Integrating ICT in business education: Using TPACK to reflect on two course redesigns

Learning at the Crossroads of Theory and Practice: Research on Innovative Learning Practices

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 141-156

  Rienties, Bart ^a   Townsend, Danielle ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886844202     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-2846-2_10     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. Adcroft, A., Teckman, J., & Willis, J. (2010). Is higher education in the UK becoming more competitive? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23(6), 578-588.
2. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1-17.
3. Arts, J. A., Gijselaers, W. H., & Boshuizen, H. (2006). Understanding managerial problem-solving, knowledge use and information processing: Investigating stages from school to the workplace. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(4), 387-410.
4. Belei, N., Noteborn, G., & De Ruyter, K. (2009). Cross-world branding-One world is not enough. In C.Wankel & J. Kingsley (Eds.), Higher education in virtual worlds: Teaching and learning in second life (pp. 115-140). United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing.
5. Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., et al. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379-439.
6. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at University (3rd ed.). Maidenhead:Open University Press.
7. Bohle Carbonell, K., Rienties, B., &Van den Bossche, P. (2011). Transactive memory profiles and their influence on advice seeking. In P.Van den Bossche, W. H. Gijselaers, &R. G. Milter (Eds.), Building learning experiences in a changing world (Vol. 3, pp. 267-283). The Netherlands:Springer.
8. Bok, D. C. (2003). Universities in the marketplace: The commercialization of higher education. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
9. Brouwer, N., Ekimova, L., Jasinska, M., Van Gastel, L., & Virgailaite-Meckauskaite, E. (2009). Enhancing mathematics by online assessments, two cases of remedial education considered. Industry and Higher Education, 23(4), 277-284.
10. Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15-42.
11. D’abate, C. P. (2010). Developmental interactions for business students: Do they make a difference. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 17(2), 143-155.
12. De Laat, M., Lally, V., Lipponen, L., &Simons, R.-J. (2007). Online teaching in networked learning communities:Amulti-method approach to studying the role of the teacher. Instructional Science, 35(3), 257-286.
13. Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P.,&Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning:A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 533-568.
14. Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Gijselaers, W. H., Segers, M.,&Tempelaar, D.T. (2009). Social presence, web-videoconferencing and learning in virtual teams. Industry and Higher Education, 23(4), 301-310.
15. Hmelo-Silver, C. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266.
16. Jang, H., Reeve, J., &Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588-600.
17. Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., & Veermans, M. (2008). Understanding the dynamics of motivation in socially shared learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(2), 122-135.
18. Kahn, B. (2005). Managing e-Learning strategies: Design, delivery, implementation and evaluation. Hershey: Idea Group.
19. Kelly, A. (2004). Design research in education: Yes, but is it methodological? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 115-128.
20. Kirschner, P. A., Beers, P., Boshuizen, H., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2008). Coercing shared knowledge in collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(2), 403-420.
21. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). Teachers learning technology by design. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 21(3), 94-102.
22. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2010). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). http://tpack.org/. Accessed 26 Jan 2011.
23. Lou, Y., Bernard, R.,&Abrami, P. (2006). Media and pedagogy in undergraduate distance education:A theory-based meta-analysis of empirical literature. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(2), 141-176.
24. Luppicini, R. (2007). Review of computer mediated communication research for education. Instructional Science, 35(2), 141-185.
25. Mazzolini, M., & Maddison, S. (2003). Sage, guide or ghost? The effect of instructor intervention on student participation in online discussion forums. Computers & Education, 40(3), 237-253.
26. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152.
27. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
28. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2010). TPACK model. http://tpack.org. Accessed 17 Jan 2012.
29. Nicholls, G. (2001). Developing teaching and learning in higher education. London: Routledge.
30. Pence, C., &Wulf, C. (2009). Innovation in cross border learning. In P. Daly & D. Gijbels (Eds.), Real learning opportunities at business school and beyond (pp. 195-209). Dordrecht: Springer.
31. Reeves, T. C., Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2005). Design research: A socially responsible approach to instructional technology research in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(2), 96-115.
32. Rienties, B., &Tempelaar, D. T. (2009). Mobility of lifelong learners and IT: Introduction to special issue. Industry and Higher Education, 23(4), 265-268.
33. Rienties, B., & Woltjer, G. (2004). Regular online assessment, motivation and learning. Discussion paper, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization. http://edocs.ub.unimaas.nl/loader/file.asp?id=914. Accessed 17 Jan 2012.
34. Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D. T., Dijkstra, J., Rehm, M., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2008). Longitudinal study of online remedial education effects. In N. P. Barsky, M. Clements, J. Ravn, & K. Smith (Eds.), Advances in business education and training 1: The power of technology for learning (pp. 43-59). Dordrecht: Springer.
35. Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D. T., Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W. H., & Segers, M. (2009). The role of academic motivation in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(6), 1195-1206.
36. Rienties, B., Kaper, W., Struyven, K., Tempelaar, D.T., Van Gastel, L., Vrancken, S., et al. (2011). A review of the role of Information Communication Technology and course design in transitional education practices. Interactive Learning Environments. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2010.542757.
37. Schmidt, H. G., Van Der Molen, H. T., Te Winkel, W. W. R., & Wijnen, W. H. F. W. (2009). Constructivist, problem-based learning does work: A meta-analysis of curricular comparisons involving a single medical school. Educational Psychologist, 44(4), 227-249.
38. Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Teunissen, E. (2003). Evaluating the effects of redesigning a problem-based learning environment. Studies In Educational Evaluation, 29, 315-334.
39. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
40. Tempelaar, D. T., Rienties, B., & Giesbers, B. (2009). Who profits most from blended learning? Industry and Higher Education, 23(4), 285-292.
41. Valcke, M., & De Wever, B. (2006). Information and communication technologies in higher education: Evidence-based practices in medical education. Medical Teacher, 28(1), 40-48.
42. Valcke, M., & Martens, R. (2006). The problem arena of researching computer supported collaborative learning: Introduction to the special section. Computers & Education, 46(1), 1-5.
43. Van den Bossche, P., Segers, M., Gijbels, D., &Dochy, F. (2004). Effects of problem-based learning in business education:Acomparison between a PBL and a conventional educational approach. In R. Ottewill, L. Borredon, L. Falque, B. Macfarlane, &A.Wall (Eds.), Educational innovation in economics and business VIII: Pedagogy, technology and innovation (pp. 205-228). Dordrecht:Kluwer.
44. Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W. H., Segers, M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2006). Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments. Team learning beliefs & behaviour. Small Group Research, 37, 490-521.
45. Van der Wende, M. C. (2003). Globalisation and access to higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 7(2), 193-206.
46. Volman, M. (2005). A variety of roles for a new type of teacher: Educational technology and the teaching profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(1), 15-31.
47. Vonderwell, S. (2003). An examination of asynchronous communication experiences and perspectives of students in an online course: A case study. The Internet and Higher Education, 6(1), 77-90.
48. Wang, Q. (2009). Designing a web-based constructivist learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 17(1), 1-13.
49. Woltjer, G. (2004). Crude oil: Using a large case to teach introductory economics. Meteor Research Memorandum, 4(14).