Nucleotide-induced asymmetry within ATPase activator ring drives Σ54-RNAP interaction and ATP hydrolysis

Genes and Development

Volumn 27, Issue 22, 2013, Pages 2500-2511

  Sysoeva, Tatyana A ^a,c   Chowdhury, Saikat ^a,d   Guo, Liang ^b   Tracy Nixon, B ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

54 dependent transcription; 54 dependent transcription activators; AAA+ ATPase; Bacterial enhancer binding protein (bEBP); Mechanochemical ATPases; Multimeric ATPases

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; NUCLEOTIDE; OLIGOMER;

ALLOSTERISM; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME STRUCTURE; FLUORESCENCE; HYDROLYSIS; ISOTHERMAL TITRATION CALORIMETRY; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; STOICHIOMETRY;

Σ54-DEPENDENT TRANSCRIPTION; Σ54-DEPENDENT TRANSCRIPTION ACTIVATORS; AAA+ ATPASE; BACTERIAL ENHANCER-BINDING PROTEIN (BEBP); MECHANOCHEMICAL ATPASES; MULTIMERIC ATPASES;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASES; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; DNA-DIRECTED RNA POLYMERASES; HYDROLYSIS; KLEBSIELLA PNEUMONIAE; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NUCLEOTIDES; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; RNA POLYMERASE SIGMA 54; SINORHIZOBIUM MELILOTI;

EID: 84887605404     PISSN: 08909369     EISSN: 15495477     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gad.229385.113     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. +ATPase magnesium chelatase. Biochemistry 51: 2029-2031.
2. Adams P. D, Afonine PV, Bunkoczi G, Chen VB, Davis IW, Echols N, Headd JJ, Hung LW, Kapral GJ, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, et al. 2010. PHENIX: A comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66: 213-221.
3. Batchelor J. D, Doucleff M, Lee CJ, Matsubara K, De Carlo S, Heideker J., Lamers MH, Pelton JG, Wemmer DE. 2008. Structure and regulatory mechanism of Aquifex aeolicus NtrC4: Variability and evolution in bacterial transcriptional regulation. J Mol Biol 384: 1058-1075.
4. Batchelor J. D, Sterling HJ, Hong E, Williams ER, Wemmer DE. 2009. Receiver domains control the active-state stoichiometry of Aquifex aeolicus α54 activator NtrC4, as revealed by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J Mol Biol 393: 634-643.
5. Biter A. B, Lee S, Sung N, Tsai FT. 2012. Structural basis for intersubunit signaling in a protein disaggregating machine. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109: 12515-12520.
6. Bordes P., Wigneshweraraj SR, Chaney M, Dago AE, Morett E, Buck M. 2004. Communication between Eα(54), promoter DNA and the conserved threonine residue in the GAFTGA motif of the PspF α-dependent activator during transcription activation. Mol Microbiol 54: 489-506.
7. Bose D., Pape T, Burrows PC, Rappas M, Wigneshweraraj SR, Buck M., Zhang X. 2008. Organization of an activator-bound RNA polymerase holoenzyme. Mol Cell 32: 337-346.
8. Brunger A.T. 2007. Version 1.2 of the crystallography and NMR system. Nat Protoc 2: 2728-2733.
9. Bujalowski W., Klonowska MM. 1993. Negative cooperativity in the binding of nucleotides to Escherichia coli replicative helicase DnaB protein. Interactions with fluorescent nucleotide analogs. Biochemistry 32: 5888-5900.
10. Carter A. P, Cho C, Jin L, Vale RD. 2011. Crystal structure of the dynein motor domain. Science 331: 1159-1165.
11. +ATPases support complex formation with their target protein, α54. Structure 15: 429-440.
12. +ATPase for remodeling bacterial RNA polymerase. Structure 18: 1420-1430.
13. +transcription activators in sensing promoter DNA conformation. J Biol Chem 282: 1087-1097.
14. Donmez I., Patel SS. 2008. Coupling of DNA unwinding to nucleotide hydrolysis in a ring-shaped helicase. EMBO J 27: 1718-1726.
15. +ATPase assembly by two component receiver domains: A transcription activation mechanism that is conserved in mesophilic and extremely hyperthermophilic bacteria. J Mol Biol 353: 242-255.
16. Emsley P., Cowtan K. 2004. Coot: Model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 60: 2126-2132.
17. Enemark E. J, Joshua-Tor L. 2006. Mechanism of DNA translocation in a replicative hexameric helicase. Nature 442: 270-275.
18. Fischetti R., Stepanov S, Rosenbaum G, Barrea R, Black E, Gore D, Heurich R, Kondrashkina E, Kropf AJ, Wang S, et al. 2004. The BioCAT undulator beamline 18ID: A facility for biological non-crystalline diffraction and X-ray absorption spectroscopy at the Advanced Photon Source. J Synchrotron Radiat 11: 399-405.
19. +protein-unfolding machine. Cell 139: 744-756.
20. +proteolytic machine. Nat Struct Mol Biol 19: 616-622.
21. Gonzalez V., Olvera L, Soberon X, Morett E. 1998. In vivo studies on the positive control function of NifA: A conserved hydrophobic amino acid patch at the central domain involved in transcriptional activation. Mol Microbiol 28: 55-67.
22. Hayward S., Berendsen HJ. 1998. Systematic analysis of domain motions in proteins from conformational change: New results on citrate synthase and T4 lysozyme. Proteins 30: 144-154.
23. Hayward S., Kitao A, Berendsen HJ. 1997. Model-free methods of analyzing domain motions in proteins from simulation: A comparison of normal mode analysis and molecular dynamics simulation of lysozyme. Proteins 27: 425-437.
24. Hohn M., Tang G, Goodyear G, Baldwin PR, Huang Z, Penczek PA, Yang C, Glaeser RM, Adams PD, Ludtke SJ. 2007. SPARX, a new environment for Cryo-EM image processing. J Struct Biol 157: 47-55.
25. Hong E., Doucleff M, Wemmer DE. 2009. Structure of the RNA polymerase core-binding domain of α(54) reveals a likely conformational fracture point. J Mol Biol 390: 70-82.
26. Itsathitphaisarn O., Wing RA, Eliason WK, Wang J, Steitz TA. 2012. The hexameric helicase DnaB adopts a nonplanar conformation during translocation. Cell 151: 267-277.
27. Joly N., Buck M. 2011. Single chain forms of the enhancer binding protein PspF provide insights into geometric requirements for gene activation. J Biol Chem286: 12734-12742.
28. +transcriptional activator. J Biol Chem 281: 34997-35007.
29. Kelch B. A, Makino DL, O'Donnell M, Kuriyan J. 2011. How a DNA polymerase clamp loader opens a sliding clamp. Science 334: 1675-1680.
30. Krissinel E., Henrick K. 2007. Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J Mol Biol 372: 774-797.
31. +ATPase domains. Genes Dev 17: 2552-2563.
32. Lyubimov A. Y, Costa A, Bleichert F, Botchan MR, Berger JM. 2012. ATP-dependent conformational dynamics underlie the functional asymmetry of the replicative helicase from a minimalist eukaryote. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109: 11999-12004.
33. Marabini R., Masegosa IM, San Martin MC, Marco S, Fernandez JJ, de la Fraga LG, Vaquerizo C, Carazo JM. 1996. Xmipp: An image processing package for electron microscopy. J Struct Biol 116: 237-240.
34. Mccoy A. J, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Adams PD, Winn MD, Storoni LC, Read RJ. 2007. Phaser crystallographic software. J Appl Crystallogr 40: 658-674.
35. Merrick M.J. 1993. In a class of its own-the RNA polymerase α factor α54 (αN). Mol Microbiol 10: 903-909.
36. Mosca R., Schneider TR. 2008. RAPIDO: A Web server for the alignment of protein structures in the presence of conformational changes. Nucleic Acids Res 36: W42-W46.
37. Mosca R., Brannetti B, Schneider TR. 2008. Alignment of protein structures in the presence of domain motions. BMC Bioinformatics 9: 352.
38. Pettersen E. F, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE. 2004. UCSF Chimera-a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 25: 1605-1612.
39. Rappas M., Schumacher J, Beuron F, Niwa H, Bordes P, Wigneshweraraj S., Keetch CA, Robinson CV, Buck M, Zhang X. 2005. Structural insights into the activity of enhancerbinding proteins. Science 307: 1972-1975.
40. +domain of transcription activator PspF. J Mol Biol 357: 481-492.
41. Sallai L., Tucker PA. 2005. Crystal structure of the central and C-terminal domain of the α(54)-activator ZraR. J Struct Biol 151: 160-170.
42. Sanders C. M, Kovalevskiy OV, Sizov D, Lebedev AA, Isupov MN, Antson AA. 2007. Papillomavirus E1 helicase assembly maintains an asymmetric state in the absence of DNA and nucleotide cofactors. Nucleic Acids Res 35: 6451-6457.
43. Schroder G. F, Levitt M, Brunger AT. 2010. Super-resolution biomolecular crystallography with low-resolution data. Nature 464: 1218-1222.
44. +ATPase transcriptional activator PspF is involved in coupling nucleotide triphosphate hydrolysis to the restructuring of α 54-RNA polymerase. J Biol Chem 282: 9825-9833.
45. +ring ATPase. J Mol Biol 381: 1-12.
46. StrongM, Sawaya MR, Wang S, PhillipsM, Cascio D, Eisenberg D. 2006. Toward the structural genomics of complexes: Crystal structure of a PE/PPE protein complex from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103: 8060-8065.
47. Svergun D., Barberato C, Koch MHJ. 1995. CRYSOL-a program to evaluate x-ray solution scattering of biological macromolecules from atomic coordinates. J Appl Crystallogr 28: 768-773.
48. x. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun doi: 10.1107/ S174430911302976X.
49. Thomsen N. D, Berger JM. 2009. Running in reverse: The structural basis for translocation polarity in hexameric helicases. Cell 139: 523-534.
50. Vidangos N., Maris AE, Young A, Hong E, Pelton JG, Batchelor JD, Wemmer DE. 2013. Structure, function, and tethering of DNA-binding domains in α transcriptional activators. Biopolymers 99: 1082-1096.
51. Wang J. T, Syed A, Hsieh M, Gralla JD. 1995. Converting Escherichia coli RNA polymerase into an enhancer-responsive enzyme: Role of an NH2-terminal leucine patch in α54. Science 270: 992-994.
52. Wang Q., Arnold JJ, Uchida A, Raney KD, Cameron CE. 2009. Phosphate release contributes to the rate-limiting step for unwinding by an RNA helicase. Nucleic Acids Res 38: 1312-1324.
53. Wedel A., Kustu S. 1995. The bacterial enhancer-binding protein NTRC is a molecular machine: ATP hydrolysis is coupled to transcriptional activation. Genes Dev 9: 2042-2052.
54. Wedel A., Weiss DS, Popham D, Droge P, Kustu S. 1990. A bacterial enhancer functions to tether a transcriptional activator near a promoter. Science 248: 486-490.
55. Xu H., Kelly MT, Nixon BT, Hoover TR. 2004. Novel substitutions in the α54-dependent activator DctD that increase dependence on upstream activation sequences or uncouple ATP hydrolysis from transcriptional activation. Mol Microbiol 54: 32-44.
56. Yang Z., Fang J, Chittuluru J, Asturias FJ, Penczek PA. 2012. Iterative stable alignment and clustering of 2D transmission electron microscope images. Structure 20: 237-247.
57. Zhang N., Joly N, Burrows PC, Jovanovic M, Wigneshweraraj SR, Buck M. 2009. The role of the conserved phenylalanine in the α54-interacting GAFTGA motif of bacterial enhancer binding proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 37: 5981-5992.
58. +protein contacts three spatially distinct transcription elements. Nucleic Acids Res 40: 9139-9152.
59. +transcription complex. J Mol Biol. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.08.018.