Estimation of impact of american college of radiology recommendations on CT colonography reporting for resection of high-risk adenoma findings

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 104, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 149-153

  Rex, Douglas K ^a   Overhiser, Andrew J ^a   Chen, Shawn C ^a   Cummings, Oscar W ^a   Ulbright, Thomas M ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; COLON ADENOMA; COLON POLYPOSIS; COLONOSCOPY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; DATA BASE; DYSPLASIA; ENDOSCOPIC POLYPECTOMY; ENTERITIS; FEMALE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL PERSONNEL; MEDICAL SOCIETY; POLYPECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGY; TUMOR VOLUME; VILLOUS ADENOMA; ADENOMA; COLON POLYP; COLON TUMOR; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RADIOGRAPHY;

ADENOMA; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLONOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 60749108734     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2008.35     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR et al. CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 2005;236:3-9.
2. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology 2006;130:1872-85.
3. Hur C, Chung DC, Schoen RE et al. The management of small polyps found by virtual colonoscopy: results of a decision analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;5:237-44.
4. Rex D, Cummings O, Ulbright T. Coming to terms with pathologists over colon polyps with cancer or high-grade dysplasia. J Clin Gastroenterol 2005;39:1-3.
5. Pickhardt P, Choi J, Hwang I. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2191-200.
6. Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, Wilson LA et al. Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2003;125:311-9.
7. Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 2004;291:1713-9.
8. Rockey DC, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D et al. Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 2005;365:305-11.
9. Rex DK. Colonoscopy: a review of its yield for cancers and adenomas by indication. Am J Gastroenterol 1995;90:353-65.
10. Chen SC, Rex DK. Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:856-61.
11. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2533-41.
12. Rex DK, Helbig CC. High yields of small and flat adenomas with highdefinition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging. Gastroenterology 2007;133:42-7.
13. Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:1296-308.
14. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:873-85.
15. Morson B. The polyp-cancer sequence in the large bowel. Proc R Soc Med 1974;67:451-7.
16. Matek W, Guggenmoos-Holzmann I, Demling L. Follow-up of patients with colorectal adenomas. Endoscopy 1985:17:175-81.
17. Shinya H, Wolff WI. Morphology, anatomic distribution and cancer potential of colonic polyps. Ann Surg 1979;190:679-83.
18. Church JM. Clinical significance of small colorectal polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:481-5.
19. Butterly LF, Chase MP, Pohl H et al. Prevalence of clinically important histology in small adenomas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;4: 343-8.
20. Schoen RE, Hur C. What is the clinical importance of small polyps with regard to colorectal cancer screening? Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;3:488-9.
21. Snover DC, Jass JR, Fenoglio-Preiser C et al. Serrated polyps of the large intestine: a morphologic and molecular review of an evolving concept. Am J Clin Pathol 2005;124:380-91.