An empirical investigation on end-users' acceptance of enterprise systems

Information Resources Management Journal

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 32-53

  Nah, Fiona Fui Hoon ^a   Tan, Xin ^a   Teh, Soon Hing ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b Singapore Power Ltd   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Compatibility; Enterprise system; ERP; Fit; Perceived ease of use; Perceived usefulness; Symbolic adoption; User acceptance

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING; INVESTMENTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RESEARCH;

COMPATIBILITY; ENTERPRISE SYSTEM; FIT; PERCEIVED EASE OF USE; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; SYMBOLIC ADOPTION; USER ACCEPTANCE;

SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

EID: 2642570043     PISSN: 10401628     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/irmj.2004070103     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Adamson, I., & Shine, J. (2003). Extending the new technology acceptance model to measure the end user information systems satisfaction in a mandatory environment: A bank's treasury. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 15(4), 441-455.
2. Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1997). The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision Sciences, 28(3), 557-582.
3. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11-39). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
4. Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
5. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6. Bagchi, S., Kanungo, S., & Dasgupta, S. (2003). Modeling use of enterprise resource planning systems: A path analytic study. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(2), 142-158.
7. Barker, T., & Frolick, M.N. (2003). ERP implementation failure: A case study. Information Systems Management, 20(4), 43-49.
8. Bingi, P., Sharma, M.K., & Godla, J.K. (1999). Critical issues affecting an ERP implementation. Information Systems Management, 16(3), 7-14.
9. Boudreau, M.-C. (2003). Learning to use ERP technology: A causal model. Paper presented at the Thirty-Sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Island of Hawaii.
10. Brown, S.A., Massey, A.P., Montoya-Weiss, M.M., & Burkman, J.R. (2002). Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 11(4), 283-295.
11. Davenport, T.H. (1998). Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harvard Business Review, 76(4), 121-131.
12. Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 318-340.
13. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., & Warshaw, P.R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
14. Hartwick, J., & Barki, H. (1994). Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Science, 40(4), 440-464.
15. Hong, K.K., & Kim, Y.G. (2002). The critical success factors for ERP implementation: An organizational fit perspective. Information and Management, 40(1), 25-40.
16. Karahanna, E. (1999). Symbolic adoption of information technology. Paper presented at the International Decision Sciences Institute, Athens, Greece.
17. Karahanna, E., & Straub, D.W. (1999). Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 183-213.
18. Klonglan, G.E., & Coward, E.W.J. (1970). The concept of symbolic adoption: A suggested interpretation. Rural Sociology, 35(1), 77-83.
19. Krasner, H. (2000). Ensuring e-business success by learning from ERP failures. IT Professional, 2(1), 22-27.
20. Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191-204.
21. Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173-191.
22. Melone, N. P. (1990). A theoretical assessment of the user-satisfaction construct in information systems research. Management Science, 36(1), 76-91.
23. Miranda, R. (1999). The rise of ERP technology in the public sector. Government Finance Review, 15(4), 9-17.
24. Moore, G.C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192-222.
25. Nadkami, S., & Nah, F. (2003). Aggregated causal maps: An approach to elicit and aggregate the knowledge of multiple experts. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12, 406-436.
26. Nah, F. (2003). Introduction: Special issue on enterprise resource planning. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 16(1), 1-3.
27. Nah, F., Faja, S., & Cata, T. (2001). Characteristics of ERP software maintenance: A multiple case study. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution, 13(6), 399-414.
28. Nah, F., Zuckweiler, K.M., & Lau, J.L. (2003). ERP implementation: Chief information officers' perceptions of critical success factors. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 16(1), 5-22.
29. Pozzebon, M. (2002). Combining a structuration approach with a behavioral-based model to investigate ERP usage. Paper presented at the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Houston, TX.
30. Rawstorne, P., Jayasuriya, R., & Caputi, P. (1998). An integrative model of information systems use in mandatory environments. Paper presented at the International Conference on Information Systems, Helsinki, Finland.
31. Rawstorne, P., Jayasuriya, R., & Caputi, P. (2000). Issues in predicting and explaining usage behaviors with the Technology Acceptance Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior when usage is mandatory. Paper presented at the International Conference on Information Systems, Brisbane, Australia.
32. Robey, D., Ross, J.W., & Boudreau, M.-C. (2002). Learning to implement enterprise systems: An exploratory study of the dialectics of change. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(1), 17-46.
33. Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
34. Saga, V., & Zmud, R.W. (1994). The nature and determinants of IT acceptance, routinization, and infusion. In L. Levine (Ed.), Diffusion, transfer, and implementation of information technology (pp. 67-86). New York: North-Holland.
35. Scott, J.E., & Vessey, I. (2002). Managing risks in enterprise systems implementations. Communications of the ACM, 45(4), 74-81.
36. Shang, S., & Seddon, P.B. (2000). A comprehensive framework for classifying the benefits of ERP systems. Paper presented at the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Long Beach, CA.
37. Siau, K. (2004). Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) implementation methodologies. Journal of Database Management, 15(1), 1-6.
38. Siau, K., & Messersmith, J. (2003). Analyzing ERP implementation at a public university using the Innovation Strategy Model. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 16(1), 57-80.
39. Sieber, T., Siau, K., Nah, F., & Sieber, M. (2000). SAP implementation at the University of Nebraska. Journal of Information Technology Cases and Applications, 2(1), 41-72.
40. Singletary, L.A., Akbulut, A.Y., & Houston, A.L. (2002). unanticipated software use by adolescents following mandatory adoption. Paper presented at the International Conference on Information Systems, Barcelona, Spain.
41. Soh, C., Kien, S.S., Boh, W.F., & Tang, M. (2003). Misalignments in ERP implementation: A dialectic perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 16(1), 81-100.
42. Soh, C., Kien, S.S., & Tay-Yap, J. (2000). Cultural fits and misfits: Is ERP a universal solution? Communications of the ACM, 43(4), 47-51.
43. Straub, D.W., Limayen, M., & Karahanna, E. (1995). Measuring system usage: Implications for IS theory testing. Management Science, 41(8), 1328-1132.
44. Taylor, S., & Todd, P.A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176.
45. Umble, E.J., & Umble M.M. (2002). Avoiding ERP implementation failure. Industrial Management, 44(1), 25-33.
46. Venkatesh, V. (1999). Creation of favorable user perceptions: Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 239-260.
47. Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365.
48. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F.D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451-481.
49. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F.D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
50. Wah, L. (2000). Give ERP a chance. Management Review, 89(3), 20-24.
51. Willcocks, L.P., & Sykes, R. (2000). The role of CIO and IT function in ERP. Communications of the ACM, 43(4), 32-38.