Cost-effectiveness criteria for marine oil spill preventive measures

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 93, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1354-1368

  Vanem, Erik ^a   Endresen, Øyvind ^a   Skjong, Rolf ^a  

^a DNV GL   (Norway)

Author keywords

Cost effectiveness criteria; Environmental risk; Maritime safety; Oil spill prevention and control; Risk control measures; Risk evaluation criteria; Risk based design; Risk based regulations

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; RISK MANAGEMENT; SAFETY FACTOR;

ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; MARITIME SAFETY; OIL SPILL PREVENTION AND CONTROL; RISK-BASED DESIGN;

OIL SPILLS;

EID: 42249092485     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2007.07.008     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. In: Ornitz B.E., and Champ M.A. (Eds). Oil spills first principles: prevention & best response (2002), Elsevier Science Ltd., Amsterdam. 0080428142
2. IMO. MARPOL 73/78 consolidated edition 2002 (2002), International Maritime Organization. 92-801-5125-8
3. IMO. Report of the Marine Environmental Protection Committee on its 49th session, MEPC 49/22. International Maritime Organization, 2003.
4. IMO. Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) for use in the IMO rule-making process, MSC/Circ.1023-MEPC/Circ.392 (2002), International Maritime Organization
5. Norway. Decision parameters including risk acceptance criteria, Submitted by Norway, MSC 72/16. International Maritime Organization, 2000.
6. IACS. Risk evaluation, Submitted by IACS, MSC 78/19/2. International Maritime Organization, 2004.
7. IACS. Experience with Formal Safety Assessment at IMO, Submitted by IACS, MSC 78/19/1, International Maritime Organization, 2004.
8. Skjong R. Experience with the use of risk assessment in IMO. In: Proceedings of ESREL 2003, 2003.
9. Skjong R. Formal safety assessment and goal based regulations at IMO-lessons learned. In: Proceedings of OMAE 2005, 2005.
10. NORSOK, Risk and emergency preparedness analysis. NORSOK standard Z-013, rev. 1, Annex D, 1998.
11. OLF, Veiledning for gjennomføring av miljørisikoanalyser for petroleumsaktivitet på norsk sokkel-Metode for Miljørettet Risiko Analyse (MIRA), Oljeindustriens Landsforening, 2001 (in Norwegian).
12. GESAMP, A Sea of Troubles, GESAMP and Advisory Committee on Protection of the Sea, Rep. Stud. GESAMP No. 70, 2001, ISBN: 82-7701-010-9.
13. Etkin DS, Wells P, Nauke M, Campbell, Grey C, Koefoed J,et al. Estimates of oil entering the marine environment in the past decade: GESAMP Working Group 32 Project. In: Proceedings of the 21st Arctic and Marine Oil Spill Program technical seminar, 1998.
14. Etkin DS, Wells P, Nauke M, Campbell J, Koefoed J, Meyer T, et al. Estimates of oil entering the marine environment in the past decade: GESAMP Working Group 32 Project. In: Proceedings of the 1999 international oil spill conference, 1999.
15. USA. Petroleum in the marine environment, Submitted by the United States, MEPC 39/INF.13. International Maritime Organization, 1990.
16. Brekke C., and Solberg A.H.S. Oil spill detection by satellite remote sensing. Remote Sens Environ 95 1 (2005) 1-13
17. National Research Council. Oil into the sea III: inputs, fates and effects (2003), The National Academic Press. 0-309-08438-5
18. ITOPF. Oil tanker spill statistics: 2004 (2005), International Tanker Owners Pollution Federation Limited. Available online at: 〈http://www.itopf.com/stats04.pdf〉
19. Huijer K. Trends in oil spills from tanker ships 1995-2004. in: Proceedings of the 28th Arctic and Marine Oil Spill Program technical seminar, 2005.
20. Stopford M. Maritime economics. 2nd ed (1997), Routledge, Tayler & Francis Group, London, UK. 0-415-15310-7
21. Fearnleys Review 2001. Fearnresearch, 2002, ISSN: 0801-4086.
22. INTERTANKO. Tanker facts 2005, available online at: 〈http://www.intertanko.com/tankerfacts/factsheet/fact.pdf〉.
23. Environment Canada. Worldwide tanker spill database, Environment Canada, Environmental Technology Centre, 2005. Available online at: 〈http://www.etc-cte.ec.gc.ca/databases/TankerSpills/Default.aspx 〉.
24. ITOPF. The cost of oil spills, International Tanker Owners Pollution Federation Limited, 2005. Available online at: 〈http://itopf.com/costs.html〉.
25. Monnier I. The costs of oil spills after tanker incidents. DNV research report no. 94-2024, Det Norske Veritas, 1994.
26. Grey C. The cost of oil spills from tankers: an analysis of IOPC fund incidents. In: Proceedings of the 1999 international oil spill conference, 1999.
27. Jean-Hansen V. Skipstrafikken i området Lofoten-Barentshavet, Kystverket, Transportøkonomisk institutt, 644/2003, 2003 (in Norwegian), ISBN:82-480-0341-8.
28. Etkin DS. Estimated clean up costs for oil spill. In: Proceedings of the 1999 international oil spill conference, 1999.
29. Etkin DS. Worldwide analysis of marine oil spill cleanup cost factors. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Arctic and Marine Oil Spill Program Technical seminar, 2000.
30. White IC, Molloy F. Factors that determine the cost of oil spills. In: Proceedings of the 2003 international oil spill conference, 2003.
31. Vazquez MX, Varela M, Prada A. Economic effects of the Prestige catastrophe-an advance. In: International scientific seminar, Economic, social and environmental effects of the "prestige" oil spill, Santiago, 2003.
32. Søfartsstyrelsen og Farvandsvæsenet, Risikovurdering af sejladssikkerheden I de danske farvande, Søfartsstiftelsen og Farvandsvæsenet, dokument nummer P-054380, 2002 (in Danish).
33. DMA and RDANH. Risk analysis of navigational safety in Danish Waters, Danish Maritime Authority and Royal Danish Administration of Navigation and Hydrography, Report no. P-054380-2, 2002 (English summary of [32]).
34. Endresen Ø., Sørgård E., Sundet J.K., Dalsøren S.B., Isaksen I.S.A., Berglen T.F., et al. Emission from international sea transportation and environmental impact. J Geophys Res 108 D17 (2003) 4560
35. Endresen Ø., Behrens H.L., Brynestad S., Andersen A.B., and Skjong R. Challenges in global ballast water management. Mar Pollut Bull 48 (2004) 615-623
36. NOAA. Habitat equivalency analysis: an overview (2006), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
37. McCay D.F., Rowe J.J., Whittier N., Sankaranarayanan S., and Etkin D.S. Estimation of potential impacts and natural resource damages of oil. J Hazard Mater 107 (2004) 11-25
38. Etkin DS. Modelling oil spill response and damage costs. In: Proceedings of 2004 freshwater spills symposium, 2004.
39. French-McCay D.P. Oil spill impact modelling: development and validation. Environ Toxicol Chem 23 10 (2004) 2441-2456
40. Liu X., and Wirtz K.W. Total oil spill costs and compensations. Maritime Policy Manage 33 1 (2006) 49-60
41. Helton D, Penn T. Putting response and natural resource damage costs in perspective. In: Proceedings of the 1999 international oil spill conference, 1999.
42. Fowler T.G., and Sørgård E. Modeling ship transportation risk. Risk Anal 20 2 (2000) 225-244
43. Thevik HJ, Sørgård E, Fowler T. A method for assessing the risk of sea transportation: numerical examples for the Oslofjord. In: Proceedings of ESREL 2001, 2001.
44. Harrald JR, Mazzuchi TA, Merrick J, Spahn J, Van Dorp R. System simulation: a risk management tool for Prince William Sound. In: Proceedings of 1997 international oil spill conference, 1997.
45. Skjong R, Ronold KO. So much for safety. In: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering, OMAE, 2002.
46. Skjong R, Vanem E. Optimised use of safety interventions, in: Proceedings of International conference on PSAM 7/ESREL'04, 2004.
47. US Congress, An Act to establish limitations on liability for damages resulting from oil pollution, to establish a fund for the payment of compensation for such damages, and for other purposes. One Hundred First Congress of the United States of America, at the second session, 1990.
48. U.S. DoT. OPA 90 Programmatic Regulatory Assessment (PRA)-benefits, cost and cost effectiveness of eleven major rulemakings of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, US Department of Transport, 2001.
49. Committee on Tank Vessel Design, National Research Council. Tanker spills: prevention by design (1991), The National Academic Press. 0-309-04377-8
50. Sørgård E, Lehmann M, Kristoffersen M, Lyridis D. SAFECO II, WP III.3, D22b: data on consequences following ship accidents, DNV report no. 99-2010, Det Norske Veritas, 1999.
51. Denmark and Norway. FSA Study on ECDIS/ENCs: details on risk assessments and cost benefit assessments. Submitted by Denmark and Norway, MSC 81/INF.9, IMO, 2006.
52. IACS. Goal-based new ship construction standards, linkage between FSA and GBS. Submitted by IACS, MSC 81/INF.6, IMO, 2006.
53. Hørte T, Skjong R, Friis-Hansen P, Teixeira AP, Francisco V. Probabilistic methods applied to structural design and rule development, RNA conference on developments in classification and international regulations, 2007.