The Collective Origins of Valued Originality: A Social Identity Approach to Creativity

Personality and Social Psychology Review

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 384-401

  Haslam, S Alexander ^a   Adarves Yorno, Inmaculada ^b   Postmes, Tom ^c   Jans, Lise ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

creativity; group processes; self categorization; self identity; social identity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CREATIVITY; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SELF CONCEPT; SELF-CATEGORIZATION; SELF/IDENTITY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL STATUS;

CREATIVITY; GROUP PROCESSES; SELF-CATEGORIZATION; SELF/IDENTITY; SOCIAL IDENTITY;

CREATIVITY; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION;

EID: 84885359672     PISSN: 10888683     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1088868313498001     Document Type: Article

References (159)

1. Adarves-YornoI. (2005). Understanding creativity: A social identity perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
2. Adarves-Yorno I.,Haslam S. A.,Postmes T.And now for something completely different? The impact of group membership on perceptions of creativity.Social Influence. 2008;3:248-266.
3. Adarves-Yorno I.,Postmes T.,Haslam S. A.Social identity and the recognition of creativity in groups.British Journal of Social Psychology. 2006;45:479-497.
4. Adarves-Yorno I.,Postmes T.,Haslam S. A.Creative innovation or crazy irrelevance? The contribution of group norms and social identity to creative behavior.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2007;43:410-416.
5. Adarves-YornoI.PostmesT.HaslamS. A. (2012). The impact of audience on creative behavior: A social identity analysis. Unpublished manuscript, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
6. Albert R. S.,Runco M. A.Handbook of creativity. Sternberg R., ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1999:16-31.
7. Amabile T. M.The effects of external evaluation on artistic creativity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1979;37:221-233.
8. Amabile T. M.Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1982;43:997-1013.
9. Amabile T. M.The social psychology of creativity. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1983:.
10. Amabile T. M.Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1996:.
11. Amatrudo A.Violence, culture and censure. Sumner C., ed. London, England: Taylor & Francis; 1997:63-84.
12. Asch S. E.Groups, leadership, and men. Guetzkow H., ed. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Press; 1951:177-190.
13. Baer J.Creativity research handbook. Runco M. A., ed. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press; 2003:.
14. Basadur M. S.,Basadur T. M.,Licina G.The handbook of organizational creativity. Mumford M., ed. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2012:667-706.
15. Bechtoldt M. N.,De Dreu C. K. W.,Nijstad B. A.,Choi H.-S.Motivated information processing, social tuning, and group creativity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2010;99:622-637.
16. Bendjelloul M.Searching for sugar man. London, England: Passion Pictures; 2012:.
17. Brewer M. B.The social self: On being the same and different at the same time.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1991;17:475-482.
18. Bruner J.On perceptual readiness.Psychological Review. 1957;64:123-152.
19. Campbell D. T.Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities.Behavioral Science. 1958;3:14-25.
20. Chen C.,Kasof J.,Himsel A. J.,Greenberger E.,Dong Q.,Xue G.Creativity in drawings of geometric shapes: A cross-cultural examination with the consensual assessment technique.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2002;33:171-187.
21. Clark R. W.,Rice G. A.Family constellations and eminence: The birth order of Novel Prize winners.The Journal of Psychology. 1982;110:281-287.
22. Codol J. P.On the so-called "superior conformity of the self" behavior: Twenty experimental investigations.European Journal of Social Psychology. 1975;5:457-501.
23. Coser L.The functions of conflict. Glencoe, IL: Free Press; 1956:.
24. Csikszentmihalyi M.The nature of creativity. Sternberg R. J., ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1988:325-339.
25. Csikszentmihalyi M.Changing the world: A framework for the study of creativity. Feldman D. H.Csikszentmihalyi M.Gardner H., ed. London, England: Praeger; 1994:135-154.
26. Csikszentmihalyi M.Genius and the mind: Studies of creativity and temperament. Steptoe A., ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1998:38-65.
27. Csikszentmihalyi M.Handbook of creativity. Sternberg R. J., ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1999:313-338.
28. Curtis G.The cave painters: Probing the mysteries of the world's first artists. New York, NY: Knopf; 2006:.
29. de Bono E.Lateral thinking for management: A handbook. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin; 1982:.
30. DeMint J.Saving freedom: We can stop America's slide into socialism. Nashville, TN: Fidelis; 2009:.
31. Diehl M.,Stroebe W.Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1987;53:497-509.
32. Dietz-Uhler B.The escalation of commitment in political decision-making groups: A social identity approach.European Journal of Social Psychology. 1996;26:611-629.
33. Doosje B.,Ellemers N.The social psychology of stereotyping and group life. Spears R.Oakes P. J.Ellemers N.Haslam S. A., ed. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 1997:257-272.
34. Doosje B.,Ellemers N.,Spears R.Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1995;31:410-436.
35. Doosje B.,Haslam S. A.,Spears R.,Oakes P. J.,Koomen W.The effect of comparative context on central tendency and variability judgements and the evaluation of group characteristics.European Journal of Social Psychology. 1998;28:173-184.
36. Drazin R.,Glynn M. A.,Kazanjian R. K.Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sensemaking perspective.Academy of Management Review. 1999;24:286-307.
37. Eisenman R.Creativity, preference for complexity, and physical and mental illness.Creativity Research Journal. 1990;3:231-236.
38. Ellemers N.Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice. Haslam S. A.van Knippenberg D.Platow M. J.Ellemers N., ed. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press; 2003:191-203.
39. Farrell M.Collaborative circles: Friendship dynamics and creative work. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2001:.
40. Feist G. J.A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity.Personality and Social Psychology Review. 1998;4:290-309.
41. Floistad G.Understanding and recognizing creativity: The emergence of a discipline. Isaksen S. G.Murdock M. C.Firestien R. L.Treffinger D. J., ed. Norwood, NJ: Ablex; 1993:202-246.
42. Forsyth D. R.Group dynamics. 2009). Group dynamics (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth; 2009:.
43. Galton F.Hereditary genius. London, England: Macmillan; 1869:.
44. Gardner H.Creating minds. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1993:.
45. Goncalo J. A.,Staw B. M.Individualism-collectivism and group creativity.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2006;100:96-109.
46. Gronum S.,Verreynne M. L.,Kastelle T.The role of networks in small and medium-sized enterprise innovation and firm performance.Journal of Small Business Management. 2012;50:257-282.
47. Guilford J. P.The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 1967:.
48. Hackman J. R.Theory and research in small groups. Tindale S., ed. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1998:245-267.
49. Harkins S. G.,Szymanski K.Social loafing and group evaluation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1989;56:934-941.
50. Haslam S. A.The social psychology of stereotyping and group life. Spears R.Oakes P. J.Ellemers N.Haslam S. A., ed. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 1997:119-143.
51. Haslam S. A.Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. 2004). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach (2nd ed.). London, England: SAGE.London, England: SAGE; 2004:.
52. Haslam S. A.,Ellemers N.International review of industrial and organizational psychology. Hodgkinson G. P.Ford J. K., ed. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2005:39-118.
53. Haslam S. A.,Oakes P. J.,Reynolds K. J.,Turner J. C.Social identity salience and the emergence of stereotype consensus.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1999;25:809-818.
54. Haslam S. A.,Postmes T.,Ellemers N.More than a metaphor: Organizational identity makes organizational life possible.British Journal of Management. 2003;14:357-369.
55. Haslam S. A.,Powell C.,Turner J. C.Social identity, self-categorization and work motivation: Rethinking the contribution of the group to positive and sustainable organizational outcomes.Applied Psychology: An International Review. 2000;49:319-339.
56. Haslam S. A.,Reicher S. D.Contesting the "nature" of conformity: What Milgram and Zimbardo's studies really show.PLoS Biology. 2012a;10 (11): e1001426.
57. Haslam S. A.,Reicher S. D.When prisoners take over the prison: A social psychology of resistance.Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2012b;16:154-179.
58. Haslam S. A.,Reicher S. D.,Platow M. J.The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence and power. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 2011:.
59. Haslam S. A.,Ryan M. K.,Postmes T.,Spears R.,Jetten J.,Webley P.Sticking to our guns: Social identity as a basis for the maintenance of commitment to faltering organizational projects.Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2006;27:607-628.
60. Haslam S. A.,Turner J. C.Context-dependent variation in social stereotyping 2: The relationship between frame of reference, self-categorization and accentuation.European Journal of Social Psychology. 1992;22:251-277.
61. Haslam S. A.,Wegge J.,Postmes T.Are we on a learning curve or a treadmill? The benefits of participative group goal setting become apparent as tasks become increasingly challenging over time.European Journal of Social Psychology. 2009;39:430-446.
62. Hennessey B. A.The effects of extrinsic constraints on children's creativity while using a computer.Creativity Research Journal. 1989;2:151-168.
63. Hennessey B. A.Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. Paulus P. B.Nijstad B. A., ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2003:181-201.
64. Hennessey B. A.,Amabile T. M.Creativity.Annual Review of Psychology. 2010;61:561-598.
65. Hewstone M.,Rubin M.,Willis H.Intergroup bias.Annual Review of Psychology. 2002;53:575-604.
66. Hirsch Y.,O'Neil W. J.The capitalist spirit: How each and every one of us can make a difference. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009:.
67. Howe M.Genius explained. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2000:.
68. Janis I. L.Victims of groupthink. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin; 1972:.
69. Jans L.,Postmes T.,Van der Zee K. I.The induction of a shared identity: The positive role of individual distinctiveness for groups.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2011;37:1130-1141.
70. Jans L.,Postmes T.,Van der Zee K. I.Sharing differences: The inductive route to social identity formation.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2012;48:1145-1149.
71. JansL.PostmesT.van der ZeeK. I.SeewaldD. (2013). Achieving freedom from normative constraints through the formation of shared social identity. Unpublished manuscript, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
72. Janssen O.,van de Vliert E.,West M.The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation.Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2004;25:129-145.
73. Rebels in groups: Dissent, deviance, difference and defiance. Jetten J.Hornsey M. J., ed. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011:.
74. Jetten J.,Hutchison P.When groups have a lot to lose: Historical continuity enhances resistance to a merger.European Journal of Social Psychology. 2010;41:335-343.
75. Jetten J.,O'Brien A.,Trindall N.Changing identity: Predicting adjustment to organizational restructure as a function of subgroup and superordinate identification.British Journal of Social Psychology. 2002;41:281-297.
76. Jetten J.,Postmes T.Individuality and the group: Advances in social identity. Postmes T.Jetten J., ed. London, England: SAGE; 2006:116-136.
77. Jetten J.,Spears R.,Manstead A. R.Strength of identification and intergroup differentiation: The influence of group norms.European Journal of Social Psychology. 1997;27:603-609.
78. John-Steiner V.Creative collaboration. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2000:.
79. Karlqvist A.The complexity of creativity. Andson A. E.Sahlin N.-E., ed. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Kluwer; 1997:105-114.
80. Kasof J.Social determinants of creativity: Status expectations and the evaluation of original products.Advances in Group Processes. 1995;12:167-2002.
81. Katz R.,Allen T. J.Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure and communication patterns of 50 R&D project groups.R&D Management. 1982;12:7-20.
82. King N.International handbook on innovation. Shavinina L. V., ed. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science; 2003:619-630.
83. Kuhn T.The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1962:.
84. Lehman D. R.,Chiu C.-Y.,Schaller M.Psychology and culture.Annual Review of Psychology. 2004;55:689-714.
85. Levine J. M.,Moreland R. L.Progress in small group research.Annual Review of Psychology. 1990;41:585-634.
86. Lichtenthaler U.,Holger E.Attitudes to externally organizing knowledge management tasks: A review, reconsideration and extension of the NIH syndrome.R&D Management. 2006;36:367-386.
87. Lindsay J.Cézanne: His life and art. Greenwich, CT: New York Graphic Society; 1969:.
88. Lubart T. I.Creativity and cross-cultural variation.International Journal of Psychology. 1990;25:39-59.
89. MacKinnon D.The nature and nurture of creative talent.American Psychologist. 1962;17:484-495.
90. Mahoney M. J.Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system.Cognitive Therapy and Research. 1977;1:161-175.
91. Markus H.,Kitayama S.Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.Psychological Review. 1991;98:224.
92. Martindale C.The clockwork muse: The predictability of artistic styles. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1990:.
93. Mednick S. A.,Mednick M. T.Manual: Remote Associates Test. Form I. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin; 1966:.
94. Morton T. A.,Haslam S. A.,Postmes T.,Ryan M. K.We value what values us: The appeal of identity-affirming science.Political Psychology. 2006;27:823-838.
95. Moscovici S.Social influence and social change. London, England: Academic Press; 1976:.
96. Mueller J. S.,Melwani S.,Goncalo J. A.The bias against creativity: Why people desire but reject creative ideas.Psychological Science. 2012;23:13-17.
97. Mukherjee S.The emperor of all maladies: A biography of cancer. New York, NY: Scribner; 2011:.
98. Mumford M. D.,Hester K. S.,Robledo I. C.Handbook of organizational creativity. Mumford M., ed. New York, NY: Academic Press; 2012:3-16.
99. Nemeth C.Managing innovation: When less is more.California Management Review. 1997;40:273-291.
100. Nijstad B.,Stroebe W.How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups.Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2006;10:186-213.
101. Oakes P. J.Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Turner J. C.Hogg M. A.Oakes P. J.Reicher S. D.Wetherell M. S., ed. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell; 1987:117-141.
102. Oakes P. J.,Haslam S. A.,Turner J. C.Stereotyping and social reality. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 1994:.
103. Osborne T.Against "creativity": A philistine rant.Economy and Society. 2003;32:507-525.
104. Osche R.Before the gates of excellence: The determinants of creative genius. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1990:.
105. Packer D. J.On being both with us and against us: A normative conflict model of dissent in social groups.Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2008;12:50-72.
106. Paletz S. B.,Peng K.Implicit theories of creativity across cultures: Novelty and appropriateness in two product domains.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2008;39:286-302.
107. Paletz S. B.,Schunn C. D.A social-cognitive framework of multidisciplinary team innovation.Topics in Cognitive Science. 2010;2:73-95.
108. Paulus P. B.,Brown V.,Ortega A. H.Social creativity. Purser R. E.Montuori A., ed. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press; 1999:151-176.
109. Paulus P. B.,Dzindolet M. T.Social influence processes in brainstorming.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1993;64:575-586.
110. The molecular biology of cancer: A bridge from bench to bedside. Pelengaris S.Khan M., ed. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013:.
111. Perry-Smith J. E.,Shalley C. E.The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective.Academy of Management Review. 2003;28:89-106.
112. Postmes T.,Haslam S. A.,Jans L.A single-item measure of social identification: Reliability, validity and utility.British Journal of Social Psychology. 2012;:.
113. Postmes T.,Haslam S. A.,Swaab R.Social identity and social influence in small groups: Communication, consensualizations and socially shared cognition.European Review of Social Psychology. 2005;16:1-42.
114. Postmes T.,Spears R.Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin. 1998;123:238-259.
115. Postmes T.,Spears R.Contextual moderators of gender differences and stereotyping in computer-mediated group discussions.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2002;28:1073-1083.
116. Postmes T.,Spears R.,Lea M.The formation of group norms in computer-mediated communication.Human Communication Research. 2000;26:341-371.
117. Postmes T.,Spears R.,Lee T.,Novak R.Individuality and social influence in groups: Inductive and deductive routes to group identity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2005;89:747-763.
118. Postmes T.,Spears R.,Sakhel K.,de Groot D.Social influence in computer-mediated communication: The effects of anonymity on group behaviour.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2001;27:1243-1254.
119. Prentice D. A.Individuality and the group: Advances in social identity. Postmes T.Jetten J., ed. London, England: SAGE; 2006:37-55.
120. Prentice D. A.,Miller D. T.,Lightdale J. R.Asymmetries in attachments to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common-identity and common-bond groups.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1994;20:484-493.
121. Puccio G. J.,Cabra J. F.The Routledge companion to creativity. Rickards T.Runco M. A.Mofer S., ed. Abingdon, UK: Routledge; 2009:327-337.
122. Raina M. K.Understanding and recognizing creativity: The emergence of a discipline. Isaksen S. C.Murdock M. C.Firestien R. L.Treffinger D. J., ed. Westport, CT: Greenwood; 1993:435-453.
123. Reicher S. D.Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Turner J. C.Hogg M. A.Oakes P. J.Reicher S. D.Wetherell M. S., ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell; 1987:171-202.
124. Richards R.Millennium as opportunity: Chaos, creativity, and Guilford's structure of intellect model.Creativity Research Journal. 2001;13:249-265.
125. Richerson P. J.Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2004:.
126. Rickards T.The management of innovation: Recasting the role of creativity.European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 1996;5:13-27.
127. Rietzschel E.,Nijstad B.,Stroebe W.The selection of creative ideas after individual idea generation: Choosing between creativity and impact.British Journal of Psychology. 2009;101:47-68.
128. Rowan R.The intuitive manager. New York, NY: Berkley Books; 1987:.
129. Runco M. A.Creativity.Annual Review of Psychology. 2004;55:657-687.
130. Runco M. A.Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Burlington, MA: Elsevier; 2010:.
131. Punk rock-So what?: The cultural legacy of punk. Sabin R., ed. London, England: Routledge; 2002:.
132. Sayre A.Rosalind Franklin and DNA. New York, NY: W.W. Norton; 1975:.
133. Sherif M.The psychology of social norms. New York, NY: Harper; 1936:.
134. Sherif M.,Hovland C. I.Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1961:.
135. Sherif M.,Sherif C.Social psychology. New York, NY: Harper & Row; 1969:.
136. Simonton D. K.Genius, creativity, and leadership: Historiometric inquiries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1984:.
137. Simonton D. K.Methodological and theoretical orientation and the long-term disciplinary impact of 54 eminent psychologists.Review of General Psychology. 2000;4:13-24.
138. Simonton D. K.The Cambridge handbook of creativity. Kaufman J. C.Sternberg R. J., ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2010:174-188.
139. Spears R.,Lea M.,Lee S.De-individuation and group polarization in computer-mediated communication.British Journal of Social Psychology. 1990;29:121-134.
140. SteffensN. K.HaslamS. A.RyanM. K.KesslerT. (2013). Leader performance and prototypicality: Differences in insider and outsider perspectives. Unpublished manuscript, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
141. Stein M. I.Critical creative processes. Runco M. A., ed. Creskill, NJ: Hamptom Press; 2003:379-394.
142. Sternberg R. J.,Lubart T.Investing in creativity.American Psychologist. 1996;51:677-688.
143. Steve Jobs: Stanford commencement address. (2011, October9). The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/oct/09/steve-jobs-stanford-commencement-address?INTCMP=SRCH.
144. Sulloway F. J.Born to rebel: Birth order, family dynamics, and creative lives. New York, NY: Pantheon Books; 1996:.
145. Tajfel H.,Turner J. C.The social psychology of intergroup relations. Austin W. G.Worchel S., ed. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole; 1979:33-47.
146. Terry D. J.Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice. Haslam S. A.van Knippenberg D.Platow M. J.Ellemers N., ed. Hove, UK: Psychology Press; 2003:223-240.
147. Thompson L.Improving the creativity of organizational work groups.Academy of Management Executive. 2003;17:96-111.
148. Turner J. C.Social identity and intergroup relations. Tajfel H., ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1982:15-40.
149. Turner J. C.Advances in group processes. Lawler E. J., ed. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 1985:77-122.
150. Turner J. C.Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Turner J. C.Hogg M. A.Oakes P. J.Reicher S. D.Wetherell M. S., ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell; 1987:42-67.
151. Turner J. C.Social influence. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press; 1991:.
152. Turner J. C.Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. 2004). What the social identity approach is and why it matters. In HaslamS. A. (Ed.), Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach (2nd ed., pp. xvii-xvix). London, England: SAGE.Haslam S. A., ed. London, England: SAGE; 2004:xvii-xvix.
153. Turner J. C.Explaining the nature of power: A three-process theory.European Journal of Social Psychology. 2005;35:1-22.
154. Turner J. C.,Hogg M. A.,Oakes P. J.,Reicher S. D.,Wetherell M. S.Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell; 1987:.
155. Turner J. C.,Oakes P. J.The psychology of group influence. 1989). Self-categorization and social influence. In PaulusP. B. (Ed.), The psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 233-275). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Paulus P. B., ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1989:233-275.
156. Turner J. C.,Oakes P. J.,Haslam S. A.,McGarty C. A.Self and collective: Cognition and social context.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1994;20:454-463.
157. Tyler T. R.,Blader S.The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior.Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2003;7:349-361.
158. Ueda Y.The chaos avant-garde: Memories of the early days of chaos theory. Abraham R.Ueda Y., ed. Singapore: World Scientific; 2000:65-80.
159. Wilder D. A.,Shapiro P. N.Role of outgroup cues in determining social identity.British Journal of Social Psychology. 1984;47:342-348.