Contesting the "Nature" Of Conformity: What Milgram and Zimbardo's Studies Really Show

PLoS Biology

Volumn 10, Issue 11, 2012, Pages

  Haslam, S Alexander ^a   Reicher, Stephen D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTHORITY; BEHAVIOR; CONFORMITY; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; OBEDIENCE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL BELIEF; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIAL STATUS; THEORY; TYRANNY;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; HIERARCHY, SOCIAL; HUMANS; INTERNAL-EXTERNAL CONTROL; MASS BEHAVIOR; PERSONALITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL; SOCIAL CONFORMITY; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION;

EID: 84870272328     PISSN: 15449173     EISSN: 15457885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001426     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Strachan H (1983) European armies and the conduct of war. London: Unwin Hyman (p.3).
2. Kelman HC, Hamilton VL (1990) Crimes of obedience. New Haven: Yale University Press.
3. Novick P (1999) The Holocaust in American life. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
4. Jetten J, Hornsey MJ (Eds.) (2011) Rebels in groups: dissent, deviance, difference and defiance. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
5. Parker I (2007) Revolution in social psychology: alienation to emancipation. London: Pluto Press. (p.84).
6. Smith, JR, Haslam SA. (Eds.) (2012) Social psychology: revisiting the classic studies. London: Sage.
7. Turner JC (1991) Social influence. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
8. Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, Reicher SD, Wetherell MS (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
9. Milgram S, (1963) Behavioral study of obedience. J Abnorm Soc Psych 67: 371-378.
10. Milgram S (1974) Obedience to authority: an experimental view. New York: Harper & Row.
11. Blass T (2004) The man who shocked the world: the life and legacy of Stanley Milgram. New York, NY: Basic Books.
12. Russell NJ, (2011) Milgram's obedience to authority experiments: origins and early evolution. Br J Soc Psychol 50: 140-162.
13. Haney C, Banks C, Zimbardo P, (1973) A study of prisoners and guards in a simulated prison. Nav Res Rev September: 1-17 Washington (D.C.): Office of Naval Research. p.11.
14. Zimbardo P (2007) The Lucifer effect: how good people turn evil. London, UK: Random House.
15. Haney C, Banks C, Zimbardo P, (1973) A study of prisoners and guards in a simulated prison. Nav Res Rev September: 1-17 Washington (D.C.): Office of Naval Research. p.12.
16. Moscovici S (1976) Social influence and social change. London, UK: Academic Press.
17. Haslam SA, Reicher SD, (2012) When prisoners take over the prison: a social psychology of resistance. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 16: 152-179.
18. Arendt H (1963) Eichmann in Jerusalem: a report on the banality of evil. New York: Penguin.
19. Cesarani D (2004) Eichmann: his life and crimes. London: Heinemann.
20. Miller A (2004). What can the Milgram obedience experiments tell us about the Holocaust? Generalizing from the social psychology laboratory. Miller A, ed. The social psychology of good and evil. New York: Guilford. pp. 193-239.
21. Browning C (1992) Ordinary men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland. London: Penguin Books.
22. Overy R, (2011) Milgram and the historians. Psychologist 24: 662-663.
23. Helm C, Morelli M, (1979) Stanley Milgram and the obedience experiment: authority, legitimacy, and human action. Polit Theory 7: 321-346.
24. Akerlof GA, (1991) Procrastination and obedience. Am Econ Rev 81: 1-19.
25. Harris LT (2009) The influence of social group and context on punishment decisions: insights from social neuroscience. Gruter Institute Squaw Valley Conference May 21, 2009. Law, Behavior & the Brain. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1405319.
26. Lozowick Y (2002) Hitler's bureaucrats: the Nazi Security Police and the banality of evil. H. Watzman, translator. London: Continuum.
27. Blass T (Ed.) (2000) Obedience to authority. Current perspectives on the Milgram Paradigm. Mahwah (New Jersey): Erlbaum.
28. Benjamin LT, Simpson JA, (2009) The power of the situation: the impact of Milgram's obedience studies on personality and social psychology. Am Psychol 64: 12-19.
29. Haslam SA, Reicher SD, (2007) Beyond the banality of evil: three dynamics of an interactionist social psychology of tyranny. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 33: 615-622.
30. Vetlesen AJ (2005) Evil and human agency: understanding collective evildoing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Mandel DR, (1998) The obedience alibi: Milgram's account of the Holocaust reconsidered. Analyse und Kritik 20: 74-94.
32. Kershaw I, (1993) Working towards the Führer: reflections on the nature of the Hitler dictatorship. Contemp Eur Hist 2: 103-108.
33. Banyard P, (2007) Tyranny and the tyrant. Psychologist 20: 494-495.
34. Zimbardo P (1989) Quiet rage: The Stanford Prison Study [video]. Stanford: Stanford University.
35. Zimbardo P (2004) A situationist perspective on the psychology of evil: understanding how good people are transformed into perpetrators. Miller A, editor. The social psychology of good and evil. New York: Guilford. pp. 21-50.
36. Milgram S, (1965) Some conditions of obedience and disobedience to authority. Hum Relat 18: 57-76.
37. Reicher SD, Haslam SA, Smith JR, (2012) Working towards the experimenter: reconceptualizing obedience within the Milgram paradigm as identification-based followership. Perspect Psychol Sci 7: 315-324.
38. Packer D, (2008) Identifying systematic disobedience in Milgram's obedience experiments: a meta-analytic review. Perspect Psychol Sci 3: 301-304.
39. Burger JM, Girgis ZM, Manning CM, (2011) In their own words: explaining obedience to authority through an examination of participants' comments. Social Psychological and Personality Science 2: 460-466.
40. Reicher SD, Haslam SA, (2011) After shock? Towards a social identity explanation of the Milgram 'obedience' studies. Brit J Soc Psychol 50: 163-169.
41. Reicher SD, Haslam SA, (2006) Rethinking the psychology of tyranny: the BBC prison study. Brit J Soc Psychol 45: 1-40.
42. Tajfel H, Turner JC (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Austin WG, Worchel S, editors. The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey (California): Brooks/Cole. pp.33-47.
43. Packer DJ, (2008) On being both with us and against us: a normative conflict model of dissent in social groups. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 12: 50-72.
44. Packer DJ, Chasteen AL, (2010) Loyal deviance: testing the normative conflict model of dissent in social groups. Pers Soc Psychol B 36: 5-18.
45. Haslam SA, Reicher SD, Platow MJ (2008) The new psychology of leadership: identity, influence and power. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
46. Milgram S, (1964) Issues in the study of obedience: a reply to Baumrind. Am Psychol 19: 848-852.
47. Bruner JS, (1957) On perceptual readiness. Psychol Rev 64: 123-152.
48. Oakes PJ, Haslam SA, Turner JC (1994) Stereotyping and social reality. Oxford: Blackwell.
49. Reicher SD, Haslam SA, Rath R, (2008) Making a virtue of evil: a five-step model of the development of collective hate. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2: 1313-1344.