A QUEST FOR ‘GOOD’ RESEARCH: The Mathematics Teacher Educator as Practitioner Researcher in a Community of Inquiry

The Mathematics Teacher Educator as a Developing Professional: Individuals, Teams, Communities and Networks: Volume 4

Volumn 4, Issue , 2008, Pages 201-220

  Goodchild, Simon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AGDER   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84885650910     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (51)

1. Becker, J. P., & Jacob, B. (1998, June). Math war developments in the United States (California). The International Commission on Mathematical Instruction Bulletin 44. Retrieved May 11, 2007, from http://www.mathunion.org/ICMI/bulletin/44/MathWar.html
2. Bishop, A. J. (1998). Research, effectiveness, and the practitioners’ world. In A. Sierpinska & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics Education as a research domain: A search for identity. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
3. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
4. Cochran Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24, 249-305.
5. Department for Education and Employment (1982). Mathematics counts: Report of the committee of Inquiry into the teaching and learning of mathematics in schools under the chairmanship of Dr. W. H. Cockcroft. London: The Stationary Office.
6. Elliott, J., & Sarland, C. (1995). A Study of ‘Teachers as researchers’ in the context of award-bearing courses and research degrees. British Educational Research Journal 21(3), 371-386.
7. Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth UK: Penguin.
9. Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting Mathematics Education: China Lectures. Hingham, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
10. Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. London: Falmer.
11. Furlong, J., & Salisbury, J. (2005). Best Practice Research Scholarships: an evaluation. Research Papers in Education 20(1), 45-83.
12. Goodchild, S. (1987). An evaluation of a curriculum development project in mathematics. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of London.
13. Goodchild, S. (1996). Learner empowerment through a problem-centred course. Mathematics Education Review 7, 8-16.
14. Goodchild, S. (2001). Students' Goals: A case study of activity in a mathematics classroom. Bergen, Norway: Caspar Forlag.
15. Goos, M. (2004). Learning mathematics in a community of inquiry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 35, 258-291.
16. Gravemeijer, K. (1994). Educational development and developmental research in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 25, 443-471.
17. Hardy, G. H. & Wright, E. M. (1960). An introduction to the theory of numbers. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
18. Hargreaves, D. (1996). Teaching as a research-based profession. Teacher Training Agency Annual Lecture. London.
19. Hiebert, J. (Ed.). (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics. Hilsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Hostetler, K. (2005). What is “good” educational research? Educational Researcher, 34(6), 16-21.
21. Huberman, M. (1999). The mind is its own place: The influence of sustained interactivity with practitioners on educational researchers. Harvard Educational Review, 69(3), 289-319.
22. Jaworski, B. (1994). Investigating Mathematics Teaching: A constructivist enquiry. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
23. Jaworski, B. (1998). Mathematics teacher research: Process, practice and the development of teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 1, 3-31.
24. Jaworski, B. (2003). Inquiry as a pervasive pedagogic process in mathematics education development. Paper presented at CERME3 Working Group 11, European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, Bellaria, Italy. Retrieved June 29, 2007, from http://ermeweb.free.fr/CERME3/Groups/TG11/TG11_Jaworski_cerme3.pdf
25. Jaworski, B. (2004a). Grappling with complexity: Co-learning in inquiry communities in mathematics teaching development. In M. Johnsen Høines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education: Vol. 1 (pp. 17-36). Bergen, Norway: Bergen University College.
26. Jaworski, B. (2004b). Insiders and outsiders in mathematics teaching development: The design and study of classroom activity. In O. Macnamara & R. Barwell (Eds.), Research in Mathematics Education: Papers of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 6, 3-22.
27. Jaworski, B. (2005). Learning communities in mathematics: Creating an inquiry community between teachers and didacticians. In R. Barwell and A. Noyes (Eds.), Research in mathematics education: Papers of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 7, 101-119.
28. Jaworski, B. (2006a). Theory and practice in mathematics teaching development: Critical inquiry as a mode of learning in teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 9, 187-211.
29. Jaworski, B. (2006b). Developmental research in mathematics teaching and learning: Developing learning communities based on inquiry and design. In P. Liljedahl (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2006 annual meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group. Calgary, Canada: University of Calgary.
30. Jaworski, B. (2007). Theory in developmental research in mathematics teaching and learning: Social practice theory and community of inquiry as analytical tools. Paper presented at CERME5 Working Group 11, European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, Larnaca, Cyprus.
31. Jaworski, B., & Goodchild, S. (2006). Inquiry community in an activity theory frame. In J. Navotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká & N. Stehliková (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education: Vol. 3 (pp. 353-360). Prague Czech Republic: Charles University in Prague.
32. Jaworski, B., Fuglestad, A. B., Bjuland, R., Breiteig, T., Goodchild, S., & Grevholm, B. (Eds.). (2007). Læringsfellesskap i matematikk/Learning communities in mathematics. Bergen, Norway: Caspar forlag.
33. Jørgensen, K. O., & Goodchild, S. (2007). Å utvikle barns forståelse av matematikk. [To develop children’s understanding of mathematics] Tangenten, 1/2007. 35-40 & 49.
34. Klein, D. (2007). A quarter century of US ‘math wars’ and political partisanship. BSHM Bulletin: Journal of the British Society for the History of Mathematics, 22(1), 22-33.
35. Lo, M. L. Marton, F., Pang, M. F., & Pong, W. Y. (2004). Toward a pedagogy of learning. In F. Marton & A. B. M. Tsui, (Eds.), Classroom discourse and the space of learning (pp. 189-225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36. Pring, R. (2004). Philosophy of educational research. (2nd ed.). London: Continuum.
37. Roth, W-M., & Lee, Y-J. (2007). “Vygotsky’s neglected legacy”: Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77(2), 186-232.
38. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1996). In fostering communities of inquiry, must it matter that the teacher knows “the answer”? For the Learning of Mathematics, 16(3), 11-16.
39. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2004). The math wars. Educational Policy, 18, 253-286.
40. Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching 77, 20-26.
41. Skemp, R. R. (1982). Communicating mathematics: Surface structures and deep structures. Visible Language 16(3), 281-288.
42. Steen, L. A. (1999). Theories that gyre and gimble in the wabe. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 30(2), 235-242.
43. Steinbring, H. (1998). Elements of epistemological knowledge for mathematics teachers. Journal for Mathematics Teacher Education 1, 157-189.
44. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: The Free Press.
45. Van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In J. v. d. Akker, R. M. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 1-14). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
46. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. Wagner, J. (1997). The unavoidable intervention of educational research: A framework for reconsidering researcher-practitioner cooperation. Educational Researcher 26(7), 13-22.
49. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
51. Zack, V., Mousley, J., & Breen, C. (1997). Developing practice: Teachers' inquiry and educational change. Geelong, Australia: Centre for Studies in Mathematics, Science and Environmental Education, Deakin University.