, M. J. (2012). Crossing the borders again: Challenges in comparing quality instruction in mathematics and reading. Teachers College Record, 114(4), 30 pages.
22. Graeber, A., Valli, L., & Newton, K. (2011). Upper elementary math lessons: Case studies of real teaching. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
23. Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teach-ing and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 184-205.
24. Good, T., & Brophy, J. (2003). looking in classrooms (9th ed.) Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
25. Hill, H. C. (2009). Evaluating value-added models: A validity approach. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 28, 700-709.
26. Jackson, P. (1986). The practice of teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.
27. Lamport, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
28. McNeil, L. M. (2000). Creating new inequalities: Contradictions of reform. Phi Delia Kappan, 81(10), 728-735.
29. Moore, W. P. (1994). The devaluation of standardized testing: One district's response to a mandates assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 74(4), 343-367.
30. Newmann, F., Smith, B., Allensworth, E., & Bryk, A.S. (2001). Instructional program coher-ence: What it is and why it should guide school improvement policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(4), 297-321.
31. Newmann, F., & Wehlage, G. (1995). Successful school restructuring. A report to the public and educators by the Center on organization and restructuring of schools. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
32. Sanders, W., & Horn, S.P. (1998). Research findings from the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS) database: Implications for educational evaluation and research. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.
33. Rivkin, S., Hanushek, E., & Kain, J. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417-458.
34. Sarason, S. (1999). Teaching as a performing art. New York: Teachers College Press.
35. Shulman, I. S. (1986a). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A con-temporary perspective. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on leaching (3rd ed., pp. 3-36). New York: Macmillan.
36. Shulman, L.S. (1986b). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
37. Sternberg, R. (2008). Applying psychological theories to educational practice. American Educational Research Journal, 45( 1), 150-165.
38. Valli, L. (2000). Facilitating reading instruction through school-wide coordination. In L. Baker, J. Dreher, & J. Guthrie (Eds.), Engaging young readers: Promoting achievement and motivation (pp. 237-263). New York: Guilford Press.
39. Valli, L., & Ohambliss, M. (2007). Creating classroom cultures: One teacher, two lessons, and a high-stakes test. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 38( 1), 57-75.
40. Valli, L., Croninger, R. G., & Buese, D. (2012). Studying high-quality teaching in a highly charged policy environment. Teachers College Record, 114(4), 33 pages.
41. Valli, I., Croninger, R., Chambliss, M., Graeber, A., & Buese, D. (2008). 'lest driven: High- stakes accountability in elementary schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
42. Valli, L., Croninger, R., Chambliss, M., Graeber, A., & Price, J. (2004, April). A study of high- quality leaching: Mathematics and reading. Paper presented at the Presidential-Sponsored Symposium, AERA annual meeting, San Diego, CIA.