A comparison of three different methods for classification of breast cancer data

Proceedings - 7th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications, ICMLA 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 619-624

  Soria, Daniele ^a   Garibaldi, Jonathan M ^a   Biganzoli, Elia ^b   Ellis, Ian O ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFIERS; ELECTRIC LOADS; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; MULTILAYERS; ROBOT LEARNING; TUMORS;

BREAST CANCER DATUM; BREAST CANCERS; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; DATA SETS; MULTI-LAYER PERCEPTRON; NAIVE BAYES; NAIVE BAYES CLASSIFIERS; SUPERVISED MACHINE LEARNING; TREE CLASSIFIERS;

NEURAL NETWORKS;

EID: 60649087331     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICMLA.2008.97     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. A. Bellaachia and E. Guven. Predicting breast cancer survivability using data mining techniques. Scientific Data Mining Workshop, in Conjunction with the 2006 SIAM Conference on Data Mining, 2006.
2. R. Bouckaert. Naive bayes classifiers that perform well with continuous variables. In Al 2004: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, volume 3339, pages 1089-1094. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 2005.
3. D. Delen, G. Walker, and A. Kadam. Predicting breast cancer survivability: a comparison of three data mining methods. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 34 (2):113-127, 2005.
4. J. Garibaldi, D. Soria, F. Ambrogi, A. Green, D. Powe, E. Rakha, R. Macmillan, R. Blarney. G. Ball, P. Lisboa. T. Etchells, P. Boracchi, E. Biganzoli, and I. Ellis. Identification of key breast cancer phenotypes. Submitted to European Journal of Cancer, 2008.
5. S. Haykin. Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation. Prentice Hall, 2 edition, 1998.
6. G. John and P. Langley. Estimating continuous distributions in bayesian classifiers. Proceeding of the Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 1995.
7. T. Mitchell. Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill, 1997.
8. J. Nahar. Y.-P. Chen, and S. Ali. Kernel-based naive bayes classifier for breast cancer prediction. Journal of Biological System, 15 (1): 17-25, 2007.
9. J. Quinlan. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, California, 1993.
10. P. Royston. Algorithm as 181: The w test for normality. Applied Statistics, 31:176180, 1982.
11. I. Witten and E. Frank. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques with Java Implementations. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 2000.