The impacts of goal orientation, terminology effect, and source credibility on communication effectiveness

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 43, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 2007-2016

  Kao, Danny Tengti ^a  

^a NATIONAL TSING HUA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84885834126     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: 15591816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jasp.12154     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Arnold, M. J., & Reynolds, K. E. (2009). Affect and retail shopping behavior: Understanding the role of mood regulation and regulatory focus. Journal of Retailing, 85, 308-320.
2. Beaulieu, P. (2001). The effects of judgments of new clients' integrity upon risk judgments, audit evidence, and fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 20(2), 85-99.
3. Beaulieu, P. R., & Rosman, A. J. (2003). How does negative source credibility affect commercial lenders' decisions? Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research, 6, 79-94.
4. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). Attention and self-regulation: A control-theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
5. Chaiken, S., & Maheswaran, D. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 460-473.
6. Chebat, J., Filiatrault, P., & Perrien, J. (1990). Limits of credibility: The case of political persuasion. Journal of Social Psychology, 130, 157-167.
7. Chernev, A. (2004). Goal orientation and consumer preference for the status quo. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 557-565.
8. Chuang, S. C., Tsai, C. C., Cheng, Y. H., & Sun, Y. C. (2009). The effect of terminologies on attitudes toward advertisements and brands: Consumer product knowledge as a moderator. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24, 485-491.
9. Chung, C., & Tsai, Q. (2009). The effects of regulatory focus and tie strength on word-of-mouth behavior. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 21, 329-341.
10. Clow, K. E., & Baack, D. (2004). Integrated advertising, promotions, and marketing communications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
11. Clow, K. E., Fames, K. E., Kranenburg, K. E., & Berry, C. T. (2006). The relationship of the visual elements of an advertisement to service quality expectations and source credibility. Journal of Services Marketing, 20, 404-411.
12. Crowe, E., & Higgins, T. E. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 117-132.
13. DeShields, O. W., Jr., & Kara, A. (2000). The persuasive effect of spokesperson similarity moderated by source credibility. American Marketing Association Conference Proceedings, 11(Summer), 132-138.
14. Frey, K. P., & Eagly, A. H. (1993). Vividness can undermine the persuasiveness of messages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 32-44.
15. Goldberg, M. E., & Hartwick, J. (1990). The effects of advertiser reputation and extremity of advertising claim on advertising effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 172-179.
16. Goldsmith, R. E., Lafferty, B. A., & Newell, S. J. (2000). The impact of corporate credibility and celebrity credibility on consumer reactions to advertisements and brands. Journal of Advertising, 29, 43-54.
17. Gotlieb, J. B., Schlacter, J. L., & St. Louis, R. D. (1992). Consumer decision making: A model of the effects of involvement, source credibility, and location on the size of the price difference required to induce consumers to change suppliers. Psychology and Marketing, 9, 191-208.
18. Harmon, R. R., & Coney, K. A. (1982). The persuasive effects of source credibility in buy and lease situations. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 255-260.
19. Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300.
20. Higgins, T. E. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55, 1217-1230.
21. Higgins, T. E. (2002). How self-regulation creates distinct values: The case of promotion and prevention decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12, 177-191.
22. Hong, C. (2002). The influence of the terminology to the customer's attitude and purchase intension: The interfering effect of the product's innovativeness. Master's thesis, Department of Business Administration, Fu-jen University, Taiwan.
23. Jain, S. P., Agrawal, N., & Maheswaran, D. (2006). When more may be less: The effects of regulatory focus on responses to different comparative frames. Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 91-98.
24. Jain, S. P., Lindsey, C., Agrawal, N., & Maheswaran, D. (2007). For better or for worse? Valenced comparative frames and regulatory focus. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 57-65.
25. Kelman, H. C. (1961). Processes of opinion change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 25, 57-78.
26. Kim, Y. J. (2006). The role of regulatory focus in message framing in antismoking advertisements for adolescents. Journal of Advertising, 35, 143-151.
27. Lafferty, B. A., & Goldsmith, R. E. (1999). Corporate credibility's role in consumer attitudes and purchase intentions when a high versus a low credibility endorser is used in the ad. Journal of Business Research, 44, 109-116.
28. Lafferty, B. A., Goldsmith, R. E., & Newell, S. J. (2002). The dual credibility model: The influence of corporate and endorser credibility on attitudes and purchase intentions. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 10, 1-13.
29. Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 205-218.
30. Liberman, N., Idson, L. C., Camacho, C. J., & Higgins, T. E. (1999). Promotion and prevention choices between stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1135-1145.
31. Liberman, N., Molden, D. C., Idson, L. C., & Higgins, T. E. (2001). Promotion and prevention focus on alternative hypotheses: Implications for attributional functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 5-18.
32. Lin, C. H., Wu, P. H., Chuang, S. C., & Kao, D. T. (2007). Price as a quality or sacrifice cue: Role of goal orientation. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 179-187.
33. Lockwood, P., Jordan, C., & Kunda, Z. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 854-864.
34. Meeds, R. (1998). Technically speaking: A content analysis of technical language, explanatory context, and information cues in magazine advertising. In D. D. Muehling (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1998 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising (p. 87). Pullman, WA: Washington State University.
35. Micu, C. C., & Chowdhury, T. G. (2010). The effect of message's regulatory focus and product type on persuasion. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 18, 181-190.
36. Mourali, M., Bockenholt, U., & Laroche, M. (2007). Compromise and attraction effects under prevention and promotion motivations. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 234-247.
37. Neufeld, D. J., Wan, Z., & Fang, Y. (2010). Remote leadership, communication effectiveness, and leadership performance. Group Decision and Negotiation, 19, 227-246.
38. Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
39. Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure perceived celebrity endorsers' perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19, 39-52.
40. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1979). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 847-855.
41. th ed., pp. 323-390). New York: McGraw-Hill.
42. Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades' evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 243-281.
43. Shedler, J., & Manis, M. (1986). Can the availability heuristic explain vividness effects? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 26-36.
44. Tamir, M. (2005). Don't worry, be happy? Neuroticism, trait-consistent affect regulation, and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 663-677.
45. Taylor, S. E., & Wood, J. V. (1983). The vividness effect: Making a mountain out of a molehill? Advances in Consumer Research, 10, 540-542.
46. Tormala, Z. L., Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2007). Multiple roles for source credibility under high elaboration: It is all in the timing. Social Cognition, 25, 536-552.
47. Wu, P. H., & Kao, D. T. (2011). Goal orientation and variety seeking behavior: The role of decision task. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 65-72.