Making our way through the world: Human reflexivity and social mobility

Making Our Way Through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-343

  Archer, Margaret S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929025397     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511618932     Document Type: Book

References (166)

1. Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, ch. 2.
2. Samuel C. Riccillo, ‘Phylogenesis: Understanding the Biological Origins of Intrapersonal Communication’, in Donna R. Vocate (ed.), Intrapersonal Communication: Different Voices, Different Minds, Hillsdale, N.J., Lawrence Erlbaum, 1994, p. 36.
3. Colin Campbell, The Myth of Social Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996
4. Gerald E. Myers, ‘Introspection and Self-Knowledge’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 23, 2, April 1986, p. 206.
5. Timothy D. Wilson and Jonathan Schooler, ‘Thinking Too Much: Introspection Can Reduce the Quality of Preferences and Decisions’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 2, 1991.
6. Mark R. Leary, The Curse of the Self, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004, p. 19.
7. Margaret S. Archer, Being Human: the Problem of Agency, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000, ch. 3.
8. For this distinction, see Martin Hollis, Models of Man: Philosophical Thoughts on Social Action, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1977.
9. Harry G. Frankfurt, The Importance of What We Care About, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1988, ch. 7.
10. A. McIntyre, After Virtue, London, Duckworth, 1981, pp. 187ff.
11. Donald Norman, The Psychology of Everyday Things, New York, HarperCollins, 1988.
12. Roy Bhaskar, The Possibility of Naturalism, Hemel Hempstead Harvester, 1989, p. 26.
13. Margaret S. Archer, Culture and Agency: the Place of Culture in Social TheoryCambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998, ch. 5.
14. Margaret S. Archer, ‘Emotions as Commentaries on Human Concerns’, in Jonathan Turner (ed.), Theory and Research on Human Emotions, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2004, pp. 327–56.
15. John Searle, Mind, Language and Society, London,Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1999, p. 43.
16. Margaret S. Archer and Jonathan Q. Tritter (eds.), Rational Choice Theory: Resisting Colonisation, London, Routledge/Taylor and Francis, 2001.
17. Martin Hollis, ‘Honour among Thieves’, Proceedings of the British Academy, 75, 1989, 163–80.
18. Pierre Bourdieu, Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1977
19. Pierre Bourdieu, The Logic of Practice, Oxford, Polity Press, 1990.
20. Andrew Collier, Critical Realism, London, Verso, 1994, pp. 76–85.
21. Margaret S. Archer, Realist Social Theory, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995, p. 201.
22. Charles Taylor, ‘Self-Interpreting Animals’, in his Human Agency and Language, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1985, esp. pp. 65–8.
23. Charles Sanders Peirce, cited in William H. Davies, Peirce’s Epistemology, The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, 1972, p. 63.
24. E. E. Evans-Pritchard, Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic among the Azande, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1937, p. 195.
25. Margaret S. Archer, Culture and Agency: the Place of Culture in Social Theory, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1988, ch. 1
26. Ernest Gellner, Thought and Change, London, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1964, p. 154.
27. Ernest Gellner, ‘Concepts and Society’, in Bryan R. Wilson (ed.), Rationality, Oxford, Blackwell, 1979, p. 44.
28. Lynne Rudder Baker, ‘The First-Person Perspective: A Test for Naturalism’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 35, 4, 1998.
29. Sydney Shoemaker, ‘On Knowing One’s Own Mind’, in his The First-Person Perspectiveand Other Essays, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
30. Margaret S. Archer, Being Human: the Problem of Agency, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000.
31. Nicos Mouzelis, Sociological Theory: What Went Wrong?, London, Routledge, 1995, pp. 101f.
32. H. Garfinkel, Studies in Ethnomethodology, Oxford, Polity Press, 1984.
33. Ulrich Beck, Risk Society:Towards a New Modernity, London, Sage, 1992 (first published in German in 1986)
34. Anthony Giddens, The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1990
35. Scott Lash, ‘Reflexive Modernization: the Aesthetic Dimension’, Theory, Culture and Society, 10, 1, 1993.
36. ‘theory of reflexive modernisation’, Risk Society, p. 87
37. ‘empirically oriented, projective theory’, Risk Society, p. 9
38. Beck et al., Reflexive Modernization, p. 112.
39. ‘intrinsic reflexivity’, Modernity and Self-Identity, p. 19.
40. Beck et al., Reflexive Modernization, p. 175.
41. Beck et al., Reflexive Modernization, p. 20.
42. Ulrich Beck, Cambridge, Polity Press, 2004
43. Beck, Risk Society, p. 12.
44. Beck et al., Reflexive Modernization, p. 6.
45. Ulrich Beck and Elizabeth Beck-Gernsheim, Individualization, London, Sage, 2002, p. 31.
46. Beck and Beck-Gernsheim, Individualization, pp. 23-4
47. G. H. Mead, Mind, Self and Society [1934], Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1974, pp. 113f.
48. J. Baudrillard, ‘On Nihilism’, On the Beach, 6, 1, 1984, p. 24.
49. Beck and Beck-Gernsheim, Individualization, p. 2.
50. Beck, Risk Society, p. 135.
51. Beck and Beck-Gernsheim, Individualization, pp. 49-51
52. Beck and Beck-Gernsheim, Individualization, p. 3.
53. Scott Lash, ‘Pierre Bourdieu: Cultural Economy and Social Change’, in Craig Calhoun, Edward LiPuma and Moishe Postone (eds.), Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives, Oxford, Polity Press, 1993, p. 204
54. Pierre Bourdieu, Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1977, p. 95.
55. Pierre Bourdieu and Loi’c Wacquant, An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, Oxford, Polity Press, 1992, p. 13.
56. Bourdieu, Outline of a Theory of Practice, 72.
57. Bourdieu and Wacquant, An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, p. 122
58. John Dewey, Human Nature and Conduct (1922), New York, Modern Library, 1930 p 190.
59. Richard Jenkins, Pierre Bourdieu, London, Routledge, 1992, p. 95
60. Bourdieu and Wacquant, An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, p. 20.
61. Bourdieu, Outline of a Theory of Practice, p 79.
62. Jenkins, PierreBourdieu, p. 74.
63. Pierre Bourdieu, La Noblesse d’Etat. Grands corps et Grandes ecoles, Paris, Editions de Minuit, 1989, p. 449
64. Pierre Bourdieu, Language and Symbolic Power, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1991, p. 11.
65. Jenkins, Pierre Bourdieu, p. 97.
66. Bourdieu, Outline of a Theory of Practice. 75.
67. Andrew Sayer, The Moral Signifiance of Class, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005, p. 31.
68. Archer, BeingHuman, pp. 177-90.
69. Bourdieu and Wacquant, An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, p. 36.
70. Pierre Bourdieu, Leçon sur la leçon, Paris, Editions de Minuit, 1982, p. 10.
71. Bourdieu and Wacquant, An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, pp. 136-7.
72. Pierre Bourdieu, ‘The Intellectual Field: a World Apart’, ch. 9 in his In Other Words: Essays Towards a Reflexive Sociology, Oxford, Polity Press, 1990
73. Lash, ‘Pierre Bourdieu: Cultural Economy and Social Change’, p. 203.
74. C. Calhoun, ‘Habitus, Field and Capital: the Question of Historical Specificity’, in C. Calhoun et al. (eds.), Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1993, p. 82.
75. Pierre Bourdieu, The Logic of Practice, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1990, p. 54.
76. L. Wacquant, ‘Toward a Reflexive Sociology: a Workshop with Pierre Bourdieu’, SociologicalTheory, 7, 1, 1989, p. 36.
77. Jenkins, Pierre Bourdieu, p. 77.
78. Archer, Culture and Agency, pp. 209-73
79. Henry Teune and Z. Mlinar, The Developmental Logic of Social Systems, London and Beverly Hills, Sage, 1978.
80. Paul Sweetman, ‘Twenty-first Century Dis-ease? Habitual Reflexivity or the Reflexive Habitus’, The Sociological Review, 51, 4, 2003, p. 538
81. Sweetman, ‘Twenty-first Century Dis-ease?’, p. 530.
82. Mouzelis, ‘Habitus and Reflexivity’, p. 5
83. James Ostrow, ‘Culture as a Fundamental Dimension of Experience: a Discussion of Pierre Bourdieu’s Theory of Human Habitus’, in Derek Robbins (ed.), Pierre Bourdieu, Vol. I, London, Sage, 2000
84. John H. Gagnon, ‘The Self, its Voices, and their Disaccord’, in Carolyn Ellis and Michael Flahery (eds.), Investigating Subjectivity, Newbury Park, Calif. and London, Sage, 1992, pp. 232-8.
85. George Steiner, ‘The Distribution of Discourse’, in his On Difficulty and Other Essays, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1978, p. 94.
86. L. S. Vygotsky, Thought and Language (1934), Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, 1964, p. 153
87. Margaret S. Archer, Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003, ch. 1.
88. Brian Tomlinson, ‘Talking to Youself: the Role of the Inner Voice in Language Learning’, Applied Language Learning, 11, 1, 2000, p. 123.
89. Margaret S. Archer, Being Human: the Problem of Agency, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000, ch. 7.
90. Hollis, Models of Man, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1977.
91. Michael Siegrist, ‘Inner Speech as a Cognitive Process Mediating Self-consciousness and Inhibiting Self-deception’, Psychological Reports, 76, 1995, p. 260.
92. Plato, Theaetetus, ed. Bernard Williams, Cambridge and Indianapolis, Hackett, 1992, 18
93. Archer, Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation, pp. 95-107.
94. B.L. Van der Waerden, ‘Denken ohne Sprache’, Acta Psychologica, 10, 1-2, 1954.
95. A. Einstein, Ideas and Opinions, New York, Crown, 1954, p. 336.
96. E. Buyssens, ‘Speaking and Thinking from the Linguistic Standpoint’, Acta Psychologica, 10, 1-2, 1954, pp. 164f.
97. N. Mex., University of New Mexico Press, 1985, p. 213
98. Hannah Arendt, The Life of the Mind, Orlando, Fla., Harcourt Brace, 1978, p. 189.
99. A. N. Sokolov, Inner Speech and Thought, New York, Plenum Press, 1972, p. 1.
100. G. H. Mead, ‘1927 Class Lectures in Social Psychology’, in D. L. Miller (ed.), The Individual and the Social Self, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1982, p. 136
101. Vygotsky, Thought and Language, p. 141.
102. Sokolov, Inner Speech, pp. 120-1.
103. Sokolov, Inner Speech, pp. 259-63
104. James Blachowicz, ‘The Dialogue of the Soul with Itself’, in Shaun Gallagher and Jonathan Shear (eds.), Models of the Self, Exeter, Imprint Academic, 1999.
105. Tomlinson, ‘Talking to Yourself’, p. 125
106. S. Pinker, The Language Instinct, London, Penguin, 1994.
107. Norbert Wiley, The Semiotic Self, Oxford, Polity Press, 1994
108. Donald Davidson,‘First-Person Authority’, Dialectica, 38, 2-3, 1984, p. 110.
109. William Alston, ‘Varieties of Privileged Access’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 8, 3, 1971.
110. Vygotsky, Thought and Language, p. 145
111. G. H. Mead, Movements of Thought in the Nineteenth Century, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1936, p. 381
112. Sokolov, InnerSpeech, pp. 121-2.
113. Wiley,‘The Sociology of Inner Speech’, p. 8
114. Sokolov, Inner Speech and Thought, p. 260.
115. R.J. Korba,‘The Rate of Inner Speech’, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, 1990, 1043-52.
116. Alistair Mutch, ‘Review’, Journal of Critical Realism, 3, 2, 2004, 384-9.
117. Tomlinson,‘Talking to Yourself’, p. 125
118. Wiley, ‘The Sociology of Inner Speech’, p. 7.
119. Blachowicz,‘The Dialogue of the Soul with Itself’, p. 190
120. Sokolov, InnerSpeech, p. 115
121. J. Coulter, The Social Construction of Mind, London, Macmillan, 1979, pp. 56-61
122. Rom Harre, The Singular SefJLondon and Beverly Hills, Sage, 1998, pp. 143f.
123. G. F. Lahey, Gerard Manley Hopkins, London, Oxford University Press, 1930, p. 22
124. Tomlinson, ‘Talking to Yourself’, p. 131.
125. Wiley,‘The Sociology of Inner Speech’, p. 26
126. Vygotsky, Thought and Language, p. 139.
127. J. Flavell, The Development of Role-taking and Communication Skills in Children, New York.
128. Wiley,‘The Sociology of Inner Speech’, p. 18
129. Harry G. Frankfurt, ‘Identification and Wholeheartedness’, in his The Importance of What We Care About, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1988, p. 170.
130. John R. Searle, The Rediscovery of the Mind, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, 1999
131. Margaret S. Archer, Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 157f
132. V. Porpora, Landscapes of the Soul: the Loss of Moral Meaning in American Life, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001
133. T. D. Wilson and J. W. Schooler, ‘Thinking Too Much: Introspection Can Reduce the Quality of Preferences and Decisions’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 2, 1991, 181-92
134. Richard Rohr and Andreas Ebert, The Enneagram: a Christian Perspective 1989, New York, Crossroad Publishing, 2004, p. 63
135. Archer, Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation, pp. 278-88.
136. Margaret S. Archer, Being Human: the Problem of Agency, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000
137. J. W. N. Watkins, ‘Methodological Individualism and Social Tendencies’, in May Brodbeck (ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences, New York, Macmillan, 1968.
138. Margaret S. Archer, Realist Social Theory: the Morphogenetic Approach, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 257-74
139. Margaret S. Archer, Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003
140. Andrew Sayer, The Moral Significance of Class, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 111-38
141. N. J. Demerath and R. A. Peterson (eds.), System, Change and Conflict, New York, Free Press/Collier Macmillan, 1967
142. Margaret S. Archer, ‘Emotions as Commentaries on our Concerns’, in Jonathan H. Turner (ed.), Theory and Research on Human Emotions, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2004.
143. Margaret S. Archer, Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 333-41
144. P. Weiss, Cambridge, Mass., Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1934-9, vol. VI, p. 286.
145. William H. Davies, Peirce’s Epistemology, The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, 1972, p. 63.
146. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. VI, p. 286
147. Margaret S. Archer, Being Human: the Problem of Agency, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000, ch. 7, pp. 230-41
148. Martin Hollis, Models of Man: Philosophical Thoughts on Social Action, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1977
149. Margaret S. Archer, Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 189f
150. M. Young and P. Willmott, Family and Kinship in East London, Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1962
151. Archer, Being Human, ch. 9
152. Margaret S. Archer, ‘Objectivity and the Growth of Knowledge’, in Margaret S. Archer and William Outhwaite (eds.), Defending Objectivity: Essays in Honour of Andrew Collier, London, Taylor and Francis, 2003, pp. 117-28.
153. Mind, Language and Society, London, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1999, p. 43.
154. Archer, Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation, pp. 214-20.
155. Margaret S. Archer and Edmond Malinvaud (eds.), The Future of Labour and Labour in the Future, Vatican City, Vatican City Press, 1998
156. Karl Popper, Objective Knowledge, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1972, pp. 298f.
157. Margaret S. Archer, ‘The Myth of Cultural Integration’, British Journal of Sociology, 36, 1985, 333-53
158. Gary Becker, Accounting for Tastes, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1996, pp. 229f
159. R. Stark and R. Finke, Acts of Faith: Explaining the Human Side of Religion, Berkley, University of California Press, 2000
160. Archer, Being Human, pp. 197-221
161. Margaret S. Archer, Realist Social Theory: the Morphogenetic Approach, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995, ch. 8, pp. 247-57
162. P. Donati, ‘L’analisi sociologica del terzo settore: introdurre la distinzione relazionale terzo settore/privato sociale’, in G. Rossi (ed.), Terzo settore, stato e mercato nella trasfor-mazione dellepolitiche sociali in Europa, Milan, Angeli, 1997, pp. 255-95
163. P. Donati, ‘Giving and Social Relations’, International Review of Sociology, 13, 2, 2003, 243-72
164. Beck and Beck-Gernsheim, Individualization, p. viii (my italics)
165. Johnson, ‘Intrapersonal Spoken Language’, p. 186
166. Jarcher, Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation, pp. 278-88.