Reconstruction of divergence-free velocity fields from cine 3D phase-contrast flow measurements

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 200-210

  Busch, Julia ^a   Giese, Daniel ^a,b   Wissmann, Lukas ^a   Kozerke, Sebastian ^a,b  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

3D flow measurements; divergence free velocity field; normalized convolution; phase contrast imaging; radial basis functions

Indexed keywords

CONVOLUTION; FLOW MEASUREMENT; FUNCTIONS; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; MEDICAL COMPUTING; TRANSPIRATION; VELOCITY;

3D FLOW; NORMALIZED CONVOLUTION; PHASE-CONTRAST IMAGING; RADIAL BASIS FUNCTIONS; VELOCITY FIELD;

IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; CINERADIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIVERGENCE FREE VELOCITY FIELD; FEMALE; FLOW KINETICS; FLOW MEASUREMENT; HEART VALVE STENOSIS; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAGNETIC FIELD; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VOXEL BASED MORPHOMETRY;

EID: 84872856956     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24221     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Markl M, Kilner PJ, Ebbers T,. Comprehensive 4D velocity mapping of the heart and great vessels by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2011; 13: 7.
2. Ebbers T, Wigstrom L, Bolger AF, Engvall J, Karlsson M,. Estimation of relative cardiovascular pressures using time-resolved three-dimensional phase contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 2001; 45: 872-879.
3. Papathanasopoulou P, Zhao S, Kohler U, Robertson MB, Long Q, Hoskins P, Xu XY, Marshall I,. MRI measurement of time-resolved wall shear stress vectors in a carotid bifurcation model, and comparison with CFD predictions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 17: 153-162.
4. Dyverfeldt P, Sigfridsson A, Kvitting JP, Ebbers T,. Quantification of intravoxel velocity standard deviation and turbulence intensity by generalizing phase-contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 2006; 56: 850-858.
5. Kilner PJ, Gatehouse PD, Firmin DN,. Flow measurement by magnetic resonance: a unique asset worth optimising. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2007; 9: 723-728.
6. Friman O, Hennemuth A, Harloff A, Bock J, Markl M, Peitgen HO,. Probabilistic 4D blood flow mapping. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2010; 13 (pt 3): 416-423.
7. Gatehouse PD, Rolf MP, Graves MJ, Hofman MB, Totman J, Werner B, Quest RA, Liu Y, von Spiczak J, Dieringer M, Firmin DN, van Rossum A, Lombardi M, Schwitter J, Schulz-Menger J, Kilner PJ,. Flow measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multi-centre multi-vendor study of background phase offset errors that can compromise the accuracy of derived regurgitant or shunt flow measurements. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2010; 12: 5.
8. Chernobelsky A, Shubayev O, Comeau CR, Wolff SD,. Baseline correction of phase contrast images improves quantification of blood flow in the great vessels. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2007; 9: 681-685.
9. Giese D, Haeberlin M, Barmet C, Pruessmann KP, Schaeffter T, Kozerke S,. Analysis and correction of background velocity offsets in phase-contrast flow measurements using magnetic field monitoring. Magn Reson Med 2011, doi 10.1002/mrm.23111.
10. Bernstein MA, Zhou XJ, Polzin JA, King KF, Ganin A, Pelc NJ, Glover GH,. Concomitant gradient terms in phase contrast MR: analysis and correction. Magn Reson Med 1998; 39: 300-308.
11. Markl M, Bammer R, Alley MT, Elkins CJ, Draney MT, Barnett A, Moseley ME, Glover GH, Pelc NJ,. Generalized reconstruction of phase contrast MRI: analysis and correction of the effect of gradient field distortions. Magn Reson Med 2003; 50: 791-801.
12. Pelc NJ, Bernstein MA, Shimakawa A, Glover GH,. Encoding strategies for three-direction phase-contrast MR imaging of flow. J Magn Reson Imaging 1991; 1: 405-413.
13. Kellman P, Epstein FH, McVeigh ER,. Adaptive sensitivity encoding incorporating temporal filtering (TSENSE). Magn Reson Med 2001; 45: 846-852.
14. Huang F, Akao J, Vijayakumar S, Duensing GR, Limkeman M,. k-t GRAPPA: a k-space implementation for dynamic MRI with high reduction factor. Magn Reson Med 2005; 54: 1172-1184.
15. Jung B, Ullmann P, Honal M, Bauer S, Hennig J, Markl M,. Parallel MRI with extended and averaged GRAPPA kernels (PEAK-GRAPPA): optimized spatiotemporal dynamic imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28: 1226-1232.
16. Tsao J, Boesiger P, Pruessmann KP,. k-t BLAST and k-t SENSE: dynamic MRI with high frame rate exploiting spatiotemporal correlations. Magn Reson Med 2003; 50: 1031-1042.
17. Pedersen H, Kozerke S, Ringgaard S, Nehrke K, Kim WY,. k-t PCA: temporally constrained k-t BLAST reconstruction using principal component analysis. Magn Reson Med 2009; 62: 706-716.
18. Pruessmann KP,. Encoding and reconstruction in parallel MRI. NMR Biomed 2006; 19: 288-299.
19. Blaimer M, Ponce IP, Breuer FA, Jakob PM, Griswold MA, Kellman P,. Temporal filtering effects in dynamic parallel MRI. Magn Reson Med 2011; 66: 192-198.
20. Gubin LG, Polyak BT, Raik EV,. The method of projections for finding the common point of convex sets. USSR Comput Math Math Phys 1967; 7: 1-24.
21. Yang GZ, Kilner PJ, Firmin DN, Underwood SR, Burger P, Longmore DB,. 3D cine velocity reconstruction using the method of convex projections. In: CinC Proceedings, London, UK; 1993. pp 361-364.
22. Song SM, Napel S, Glover GH, Pelc NJ,. Noise reduction in three-dimensional phase-contrast MR velocity measurements. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 3: 587-596.
23. Buonocore MH,. Algorithms for improving calculated streamlines in 3-D phase contrast angiography. Magn Reson Med 1994; 31: 22-30.
24. Knutsson H, Westin CF,. Normalized and differential convolution. In: Proceedings of CVPR, New York City, USA; 1993. pp 515-523.
25. Andersson K, Knutsson H,. Continuous normalized convolution. In: Proceedings of IEEE ICME, vol. 721, Lausanne, Switzerland; 2002. pp 725-728.
26. Haraldsson H, Wigstrom L, Lundberg M, Bolger AF, Engvall J, Ebbers T, Kvitting JP,. Improved estimation and visualization of two-dimensional myocardial strain rate using MR velocity mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28: 604-611.
27. Westin C-F, Knutsson H,. Tensor field regularization using normalized convolution. In:, Moreno-Díaz R, Pichler F, editors. Computer aided systems theory-EUROCAST 2003, vol. 2809, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer; 2003. pp 564-572.
28. Westin C-F, Martin-Fernandez M, Alberola-Lopez C, Ruiz-Alzola J, Knutsson H,. Tensor field regularization using normalized convolution and markov random fields in a bayesian framework. In:, Weickert J, Hagen H, editors. Visualization and processing of tensor fields, mathematics and visualization. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer; 2006. pp 381-398.
29. Lowitzsch S,. Approximation and interpolation employing divergence-free radial basis functions with applications. Texas: A&M University Texas; 2002.
30. Skrinjar O, Bistoquet A, Oshinski J, Sundareswaran K, Frakes D, Yoganathan A,. A divergence-free vector field model for imaging applications. In: ISBI I. From Nano to Macro, June 28 2009-July 1 2009; Boston, MA; 2009. pp 891-894. (From Nano to Macro).
31. Bistoquet A, Oshinski J, Skrinjar O,. Myocardial deformation recovery from cine MRI using a nearly incompressible biventricular model. Med Image Anal 2008; 12: 69-85.
32. Ghiglia DC, Pritt, M D,. Two-dimensional phase unwrapping: theory, algorithms and software. New York: Wiley-Interscience; 1998.
33. Cootes TF, Taylor, C.J., Active shape models-smart snakes. In: Proceedings of BMVC, Leeds, UK; 1992.
34. Cootes TF, Edwards GJ, Taylor CJ,. Active appearance models. IEEE TPAMI 2001; 23: 681-685.
35. de Bruijne M, van Ginneken B, Viergever M, Niessen W,. Adapting active shape models for 3D segmentation of tubular structures in medical images. In:, Taylor C, Noble J, editors. Information Processing in Medical Imaging. Vol. 2732, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer; 2003. pp 136-147.