A cluster randomized controlled trial of strategies to increase adolescents' physical activity and motivation in physical education: Results of the Motivating Active Learning in Physical Education (MALP) trial

Preventive Medicine

Volumn 57, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 696-702

  Lonsdale, Chris ^a   Rosenkranz, Richard R ^a,b   Sanders, Taren ^a   Peralta, Louisa R ^c   Bennie, Andrew ^a   Jackson, Ben ^d   Taylor, Ian M ^e   Lubans, David R ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^e LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Autonomy support; Health behavior; Intervention; Sedentary behavior; Self determination theory

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETER; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; LEARNING; MOTIVATION; PERCEPTION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PHYSICAL EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SATISFACTION; SEDENTARY LIFESTYLE; STUDENT; TEACHER;

AUTONOMY SUPPORT; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; INTERVENTION; SEDENTARY BEHAVIOR; SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT PSYCHOLOGY; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHILD; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MALE; MOTIVATION; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NEW SOUTH WALES; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEDENTARY LIFESTYLE;

EID: 84885852763     PISSN: 00917435     EISSN: 10960260     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Aelterman N., Vansteenkiste M., Van Keer H., Van den Berghe L., De Meyer J., Haerens L. Students' objectively measured physical activity levels and engagement as a function of between-class and between-student differences in motivation toward physical education. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2012, 34:457.
2. Assor A., Kaplan H., Roth G. Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students engagement in schoolwork. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 2002, 72:261-278.
3. Assor A., Roth G., Deci E.L. The emotional costs of parents' conditional regard: a self-determination theory analysis. J. Pers. 2004, 72:47-88.
4. Campbell M.K., Elbourne D.R., Altman D.G. CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ 2004, 328:702-708.
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Strategies to improve the quality of physical education 2010, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/physicalactivity/pdf/quality_pe.pdf on Sept 18, 2013.
6. Chatzisarantis N.L.D., Hagger M.S. Effects of an intervention based on self-determination theory on self-reported leisure-time physical activity participation. Psychol. Health 2008, 24:29-48.
7. Chatzisarantis N.L., Hagger M.S., Kamarova S., Kawabata M. When effects of the universal psychological need for autonomy on health behaviour extend to a large proportion of individuals: a field experiment. Br. J. Health Psychol. 2012, 17:785-797.
8. Cheon S.H., Reeve J., Moon I.S. Experimentally based, longitudinally designed, teacher-focused intervention to help physical education teachers be more autonomy supportive toward their students. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2012, 34:365-396.
9. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1988, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J. 2nd ed.
10. Crawford D. The future of sport in Australia 2009, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.
11. Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol. Inq. 2000, 11:227-268.
12. Dimmock J.A., Jackson B., Podlog L., Magaraggia C. The effect of variety expectations on interest, enjoyment, and locus of causality in exercise. Motiv. Emot. 2013, 37:146-153.
13. Edmunds J. Adherence and well-being in overweight and obese patients referred to an exercise on prescription scheme: a self-determination theory perspective. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2007, 8:722-740.
14. Fairclough S., Stratton G. Physical activity levels in middle and high school physical education: a review. Pediatr. Exerc. Sci. 2005, 17:217.
15. Fairclough S.J., Stratton G. A review of physical activity levels during elementary school physical education. J. Teach. Phys. Educ. 2006, 25:239-257.
16. Gillison F.B., Standage M., Skevington S.M. The effects of manipulating goal content and autonomy support climate on outcomes of a PE fitness class. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2013, 14:342-352.
17. Guay F., Vallerand R.J., Blanchard C. On the assessment of situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: the Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS). Motiv. Emot. 2000, 24:175-213.
18. Hagger M.S., Chatzisarantis N., Barkoukis V., Wang C.K.J., Baranowski J. Perceived autonomy support in physical education and leisure-time physical activity: a cross-cultural evaluation of the trans-contextual model. J. Educ. Psychol. 2005, 97:376-390.
19. Halas J. Questioning our assumptions: unconventional lessons from the "Swamp of Practice". J. Phys. Educ. Recreat. Dance 2004, 75:14-21.
20. Hardy L.L., King L., Espinel P., Cosgrove C., Bauman A. NSW Schools Physical Activity and Nutrition Survey (SPANS): full report 2010, NSW Ministry of Health, Sydney.
21. Jaakkola T., Liukkonen J., Laakso T., Ommundsen Y. The relationship between situational and contextual self-determined motivation and physical activity intensity as measured by heart rates during ninth grade students' physical education classes. Eur. Phys. Educ. Rev. 2008, 14:13.
22. Jang H., Reeve J., Deci E.L. Engaging students in learning activities: it is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. J. Educ. Psychol. 2010, 102:588-600.
23. Katz I., Assor A. When choice motivates and when it does not. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 2007, 19:429-442.
24. Lonsdale C., Sabiston C.M., Raedeke T.D., Ha A.S., Sum R.K. Self-determined motivation and students' physical activity during structured physical education lessons and free choice periods. Prev. Med. 2009, 48:69-73.
25. Lonsdale C., Sabiston C.M., Taylor I.M., Ntoumanis N. Measuring student motivation for physical education: examining the psychometric properties of the Perceived Locus of Causality Questionnaire and the Situational Motivation Scale. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2011, 12:284-292.
26. Lonsdale C., Rosenkranz R.R., Peralta L.R., Bennie A., Fahey P., Lubans D.R. A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions designed to increase moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in school physical education lessons. Prev. Med. 2013, 152-161.
27. McAuley E., Duncan T., Tammen V.V. Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: a confirmatory factor analysis. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 1989, 60:48.
28. Monti B. Appropriate practices for high school physical education. National Association for Sport and Physical Education, an Association of the American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance 2004.
29. Ng J.Y.Y., Lonsdale C., Hodge K. The Basic Needs Satisfaction in Sport Scale (BNSSS): instrument development and initial validity evidence. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2011, 12:257-264.
30. Office for Standards in Education Children's Services, Skills Beyond 2012-Outstanding Physical Education for all: Physical Education in Schools, Manchester, UK 2013.
31. Patall E.A., Cooper H., Robinson J.C. The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: a meta-analysis of research findings. Psychol. Bull. 2008, 134:270-300.
32. Perlman D.J. The influence of the social context on students' in-class physical activity. J. Teach. Phys. Educ. 2013, 32:46-60.
33. Richer S.F., Vallerand R.J. Construction et validation de l'Echelle du Sentiment d'Appartenance Sociale (ESAS). Eur. Rev. Appl. Psychol. 1998, 48:129-137.
34. Rosenkranz R.R., Lubans D.R., Peralta L.R., Bennie A., Sanders T., Lonsdale C. A cluster-randomized controlled trial of strategies to increase adolescents' physical activity and motivation during physical education lessons: the Motivating Active Learning in Physical Education (MALP) trial. BMC Publ. Health 2012, 12:834.
35. Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. Overview of self-determination theory: an organismic dialectical perspective. Handbook of self-determination research 2002, 3-33. The University of Rochester Press, Rochester, NY. E.L. Deci, R.M. Ryan (Eds.).
36. Standage M., Gillison F. Students' motivational responses toward school physical education and their relationship to general self-esteem and health-related quality of life. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2007, 8:704-721.
37. Standage M., Duda J.L., Ntoumanis N. A model of contextual motivation in physical education: using constructs from self-determination and achievement goal theories to predict physical activity intentions. J. Educ. Psychol. 2003, 95:97.
38. Su Y.L., Reeve J. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intervention programs designed to support autonomy. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 2011, 23:159-188.
39. Taylor I.M., Lonsdale C. Cultural differences in the relationships among autonomy support, psychological need satisfaction, subjective vitality, and effort in British and Chinese physical education. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2010, 32:655-673.
40. Taylor I.M., Ntoumanis N., Smith B. The social context as a determinant of teacher motivational strategies in physical education. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2009, 10:235-243.
41. US Department of Health and Human Services Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report 2008, Washington, DC.
42. Vansteenkiste M., Simons J., Soenens B., Lens W. How to become a perservering exerciser? Providing a clear, future intrinsic goal in an autonomy-supportive way. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2004, 26:232-249.
43. Ward J., Wilkinson C., Graser S.V., Prusak K.A. Effects of choice on student motivation and physical activity behavior in physical education. J. Teach. Phys. Educ. 2008, 27:385-398.