The contingent effect of personal IT innovativeness and IT self-efficacy on innovative use of complex IT

Behaviour and Information Technology

Volumn 32, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 1105-1124

  Wang, Wei ^a   Li, Xixi ^b   Hsieh, Jj Po An ^b  

^a JINAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

complex information technologies; innovate with IT; IT self efficacy; IS continuance; personal innovativeness with IT; post acceptance use

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SYSTEM CONTINUANCES; INNOVATE WITH IT; IS CONTINUANCE; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS; PERSONAL INNOVATIVENESS; POST-ACCEPTANCE USE; RESEARCH FRAMEWORKS;

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING; MODERATORS; PARTIAL DISCHARGES;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84887491347     PISSN: 0144929X     EISSN: 13623001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2011.566940     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Agarwal, R., 2000. Individual acceptance of information technologies. In: R. W. Zmud, ed. Framing the domains of IT management: projecting the future. . . through the past. Cincinnati, OH: Pinnaflex Educational Resources, 85-104.
2. Agarwal, R. and Karahanna, E., 2000. Time flies when you're having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24, 665-695.
3. Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J., 1998. A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research, 9, 204-215.
4. Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J., 1999. Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies. Decision Sciences, 30, 361-391.
5. Ahuja, M. K. and Thatcher, J. B., 2005. Moving beyond intentions and toward the theory of trying: effects of work environment and gender on post-adoption information technology use. MIS Quarterly, 29, 427-459. (Pubitemid 46063137)
6. Aiken, L. S. and West, S. G., 1991. Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7. Amabile, T. M. A., 1988. Model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In: L. L. C. B. M. Staw, ed. Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 123-167.
8. Amabile, T. M., et al., 1996. Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154-1184.
9. Atkinson, J. W., 1964. An introduction to motivation. New York: Van Nostrand.
10. Bagozzi, R. P., Davis, F. D., and Warshaw, P. R., 1992. Development and test of a theory of technological learning and usage. Human Relations, 45, 659-686.
11. Bandura, A., 1997. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
12. Bhattacherjee, A., 2001. Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25, 351-370. (Pubitemid 33738440)
13. Bhattacherjee, A. and Premkumar, G., 2004. Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology usage: a theoretical model and longitudinal test. MIS Quarterly, 28, 229-254.
14. Bommer, M. and Jalajas, D. S., 1999. The threat of organizational downsizing on the innovative propensity of R&D professionals. R & D Management, 29, 27-34.
15. Boudreau, M. C., 2003. Learning to use ERP technology: a causal model. In: Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, 6-9 January 2003, Biglsland, HI. IEEE Computer Society.
16. Boudreau, M. C. and Seligman, L., 2005. Quality of use of a complex technology: a learning-based model. Journal of Organizational and End Use Computing, 17, 1-22. (Pubitemid 41509625)
17. Brislin, R. W., Lonner, W., and Thorndike, R. M., 1973. Cross-culture research method. New York: John Wiley.
18. Carlson, J. R. and Zmud, R. W., 1999. Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 153-170.
19. Carte, T. A. and Russell, C. J., 2003. In pursuit of moderation: Nine common errors and their solutions. MIS Quarterly, 27, 479-501.
20. Chin, W., 1998. Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22, vii-xvi.
21. Chin, W. and Marcolin, B. L., 2001. The future of diffusion research. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 32, 8-12. (Pubitemid 33784836)
22. Chin, W.,Marcolin, B. L., and Newsted, P. R., 2003. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14, 189-217.
23. Ciborra, C. U., 1991. From thinking to tinkering: the grassroots of strategic information systems. In: Proceedings of international conference on information systems, 16-18 December 1991, New York. Association for Information Systems.
24. Cohen, J., et al., 2003. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed. ). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Compeau, D. R. and Higgins, C. A., 1995a. Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Information Systems Research, 6, 118-140.
26. Compeau, D. R. and Higgins, C. A., 1995b. Computer selfefficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19, 189-211.
27. Davis, F. D., 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340.
28. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R., 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982-1003.
29. DeSanctis, G. and Poole, M. S., 1994. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5, 121-147.
30. Devaraj, S., Easley, R. F., and Crant, J. M., 2008. How does personality matter? Relating the five-factor model to technology acceptance and use. Information Systems Research, 19, 93-105.
31. Evans, G. W. and Lepore, S. J., 1997. Moderating and mediating processes in environment-behavior research. In: G. T. Moore and R. W. Marans, eds. Advances in environment, behavior, and design. New York: Plenum Press, 250-285.
32. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F., 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with observable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
33. Gallivan, M. J., Spilter, V. K., and Koufaris, M., 2005. Does information technology training really matter? A social information processing analysis of coworkers' influence on IT usage in the workplace. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22, 153-192. (Pubitemid 41136753)
34. Gattiker, T. F. and Goodhue, D. L., 2005. What happens after ERP implementation: understanding the impact of inter-dependence and differentiation on plant-level outcomes. MIS Quarterly, 29, 559-585. (Pubitemid 46063141)
35. Gefen, D. and Straub, D., 2005. A practical guide to factorial validity and PLS-Graph: tutorial and annotated example. Communication of the AIS, 16, 91-109.
36. Goodhue, D., Lewis, W., and Thompson, R., 2007. Statistical power in analyzing interaction effects: questioning the advantages of PLS with product indicators. Information Systems Research, 18, 211-227.
37. Hirschman, E. C., 1980. Innovativeness, novelty seeking, and consumer creativity. Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 283-295.
38. Hsieh, J. J., Rai, A., and Keil, M., 2010. Addressing digital inequality for the socio-economically disadvantaged through government initiatives: forms of capital that affect ICT utilization. Information Systems Research. Articles in Advance, http://isr. journal. informs. org/cgi/ reprint/isre. 1090. 0256vl.
39. Hsieh, J. J. and Wang, W., 2007. Explaining employees' extended use of complex information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 16, 216-227.
40. Hu, J., Huhmann, B. A., and Hyman, M. R., 2007. The relationship between task complexity and information search: the role of self-efficacy. Psychology and Marketing, 24, 253-270.
41. Jasperson, J., Carter, P. E., and Zmud, R. W., 2005. A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systems. MIS Quarterly, 29, 525-557. (Pubitemid 46063140)
42. Kanaracus, C., 2008. Gartner: global IT spending growth stable. London: Smith, Elder and Co. . Available from: http://www. infoworld. com/t/business/gartner-global-itspending-growth-stable-523 [Accessed 12 May 2009].
43. Kaplan, S. N. and Zingales, L., 1997. Do investment-cash flow sensitivites provide useful measures of financing constraints. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 169-215.
44. Karahanna, E. and Agarwal, R., 2006. When the spirit is willing: symbolic adoption and technology exploration. Athens, GA: University of Georgia.
45. Kim, S. S. and Malhotra, N. K., 2005. Predicting system usage from intention and past use: scale issues in the predictors. Decision Science, 36, 187-196. (Pubitemid 41602173)
46. Krueger, N. J. and Dickson, P. R., 1993. Perceived selfefficacy and perceptions of opportunity and threat. Psychological Reports, 72, 1235-1240.
47. Krueger, N. J. and Dickson, P. R., 1994. How believing in ourselves increase risk taking: perceived self-efficacy and opportunity recognition. Decision Science, 25, 385-400.
48. Latham, G. P., Locke, E. A., and Fassina, N. E., 2000. The high performance cycle: standing the test of time. In. In: S. Sonnentag, ed. The psychological management of individual performance. A handbook in the psychology of management in organizations. Chichester: John Wiley, 201-228.
49. Lewis, W., Agarwal, R., and Sambamurthy, V., 2003. Sources of influence on beliefs about information technology use: an empirical study of knowledge workers. MIS Quarterly, 27, 657-678.
50. Li, X. and Hsieh, J. P., 2007. Impact of transformational leadership on system exploration in the mandatory organizational context. . In: Proceedings of 28th international conference on information systems, 9-12 December 2007, Canada, Montreal. Association for Information Systems.
51. Li, Y., et al., 2006. Innovative usage of information technology in Singapore organizations: do CIO characteristics make a difference? IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53, 177-190.
52. Liang, H., et al., 2007. Assimilation of enterprise systems: the effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Quarterly, 31, 59-87. (Pubitemid 46382518)
53. Luthans, F. and Youssef, C. M., 2007. Emerging positive organizational behavior. Journal of Management, 33, 321-349.
54. MacKinnon, D. W., 1962. The nature and nurture of creative talent. American Psychologist, 17, 484-495.
55. Martocchio, J. J. and Dulebohn, J. S., 1994. Performance feedback effects in training: the role of perceived controllability. Personnel Psychology, 47, 357-373.
56. Martocchio, J. J. and Webster, J., 1992. Effects of feedback and cognitive playfulness on performance in microcomputer software training. Personnel Psychology, 45, 553-578.
57. Mills, A. and Chin, W., 2007. Conceptualizing creative use: an examination of the construct and its determinants. . In: Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) 10-12 August 2007, Colorado, USA. Association for Information Systems.
58. Moore, J. B. I., 2002. Information technology infusion: a motivation approach. Thesis (PhD). Department of Information and Management Sciences, The Florida State University.
59. Nah, F. F. H., Tan, X., and Teh, S. H., 2004. An empirical investigation on end-users' acceptance of enterprise systems. Information Resources Management Journal, 17, 32-53.
60. Nambisan, S., Agarwal, R., and Tanniru, M., 1999. Organizational mechanisms for enhancing user innovation in information technology. MIS Quarterly, 23, 365-395.
61. Negash, S. and Gray, P., 2008. International handbooks on information systems. In: B. Frada and C. W. Holsapple, eds. Handbook on decision support systems 2: variations. Berlin: Springer, 175-194.
62. Nunnally, J. C., 1994. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
63. Oliver, R. L., 1980. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 460-469.
64. Oliver, T. A. and Shapiro, F., 1993. Self-efficacy and computers. Journal of Computer-Based Interactions, 20, 81-85.
65. Podsakoff, P. M., et al., 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903. (Pubitemid 37239703)
66. Podsakoff, P. M. and Organ, D. W., 1986. Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531-544.
67. Porter, S. M. and Lawler, E. E., 1968. Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
68. Pozzebon, M., 2000. Combining a structuration approach with a behavioral-based model to investigate ERP usage. Americas Conference on Information Systems, 10-15 August 2000, Long Beach, CA. Association for Information Systems.
69. Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., and Will, A., 2005. University of Hamburg. Hamburg, Germany. Available from: http:// www. smartpls. de. [Accessed 5 May 2010].
70. Rogers, E. M., 2003. Diffusion of innovation. New York: Free Press.
71. Saga, V. L. and Zmud, R. W., 1994. The nature and determinants of IT acceptance, routinization, and infusion. In: L. Levine, ed. Diffusion, transfer and implementation of information technology. Amsterdam, North-Holland: Elsevier, 67-86.
72. Schaefers, K. G., Eppeerson, D. L., and Nauta, M. M., 1997. Women's career development: can theoretically derived variables predict persistence in engineering majors? Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44, 173-183. (Pubitemid 127465569)
73. Sternberg, R. J., O'Hara, L. A., and Lubart, T. I., 1997. Creativity as investment. California Management Review, 40, 8-21.
74. Sun, H. and Zhang, P., 2006. The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64, 53-78. (Pubitemid 41682003)
75. Sun, H. and Zhang, P., 2008. Adaptive system use: an investigation at the system feature level. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, 14-17 December 2008, Paris. Association for Information Systems.
76. Taylor, S. and Todd, P. A., 1995. Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6, 144-176. (Pubitemid 126102974)
77. Thatcher, J. B. and Perrewe, P. L., 2002. An empirical examination of individual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. MIS Quarterly, 26, 381-396.
78. van der Heijden, H., 2004. User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28, 695-704.
79. Vanyeperten, N. W., 1998. Informational support, equity and burnout: the moderating effect of self-efficacy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 71, 29-33.
80. Venkatesh, V., et al., 2003. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425-478.
81. Wang, W. and Hsieh, J. J., 2006. Symbolic adoption, extended use, and emergent use of complex information systems in the mandatory organizational context. In: Proceedings of 27th International Conference on Information Systems, 10-13 December 2006, Milwaukee, WI. Association for Information Systems.
82. Westland, J. C. and Clark, T. H. K., 2000. Global electronic commerce: theory and case studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
83. Wohlwill, J. and Heft, H., 1987. The physical environment and the development of the child. In: D. Stokols and I. Altman, eds. Handbook of environmental psychology. New York: John Wiley, 281-328.
84. Wood, R. E., et al., 1999. 360 degree feedback: theory, research and practice. In: A. V. M. Travaglione, ed. Human resource strategies: an applied approach. Sydney: Irwin/McGraw-Hill, 209-228.
85. Yi, M. Y., et al., 2006. Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: toward an integrative view. Information and Management, 43, 350-363. (Pubitemid 43333006)