The effect of partial reinforcement on instrumental successive negative contrast in inbred Roman High- (RHA-I) and Low- (RLA-I) Avoidance rats

Physiology and Behavior

Volumn 105, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1112-1116

  Cuenya, L ^a   Sabariego, M ^b   Donaire, R ^b   Fernandez Teruel A ^c   Tobena A ^c   Gomez M J ^b   Mustaca, A ^a   Torres, C ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JAÉN   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Anxiety; Partial reinforcement; Roman rat; Successive negative contrast

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; INSTRUMENTAL SUCCESSIVE NEGATIVE CONTRAST; MALE; NONHUMAN; PARTIAL REINFORCEMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; RAT STRAIN; REINFORCEMENT; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; AVOIDANCE LEARNING; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; EMOTIONS; FRUSTRATION; RATS; RATS, INBRED STRAINS; RATS, WISTAR; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); SELECTION, GENETIC; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84855772827     PISSN: 00319384     EISSN: 1873507X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.12.006     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Driscoll P., Bättig K. Behavioral, emotional and neurochemical profiles of rats selected for extreme differences in active, two-way avoidance performance. Genetics of the Brain 1982, 95-123. Elsevier Biomedical Press, Amsterdam. I. Lieblich (Ed.).
2. Escorihuela R.M., Fernández-Teruel A., Tobeña A., Langhans W., Bättig P., Driscoll P. Labyrinth exploration, emotional reactivity, and conditioned fear in young Roman/Verh Inbred rats. Behav Genet 1997, 27(6):573-578.
3. Driscoll P., Fernández-Teruel A., Corda M.G., Giorgi O., Steimer T. Some guidelines for defining personality differences in rats. Handbook of behavior genetics 2009, 281-300. Springer. K. Yong-Kyu (Ed.).
4. Ferré P., Fernández-Teruel A., Escorihuela R.M., Driscoll P., Corda M.G., Giorgi O., et al. Behavior of Roman/Verh High- and Low-Avoidance rat lines in anxiety tests: relationship with defecation and self-grooming. Physiol Behav 1995, 58(6):1209-1213.
5. López-Aumatell R., Blázquez G., Gil L., Aguilar R., Cañete T., Giménez-Llort L., et al. The Roman High- and Low-Avoidance rat strains differ in fear-potentiated startle and classical aversive conditioning. Psicothema 2009, 21(1):27-32.
6. Torres C., Cándido A., Escarabajal M.D., de la Torre L., Maldonado A., Tobeña A., et al. One-way avoidance learning and diazepam in female Roman High- and Roman Low-avoidance rats. Behav Pharmacol 2007, 8(3):251-253.
7. Gómez M.J., Morón I., Torres C., Esteban F.J., de la Torre L., Cándido A., et al. One-way avoidance acquisition and cellular density in the basolateral amygdala: strain differences in Roman high- and low-avoidance rats. Neurosci Lett 2009, 450(3):317-320.
8. Morón I., Gómez M.J., Escarabajal M.D., de la Torre L., Cándido A., Maldonado A., et al. One-way avoidance learning in female inbred Roman High- and Low-Avoidance rats: effects of bilateral electrolytic central amygdala lesions. Neurosci Lett 2010, 474(1):32-36.
9. Steimer T., Driscoll P. Divergent stress response and coping styles in psychogenetically selected Roman high-(RHA) and low-(RLA) avoidance rats: behavioral, neuroendocrine and developmental aspects. Stress 2003, 6(2):87-100.
10. Steimer T., Driscoll P. Inter-individual vs. line/strain differences in psychogenetically selected Roman High- (RHA) and Low- (RLA) Avoidance rats: neuroendocrine and behavioral aspects. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2005, 29(1):99-112.
11. Moreno M., Cardona D., Gómez M.J., Sánchez-Santed F., Tobeña A., Campa L., et al. Impulsivity characterization in the roman high- and low-avoidance rat strains: behavioral and neurochemical differences. Neuropsychopharmacology 2010, 35(5):1198-1208.
12. Carrasco J., Márquez C., Nadal R., Tobeña A., Fernández-Teruel A., Armario A. Characterization of central and peripheral components of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis in the inbred Roman rat strains. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2008, 33(4):437-445.
13. Sabariego M., Gómez M.J., Morón I., Torres C., Fernández-Teruel A., Tobeña A., et al. Differential gene expression between inbred Roman high- (RHA-I) and low- (RLA-I) avoidance rats. Neurosci Lett 2011, 504(3):265-270.
14. Amsel A. Précis of frustration theory: an analysis of dispositional learning and memory. Psychon Bull Rev 1994, 1(3):280-296.
15. Papini M.R. Role of surprising nonreward in associative learning. JPN J Anim Psychol 2006, 56(1):35-54.
16. Flaherty C.F. Incentive relativity 1996, Cambridge University press, New York.
17. Gray J.A. The psychology of fear and stress 1987, CUP, Cambridge.
18. Gray J.A., McNaughton N. The neuropsychology of anxiety: an enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. Oxford Psychology Series 2000, No. 33. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 2 ed.
19. Papini M.R. Comparative psychology of surprising nonreward. Brain Behav Evol 2003, 62(2):83-95.
20. Rosas J.M., Callejas-Aguilera J.E., Escarabajal M.D., Gómez M.J., de la Torre L., Aguero Á., et al. Successive negative contrast effect in instrumental runway behavior: a study with Roman high- (RHA) and Roman low- (RLA) avoidance rats. Behav Brain Res 2007, 185(1):1-8.
21. Torres C., Cándido A., Escarabajal M.D., de la Torre L., Maldonado A., Tobeña A., et al. Successive negative contrast effect in one-way avoidance learning in female roman rats. Physiol Behav 2005, 85(4):377-382.
22. Gómez M.J., de la Torre L., Callejas-Aguilera J.E., Lerma-Cabrera J.M., Rosas J.M., Escarabajal M.D., et al. The partial reinforcement extinction effect (PREE) in female Roman high- (RHA-I) and low-avoidance (RLA-I) rats. Behav Brain Res 2008, 194(2):187-192.
23. Gómez M.J., de la Torre L., Callejas-Aguilera J.E., Rosas J.M., Escarabajal M.D., Agüero A., et al. Differences in extinction of an appetitive instrumental response in female inbred Roman high- (RHA-I) and low- (RLA-I) avoidance rats. Psicológica 2009, 30(2):179-186.
24. Gómez M.J., Escarabajal M.D., de la Torre L., Tobeña A., Fernández-Teruel A., Torres C. Consummatory successive negative and anticipatory contrast effects in inbred Roman rats. Physiol Behav 2009, 97(3-4):374-380.
25. Pellegrini S., Muzio R.N., Mustaca A.E., Papini M.R. Successive negative contrast after partial reinforcement in the consummatory behavior of rats. Learn Motiv 2004, 35(4):303-321.
26. Cuenya L., Fosacheca S., Mustaca A.E., Kamenetzky G. Efectos del aislamento en la adultez sobre el dolor y la frustración. Psicológica 2011, 32(1):49-63.
27. Flaherty C.F., Coppotelli C., Hsu D., Otto T. Excitotoxic lesions of the hippocampus disrupt runway but not consummatory contrast. Behav Brain Res 1998, 93(1-2):1-9.
28. Gellermann L.W. Chance orders of alternating stimuli in visual discrimination experiments. J Genet Psychology 1933, 42(1):206-208.
29. Giorgi O., Piras G., Corda M.G. The psychogenetically selected Roman high and low-avoidance rat lines: a model to study the individual vulnerability to drug addiction. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2007, 31(1):148-163.
30. Kamenetzky G.V., Mustaca A.E., Papini M.R. An analysis of the anxiolytic effects of ethanol on consummatory successive negative contrast. Av. Psicol. Latinoam 2008, 26(2):135-144.
31. Henke P.G. Effects of reinforcement omission on rats with lesions in the amygdala. J Comp Physiol Psychol 1973, 48(1):187-193.
32. Feldon J., Rawlins J.N.P., Gray J.A. Fornix-fimbria section and the partial reinforcement extinction effect. Exp Brain Res 1985, 58(3):435-439.
33. Leslie J.C., Shaw D., McCabe C., Reynolds D.S., Dawson G.R. Effects of drugs that potentiate GABA on extinction of positively-reinforced operant behavior. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2004, 28(3):229-238.
34. Capaldi E.J. Partial reinforcement: a hypothesis of sequential effects. Psychol Rev 1966, 73(5):459-477.
35. Capaldi E.J. The relation between memory and expectancy as revealed percentage and sequence of reward investigations. Psychon Bull Rev 1994, 1(3):303-310.
36. Aguilar R., Escorihuela R.M., Gil L., Tobeña A., Fernández-Teruel A. Differences between two psychogenetically selected lines of rats in a swimming pool matching-to-place task: long-term effects of infantile stimulation. Behav Genet 2002, 32(2):127-134.
37. Willig F., M'Harzi M., Bardelay C., Viet D., Delacour J. Roman strains as a psychogenetic model for the study of working memory: behavioral and biochemical data. Pharmacol, Biochem Behav 1991, 40(1):7-16.
38. Willig F., Van de Velde D., Laurent J., M'Harzi M., Delacour J. The Roman strains of rats as a psychogenetic tool for pharmacological investigation of working memory: example with RU 41656. Psychopharmacology 1992, 107(2-3):415-424.