Researching the sustainable impact of professional development programmes on participating teachers' beliefs

Proficiency and Beliefs in Learning and Teaching Mathematics: Learning from Alan Schoenfeld and Günter Törner

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 139-155

  Zehetmeier, Stefan ^a   Krainer, Konrad ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KLAGENFURT   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887349340     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6209-299-0     Document Type: Chapter

References (60)

1. Ainley, J., & Luntley, M. (2005). What teachers know: The knowledge base of classroom practice. In M. Bosch (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 1410-1419). Sant Feliu de Guíxols, Spain: European Research in Mathematics Education.
2. Altrichter, H., & Posch, P. (2007). Lehrerinnen und Lehrer erforschen ihren Unterricht [Teachers researching their practice]. Bad Heilbrunn, Germany: Klinkhardt.
3. Anderson, S., & Stiegelbauer, S. (1994). Institutionalization and renewal in a restructured secondary school. School Organization, 14(3), 279-293.
4. Benke, G., Erlacher, W., & Zehetmeier, S. (2006). Miniaturen zu IMST2 [Miniatures of the IMST2 project]. Unpublished paper. Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt, Austria: Institute of Instructional and School Development.
5. Bromme, R. (1997). Kompetenzen, Funktionen und unterrichtliches Handeln des Lehrers [Expertise, tasks and instructional practice of teachers]. In F.Weinert (Ed.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie. Band 3. Psychologie des Unterrichts und der Schule (pp. 177-212). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
6. Brühlmeier, A. (2010). Head, heart and hand. Education in the spirit of Pestalozzi. Cambridge, MA: Open Book Publishers.
7. Carrington, S., Deppeler, J., & Moss, J. (2010). Cultivating teachers' beliefs, knowledge and skills for leading change in schools. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(1), 1-13.
8. Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design. Choosing among five traditions (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
9. Da Ponte, J., & Chapman, O. (2006). Mathematics teachers' knowledge and practices. In A. Gutierrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 461-494). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
10. Datnow, A. (2005). The sustainability of comprehensive school reform models in changing district and state contexts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(1), 121-153.
11. DEZA - Direktion für Entwicklungshilfe und Zusammenarbeit. (2002). Glossar deutsch [German glossary]. Bern, Switzerland: DEZA.
12. Ernest, P. (1989a). The impact of beliefs on the teaching of mathematics. In P. Ernest (Ed.), Mathematics teaching: The state of the art (pp. 249-254). London: Falmer Press.
13. Ernest, P. (1989b). The knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of the mathematics teacher: A model. Journal of Education for Teaching, 15(1), 13-33.
14. Fullan, M. (2006). The future of educational change: System thinkers in action. Journal of Educational Change, 7, 113-122.
15. Garet, M., Porter, A., Desimone, L., Birman, B., & Yoon, K. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.
16. Guskey, T.R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
17. Hancock, D., & Algozzine, B. (2006). Doing case study research. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
18. Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2003). Sustaining leadership. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(9), 693-700.
19. Haslauer, E. (2010). Teachers' knowledge, beliefs, and classroom practices in relation to English language learners in mainstream classrooms in Midwestern schools. Dissertation. Madison, WI: University of Wisconson.
20. Ingvarson, L., Meiers, M., & Beavis, A. (2005). Factors affecting the impact of professional development programs on teachers' knowledge, practice, student outcomes and efficacy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(10), 1-28.
21. Jungwirth, H. (2005). Die Arbeit mit den Schulen. Beispiele aus Mathematik. In IUS (Ed.), Ergebnisbericht zum Projekt IMST2 2000-2004 (pp. 146-153). Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt, Austria: Institute of Instructional and School Development.
22. Krainer, K. (2003). Innovations in mathematics, science and technology teaching (IMST2): Initial outcome of a nation-wide initiative for upper secondary schools in Austria. Mathematics Education Review, 16, 49-60.
23. Krainer, K. (2005). Pupils, teachers and schools as mathematics learners. In C. Kynigos (Ed.), Mathematics education as a field of research in the knowledge society. Proceedings of the First GARME Conference (pp. 34-51). Athens, Greece: Hellenic Letters (Pubs).
24. Krainer, K. (2006). How can schools put mathematics in their centre? Improvement = content + community + context. In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká, & N. Stehlková (Eds.), Proceedings of 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 84-89). Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University.
25. Krainer, K. (2008). Innovations in mathematics, science and technology teaching. In J. Vincent, J. Dowsey, & R. Pierce (Eds.), Connected Maths. MAV Annual Conference 2008 (pp. 199-212). Brunswick, Vic: The Mathematical Association of Victoria (MAV).
26. Krainer, K. (2011). Teachers as stakeholders in mathematics education research. In B. Ubuz (Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 47-62). Ankara, Turkey: Middle East Technical University.
27. Krainer, K., & Wood, T. (Eds.). (2008). Participants in mathematics teacher education: Individuals, teams, communities and networks. International handbook of mathematics teacher education, Vol. 3. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
28. Krainer, K., & Zehetmeier, S. (2008). What do we know about the sustainability of professional development programmes? Paper presented in Discussion Group 7 at ICME 11 in Monterrey, Mexico (July 7, 2008).
29. Lachance, A., & Confrey, J. (2003). Interconnecting content and community: A qualitative study of secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 107-137.
30. Leder, G. (2008). Beliefs: What lies behind the mirror? In B. Sriraman (Ed.), Beliefs and Mathematics: Festschrift in honor of Guenter Toerner's 60th birthday (pp. 39-54). Missoula, MT: Information Age Publishing.
31. Leder, G., Pehkonen, E., & Törner, G. (2002). Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
32. Liljedahl, P. (2008). Teachers' beliefs as teachers' knowledge. Paper presented at the Symposium on the Occasion of the 100th Anniversary of ICMI (Rome, 5-8 March 2008).
33. Lipowsky, F. (2004). Was macht Fortbildungen für Lehrkräfte erfolgreich? [What makes teacher professional development successful?]. Die Deutsche Schule, 96, 462-479.
34. Llinares, S., & Krainer, K. (2006). Mathematics (student) teachers and teacher educators as learners. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education. Past, present and future (pp. 429-459). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
35. Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K., & Hewson, P. (1996). Principles of effective professional development for mathematics and science education: A synthesis of standards. NISE Brief, 1(1), 1-6.
36. Maaß, J., & Schlöglmann, W. (2008). Beliefs and attitudes in mathematics education: New research results. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
37. Maldonado, L. (2002). Effective professional development. Findings from research. Retrieved from http://www.collegeboard.com, accessed August 16, 2012.
38. Mason, J. (2004). Are beliefs believable? Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(3), 343-351.
39. Mayring, P. (2003). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse [Qualitative content analysis]. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.
40. Merriam, S. (2001). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
41. Mundry, S. (2005). What experience has taught us about professional development. National Network of Eisenhower Regional Consortia and Clearinghouse.
42. Pegg, J., & Krainer, K. (2008). Studies on regional and national reform initiatives as a means to improve mathematics teaching and learning at scale. In K. Krainer & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education, Vol. 3: Participants in mathematics teacher education: Individuals, teams, communities and networks (pp. 255-280). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
43. Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: Free Press.
44. Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th edition). New York, NY: Free Press.
45. Rowland, T., Huckstep, P., & Thwaites, A. (2005). Elementary teachers' mathematics subject knowledge: the knowledge quartet and the case of Naomi. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(3), 255-281.
46. Schoenfeld, A. (1987). Cognitive science and mathematics education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
47. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
48. Song, E., & Koh, K. (2010). Assessment for learning: Understanding teachers' beliefs and practices. Paper presented at the 36th International Association for Educational Assessment (IAEA) Annual Conference in Bangkok, Thailand, 22-27 August, 2010.
49. Sowder, J. (2007). The mathematical education and development of teachers. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 157-223). Greenwich, CT: NCTM.
50. Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
51. Stein, M. K., Smith,M. S.,&Silver, E. A. (1999). The development of professional developers: Learning to assist teachers in new settings in new ways. Harvard Educational Review, 69(3), 237-269.
52. Stockmann, R. (1992). Die Nachhaltigkeit von Entwicklungsprojekten [The sustainability of development projects]. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
53. Tatto, M. T., & Coupland, D. B. (2003). Teacher education and teachers' beliefs: Theoretical and measurement concerns. In J. Rath & A. C.McAninch (Eds.), Teacher beliefs and classroom performance: The impact of teacher education (pp. 123-181). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
54. Thompson, A. (1984). The relationship of teachers' conceptions of mathematics and mathematics teaching to instructional practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 105-127.
55. Törner, G. (2002). Mathematical beliefs - A search for a common ground: Some theoretical considerations on structuring beliefs, some research questions, and some phenomenological observations. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner, (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 73-94). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
56. Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
57. Zehetmeier, S. (2008). Zur Nachhaltigkeit von Lehrer/Innenfortbildung [The sustainability of teacher professional development]. Doctoral Thesis. Klagenfurt, Austria: Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt.
58. Zehetmeier, S. (2010). Aktionsforschung in der Lehrerfortbildung: Was bleibt? [Action research in teacher education. What remains?] In F. H. Müller, A. Eichenberger, M. Lüders, & J. Mayr (Eds.), Lehrerinnen und Lehrer lernen. Konzepte und Befunde der Lehrerfortbildung (pp. 197-211).Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
59. Zehetmeier, S. (in preparation). Tracking the sustainable impact of professional development.
60. Zehetmeier, S. & Krainer, K. (2011). Ways of promoting the sustainability of mathematics teachers' professional development. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43(6/7), 875-887.