An improved survivability prognosis of breast cancer by using sampling and feature selection technique to solve imbalanced patient classification data

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Wang, Kung Jeng ^a   Makond, Bunjira ^a,b   Wang, Kung Min ^c  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^b PRINCE OF SONGKLA UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^c SHIN KONG WU HO SU MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Cost sensitive classifier technique; Decision tree; Imbalanced data; Logistic regression; Synthetic minority over sampling

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; CLASSIFICATION; DECISION TREE; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MORTALITY; PROGNOSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CLASSIFICATION; DECISION TREES; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROGNOSIS;

EID: 84887091192     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-124     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. World Health Organization, Quick cancer facts. Retrieved September 22, 2010 http://www.who.int/cancer/en/
2. Breast Cancer Statistics, 2011. DeSantis C, Siegel R, Bandi P, Jemal A, Cancer J Clin 2011 61 409 418
3. National Cancer Institute, Cancer trends progress report-2009/2010 update. Retrieved June 22, 2009 http://progressreport.cancer.gov/highlights.asp
4. Artificial neural networks applied to survival prediction in breast cancer. Lundin M, Lundin J, Burke HB, Toikkanen S, Pylkkänen L, Joensuu H, Oncology 1999 57 281 286 10.1159/000012061 10575312
5. A comparison of three different methods for classification of breast cancer data. Soria D, Garibaldi JM, Biganzoli E, Ellis IO, Proceedings of the seventh international conference IEEE San Diego: IEEE 2008 619 624
6. Predicting breast cancer survivability using fuzzy decision trees for personalized healthcare. Khan MU, Choi JP, Shin H, Kim M, Proceedings of 30th Annual International IEEE EMBS Conference Vancouver: IEEE 2008 5148 5151
7. Comparison of three data mining techniques with genetic algorithm in the analysis of breast cancer data. Chang WP, Liou DM, J Telemed Telecare 2008 9 1 26
8. Predicting breast cancer survivability: a comparison of three data mining methods. Delen D, Walker G, Kadam A, Artif Intell Med 2005 34 113 127 10.1016/j.artmed.2004.07.002 15894176 (Pubitemid 40719029)
9. Predicting breast cancer survivability using data mining techniques. Bellaachia A, Guven E, Age 2006 58 10 110
10. Comparison of seven algorithms to predict breast cancer survival. Endo A, Shibata T, Tanaka H, Int J Biomed Soft Comput Hum Sci 2008 13 11 16
11. Decision tree based predictive models for breast cancer survivability on imbalance data. Liu Y, Cheng W, Lu Z, Proceedings of International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering Beijing: IEEE 2009 1 4
12. SMOTEBoost: Improving prediction of the minority class in boosting. Chawla NV, Lazarevic A, Hall LO, Bowyer KW, Proceedings of the 7th European conference on principles and practice of knowledge discovery in database Berlin: Springer 2003 107 119 (Pubitemid 37231089)
13. Learning from imbalanced data. He H, Garcia E, IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 2009 21 9 1263 1284
14. Classification of imbalanced data sets by using the hybrid re-sampling algorithm based on isomap. Gu Q, Cai Z, Ziu L, In LNCS, Adv Comput Intelligence 2009 5821 287 296 10.1007/978-3-642-04843-2-31
15. Local neighbourhood extension of SMOTE for mining imbalanced data. Maciejewski T, Stefanowski J, Proceeding of the IEEE symposium on computational intelligence and data mining Paris: IEEE 2011 104 111
16. Predicting disease risks from highly imbalanced data using random forest. Khalilia M, Chakraborty S, Popescu M, BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2011 11 51 10.1186/1472-6947-11-51 21801360
17. Improving sensitivity of machine learning methods for automated case identification from free-text electronic medical records. Afzal Z, Schuemie MJ, van Blijderveen JC, Sen EF, Sturkenboom MCJM, Kors JA, BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013 13 30 10.1186/1472-6947-13-30 23452306
18. Addressing the course of imbalanced training-sets: one-sided selection. Kubat M, Matwin S, Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Machine Learning San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997 179 186
19. Data Mining for Imbalanced Datasets. Chawla NV, An Overview. In Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook USA: Springer 2005 853 867
20. An insight into classification with imbalanced data: Empirical results and current trends on using data intrinsic characteristics. Lopez V, Fernández A, García S, Palade V, Herrera F, Inform Sci in press
21. C4.5, class imbalance, and cost sensitivity: Why under-sampling beats over-sampling. Drummond C, Holte RC, Proceeding of Workshop on Learning from Imbalanced Datasets II, ICML 2003 1 8
22. SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique. Chawla NV, Bowyer KW, Hall LO, Kegelmeyer WP, J Artif Intell Res 2002 16 321 357 (Pubitemid 43057176)
23. Protein classification with imbalanced data. Zhao XM, Li X, Chen L, Aihara K, Proteins 2007 70 4 1125 1132 10.1002/prot.21870 (Pubitemid 351304071)
24. Applying novel resampling strategies to software defect prediction. Pelayo L, Dick S, Proceedings of the annual meeting of the North American fuzzy information processing society San Diego: IEEE 2007 69 72 (Pubitemid 47533936)
25. The effects of over and under sampling on fault-prone module detection. Kamei Y, Monden A, Matsumoto S, Kakimoto T, Matsumoto K, Proceedings of First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement Madrid: IEEE 2007 196 204
26. Cost-Sensitive Learning and the Class Imbalance Problem. Ling CX, Sheng VS, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning New York: Springer, Sammut C, 2008
27. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program, Research Data (1973-2007), National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Cancer Statistics Branch, released April 2010, based on the November 2009 submission http://www.seer.cancer.gov
28. Lung cancer survival prediction using ensemble data mining on SEER data. Agrawal A, Misra S, Narayanan R, Polepeddi L, Choudhary A, Sci Program 2012 20 29 42
29. Han J, Kamber M, Data mining: Concepts and techniques San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, Elsevier Science 2006
30. Practical feature subset selection for machine learning. Hall MA, Smith LA, Proceedings of Australasian Computer Science Conference Berlin: Springer 1998 181 191
31. Hall MA, Correlation-based feature selection for machine learning. PhD Thesis New Zealand: Department of Computer Science, Waikato University 1999
32. An introduction to variable and feature selection. Guyon I, Elisseeff A, J Mach Learn Res 2003 3 1157 1182
33. Tutorial: Data mining for analysis of rare events: a case study in security, financial and medical applications. Lazarevic A, Srivastava J, Kumar V, Proceeding of Pacific-Asia Conference Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 2004
34. Witten IH, Frank E, Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann 2005
35. Roulette sampling for cost-sensitive learning. Sheng VS, Ling CX, Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on Machine Learning Berlin: Springer 2007 724 731
36. The WEKA Data Mining Software: An Update. Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, Pfahringer B, Reutemann P, Witten IH, ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 2009 11 10 18 10.1145/1656274.1656278
37. Virtual screening of bioassay data. Schierz AC, J Cheminformatics 2009 1 12 10.1186/1758-2946-1-12
38. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, Applied logistic regression (2nd Ed.) New York, USA: A Wiley-Interscience Publication, John Wiley & Sons Inc. 2000
39. Logistic regression when binary predictor variables are highly correlated. Barker L, Brown C, Stat Med 2001 20 1431 1442 10.1002/sim.680 11343364 (Pubitemid 32433189)
40. Fountoulaki A, Karacapilidis M, Manatakis N, Using Decision Trees for the Semi-automatic Development of Medical Data Patterns: A Computer-Supported Framework Biomedicine: Web-Based Applications in Healthcare and 2010 229 242
41. Learning classifiers from imbalanced, only positive and unlabeled data set. Chen Y, Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University 2009
42. Analysis of preprocessing vs. cost-sensitive learning for imbalanced classification. Open problems on intrinsic data characteristics. Lopez V, Fernández A, Moreno-Torres JG, Herrera F, Expert Syst Appl 2012 39 6585 6608 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.12.043
43. Does cost-sensitive learning beat sampling for classifying rare classes? McCarthy K, Zabar B, Weiss G, Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on Utility-based data mining-UBDM '05 USA: ACM Press 2005 69 77
44. Discretization of continuous valued dimensions in OLAP data cubes. Palaniappan S, Hong TK, Int J Comput Sci Network Secur 2008 8 116 126
45. Prediction of breast cancer survivability: to alleviate oncologists in decision making. Ali A, An Y, Kim D, Park K, Shin H, Kim M, Proceeding of the Business Intelligence and Data Mining Conference Seoul, Korea: Seoul, Korea 2010 80 92