Interpretation, validation and segmentation of preference mapping models

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 32, Issue PA, 2014, Pages 198-209

  Endrizzi, Isabella ^a   Gasperi, Flavia ^a   Rødbotten, Marit ^b   Næs, Tormod ^b  

^a RESEARCH AND INNOVATION CENTRE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

ANOVA; Individual differences; PCA; PLS DA; Preference mapping; Validation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887672649     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ares G., Varela P., Rado G., Giménez A. Identifying ideal products using three different consumer profiling methodologies. Comparison with external preference mapping. Food Quality and Preference 2011, 22:581-591.
2. Busing, F. M. T. A., & Van Deun, K. (2005). Unfolding degeneracies' history. In K. Van Deun (Ed.), Degeneracies in multidimensional unfolding. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Belgium: Catholic University Leuven.
3. Busing F.M.T.A., Heiser W.J., Cleaver G. Restricted unfolding: Preference analysis with optimal transformations of preferences and attributes. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:82-92.
4. Carroll J.D. Individual differences and multidimensional scaling. Multidimensional scaling: Theory and application in the behavioural sciences 1972, Vol. 1:105-155. Seminar Press, New York.
5. Chang J.J., Carroll J.D. How to use MDPREF, a computer program for multidimensional analysis of preference data 1969, Bell Telephone Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ, (Tech. Rep.).
6. Danzart, M., Sieffermann, J. M., & Delarue, J. (2004). New developments in preference mapping techniques: Finding out a consumer optimal product, its sensory profile and the key sensory attributes. In 6th Sensometric Meeting, Davis, CA USA.
7. Endrizzi I., Menichelli E., Johansen S.B., Olsen N.V., Næs T. Handling of individual differences in rating-based conjoint analysis. Food Quality and Preference 2011, 22:241-254.
8. Endrizzi I., Pirretti G., Calò D.G., Gasperi F. A consumer study of fresh juices containing berry fruits. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture 2009, 89:1227-1235.
9. Ennis D., Rousseau B. Motivations for product consumption: Application of a probabilistic model to adolescent smoking. Journal of Sensory Studies 2004, 19:107-117.
10. Esbensen K.H. Multivariate data analysis - in practice: An introduction to multivariate data analysis and experimental design 2002, Camo Process AS, Oslo. 5th ed.
11. Everitt B.S., Landau M., Leese S., Stahl D. Cluster analysis 2011, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK. 5th ed.
12. Felberg I., Deliza R., Farah A., Calado E., Donangelo C.M. Formulation of a soy-coffee beverage by response surface methodology and internal preference mapping. Journal of Sensory Studies 2010, 25:226-242.
13. Good P. Permutation tests: A practical guide to resempling methods for testing hypothesis 2000, Springer, New York. 2nd ed.
14. Johansen S.B., Herseleth M., Næs T. A new approach to product set selection and segmentation in preference mapping. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:188-196.
15. Kaufman L., Rousseeuw P.J. Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis 1990, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, New york.
16. Landgrebe J., Wurst W., Welzl G. Permutation-validated principal components analysis of microarray data. Genome Biology 2002, 3:0019.
17. Linting M., van Os B.J., Meulman J.J. Statistical significance of the contribution of variables to the PCA solution: An alternative permutation strategy. Psychometrika 2011, 76:440-460.
18. MacKay D. Probabilistic unfolding models for sensory data. Food Quality and Preference 2001, 12:427-436.
19. MacKay D. Chemometrics, econometrics, psychometrics-How best to handle hedonics?. Food Quality and Preference 2006, 17:529-535.
20. Mardia K.V., Kent J.T., Bibby J.M. Multivariate analysis 1979, Academy Press, London.
21. Martens H., Anderssen E., Flatberg A., Gidskehaug L.H., Høy M., Westad F., et al. Regression of a matrix on descriptors of both its rows and of its columns via latent variables: L-PLSR. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 2005, 48:103-123.
22. Martens M., Esposito Vinzi V., Martens H. The use of partial least squares methods in new food product development. Consumer-led food product development 2007, 492-523. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambrige. H. Mafie (Ed.).
23. Martens H., Martens M. Modified Jack-knife estimation of parameter uncertainty in bilinear modelling by partial least squares regression (PLSR). Food Quality and Preference 2000, 11:5-16.
24. McEwan J.A. Acceptance mapping for product optimization. Multivariate analysis of data in sensory science 1996, Vol. 16:71-102. Elsevier Science B.V., Data handling in science and technology.
25. Meullenet J.-F., Lovely C., Threlfall R., Morris J.R., Striegel R.K. An ideal point density plot method for determining an optimal sensory profile for muscadin grape juice. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19:210-219.
26. Meullenet J.-F., Xiong R., Findlay C. Multivariate and probabilistic analyses of sensory science problems 2007, Wiley-Blackwell.
27. Michon C., O'Sullivan M.G., Sheehan E., Delahunty C.M., Kerry J.P. Investigation of the influence of age, gender and consumption habits on the liking of jam-filled cakes. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:553-561.
28. Næs T., Brockhoff P.B., Tomic O. Statistics for sensory and consumer science 2010, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.
29. Næs T., Isaksson T., Fearn T., Davies T. A user friendly guide to multivariate calibration and classification 2002, NIR Publications, Chichester, UK.
30. Peres-Neto P.R., Jackson D.A., Somers K.M. Giving meaningful interpretation to ordination axes: Assessing loading significance in principal component analysis. Ecology 2003, 84:2347-2363.
31. Ripley B.D. Pattern recognition and neural networks 1996, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
32. Rødbotten M., Martinsen B.K., Borge G.I., Mortvedt H.S., Knutsen S.H., Lea P., et al. A cross-cultural study of preference for apple juice with different sugar acid contents. Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20:277-284.
33. Rousseau B., Ennis D.M., Rossi F. Internal preference mapping and the issue of satiety. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 24:67-74.
34. Sinesio F., Cammareri M., Moneta E., Navez B., Peparaio M., Causse M., et al. Sensory quality of fresh French and Ducth market tomatoes: A preference mappingstudy with Italian consumers. Journal of Food Science 2010, 75:S55-S67.
35. van de Velden M., De Beuckelaer A., Groenen P., Busing F.M.T.A. Solving degeneracy and stability in nonmetric unfolding. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 27:85-95.
36. van Kleef E., van Trijp H.C.M., Luning P. Internal versus external preference analysis: An exploratory study on end-user evaluation. Food Quality and Preference 2006, 17:387-399.
37. Vigneau E., Endrizzi I., Qannari E.M. Finding and explaining clusters of consumers using the CLV approach. Food Quality and Preference 2011, 22:705-713.
38. Vigneau E., Qannari E.M., Punter P.H., Knoops S. Segmentation of a panel of consumers using clustering of variables around latent directions of preference. Food Quality and Preference 2001, 12:359-363.
39. Wajrock S., Antille N., Rytz A., Pineau N., Hager C. Partitioning methods outperform hierarchical methods for clustering consumers in preference mapping. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19:662-669.
40. Wakeling I.N., Raats M.M., MacFie H.J.H. A new significance test for consensus in generalized procrustes analysis. Journal of Sensory Studies 1992, 7:91-96.
41. Westad F., Hersleth M., Lea P. Strategies for consumer segmentation with applications on preference data. Food Quality and Preference 2004, 15:681-687.
42. Xiong R., Blot K., Meullenet J.F., Dessirier J.M. Permutation tests for generalized procrustes analysis. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19:146-155.
43. Yenket R., Chambers E., Adhikari K. A comparison of seven preference mapping techniques using four software programs. Journal of Sensory Studies 2011, 26:135-150.