Study designs to compare new colonoscopic techniques: Clinical considerations, data analysis, and sample size calculations

Endoscopy

Volumn 45, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 922-927

  Van Den Broek, Frank Jozef Christiaan ^a   Kuiper, Teaco ^a   Dekker, Evelien ^a   Zwinderman, Aeilko H ^a   Fockens, Paul ^a   Reitsma, Johannes B ^a,b  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCULATION; COLONOSCOPY; DATA ANALYSIS; HUMAN; POLYP; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; REVIEW; SAMPLE SIZE; SIMULATION; STUDY DESIGN;

COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN; SAMPLE SIZE;

EID: 84887016555     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: 14388812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1344434     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Winawer S. J., Zauber A. G., Fletcher R. H. et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology: 2006; 130 1872 1885 (Pubitemid 43668826)
2. van Rijn J. C., Reitsma J. B., Stoker J. et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol: 2006; 101 343 350 (Pubitemid 43381678)
3. van den Broek F. J., Fockens P., Dekker E. Review article: new developments in colonic imaging. Aliment Pharmacol Ther: 2007; 26 02 91 99 (Pubitemid 350233339)
4. Monkemuller K., Fry L. C., Zimmermann L. et al. Advanced endoscopic imaging methods for colon neoplasia. Dig Dis: 2010; 28 629 640
5. Tischendorf J. J., Wasmuth H. E., Koch A. et al. Value of magnifying chromoendoscopy and narrow band imaging (NBI) in classifying colorectal polyps: a prospective controlled study. Endoscopy: 2007; 39 1092 1096
6. Su M. Y., Hsu C. M., Ho Y. P. et al. Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and narrow-band imaging systems in differential diagnosis of neoplastic and nonneoplastic colonic polyps. Am J Gastroenterol: 2006; 101 2711 2716
7. Sikka S., Ringold D. A., Jonnalagadda S. et al. Comparison of white light and narrow band high definition images in predicting colon polyp histology, using standard colonoscopes without optical magnification. Endoscopy: 2008; 40 818 822
8. Chiu H. M., Chang C. Y., Chen C. C. et al. A prospective comparative study of narrow-band imaging, chromoendoscopy, and conventional colonoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia. Gut: 2007; 56 373 379
9. Knottnerus J. A., Muris J. W. Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional study. J Clin Epidemiol: 2003; 56 1118 1128 (Pubitemid 37386337)
10. Bossuyt P. M., Reitsma J. B., Bruns D. E. et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Ann Intern Med: 2003; 138 40 44 (Pubitemid 36232093)
11. Whiting P., Rutjes A. W., Reitsma J. B. et al. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol: 2003; 3 25
12. Adler A., Aschenbeck J., Yenerim T. et al. Narrow-band versus white-light high definition television endoscopic imaging for screening colonoscopy: a prospective randomized trial. Gastroenterology: 2009; 136 410 416
13. East J. E., Suzuki N., Stavrinidis M. et al. Narrow band imaging for colonoscopic surveillance in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. Gut: 2008; 57 65 70
14. Kaltenbach T., Friedland S., Soetikno R. A randomised tandem colonoscopy trial of narrow band imaging versus white light examination to compare neoplasia miss rates. Gut: 2008; 57 1406 1412
15. van den Broek F. J., Fockens P., van Eeden S. et al. Narrow-band imaging versus high-definition endoscopy for the diagnosis of neoplasia in ulcerative colitis. Endoscopy: 2011; 43 108 115
16. Brooker J. C., Saunders B. P., Shah S. G. et al. Total colonic dye-spray increases the detection of diminutive adenomas during routine colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc: 2002; 56 333 338
17. East J. E., Stavrindis M., Thomas-Gibson S. et al. A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique. Aliment Pharmacol Ther: 2008; 28 768 776
18. Inoue T., Murano M., Murano N. et al. Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy and pan-colonic narrow-band imaging system in the detection of neoplastic colonic polyps: a randomized, controlled trial. J Gastroenterol: 2008; 43 45 50 (Pubitemid 351324985)
19. Kiesslich R., Goetz M., Lammersdorf K. et al. Chromoscopy-guided endomicroscopy increases the diagnostic yield of intraepithelial neoplasia in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology: 2007; 132 874 882 (Pubitemid 46440874)
20. Marion J. F., Waye J. D., Present D. H. et al. Chromoendoscopy-targeted biopsies are superior to standard colonoscopic surveillance for detecting dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease patients: a prospective endoscopic trial. Am J Gastroenterol: 2008; 103 2342 2349
21. Paggi S., Radaelli F., Amato A. et al. The impact of narrow band imaging in screening colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol: 2009; 7 1049 1054
22. Pellise M., Fernandez-Esparrach G., Cardenas A. et al. Impact of wide-angle, high-definition endoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia: a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology: 2008; 135 1062 1068
23. Rastogi A., Early D. S., Gupta N. et al. Randomized, controlled trial of standard-definition white-light, high-definition white-light, and narrow-band imaging colonoscopy for the detection of colon polyps and prediction of polyp histology. Gastrointest Endosc: 2011; 74 593 602
24. Dekker E., Van den Broek F. J., Reitsma J. B. et al. Narrow-band imaging compared with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of dysplasia in patients with longstanding ulcerative colitis. Endoscopy: 2007; 39 216 221 (Pubitemid 46510792)
25. Heresbach D., Barrioz T., Lapalus M. G. et al. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy: 2008; 40 284 290 (Pubitemid 351524375)
26. Matsuda T., Saito Y., Fu K. I. et al. Does autofluorescence imaging videoendoscopy system improve the colonoscopic polyp detection rate? A pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol: 2008; 103 1926 1932
27. van den Broek F. J., Fockens P., van Eeden S. et al. Clinical evaluation of endoscopic trimodal imaging for the detection and differentiation of colonic polyps. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol: 2009; 7 288 295
28. Gross S. A., Buchner A. M., Crook J. E. et al. A comparison of high definition-image enhanced colonoscopy and standard white-light colonoscopy for colorectal polyp detection. Endoscopy: 2011; 43 1045 1051
29. Ramsoekh D., Haringsma J., Poley J. W. et al. A back-to-back comparison of white light video endoscopy with autofluorescence endoscopy for adenoma detection in high-risk subjects. Gut: 2010; 59 785 793
30. Rex D. K., Overhiser A. J., Chen S. C. et al. Estimation of impact of American College of Radiology recommendations on CT colonography reporting for resection of high-risk adenoma findings. Am J Gastroenterol: 2009; 104 149 153
31. van den Broek F. J., Reitsma J. B., Curvers W. L. et al. Systematic review of narrow-band imaging for the detection and differentiation of neoplastic and nonneoplastic lesions in the colon (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc: 2009; 69 124 135
32. Bombi J. A. Polyps of the colon in Barcelona, Spain. An autopsy study. Cancer: 1988; 61 1472 1476 (Pubitemid 18076428)
33. Williams A. R., Balasooriya B. A., Day D. W. Polyps and cancer of the large bowel: a necropsy study in Liverpool. Gut: 1982; 23 835 842 (Pubitemid 12018511)
34. Levin B., Lieberman D. A., McFarland B. et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin: 2008; 58 130 160 (Pubitemid 351830299)
35. Regula J., Rupinski M., Kraszewska E. et al. Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med: 2006; 355 1863 1872 (Pubitemid 44664644)
36. Lecomte T., Cellier C., Meatchi T. et al. Chromoendoscopic colonoscopy for detecting preneoplastic lesions in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol: 2005; 3 897 902 (Pubitemid 41219293)
37. Rutter M. D., Saunders B. P., Schofield G. et al. Pancolonic indigo carmine dye spraying for the detection of dysplasia in ulcerative colitis. Gut: 2004; 53 256 260 (Pubitemid 38125515)
38. Lai E. J., Calderwood A. H., Doros G. et al. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc: 2009; 69 620 625
39. Rostom A., Jolicoeur E. Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality. Gastrointest Endosc: 2004; 59 482 486 (Pubitemid 38437086)
40. Rex D. K., Imperiale T. F., Latinovich D. R. et al. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol: 2002; 97 1696 1700 (Pubitemid 34761391)
41. Froehlich F., Wietlisbach V., Gonvers J. J. et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc: 2005; 61 378 384 (Pubitemid 40349029)
42. Kaminski M. F., Regula J., Kraszewska E. et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med: 2010; 362 1795 1803
43. Lieberman D. A., Weiss D. G., Harford W. V. et al. Five-year colon surveillance after screening colonoscopy. Gastroenterology: 2007; 133 1077 1085 (Pubitemid 47494453)