The effects of over and under sampling on fault-prone module detection

Proceedings - 1st International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 196-204

  Kamei, Yasutaka ^a   Monden, Akito ^a   Matsumoto, Shinsuke ^a   Kakimoto, Takeshi ^a   Matsumoto, Ken Ichi ^a  

^a NARA INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FAILURE ANALYSIS; FAULT DETECTION; FAULT TREE ANALYSIS; FOOD PROCESSING; FORECASTING; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; MATERIALS HANDLING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NEURAL NETWORKS; PAPER COATING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; SAMPLING; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; TECHNOLOGY;

CLASSIFICATION TREES; DATA SETS; EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; FAULT-PRONE; INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM; LEGACY SOFTWARES; LINEAR DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; LOGISTIC MODELS; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MODULE SETS; OVER-SAMPLING; PREDICTION MODELING; PREDICTION PERFORMANCE; SAMPLING METHODS; UNDER-SAMPLING;

QUALITY ASSURANCE;

COMPUTER PROGRAMS; DETECTION; FAILURE; FOOD; FORECASTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NEURAL NETWORKS; PROCESSING; QUALITY CONTROL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SAMPLING; TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 47949103719     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ESEM.2007.80     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O. and Kegelmeyer, W. P.: SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, Vol. 16, pp. 321-357 (2002).
2. Gray, A. R. and MacDonell, S. G.: Software Metrics Data Analysis. Exploring the Relative Performance of Some Commonly Used Modeling Techniques, Empirical Software Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 297-316(1999).
3. Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, J. A., Terveen, L. G. and Riedl, J. T.: Evaluating Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems, ACM Trans. Information Systems, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 5-53 (2004).
4. Jones, C.: Applied Software Measurement, Second Edition, p. 861, McGraw-Hill, New York (1996).
5. Khoshgoftaar, T. M. and Allen, E. B.: Modeling Software Quality with Classification Trees, Recent Advances in Reliability and Quality Engineering, World Scientific, pp. 247-270, Singapore (1999).
6. Khoshgoftaar, T. M., Gao, K. and Szabo, R. M.: An Application of Zero-inflated Poisson Regression for Software Fault Prediction, Proc. 12th Int'l Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE'01), pp. 66-73, Hong Kong, China (2001).
7. Khoshgoftaar, T. M., Yuan, X. and Allen, E. B.: Balancing Misclassification Rates in Classification-Tree Models of Software Quality, Empirical Software Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 313-330 (2000).
8. Kubat, M. and Matwin, S.: Addressing the Curse of Imbalanced Training Sets: One-Sided Selection, Proc. 14th Int'l Conf. on Machine Learning (ICML '97), pp. 179-186, Nashville, USA (1997).
9. Li, P. L., Herbsleb, I. Shaw, M. and Robinson, B.: Experiences and Results from Initiating Field Defect Prediction and Product Test Prioritization Efforts at ABB Inc, Proc. 28th Int'l Conf. on Software Engineering (ICSE'06), pp. 413-422, Shanghai, China (2006).
10. Munson, J. C. and Khoshgoftaar, T. M.: The detection of fault-prone programs, IEEE Trans. Software Engineering, Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 423-433 (1992).
11. NASA IV & V Facility.: Metrics Data Program, http://mdp.iw.nasa.gov/
12. Ohlsson, N. and Alberg, H.: Predicting Fault-Prone Software Modules in Telephone Switches, IEEE Trans. Software Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 12, pp. 886-894 (1996).
13. Pighin, M. and Zamolo, R.: A Predictive Metric Based on Discriminant Statistical Analysis, Proc. 19th Int'l Conf. on Software Engineering (ICSE '97), pp. 262-270, Boston, USA (1997).
14. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E. and Williams, R. J.: Learning Representations by Back-propagating Errors, Nature, Vol. 323, pp. 533-536 (1986).
15. Tomek, I.: Two Modifications of CNN, IEEE Trans. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC. 6, pp. 769-772 (1976).