Nonverbal communication and conversational contribution in breast cancer genetic counseling. Are counselors' nonverbal communication and conversational contribution associated with counselees' satisfaction, needs fulfillment and state anxiety in breast cancer genetic counseling?

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 93, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 216-223

  Dijkstra, Henriëtta ^a   Albada, Akke ^b   Klöckner Cronauer, Christina ^c   Ausems, Margreet G E M ^b   van Dulmen, Sandra ^a,d,e  

^a NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEUCHÂTEL   (Switzerland)

^d RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH EASTERN NORWAY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Anxiety; Communication; Eye gaze; Familial breast cancer; Genetic counseling; Interactivity; Needs fulfillment; Nonverbal encouragement; Satisfaction; Verbal dominance

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER RESEARCH; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; GAZE; GENETIC COUNSELING; HEALTH CARE NEED; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; ROTER INTERACTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM; VERBAL COMMUNICATION;

ANXIETY; COMMUNICATION; EYE GAZE; FAMILIAL BREAST CANCER; GENETIC COUNSELING; INTERACTIVITY; NEEDS FULFILLMENT; NONVERBAL ENCOURAGEMENT; SATISFACTION; VERBAL DOMINANCE;

ADULT; ANXIETY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; GENETIC COUNSELING; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING;

EID: 84885385547     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: 18735134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.05.014     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Street R.L., Millay B. Analyzing patient participation in medical encounters. Health Commun 2001, 13:61-73.
2. Roter D.L., Frankel R.M., Hall J.A., Sluyter D. The expression of emotion through nonverbal behavior in medical visits: mechanisms and outcomes. J Gen Intern Med 2006, 21:28-34.
3. Jokinen K., Nishida M., Yamamoto S. On eye-gaze and turn-taking. Proceedings of the 2010 workshop on eye-gaze in intelligent human machine interaction 2010, 118-123.
4. Knapp M.L., Hall J.A. Nonverbal communication in human interaction 2005, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA. 6th ed.
5. Burgoon J.K. Nonverbal signals. Handbook of interpersonal communication 1985, 344-390. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA. M.L. Knapp, G.R. Miller (Eds.).
6. Zandbelt L.C., Smets E.M.A., Oort F.J., Godfried M.H., de Haes H.C.J.M. Patient participation in the medical specialist encounter: does physicians' patient-centred communication matter. Patient Educ Couns 2007, 65:396-406.
7. Baumann C., Rat A.C., Osnowycz G., Mainard D., Cuny C., Guillemin F. Satisfaction with care after total hip or knee replacement predicts self-perceived health status after surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009, 10:150.
8. Henry S.G., Fuhrel-Forbis A., Rogers M.A.M., Eggly S. Associations between nonverbal communication during clinical interactions and outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Patient Educ Couns 2012, 86:297-315.
9. Street R.L., Makoul G., Arora N., Epstein R.M. How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns 2009, 74:295-301.
10. Hall J.A., Harrigan J.A., Rosenthal R. Nonverbal behavior in clinician-patient interaction. Appl Prev Psychol 1995, 4:21-37.
11. Griffith C.H., Wilson J.F., Langer S., Haist S.A. House staff nonverbal communication skills and standardized patient satisfaction. J Gen Intern Med 2003, 181:70-74.
12. Schmid Mast M. Review on the importance of nonverbal communication in the physician-patient interaction. Patient Educ Couns 2007, 7:15-18.
13. Bensing J.M. Doctor-patient communication and the quality of care. Soc Sci Med 1991, 3:1301-1310.
14. Roter D.L., Larson S.M., Beach M.C., Cooper L.A. Interactive and evaluative correlates of dialogue sequence: a simulation study applying the RIAS to turn taking structure. Patient Educ Couns 2008, 71:26-33.
15. Bertakis K.D., Roter D., Putnam S.M. The relationship of physician medical interview style to patient satisfaction. J Fam Pract 1991, 32:175-181.
16. Buller M.K., Buller D.B. Physician communication style and health care satisfaction. J Health Soc Behav 1987, 28:375-387.
17. Hall J.A., Irish J.T., Roter D.L., Ehrlich C.M., Miller L.H. Satisfaction, gender, and communication in medical visits. Med Care 1994, 32:1216-1231.
18. Schmid Mast M. Dominance and gender in the physician-patient interaction. J Men's Health Gender 2004, 4:354-358.
19. Sullivan L.M., Stein M.D., Savetsky J.B., Samet J.H. The doctor-patient relationship and HIV-infected patients' satisfaction with primary care physicians. J Gen Intern Med 2000, 15:462-469.
20. Biesecker B.B. Goals of genetic counseling. Clin Genet 2001, 60:323-330.
21. Dolbeault S., Flahault C., Stoppa-Lyonnet D., Brédart A. Communication in genetic counselling for breast/ovarian cancer. Recent Results Cancer Res 2006, 168:23-36.
22. Duric V., Butow P., Sharpe L., Lobb E., Meiser B., Barratt A., et al. Reducing psychological distress in a genetic counseling consultation for breast cancer. J Genet Couns 2003, 12:243-264.
23. De Kok M., Scholte R.W., Sixma H.J., van der Weijden T., Spijkers K.F., van de Velde C.J.H., et al. The patient's perspective of the quality of breast cancer care: the development of an instrument to measure quality of care through focus groups and concept mapping with breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 2007, 43:1257-1264.
24. Pieterse A.H., van Dulmen A.M., Ausems M.G.E.M., Beemer F.A., Bensing J.M. Communication in cancer genetic counselling: does it reflect counselees' previsit needs and preferences. Br J Cancer 2005, 92:1671-1678.
25. Pieterse A.H., van Dulmen A.M., Beemer F.A., Bensing J.M., Ausems M.G.E.M. Cancer genetic counseling: communication and counselees' post-visit satisfaction, cognitions, anxiety, and needs fulfillment. J Genet Couns 2007, 16:85-96.
26. Pieterse A.H., Ausems M.G.E.M., Van Dulmen A.M., Beemer F.A., Bensing J.M. Initial cancer genetic counseling consultation: change in counselees' cognitions and anxiety, and association with addressing their needs and preferences. Am J Med Genet A 2005, 137:27-35.
27. Bowen D.J., Burke W., McTiernan A., Yasui Y., Andersen M.R. Breast cancer risk counseling improves women's functioning. Patient Educ Couns 2005, 54:79-86.
28. Bensing J.M., Verheul W., van Dulmen A.M. Patient anxiety in the medical encounter: a study of verbal and non-verbal communication in general practice. Health Educ 2008, 108:373-383.
29. Takayama T., Yamazaki Y., Katsumata N. Relationship between outpatients' perceptions of physicians' communication styles and patients' anxiety levels in a Japanese oncology setting. Soc Sci Med 2001, 53:1335-1350.
30. Pieterse A.H., van Dulmen A.M., Ausems M.G.E.M. QUOTE-GENECA. Development of a counselee-centered instrument to measure needs and preferences in genetic counselling for hereditary cancer. Psychooncology 2005, 14:361-375.
31. Butow P.N., Lobb E.A. Analyzing the process and content of genetic counseling in familial breast cancer consultations. J Genet Couns 2004, 13:403-424.
32. Ellington L., Roter D., Dudley W.N., Baty B.J., Upchurch R., Larson S., et al. Communication analysis of BRCA1 genetic counseling. J Genet Couns 2005, 14:377-386.
33. Pieterse A.H., van Dulmen S., van Dijk S., Bensing J.M., Ausems M.G.E.M. Risk communication in completed series of breast cancer genetic counseling visits. Genet Med 2006, 8:688-696.
34. Meiser B., Irle J., Lobb E., Barlow-Stewart K. Assessment of the content and process of genetic counseling: a critical review of empirical studies. J Genet Couns 2008, 17:434-451.
35. Kash K.M., Holland J.C., Osborne M.P., Miller D.G. Psychological counseling strategies for women at risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995, 17:73-79.
36. STOET, Association Clinical Genetics Netherlands Working group Clinical Oncogenetics: Hereditary tumours: Guidelines for diagnostics and prevention. [Erfelijke tumoren: Richtlijnen voor diagnostiek en preventie] 2010, http://www.stoet.nl/.
37. ca: a computer-tailored intervention prior to breast cancer genetic counselling. J Genet Couns 2009, 18:326-338.
38. Albada A., van Dulmen S., Ausems M.G.E.M., Bensing J.M. A pre-visit website with question prompt sheet for counselees facilitates tailored communication in the first consultation for breast cancer genetic counseling: findings from an randomized controlled trial. Genet Med 2012, 11:85-95.
39. Zandbelt L.C., Smets E.M.A., Oort F.J., Godfried M.H., de Haes H.C.J.M. Satisfaction with the outpatient encounter: a comparison of patients' and physicians' views. J Gen Intern Med 2004, 19:1088-1095.
40. Spielberger C.D. Manual of the State-Trait anxiety inventory 1983, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.
41. Van der Ploeg H.M., Defares P.B., Spielberger C.D. Handleiding bij de zelfbeoordelings vragenlijst (ZBV) [manual of the Dutch version of the State Trait Anxiety Inventory] 1980, Swets and Zeitinger, Lisse.
42. Pieterse A.H., Ausems M.G.E.M., Spreeuwenberg P., van Dulmen S. Longer-term influence of breast cancer genetic counseling on cognitions and distress: smaller benefits for affected versus unaffected women. Patient Educ Couns 2011, 85:425-431.
43. Roter D.L., Larson S.M. The Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS): utility and flexibility for analysis of medical interactions. Patient Educ Couns 2002, 46:243-251.
44. Roter D.L. The Roter method of interaction process analysis 2006, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health. http://www.riasworks.com/.
45. Van der Ploeg H.M. De Zelf-Beoordelings Vragenlijst (STAI-DY): De ontwikkeling en validatie van een Nederlandstalige vragenlijst voor het meten van angst [The development and validation of a Dutch questionnaire to measure anxiety]. Tijdschr Psychiatr 1982, 24:576-588.
46. Graugaard P.K., Eide H., Finset A. Interaction analysis of physician-patient communication: the influence of trait anxiety on communication and outcome. Patient Educ Couns 2003, 49:149-156.
47. Pawlikowska T., Zhang W., Griffiths F., van Dalen J., van der Vleuten C. Verbal and non-verbal behavior of doctors and patients in primary care consultations - how this relates to patient enablement. Patient Educ Couns 2012, 86:70-76.
48. Street R.L., Buller D.B. Nonverbal response patterns in physician-patient interactions: a functional analysis. J Nonverbal Behav 1987, 11:234-253.
49. Schmid Mast M., Hall J.A., Roter D.L. Caring and dominance affect participants' perceptions and behaviors during a virtual medical visit. J Gen Intern Med 2008, 23:523-527.
50. Roter D.L. The medical visit context of treatment decision-making and the therapeutic relationship. Health Expect 2000, 3:17-25.
51. Tariman J.D., Berry D.L., Cochrane B., Doorenbos A., Schepp K. Preferred and actual participation roles during health care decision making in persons with cancer: a systematic review. Ann Oncol 2010, 21:1145-1151.
52. Gattellari M., Butow P.N., Tattersall M.H. Sharing decisions in cancer care. Soc Sci Med 2001, 52:1865-1878.
53. Kaplan S.H., Greenfield S., Gandek B., Rogers W.H., Ware J.E. Characteristics of physicians with participatory decision-making styles. Ann Intern Med 1996, 124:497-504.
54. Hall J.A., Roter D.L., Katz N.R. Meta-analysis of correlates of provider behavior in medical encounters. J Med Care 1988, 26:657-675.
55. Mead N., Bower P., Hann M. The impact of general practitioners' patient-centredness on patients' post-consultation satisfaction and enablement. Soc Sci Med 2002, 55:283-299.
56. Hall J.A., Coats E.J., LeBeau L.S. Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 2005, 131:898-924.
57. Schmid Mast M., Hall J.A., Klöckner Cronauer C., Cousin G. Perceived dominance in physicians: are female physicians under scrunity?. Patient Educ Couns 2011, 83:174-179.
58. Lobb E.A., Butow P.N., Barratt A., Meiser B., Tucker K. Differences in individual approaches: communication in the familial breast cancer consultation and the effect on patient outcomes. J Genet Couns 2005, 14:174-186.