Incentive loss and hippocampal gene expression in inbred Roman high- (RHA-I) and Roman low- (RLA-I) avoidance rats

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 257, Issue , 2013, Pages 62-70

  Sabariego, Marta ^a   Morón, Ignacio ^b   Gómez, M José ^a   Donaire, Rocío ^a   Tobeña, Adolf ^c   Fernández Teruel, Alberto ^c   Martínez Conejero, José A ^d   Esteban, Francisco J ^a   Torres, Carmen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JAÉN   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^c INSTITUT DE NEUROCIÈNCIES   (Spain)

^d IGenomix   (Spain)

Author keywords

CDNA microarray; Frustration; Gene expression; Hippocampus; Roman rat; RT PCR

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ANXIETY; ANXIETY DISORDER; ARTICLE; AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPRESSION; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DRUG DEPENDENCE; EXPERIMENTAL TEST; FOOD DEPRIVATION; FRUSTRATION; GENE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE FUNCTION; GENE IDENTIFICATION; HIPPOCAMPUS; INSTRUMENTAL SUCCESSIVE NEGATIVE CONTRAST; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; NANOS GENE; NONHUMAN; PKD2L1 GENE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; RAT STRAIN; REWARD; ROMAN RAT; SCHIZOPHRENIA; STRAIN DIFFERENCE; TAAR2 GENE; THAP1 GENE; TRAINING;

CDNA MICROARRAY; FRUSTRATION; GENE EXPRESSION; HIPPOCAMPUS; ROMAN RAT; RT-PCR;

ANIMALS; ANXIETY; AVOIDANCE LEARNING; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; FOOD DEPRIVATION; FRUSTRATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HIPPOCAMPUS; MALE; MOTIVATION; NERVE TISSUE PROTEINS; RATS; RATS, INBRED STRAINS; RECEPTORS, G-PROTEIN-COUPLED; RNA-BINDING PROTEINS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; TRPP CATION CHANNELS;

EID: 84885397768     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: 18727549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.09.025     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Wang H., Zhu Y., Wong P., Farook J., Teo A., Lee L., et al. cDNA microarray analysis of gene expression in anxious PVG and SD rats after cat-freezing test. Exp Brain Res 2003, 149:413-421.
2. Scully J.A., Tosi H., Banning K. Life event checklists: revisiting the social Readjustment Rating Scale after 30 years. Educ Psychol Meas 2000, 60:864-876.
3. Leslie J.C., Shaw D., McCabe C., Reynolds D.S., Dawson G.R. Effects of drugs that potentiate GABA on extinction of positively-reinforced operant behaviour. Neurosci Biobehav R 2004, 28:229-238.
4. Pellegrini S., Muzio R.N., Mustaca A.E., Papini M.R. Successive negative contrast after partial reinforcement in the consummatory behavior of rats. Learn Motiv 2004, 35:303-321.
5. Flaherty C.F. Incentive contrast and selected animal models of anxiety. Current topics in animal learning: brain, emotion, and cognition 1991, 207-243.
6. Pellegrini S., Mustaca A. Consummatory successive negative contrast with solid food. Learn Motiv 2000, 3:200-209.
7. Mitchell C.P., Flaherty C.F. Differential effects of removing the glucose or saccharin components of a glucose-saccharin mixture in a successive negative contrast paradigm. Physiol Behav 2005, 84:579-583.
8. Crespi L.P. Quantitative variation of incentive and performance in the white rat. Am J Psychol 1942, 55:467-517.
9. Cross H.A., Boyer W.N. Evidence of a primary frustration effect following quality reduction in the double runway. J Exp Psychol Anim B 1974, 102:1069-1075.
10. Elliott M.H. The effect of change of reward on the maze performance of rats. A preliminary study in discrimination of maze patterns by the rat, 4(1-21) 1928, 19.
11. Mustaca A.E., Bentosela M., Papini M.R. Consummatory successive negative contrast in mice. Learn Motiv 2000, 31:272-282.
12. Papini M.R. Comparative psychology of surprising nonreward. Brain Behav Evol 2003, 62:83-95.
13. Flaherty C.F. Incentive relativity 1996, Cambridge University Press, New York.
14. Cándido A., Maldonado A., Megías J.L., Catena A. Successive negative contrast in one-way avoidance learning in rats. Q J Exp Psychol-B 1992, 45:15-32.
15. Black R.W. Shifts in magnitude of reward and contrast effects in instrumental and selective learning: a reinterpretation. Psychol Rev 1968, 75:114.
16. Capaldi E. The sequential view: from rapidly fading stimulus traces to the organization of memory and the abstract concept of number. Psychon B Rev 1994, 1:156-181.
17. Capaldi E.J., Lynch D. Repeated shifts in reward magnitude: evidence in favor of an associational and absolute (noncontextual) interpretation. J Exp Psychol Anim B 1967, 75:226-235.
18. Amsel A. The role of frustrative nonreward in noncontinuous reward situations. Psychol Bull 1958, 55:102-119.
19. Gray J.A. The psychology of fear and stress 1987, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.
20. Papini M.R. Role of surprising nonreward in associative learning. Jpn J Anim Psychol 2006, 56:35-54.
21. Ruetti E., Justel N. Bases Neurobiológicas de la Frustración. RACC 2010, 2:45-60.
22. Flaherty C.F., Coppotelli C., Hsu D., Otto T. Excitotoxic lesions of the hippocampus disrupt runway but not consummatory contrast. Behav Brain Res 1998, 93:1-9.
23. Leszczuk M.H., Flaherty C.F. Lesions of nucleus accumbens reduce instrumental but not consummatory negative contrast in rats. Behav Brain Res 2000, 116:61-79.
24. Liao R.M., Chuang F.J. Differential effects of diazepam infused into the amygdala and hippocampus on negative contrast. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2003, 74:953-960.
25. Sastre A., Reilly S. Excitotoxic lesions of the gustatory thalamus eliminate consummatory but not instrumental successive negative contrast in rats. Behav Brain Res 2006, 170:34-40.
26. Pecoraro N., Dallman M.F. c-fos after incentive shifts: expectancy, incredulity, and recovery. Behav Neurosci 2005, 119:366-387.
27. Driscoll P., Bättig K. Behavioral emotional and neurochemical profiles of rats selected for extreme differences in active, two-way avoidance performance 1982, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
28. Escorihuela R.M., Fernández-Teruel A., Gil L., Aguilar R., Tobeña A., Driscoll P. Inbred Roman high- and low-avoidance rats: differences in anxiety, novelty-seeking and shuttlebox behaviours. Physiol Behav 1999, 67:19-26.
29. Driscoll P., Fernández-Teruel A., Corda M.G., Giorgi O., Steimer T. Some guidelines for defining personality differences in rats. Handbook of behavior genetics 2009, Springer, New York. K. Yong-Kyu (Ed.).
30. Rosas J.M., Callejas-Aguilera J.E., Escarabajal M.D., Gómez M.J., de la Torre L., Agüero A., et al. Successive negative contrast effect in instrumental runway behaviour: a study with Roman high- (RHA) and Roman low- (RLA) avoidance rats. Behav Brain Res 2007, 185:1-8.
31. Torres C., Cándido A., Escarabajal M.D., de la Torre L., Maldonado A., Tobeña A., et al. Successive negative contrast in one-way avoidance learning in female Roman rats. Physiol Behav 2005, 85:377-382.
32. Gómez M.J., Escarabajal M.D., de la Torre L., Tobeña A., Fernández-Teruel A., Torres C. Consummatory successive negative and anticipatory contrast effects in inbred Roman rats. Physiol Behav 2009, 97:374-380.
33. Gómez M.J., de la Torre L., Callejas-Aguilera J.E., Rosas J.M., Escarabajal M.D., Agüero Á., et al. Differences in extinction of an appetitive instrumental response in female inbred Roman high- (RHA-I) and low- (RLA-I) avoidance rats. Psicológica 2009, 30:181-188.
34. Coppens C.M., de Boer S.F., Steimer T., Koolhaas J.M. Correlated behavioral traits in rats of the roman selection lines. Behav Genet 2013, 1-7.
35. Gómez M.J., de la Torre L., Callejas-Aguilera J.E., Lerma-Cabrera J.M., Rosas J.M., Escarabajal M.D., et al. The partial reinforcement extinction effect (PREE) in female Roman high- (RHA-I) and low-avoidance (RLA-I) rats. Behav Brain Res 2008, 194:187-192.
36. Cuenya L., Sabariego M., Donaire R., Fernández-Teruel A., Tobeña A., Gómez M.J., et al. The effect of partial reinforcement on instrumental successive negative contrast in inbred Roman high- (RHA-I) and low- (RLA-I) avoidance rats. Physiol Behav 2012, 105:1112-1116.
37. Sabariego M., Gómez M.J., Morón I., Torres C., Fernández-Teruel A., Tobeña A., et al. Differential gene expression between inbred Roman high- (RHA-I) and low- (RLA-I) avoidance rats. Neurosci Lett 2011, 504:265-270.
38. Blázquez-Romero G., Díaz-Morán S., Palència M., Mont-Cardona C., Cañete T., Martinez-Membrives E., et al. Hippocampal gene expression profile in inbred Roman high- (RHA-I) and low- (RLA-I) avoidance rats. Poster presented at the FENS Forum of Neuroscience VIII 2012.
39. García-Falgueras A., Castillo-Ruiz M.M., Put T., Tobeña A., Fernández-Teruel A. Differential hippocampal neuron density between inbred Roman high- (low anxious) and low-avoidance (high anxious) rats. Neurosci Lett 2012, 26(522):41-46.
40. Hou Y.Y., Liu Y., Kang S., Yu C., Chi Z.Q., Liu J.G. Glutamate receptors in the dorsal hippocampus mediate the acquisition, but not the expression, of conditioned place aversion induced by acute morphine withdrawal in rats. Acta Pharm Sinic 2009, 30:1385-1391.
41. Mei B., Chuxia L., Dong S., Jiang C.H., Wang H., Hu Y. Distinct gene expression profiles in hippocampus and amygdala after fear conditioning. Brain Res Bull 2005, 67:1-12.
42. Wang J., Wang Y.H., Hou Y.Y., Liu Y., Liu Y.G. The small GT PaseRhoA, but not Rac1, is essential for conditioned aversive memory formation through regulation of actin rearrangements in rat dorsal hippocampus. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2013, 34:811-818.
43. Fernández-Teruel A., Escorihuela R.M., Gray J.A., Aguilar R., Gil L., Giménez-Llort L., et al. A quantitative trait locus influencing anxiety in the laboratory rat. Genome Res 2002, 12:618-626.
44. Zhang S., Amstein T., Shen J., Brush F.R., Gershenfeld H.K. Molecular correlates of emotional learning using genetically selected rat lines. Genes Brain Behav 2005, 4:99-109.
45. Yalcin B., Willis-Owen S.A.G., Fullerton J., Meesaq A., Deacon R.M., Rawlins J.N.P., et al. Genetic dissection of a behavioral quantitative trait locus shows that Rgs2 modulates anxiety in mice. Nat Genet 2004, 36:1197-1202.
46. Smoller J.W., Paulus M.P., Fagerness J.A., Purcell S., Yamaki L.H., Hirshfeld-Becker D., et al. Influence of RGS2 on anxiety-related temperament, personality, and brain function. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2008, 65:298-308.
47. Borowsky B., Adham N., Jones K.A., Raddatz R., Artymyshyn R., Ogozalek K.L., et al. Trace amines: identification of a family of mammalian G protein-coupled receptors. PNAS 2001, 98:8966-8971.
48. Bunzow J.R., Sonders M.S., Arttamangkul S., Harrison L.M., Zhang G., Quigley D.I., et al. Amphetamine, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, lysergic acid diethylamide, and metabolites of the catecholamine neurotransmitters are agonists of a rat trace amine receptor. Mol Pharmacol 2001, 60:1181-1188.
49. Berry M. The potential of trace amines and their receptors for treating neurological and psychiatric diseases. Rev Recognit Clin Trials 2007, 2:3-19.
50. Xie Z., Miller G.M. Trace amine-associated receptor 1 as a monoaminergic modulator in brain. Biochem Pharmacol 2009, 78:1095-1100.
51. Bly M. Examination of the trace amine-associated receptor 2 (TAAR2). Schizophr Res 2005, 80:367-368.
52. Janssen P.A., Leysen J.E., Megens A.A., Awouters F.H. Does phenylethylamine act as an endogenous amphetamine in some patients?. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 1999, 2:229-240.
53. O'reilly R.L., Davis B.A. Phenylethylamine and schizophrenia. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psych 1994, 18:63-75.
54. Lindemann L., Hoener M.C. A renaissance in trace amines inspired by a novel GPCR family. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2005, 26:274-281.
55. Sabelli H., Mosnaim A., Vázquez A. Phenylethylamine: possible role in depression and antidepressive drug action. Advances in behavioral biology 1974, Vol. 10:331-357. Springer, New York.
56. Baker G.B., Bornstein R., Rouget A., Ashton S., Van Muyden J., Coutts R. Phenylethylaminergic mechanisms in attention-deficit disorder. Biol Psychiatry 1991, 29:15-22.
57. Kusaga A., Yamashita Y., Koeda T., Hiratani M., Kaneko M., Yamada S., et al. Increased urine phenylethylamine after methylphenidate treatment in children with ADHD. Ann Neurol 2002, 52:372-374.
58. Lewin A.H. Receptors of mammalian trace amines. AAPS J 2006, 8:E138-E145.
59. Borison R.L., Sabelli H.C., Maple P.J., Havdala H.S., Diamond B.I. Lithium prevention of amphetamine-induced 'manic' excitement and of reserpine-induced 'depression' in mice: possible role of 2-phenylethylamine. Psychopharmacology 1978, 59:259-262.
60. Greenshaw A. β-Phenylethylamine and reinforcement. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 1984, 8:615-620.
61. Shannon H.E., Thompson W.A. Behavior maintained under fixed-interval and second-order schedules by intravenous injections of endogenous noncatecholic phenylethylamines in dogs. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1984, 228:691-695.
62. Reynolds G.P. Phenylethylamine - a role in mental illness?. Trends Neurosci 1979, 2:265-268.
63. Branchek T.A., Blackburn T.P. Trace amine receptors as targets for novel therapeutics: legend, myth and fact. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2003, 3:90-97.
64. Baumeister A.A., Hawkins M.F., Uzelac S.M. The myth of reserpine-induced depression: role in the historical development of the monoamine hypothesis. J Hist Neurosci 2003, 12:207-220.
65. Boulton A., Juorio A., Philips S., Wu P. The effects of reserpine and 6-hydroxydopamine on the concentrations of some arylalkylamines in rat brain. Br J Pharmacol 1977, 59:209-214.
66. Szabo A., Billett E., Turner J. Phenylethylamine, a possible link to the antidepressant effects of exercise?. Br J Sport Med 2001, 35:342-343.
67. Lapin I.P. Beta-phenylethylamine (PEA): an endogenous anxiogen? Three series of experimental data. Biol Psychiatry 1990, 28:997-1003.
68. Paulos M.A., Tessel R.E. Excretion of beta-phenethylamine is elevated in humans after profound stress. Science 1982, 215:1127-1129.
69. D'Angio M., Serrano A., Driscoll P., Scatton B. Stressful environmental stimuli increase extracellular DOPAC levels in the prefrontal cortex of hypoemotional (Roman high-avoidance) but not hyperemotional (Roman low-avoidance) rats. An in vivo voltammetric study. Brain Res 1988, 45:237-247.
70. Giménez-Llort L., Cañete T., Guitart-Masip M., Fernández-Teruel A., Tobeña A. Two distinctive apomorphine-induced phenotypes in the Roman high- and low-avoidance rats. Physiol Behav 2005, 86:458-466.
71. Giorgi O., Orlandi M., Escorihuela R., Driscoll P., Lecca D., Corda M. GABAergic and dopaminergic transmission in the brain of Roman high-avoidance and Roman low-avoidance rats. Brain Res 1994, 638:133-138.
72. Giorgi O., Lecca D., Piras G., Driscoll P., Corda M. Dissociation between mesocortical dopamine release and fear-related behaviours in two psychogenetically selected lines of rats that differ in coping strategies to aversive conditions. Eur J Neurosci 2003, 17:2716-2726.
73. Guitart-Masip M., Johansson B., Fernández-Teruel A., Cañete T., Tobeña A., Terenius L., et al. Divergent anatomical pattern of D1 and D3 binding and dopamine- and cyclic AMP-regulated phosphoprotein of 32kDa mRNA expression in the Roman rat strains: implications for drug addiction. Neuroscience 2006, 142:1231-1243.
74. Guitart-Masip M., Johansson B., Fernández-Teruel A., Tobeña A., Giménez-Llort L. Divergent effect of the selective D3 receptor agonist pd-128,907 on locomotor activity in Roman high- and low-avoidance rats: relationship to NGFI-A gene expression in the Calleja islands. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2008, 196:39-49.
75. Piras G., Giorgi O., Corda M.G. Effects of antidepressants on the performance in the forced swim test of two psychogenetically selected lines of rats that differ in coping strategies to aversive conditions. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2010, 211:403-414.
76. Fernández-Teruel A., Blázquez G., Pérez M., Aguilar R., Cañete T., Guitart M., et al. Latent inhibition threshold in Roman high-avoidance rats: a psychogenetic model of abnormalities in attentional filter?. Actas Esp Psiquiatr 2006, 34:257-263.
77. Aguilar R., Escorihuela R.M., Gil L., Tobeña A., Fernández-Teruel A. Differences between two psychogenetically selected lines of rats in a swimming pool matching-to-place task: long-term effects of infantile stimulation. Behav Genet 2002, 32:127-134.
78. Fernández-Teruel A., Escorihuela R.M., Castellano B., González B., Tobeña A. Neonatal handling and environmental enrichment effects on emotionality, Novelty/Reward seeking, and age-related cognitive and hippocampal impairments: focus on the Roman rat lines. Behav Genet 1997, 27:513-526.
79. López-Aumatell R., Blázquez G., Gil L., Aguilar R., Cañete T., Giménez-Llort L., et al. The Roman high- and low-avoidance rat strains differ in fear-potentiated startle and classical aversive conditioning. Psicothema 2009, 21:27-32.
80. López-Aumatell R., Vicens-Costa E., Guitart-Masip M., Martínez-Membrives E., Valdar W., Johannesson M., et al. Unlearned anxiety predicts learned fear: a comparison among heterogeneous rats and the Roman rat strains. Behav Brain Res 2009, 24(202):92-101.
81. Martin J.R., Bättig K. Acquisition and extinction of gustatory aversion in two lines of rats selectively bred for differential shuttlebox avoidance performance. Behav Process 1980, 5:303-310.
82. Corda M.G., Piras G., Lecca D., Fernández-Teruel A., Driscoll P., Giorgi O. The psychogenetically selected Roman rat lines differ in the susceptibility to develop amphetamine sensitization. Behav Brain Res 2005, 157:147-156.
83. Lecca D., Piras G., Driscoll P., Giorgi O., Corda M.G. A differential activation of dopamine output in the shell and core of the nucleus accumbens is associated with the motor responses to addictive drugs: a brain dialysis study in Roman high- and low-avoidance rats. Neuropharmacology 2004, 46:688-699.
84. Peterson D.A., Sejnowski T.J., Poizner H. Convergent evidence for abnormal striatal synaptic plasticity in dystonia. Neurobiol Dis 2010, 37:558-573.
85. Moreno M., Cardona D., Gómez M.J., Sánchez-Santed F., Tobeña A., Fernández-Teruel A., et al. Impulsivity characterization in the Roman high- and low-avoidance rat strains: behavioral and neurochemical differences. Neuropsychopharmacology 2010, 35:1198-1208.
86. Gavarini S., Cayrol C., Fuchs T., Lyons N., Ehrlich M.E., Girard J., et al. Direct interaction between causative genes of DYT1 and DYT6 primary dystonia. Ann Neurol 2010, 68:549-553.
87. Kaiser F.J., Osmanoric A., Rakovic A., Erogullari A., Uflacker N., Braunholz D., et al. The dystonia gene DYT1 is repressed by the transcription factor THAP1 (DYT6). Ann Neurol 2010, 68:554-559.
88. Yokoi F., Dang M.T., Miller C.A., Marshall A.G., Campbell S.L., Sweatt J.D., et al. Increased c-fos expression in the central nucleus of the amygdala and enhancement of cued fear memory in Dyt1 δGAG knock-in mice. Neurosci Res 2009, 65:228-235.
89. Horio N., Yoshida R., Yasumatsu K., Yanagawa Y., Ishimaru Y., Matsunami H. PKD2L1 is associated with the sour taste transduction. Neurosci Res 2010, 68:e385.
90. Razafimanalina R., Mormede P., Velley L. Gustatory preference-aversion profiles for saccharin, quinine and alcohol in Roman high-and low-avoidance lines. Behav Pharmacol 1996, 7:78-84.
91. Haraguchi S., Tsuda M., Kitajima S., Sasaoka Y., Nomura-Kitabayashid A., Kurokawa K., et al. nanos1: a mouse nanos gene expressed in the central nervous system is dispensable for normal development. Mech Dev 2003, 120:721-731.
92. Díaz-Morán S., Palència M., Mont-Cardona C., Cañete T., Blázquez G., Martínez-Membrives E., et al. Gene expression in amygdala as a function of differential trait anxiety levels in genetically heterogeneous NIH-HS rats. Behav Brain Res 2013, 252:422-431.