Consummatory successive negative and anticipatory contrast effects in inbred Roman rats

Physiology and Behavior

Volumn 97, Issue 3-4, 2009, Pages 374-380

  Gómez, Ma José ^a   Escarabajal, Ma Dolores ^a   de la Torre, Lourdes ^a   Tobeña, Adolf ^b   Fernández Teruel, Alberto ^b   Torres, Carmen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JAÉN   (Spain)

^b Institute of Neurosciences   (Spain)

Author keywords

Anxiety; Contrast; Emotionality; Fear; Frustration; Reward reduction paradigms; Roman rats

Indexed keywords

SUCROSE;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANTICIPATORY ANXIETY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMOTIONALITY; FEMALE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; RAT STRAIN; STRAIN DIFFERENCE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; CONSUMMATORY BEHAVIOR; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; EXTINCTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; RATS; RATS, INBRED STRAINS; REACTION TIME; REWARD; SUCROSE; SWEETENING AGENTS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 67349231803     PISSN: 00319384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. McDonald G., and Leary M.R. Why does social exclusion hurt? The relationship between social and physical pain. Psychol Bull 131 (2005) 202-223
2. McNaughton N., and Corr P.J. A two-dimensional neuropsychology of defense: fear/anxiety and defensive distance. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 28 (2004) 285-305
3. Papini M.R., Wood M., Daniel A.M., and Norris J.N. Reward loss as psychological pain. Inter J Psych Psychol Ther 6 2 (2006) 189-213
4. Papini M.R. Comparative psychology of surprising nonreward. Brain Behav Evol 62 (2003) 83-95
5. Amsel A. The role of frustrative nonreward in noncontinuous reward situations. Psychol Bull 55 (1958) 102-119
6. Pellegrini S., Muzio R.N., Mustaca A.E., and Papini M.R. Successive negative contrast after partial reinforcement in the consummatory behavior of rats. Learn Motiv 35 (2004) 303-321
7. Flaherty C.F. Incentive relativity (1996), Cambridge University Press, New York
8. Gray J.A. The Psychology of fear and stress (1987), CUP, Cambridge
9. Gray J.A., and McNaughton N. The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system (2000), Oxford University Press, New York
10. Amsel A. Frustration Theory: An analysis of dispositional learning and memory (1992), CUP, New York
11. Papini M.R. Role of surprising nonreward in associative learning. Jpn J Anim Psychol 56 1 (2006) 35-54
12. Gray J.A. Précis of the neuropsychology of anxiety: an enquiry into the functions of the septohippocampal system. Behav Brain Sci 5 (1982) 469-534
13. Escorihuela R.M., Fernández-Teruel A., Gil L., Aguilar R., Tobeña A., and Driscoll P. Inbred Roman High- and Low- Avoidance rats: differences in anxiety, novelty-seeking and shuttlebox behaviors. Physiol Behav 67 1 (1999) 19-26
14. Driscoll P., and Bättig K. Behavioral, emotional and neurochemical profiles of rats selected for extreme differences in active, two-way active performance. In: Lieblich I. (Ed). Genetics of the Brain (1982), Elsevier, Amsterdam 95-123
15. Driscoll P., Escorihuela R.M., Fernández-Teruel A., Giorgi O., Schwegler H., Steimer Th., et al. Genetic selection and differential stress responses: the Roman lines/strains of rats. Ann NY Acad Sci (1998) 501-510
16. Torres C., Cándido A., Escarabajal M.D., de la Torre L., Maldonado A., Tobeña A., et al. Successive negative contrast effect in one-way avoidance learning in female roman rats. Physiol Behav 85 (2005) 377-382
17. Rosas J.M., Callejas-Aguilera J.E., Escarabajal M.D., Gómez M.J., de la Torre L., Agüero A., et al. Successive negative contrast effect in instrumental runway behaviour: a study with Roman high- (RHA) and Roman low- (RLA) avoidance rats. Behav Brain Res 185 (2007) 1-8
18. Carrasco J., Márquez C., Nadal R., Tobeña A., Fernández-Teruel A., and Armario A. Characterization of central and peripheral components of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis in the inbred Roman rats strains. Psychoneuroendocrinology 33 (2008) 437-445
19. P. Driscoll, A. Fernández-Teruel, M. Corda, O. Giorgi, T. Steimer. Some guidelines for defining personality differences in rats. In: Yong-Kyu K, editors. Handbook of Behavior Genetics, vol. III. New York: Springer; 2009. pp. 281-300.
20. Steimer T., and Driscoll P. Divergent stress responses and coping styles in psychogenetically selected Roman high-(RHA-I) and low-(RLA) avoidance rats: behavioural, neuroendocrine and developmental aspects. Stress 6 2 (2003) 87-100
21. Steimer T., and Driscoll P. Inter-individual vs line/strain differences in psychogenetically selected Roman High- (RHA-I) and Low- (RLA) Avoidance rats: neuroendocrine and behavioural aspects. Neurosci Biobehav Res 29 (2005) 99-112
22. Gómez M.J., de la Torre L., Callejas-Aguilera J.E., Rosas J.M., Escarabajal M.D., Agüero A., et al. Differences in extinction of an appetitive instrumental response in female Roman High (RHA) and Low Avoidance (RLA) rats. Psicológica 30 (2009) 179-186
23. Gómez M.J., de la Torre L., Callejas-Aguilera J.E., Lerma J.M., Rosas J.M., Escarabajal M.D., et al. The Partial Reinforcement Extinction Effect (PREE) in female Roman High (RHA-I) and Low Avoidance (RLA-I) rats. Behav Brain Res 194 (2008) 187-192
24. Norris J.N., Daniel A.M., and Papini M.R. Spontaneous recovery of consummatory behaviour, but not of consummatory successive negative contrast. Learn Motiv 39 4 (2008) 296-312
25. Flaherty C.F., and Rowan G.A. Rats (Rattus norvegicus) selectively bred to differ in avoidance behavior also differ in response to novelty stress, in glycemic conditioning, and in reward contrast. Behav Neural Biol 51 (1989) 145-164
26. Rowan G.A., and Flaherty C.F. Behavior of Maudsley reactive and nonreactive rats (Rattus norvergicus) in three consummatory contrast paradigms. J Comp Psychol 105 (1991) 115-124
27. Flaherty C.F., and Mitchell C. Absolute and relative rewarding properties of fructose, glucose and saccharin mixtures as reflected in anticipatory contrast. Physiol Behav 66 5 (1999) 841-853
28. Flaherty C.F., Turovsky J., and Krauss K.L. Relative hedonic value modulates anticipatory contrast. Physiol Behav 55 6 (1994) 1047-1054
29. Aguilar R., Gil L., Tobeña A., Escorihuela R.M., and Fernández-Teruel A. Differential effects of cohort removal stress on the acoustic startle response of the Roman/Verh rat strains. Behav Genet 30 1 (2000) 71-75
30. Fernández-Teruel A., Driscoll P., Gil L., Aguilar R., Tobeña A., and Escorihuela R.M. Enduring effects of environmental enrichment on novelty seeking, sacharin and ethanol intake in two rat lines (RHA/Verh and RLA/Verh) differing in incentive-seeking behavior. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 73 (2002) 225-231
31. Martin J.R., and Bättig K. Acquisition and extinction of gustatory aversion in two lines of rats selectively bred for differential shuttlebox avoidance performance. Behav Process 5 (1980) 303-310
32. Razafimanalina R., Mormède P., and Velley L. Gustatory preference-aversion profiles for saccharin, quinine and alcohol in Roman high- and low- avoidance lines. Behav Pharmacol 7 1 (1996) 78-84
33. Giorgi O., Piras G., and Corda M.G. The psychogenetically selected Roman high and low-avoidance rat lines: a model to study the individual vulnerability to drug addiction. Neurosci Biobehav Res 31 (2007) 148-163
34. Martel P., and Fantino M. Mesolimbic dopaminergic system as a function of food reward: a microdialysis study. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 53 1 (1996) 221-226
35. Dilollo F.D., and Beez V. Negative contrast effect as a function of magnitude of reward decrement. Psychon Sci 5 (1966) 99-100
36. Papini M.R., and Pellegrini S. Scaling relative incentive value in consummatory behaviour. Learn Motiv 37 (2006) 357-378
37. Pellegrini S., and Mustaca A. Consummatory successive negative contrast with solid food. Learn Motiv 31 (2000) 200-209
38. Salinas J.A., and Huff N.C. Lead and conditioned fear to contextual and discrete cues. Neurotoxicol Teratol 24 (2002) 541-550
39. Flaherty C.F., and Checke S. Anticipation of incentive gain. Anim Learn Behav 10 (1982) 177-182
40. Leszczuk M., and Flaherty C.F. Lesions of nucleus accumbens reduce instrumental but not consummatory negative contrast in rats. Behav Brain Res 116 (2000) 61-79
41. Becker H.C. Comparison of the effects of the benzodiacepine midazolam and three serotonin antagonists on a consummatory conflict paradigm. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 24 (1986) 1057-1064
42. Becker H.C., and Flaherty C.F. Chlordiazepoxide and ethanol additively reduce gustatory negative contrast. Psychopharmacology 80 (1982) 35-37
43. Flaherty C.F., Grigson P., and Rowan G.A. Chlordiazepoxide and the determinants of contrast. Anim Learn Behav 14 (1986) 315-321
44. Leslie J.C., Shaw D., McCabe C., Reynolds D.S., and Dawson G.R. Effects of drugs that potentiate GABA on extinction of positively-reinforced operant behaviour. Neurosci Biobehav Res 28 (2004) 229-238
45. Rosen A.J., and Tessel R.E. Chlorpromazine, chlordiazepoxide and incentive-shift performance in the rat. J Comp Physiol Psychol 72 (1970) 257-262
46. Wood M.D., Norris J.N., Daniel A.M., and Papini M.R. Trial-selective effects of U50,488H, a K{green}-opioid receptor agonist, on consummatory successive negative contrast. Behav Brain Res 193 (2008) 28-36
47. Ortega L.A., and Papini M.R. El estudio del contraste entre incentivos: la contribución de Abram Amsel. Rev Latinoam Psicol 39 3 (2007) 609-621
48. Abler B., Walter H., and Erk S. Neural correlates of frustration. Neuroreport 16 (2005) 669-672
49. Becker H.C., Jarvis M., Wagner G., and Flaherty C.F. Medial and lateral amygdala lesions differentially influence contrast with sucrose solutions. Physiol Behav 33 (1984) 707-712
50. Genn R.F., Ahn S., and Phillips A.G. Attenuated dopamine efflux in the rat nucleus accumbens during successive negative contrast. Behav Neurosci 118 (2004) 869-873
51. Gómez M.J., Morón I., Torres C., Esteban F., de la Torre L., Cándido A., et al. One-way avoidance acquisition and cellular density in the basolateral amygdala: strain differences in Roman High- and Low-Avoidance rats. Neurosci Lett 450 (2009) 317-320
52. Liao R.M., and Chuang F.J. Differential effects of diazepam infused into the amygdala and hippocampus on negative contrast. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 74 (2003) 953-960
53. Pecoraro N., and Dallman M.F. C-Fos after incentive shifts: expectancy, incredulity and recovery. Behav Neurosci 119 (2005) 366-387
54. Flaherty C.F., Becker H.C., and Pohorecky L.A. Correlation of corticosterone elevation and negative contrast varies as a function of postshift day. Anim Learn Behav 13 (1985) 309-314
55. Mitchell C., and Flaherty C.F. Temporal dynamics of corticosterone elevation in successive negative contrast. Physiol Behav 64 (1998) 287-292
56. Romero L.M., Levine S., and Sapolsky R.M. Adrenocorticotropine secretation release: stimulation by frustration and paradoxically by reward presentation. Brain Res 676 (1995) 151-156