Midterm outcomes of electromagnetic computer-assisted navigation in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Thiengwittayaporn, Satit ^a   Kanjanapiboonwong, Auttakorn ^a   Junsee, Detchart ^b  

^a NAVAMINDRADHIRAJ UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^b Sing Buri Hospital   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Electromagnetic computer assisted navigation; Midterm follow up; Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty; Outcomes

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84886231147     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1749799X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1749-799X-8-37     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bonutti PM, Mont MA, McMahon M, Ragland PS, Kester M. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86-A(Suppl 2):26-32.
2. Seyler TM, Bonutti PM, Ulrich SD, Fatscher T, Marker DR, Mont MA. Minimally invasive lateral approach to total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:21-26.
3. Tria AJ. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: the importance of instrumentation. Orthop Clin North Am 2004, 35:227-234. 10.1016/S0030-5898(03)00118-4, 15062708.
4. Tanavalee A, Thiengwittayaporn S, Itiravivong P. Progressive quadriceps incision during minimally invasive surgery for total knee arthroplasty: the effect on early postoperative ambulation. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:1013-1018. 10.1016/j.arth.2006.11.007, 17920474.
5. Chin PL, Yang KY, Yeo SJ, Lo NN. Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:618-626. 10.1016/j.arth.2005.04.004, 16309998.
6. Ensini A, Catani F, Leardini A, Romagnoli M, Giannini S. Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 457:156-162.
7. Seon JK, Song EK. Navigation-assisted less invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty: a randomized prospective trial. J Arthroplasty 2006, 21:777-782. 10.1016/j.arth.2005.08.024, 16950026.
8. Fu Y, Wang M, Liu Y, Fu Q. Alignment outcomes in navigated total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012, 20:1075-1082. 10.1007/s00167-011-1695-6, 22002300.
9. Hetaimish BM, Khan MM, Simunovic N, Al-Harbi HH, Bhandari M, Zalzal PK. Meta-analysis of navigation vs conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2012, 27:1177-1182. 10.1016/j.arth.2011.12.028, 22333865.
10. Zamora LA, Humphreys KJ, Watt AM, Forel D, Cameron AL. Systematic review of computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. ANZ J Surg 2013, 83:22-30. 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06255.x, 22984894.
11. Decking R, Markmann Y, Fuchs J, Puhl W, Scharf HP. Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:282-288. 10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.047, 15809943.
12. Stulberg SD, Loan P, Sarin V. Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002, 84-A(Suppl 2):90-98.
13. Dutton AQ, Yeo SJ, Yang KY, Lo NN, Chia KU, Chong HC. Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90:2-9.
14. Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989, doi:10.1097/00003086-198911000-00003.
15. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989, doi:10.1097/00003086-198911000-00004.
16. Tashiro Y, Miura H, Matsuda S, Okazaki K, Iwamoto Y. Minimally invasive versus standard approach in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 463:144-150.
17. Chin PL, Foo LS, Yang KY, Yeo SJ, Lo NN. Randomized controlled trial comparing the radiologic outcomes of conventional and minimally invasive techniques for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:800-806. 10.1016/j.arth.2006.10.009, 17826268.
18. Huang HT, Su JY, Chang JK, Chen CH, Wang GJ. The early clinical outcome of minimally invasive quadriceps-sparing total knee arthroplasty: report of a 2-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:1007-1012. 10.1016/j.arth.2007.03.021, 17920473.
19. King J, Stamper DL, Schaad DC, Leopold SS. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with traditional total knee arthroplasty: assessment of the learning curve and the postoperative recuperative period. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:1497-1503. 10.2106/JBJS.F.00867, 17606788.
20. Hoppe S, Mainzer JD, Frauchiger L, Ballmer PM, Hess R, Zumstein MA. More accurate component alignment in navigated total knee arthroplasty has no clinical benefit at 5-year follow-up. Acta Orthop 2012, 83:629-633. 10.3109/17453674.2012.747923, 3555448, 23140107.
21. Kamat YD, Aurakzai KM, Adhikari AR, Matthews D, Kalairajah Y, Field RE. Does computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty improve patient outcome at midterm follow-up?. Int Orthop 2009, 33:1567-1570. 10.1007/s00264-008-0690-0, 2899163, 19034445.
22. Choong PF, Dowsey MM, Stoney JD. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24:560-569. 10.1016/j.arth.2008.02.018, 18534397.
23. Hafez MA, Jaramaz B, DiGioia A. Computer-assisted knee surgery: an overview. Insall & Scott Surgery of the Knee 2006, 1655-1674. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, Norman Scott W, 4.
24. Lionberger DR. Electromagnetic Computer-assisted Navigation 2012, Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier.