Reflexive professionalism: reclaiming the voice of authority in shaping the discourses of education policy

Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 398-413

  Bourke, Theresa ^a   Ryan, Mary Elizabeth ^a   Lidstone, John ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

archaeology; professional standards; professionalism; reflexivity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886440048     PISSN: 1359866X     EISSN: 14692945     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1359866X.2013.838619     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Archer, M. (2007). Making our way though the world: Human reflexivity and social mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Archer, M. (2010). Introduction: The reflexive re-turn. In M. Archer (Ed.), Conversations about reflexivity (pp. 1-14). London: Routledge.
3. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2011). National professional standards for teachers. Melbourne: Author.
4. Bacchi, C. (2012). Introducing the "What's the problem represented to be"? Approach. In A. Bletsas & C. Beasley (Eds.), Engaging with Carol Bacchi: Strategic interventions and exchanges (pp. 21-24). Adelaide, SA: University of Adelaide Press.
5. Ball, S. (Ed.). (1990). Foucault and education: Disciplines and knowledge. London: Routledge.
6. Ball, S. (1993). What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. Discourse, 13(2), 10-17.
7. Ball, S. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.
8. Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world's best-performing schools come out on top. London: McKinsey and Company.
9. Beck, J. (2009). Appropriating professionalism: Restructuring the official knowledge base of England's "modernised" teaching profession. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30(1), 3-14.
10. Bloomfield, D. (2006, November). A new discourse for teacher professionalism: Ramsey, standards and accountability. Paper presented at the AARE 2006 Conference, Adelaide. Retrieved from http://publications.aare.edu.au/06pap/blo06777.pdf
11. Council of Australian Governments. (2008). National partnership agreement on improving teacher quality. Canberra: Author.
12. Crowley, R. (1998). A class act: An inquiry into the status of the teaching profession. Canberra: Senate Employment Education and Training References Committee.
13. Darling-Hammond, L. (1992). Creating standards of practice and delivery for learner-centred schools. Stanford Law and Policy Review, 4, 37-52.
14. Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Reshaping teaching policy, preparation and practice: Influences on the National Board for Teaching Professional Standards. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
15. Darling-Hammond, L. (2001). Standard setting in teaching: Changes in licensing, certification and assessment. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 751-776). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
16. Dawkins, J. (1988). Strengthening Australia's schools: A consideration of the focus and content of schooling. Canberra: Australian Government.
17. Day, C. (2002). School reform and transitions in teacher professionalism and identity. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(8), 677-692.
18. Department of Employment, Education and Training. (1994). Agreement between the Commonwealth Government and the teaching profession through their unions: Providing for an accord to advance the quality of teaching and learning. Canberra: Author.
19. Dwyer, P.J. (1995). Foucault, docile bodies and post-compulsory education in Australia. British Journal of Sociology, 16(4), 467-477.
20. Evans, L. (2008). Professionalism, professionality and the development of education professionals. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(1), 20-38.
21. Evans, L. (2011). The "shape" of teacher professionalism in England: Professional standards, performance management, professional development and the changes proposed by the 2010 White Paper. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 851-870.
22. Evetts, J. (2009). The management of professionalism: A contemporary paradox. In S. Gewirtz, P. Mahony, I. Hextall, & A. Cribb (Eds.), Changing teacher professionalism: International trends, challenges and ways forward (pp. 19-30). London: Routledge.
23. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock.
24. Foucault, M. (1980). Questions on geography. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977 (pp. 63-77). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
25. Foucault, M. (1984). Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader (pp. 76-100). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
26. Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York, NY: Random House.
27. Freeland, J. (1994, July). Teacher education in the late 1990s: Fighting for a place on the post-pluralist political agenda. Paper presented at the 24th Teacher Education Association (ATEA) Conference, Brisbane.
28. Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism, the third logic: On the practice of knowledge. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
29. Furlong, J., Barton, L., Miles, S., Whiting, C., & Whitty, G. (2000). Teacher education in transition: Reforming professionalism. Buckingham: Open University Press.
30. Gale, T. (1999). Policy trajectories: Treading the discursive path of policy analysis. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 20(3), 393-407.
31. Gale, T. (2007). Critical policy sociology: Historiography, archaeology and genealogy as methods of policy analysis. In S.J. Ball, I.F. Goodson, & M. Maguire (Eds.), Education, globalisation and new times (pp. 148-166). New York, NY: Routledge.
32. Gale, T., & Densmore, K. (2003). Engaging teachers: Towards a radical democratic agenda for schooling. Maidenhead, PA: Open University Press.
33. Gewirtz, S., Mahony, P., Hextall, I., & Cribb, A. (2009). Changing teacher professionalism: International trends, changes and ways forward. London: Routledge.
34. Goode, W.J. (1957). Community within a community: The professions. American Sociological Review, 22(2), 194-200.
35. Goodson, I. (1999, January). Towards a principled professionalism for teaching. Keynote address at the Conference on New Professionalism in Teaching, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
36. Goodson, I. (2000). The principled professional. Prospects, 30(2), 181-188.
37. Goodson, I., & Hargreaves, A. (1996). Teachers' professional lives: Aspirations and actualities. In I.F. Goodson & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teachers' professional lives (pp. 1-27). London: Falmer Press.
38. Hargreaves, A. (2000). Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers and Teaching, 6(2), 151-182.
39. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (1998). What's worth fighting for out there? New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
40. Hargreaves, A., & Lo, L. (2000). The paradoxical profession: Teaching at the turn of the century. Prospects in Education, 30(2), 167-180.
41. Hargreaves, D.H. (1994). The new professionalism: The synthesis of professional and institutional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(4), 423-438.
42. Hattie, J. (2003, October). Teachers make a difference. What is the research evidence? Paper presented at the Australian Council for Educational Research Annual Conference on Building Teacher Quality, Melbourne.
43. Helsby, G. (1995). Teacher's construction of professionalism in England in the 1990s. Journal of Education for Teaching, 21(3), 317-332.
44. Hilferty, F. (2008). Theorising teacher professionalism as an enacted discourse of power. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(2), 161-173.
45. Holroyd, C. (2000). Are assessors professional? Active Learning in Higher Education, 1(1), 28-44.
46. Hoyle, E. (1974). Professionality, professionalism and control in teaching. London Educational Review, 3, 13-19.
47. Ingvarson, L. (1995). Professional credentials: Standards for primary and secondary science teaching in Australia. Canberra: Australian Science Teachers Association.
48. Ingvarson, L. (2010). Recognising accomplished teachers in Australia: Where have we been? Where are we heading? Australian Journal of Education, 54(1), 46-71.
49. Jensen, B. (2010). What teachers want: Better teacher management. Melbourne: Grattan Institute.
50. Leaton Gray, S., & Whitty, G. (2010). Social trajectories or disrupted identities? Changing and competing models of teacher professionalism under New Labour. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(1), 5-23.
51. Mahony, P., & Hextall, I. (2000). Reconstructing teaching: Standards, performance and accountability. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
52. Marginson, S. (1997). Educating Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Marsh, C. (1996). Handbook for beginning teachers. Melbourne: Longman.
54. Marshall, T.H. (1939). The recent history of the professionalism. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 5, 325-340.
55. Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. (2003). A national framework for professional standards for teaching. Melbourne: Author.
56. Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and National Commission on Teaching. (2008). Melbourne declaration on educational goals for young Australians. Melbourne: Author.
57. National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future. New York, NY: Author.
58. O'Farrell, C. (2005). Michel Foucault. London: Sage.
59. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Paris: Author.
60. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009, December). Teacher evaluation: A conceptual framework and examples of country practices. Paper presented at the OECD-Mexico Workshop, towards a teacher evaluation framework in Mexico: International practices, criteria and mechanisms, Mexico City.
61. Ozga, J. (1990). Policy research and policy theory: A comment on Fitz and Halpin. Journal of Education Policy, 5(4), 359-362.
62. Ozga, J. (1995). Deskilling a profession: Professionalism, deprofessionalisation and new managerialism. In H. Busher & R. Saran (Eds.), Managing teachers as professionals in schools (pp. 21-37). London: Kogan Page.
63. Parsons, T. (1954). Essays in sociological theory. Glencoe: Free Press.
64. Purvis, J. (1973). Schoolteaching as a professional career. British Journal of Sociology, 24, 43-57.
65. Queensland College of Teachers. (2006). Professional standards for Queensland teachers. Brisbane: Author.
66. Robertson, S.L. (1996). Teachers' work, restructuring and postFordism: Constructing the new "professionalism". In I. Goodson & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teachers' professional lives (pp. 28-55). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
67. Ryan, M.E., & Bourke, T. (2013). The teacher as reflexive professional: Making visible the excluded discourse in teacher standards. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(3), 411-423.
68. Sachs, J. (2001). Teacher professional identity: Competing discourses, competing outcomes. Journal of Educational Policy, 16(2), 149-161.
69. Sachs, J. (2003). The activist teaching profession. Buckingham: Open University Press.
70. Sachs, J. (2005, August). Professional standards: Quality teachers for the future. Keynote address presented at Sharing Experience: Ways forward on standards conference, hosted by NIQTSL, Hilton Hotel, Melbourne.
71. Scheurich, J. (1994). Policy archaeology: A new policy studies methodology. Journal of Education Policy, 9(4), 297-316.
72. Stinnett, T.M., & Huggett, A.J. (1963). Professional problems of teachers. New York, NY: Macmillan.
73. Swann, M., McIntyre, D., Pell, T., Hargreaves, L., & Cunningham, M. (2010). Teachers' conceptions of teacher professionalism in England in 2003 and 2006. British Educational Research Journal, 36(4), 549-571.
74. Taylor, S. (1997). Critical policy analysis: Exploring contexts, texts and consequences. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 18(1), 23-25.
75. Thomas, S. (2005). Taking teachers out of the equation: Constructions of teachers in education policy documents over a ten-year period. Australian Educational Researcher, 32(3), 45-62.
76. Travers, P.D., & Rebore, R.W. (1990). Foundations of education: Becoming a teacher. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
77. Troman, G. (1996). The rise of the new professionals? The restructuring of primary teachers' work and professionalism. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 17(4), 473-487.
78. Wilensky, H. (1964). Professionalisation for everyone. American Journal of Sociology, 70, 137-158.
79. Winch, C., & Foreman-Peck, L. (2005, May). What do we mean by teachers' professionalism and professional knowledge? How useful are these concepts? Paper presented at the Changing teachers' roles, identities and professionalism seminar series, Seminar 3: Conceptions of professionalism and professional knowledge, King's College, London.
80. Yinger, R., & Hendricks-Lee, M.S. (2000). The language of standards and teacher education reform. Educational Policy, 14(1), 94-106.