An Expected Consequence Approach to Route Choice in the Maritime Transportation of Crude Oil

Risk Analysis

Volumn 33, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 2041-2055

  Siddiqui, Atiq ^a   Verma, Manish ^a  

^a MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cleanup cost; Crude oil shipments; Insurance; Intercontinental transportation; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PROBABILITY; CLEAN-UP COST; ESTIMATION TECHNIQUES; INSURANCE PREMIUMS; INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATIONS; MARITIME TRANSPORTATION; PROBLEM INSTANCES; TRANSPORT COMPANIES;

COSTS; CRUDE OIL; INSURANCE; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; MARINE POLLUTION; OIL SPILLS; PETROLEUM TRANSPORTATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK PERCEPTION; TRANSPORTATION ROUTES;

WATERWAY TRANSPORTATION;

ACCIDENT; CLEANUP; CRUDE OIL; DATA ACQUISITION; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; MARITIME TRANSPORTATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY;

EID: 84887402096     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/risa.12049     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Rodrigue J, Comtois C, Slack B. The Geography of Transport Systems. New York: Routledge, 2009.
2. ITOPF. ITOPF Oil Spill Statistics, 2010. Available at: http://www.itopf.com/information-services/data-and-statistics/statistics/, Accessed on January 1, 2010.
3. IOPCF. Annual report 2008: International oil pollution compensation funds. 2008; l:1-214.
4. IMO. International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL), 2011. Available at: http://www.imo.org/about/conventions/listofconventions/pages/international-convention-for-the-prevention-of-pollution-from-ships-(marpol).aspx, Accessed on April 16, 2011.
5. EU Legislations. Waterborne Transport: Maritime Safety, 2011. Available at: http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/transport/waterborne_transport/index_en.htm, Accessed on July 14, 2011.
6. Douligeris C, Iakovou E, Yudhbir L. Maritime route risk analysis for hazardous materials transportation. IFAC Transportation Systems, 1997; 574-579.
7. Kontovas CA, Psaraftis HN. Formal safety assessment: a critical review. Marine Technology, 2009; 46(1):45-59.
8. IMO. Guidelines for formal safety assessment (FSA) for use in the IMO rule-making process. MSC/Circ.1023 and MEPC/Circ. 2002; 392:1-52.
9. Hu S, Fang Q, Xia H, Xi Y. Formal safety assessment based on relative risks model in ship navigation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2007; 92(3):369-377.
10. Safdor. Formal safety assessment, FSA-Crude oil tankers, submitted by Denmark (MEPC 58/INF.2). 2008; 1-137.
11. Safdor. Formal safety assessment, FSA-Crude oil tankers, submitted by Denmark (MEPC 58/17/2). 2008; 1-26.
12. Martins MR, Maturana MC. Human error contribution in collision and grounding of oil tankers. Risk Analysis, 2010; 30(4):674-698.
13. Vanem E, Endresen Ø, Skjong R. Cost-effectiveness criteria for marine oil spill preventive measures. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2008; 93(9):1354-1368.
14. Jin D, Kite-Powell HL. On the optimal environmental liability limit for marine oil transport. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 1999; 35(2):77-100.
15. Jin D, Kite-Powell HL. Environmental liability, marine insurance and an optimal risk sharing strategy for marine oil transport. Marine Resource Economy, 1999; 10(1):1-19.
16. Li H, Iakovou E, Douligeris C. Strategic planning model for marine oil transportation in the Gulf of Mexico. Transportation Research Record, 1996; 1522:108-115.
17. Iakovou ET. An interactive multiobjective model for the strategic maritime transportation of petroleum products: Risk analysis and routing. Safety Science, 2001; 39(1-2):19-29.
18. Douligeris C, Iakovou E, Englehardt JD, Li H, Ip CM, Mooers CNK. Development of a national marine oil transportation system model. Spill Science & Technology Bulletin, 1997; 4(2):113-121.
19. Iakovou E, Douligeris C, Li H, Ip C, Yudhbir L. A maritime global route planning model for hazardous materials transportation. Transportation Science, 1999; 33(1):34-48.
20. Martinez LJ, Lambert JH. Prioritising sources of risk at liquefied natural gas storage terminals in Mexico. International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management, 2010; 1(4):363-383.
21. Erkut E, Verter V. Hazardous materials logistics: A review. Pp. 467-506 in Drezner Z (ed). Facility Location: A Survey of Applications and Methods. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1995.
22. Fabiano B, Currò F, Palazzi E, Pastorino R. A framework for risk assessment and decision-making strategies in dangerous good transportation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2002; 93(1):1-15.
23. Verma M. A cost and expected consequence approach to planning and managing railroad transportation of hazardous materials. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2009; 14(5):300-308.
24. Erkut E, Tjandra SA, Verter V. Hazardous materials transportation. Pp. 539-621 in Barnhart C and Laporte G (eds). Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2007.
25. Fowler TG, Sørgård E. Modeling ship transportation risk. Risk Analysis, 2000; 20(2):225-244.
26. Soares CG, Teixeira AP. Risk assessment in maritime transportation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2001; 74(3):299-309.
27. Grigalunas TA, Opaluch JJ, French D, Reed M, Knauss D. A natural resource damage assessment model for coastal and marine environments. GeoJournal, 1988; 16(3):315-321.
28. Yudhbir L, Iakovou E. A Maritime Oil Spill Risk Assessment Model. International Oil Spill Conference, 2001; 235-240.
29. Harrald JR, Mazzuchi TA, Spahn J, Van Dorp R, Merrick J, Shrestha S, Grabowski M. Using system simulation to model the impact of human error in a maritime system. Safety Science, 1998; 30(1-2):235-247.
30. Merrick JRW, van Dorp JR, Harrald J, Mazzuchi T, Spahn JE, Grabowski M. A systems approach to managing oil transportation risk in Prince William Sound. Systems Engineering, 2000; 3(3):128-142.
31. Ulusçu ÖS, Özbaş B, Altiok T, Or İ. Risk analysis of the vessel traffic in the Strait of Istanbul. Risk Analysis, 2009; 29(10):1454-1472.
32. Stewart TR, Leschine TM. Judgment and analysis in oil spill risk assessment. Risk Analysis, 1986; 6(3):305-315.
33. Vanem E, Antão P, Østvik I, de Comas FDC. Analysing the risk of LNG carrier operations. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2008; 93(9):1328-1344.
34. Eliopoulou E, Papanikolaou A. Casualty Analysis of Tankers. Learning from Marine Incidents III, 2006.
35. Eliopoulou E, Papanikolaou A. Casualty analysis of large tankers. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2007; 12(4):240-250.
36. Burgherr P. In-depth analysis of accidental oil spills from tankers in the context of global spill trends from all sources. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2007; 140(1-2):245-256.
37. Ylitalo J. Modelling marine accident frequency [master's thesis]. 2010; 1-91.
38. Goerlandt F, Kujala P. Traffic simulation based ship collision probability modeling. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2011; 96(1):91-107.
39. Wheeler TA. Risk-based ranking of dominant contributors to maritime pollution events. Risk Analysis, 1993; 13(2):207-214.
40. Amrozowicz MD, Brown A, Golay M. A Probabilistic Analysis of Tanker Groundings; 7th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference 1997; 1-19.
41. Česnauskis M. Model for probabilistic assessment of oil outflow event caused by tanker accident. Transportation, 2007; 22(3):187-194.
42. Montewka J, Hinz T, Kujala P, Matusiak J. Probability modelling of vessel collisions. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2010; 95(5):573-589.
43. Price JM, Johnson WR, Marshall CF, Ji Z, Rainey GB. Overview of the oil spill risk analysis (OSRA) model for environmental impact assessment. Spill Science & Technology Bulletin, 2003; 8(5-6):529-533.
44. Guillen G, Rainey G, Morin M. A simple rapid approach using coupled multivariate statistical methods, GIS and trajectory models to delineate areas of common oil spill risk. Journal of Marine Systems, 2004; 45(3-4):221-235.
45. Al-Rabeh AH, Lardner RW, Gunay N. Gulfspill version 2.0: A software package for oil spills in the Arabian Gulf. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2000; 15(4):425-442.
46. Cronk JK, Mitsch WJ, Sykes RM. Effective modelling of a major inland oil spill on the Ohio River. Ecological Modelling, 1990; 51(3-4):161-192.
47. Yapa PD, Shen HT, Wang D, Angammana K. An integrated computer model for simulating oil spills in the Upper St. Lawrence River. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 1992; 18(2):340-351.
48. Etkin S. Estimating Cleanup Costs for Oil Spills. 1999 International Oil Spill Conference, 1999.
49. Etkin S. Worldwide Analysis of Marine Oil Spill Cleanup Cost Factors. Arctic and Marine Oil Spill Program Technical Seminar, 2000.
50. Shahriari M, Frost A. Oil spill cleanup cost estimation-Developing a mathematical model for marine environment. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2008; 86(3):189-197.
51. Helton D, Penn T. Putting Response and Natural Response Damage Cost in Perspective. International Oil Spill Conference, 1999; 1-22.
52. French McCay D, Rowe JJ, Whittier N, Sankaranarayanan S, Schmidt Etkin D. Estimation of potential impacts and natural resource damages of oil. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2004; 107(1-2):11-25.
53. Friis-Hansen P, Ditlevsen O. Nature preservation acceptance model applied to tanker oil spill simulations. Structural Safety, 2003; 25(1):1-34.
54. Yamada Y. The cost of oil spills from tankers in relation to weight of spilled oil. Marine Technology and SNAME News, 2009; 46(4):219-228.
55. Kontovas CA, Psaraftis HN, Ventikos NP. An empirical analysis of IOPCF oil spill cost data. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2010; 60(9):1455-1466.
56. Psarros G, Skjong R, Vanem E. Risk acceptance criterion for tanker oil spill risk reduction measures. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2011; 62(1):116-127.
57. Environmental Science Technology Centre (ESTC). Environmental Science Technology Centre (ESTC) Tanker Spill Database, 2011. Available at: http://www.etc-cte.ec.gc.ca/databases/TankerSpills/Default.aspx, Accessed on July 13, 2011.
58. Huijer K. Trend in oil from tanker ships 1995-2004. International Tanker Owner Pollution Federation (ITOPF), 2005.
59. Erkut E, Verter V. Modeling of transport risk for hazardous materials. Operational Research, 1998; 46(5):625-642.
60. Erkut E, Ingolfsson A. Catastrophe avoidance models for hazardous materials route planning. Transportation Science, 2000; 34(2):165-179.
61. Abkowitz M, Lepofsky M, Cheng P. Selecting criteria for designating hazardous materials highway routes. Transportation Research Record, 1992; 1333:30-35.