Acting like an individual versus feeling like an individual

Individuality and the Group: Advances in Social Identity

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 37-55

  Prentice, Deborah ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38349004395     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781446211946.n3     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. Andersen, S. M. (1984). Self-knowledge and social inference: II. The diagnosticity of cognitive/affective and behavioral data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 294-307. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.2.294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.2.294
2. Andersen, S. M., & Ross, L. (1984). Self-knowledge and social inference: I. The impact of cognitive/affective and behavioral data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 280-293. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.2.280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.2.280
3. Bettencourt, B. A., & Sheldon, K. (2001). Social roles as mechanisms for psychological need satisfaction within social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1131-1143. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1131
4. Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 117, 475-482. doi:10.1177/0146167291175001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167291175001
5. Brewer, M. B., & Roccas, S. (2001). Individual values, social identity, and optimal distinctiveness. In C.Sedikides & M. B.Brewer (Eds.), Individual self, relational self, collective self (pp. 291-240). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
6. Cohen, G. L. (2003). Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 808-822. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.808
7. D'Andrade, R. G. (1992). Schemas and motivation. In R.D'Andrade & C.Strauss (Eds.), Human motives and cultural models (pp. 23-44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139166515.003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166515.003
8. De Tocqueville, A. (1840/1994). Democracy in America. New York: Knopf.
9. Gaertner, L., Sedikides, C., & Graetz, K. (1999). In search of self-definition: Motivational primacy of the individual self, motivational primacy of the collective self, or contextual primacy?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 5-18. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.5
10. Hogg, M. A. (2001). Social identity and the sovereignty of the group: A psychology of belonging. In C.Sedikides & M. B.Brewer (Eds.), Individual self, relational self, collective self (pp. 125-145). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
11. James, W. (1890/1983). The principles of psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Jetten, J., Postmes, T., & McAuliffe, B. (2002). "We're all individuals": Group norms of individualism and collectivism, levels of identification, and identity threat. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 189-207. doi:10.1002/ejsp.65 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.65
13. Kampmeier, C., & Simon, B. (2001). Individuality and group formation: The role of independence and differentiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 448-462. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.3.448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.3.448
14. Latane, B., & Darley, J. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn't he help?New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
15. Le Bon, G. (1896). The crowd: A study of the popular mind.
16. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
17. McAdams, D. P. (1996). Alternative futures for the study of human individuality. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 374-388. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1996.0026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1996.0026
18. McDougall, W. (1921). The group mind. London: Cambridge University Press.
19. McFarland, C., & Miller, D. T. (1990). Judgments of self-other similarity: Just like other people, only more so. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 475-484. doi:10.1177/0146167290163006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167290163006
20. Miller, D. T., & McFarland, C. (1987). Pluralistic ignorance: When similarity is interpreted as dissimilarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 298-305. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.2.298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.2.298
21. Miller, D. T., & McFarland, C. (1991). When social comparison goes awry: The case of pluralistic ignorance. In J.Suls & T.Wills (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 287-313). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Miller, D. T., & Prentice, D. A. (1994). Collective errors and errors about the collective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 541-550. doi:10.1177/0146167294205011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167294205011
23. Neisser, U. (1988). Five kinds of self-knowledge. Philosophical Psychology, 1, 35-59. doi:10.1080/09515088808572924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09515088808572924
24. Postmes, T., Haslam, S. A., & Swaab, R. (2005). Social influence in small groups: An interactive model of social identity formation. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 1-42. doi:10.1080/10463280440000062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10463280440000062
25. Postmes, T., Spears, R., Novak, R., & Lee, T. (2004). Social influence processes in small groups: Inductive and deductive identity and the role of individuality. Unpublished manuscript.
26. Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (1993). Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 243-256. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.243
27. Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (1996). Pluralistic ignorance and the perpetuation of social norms by unwitting actors. In M. P.Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 17, pp. 161-209). San Diego: Academic.
28. Prentice, D. A., Miller, D. T., & Lightdale, J. R. (1994). Asymmetries in attachments to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common-identity and common-bond groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 484-493. doi:10.1177/0146167294205005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167294205005
29. Prentice, D. A., Trail, T., & Cantor, N. E. (2004). The pursuit of individuality through group membership: Extracurricular groups in the everyday lives of college students. Unpublished manuscript, Princeton University.
30. Pronin, E., Berger, J., & Molouki, S. (2004). Alone in a crowd of sheep: Perceptions of conformity in self versus others. Unpublished manuscript, Princeton University.
31. Pronin, E., Gilovich, T., & Ross, E. (2004). Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: Divergent perceptions of bias in self versus others. Psychological Review, 111, 781-799. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.781
32. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
33. Roccas, S., & Brewer, M. B. (2002). Social identity complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 88-106. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0602_01 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0602_01
34. Sassenberg, K., & Postmes, T. (2002). Cognitive and strategic processes in small groups: Effects of anonymity of the self and anonymity of the group on social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 463-480. doi:10.1348/014466602760344313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/014466602760344313
35. Schroeder, C. M., & Prentice, D. A. (1998). Exposing pluralistic ignorance to reduce alcohol use among college students. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 2150-2180. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01365.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01365.x
36. Sedikides, C., & Gaertner, L. (2001). A homecoming to the individual self: Emotional and motivational primacy. In C.Sedikides & M. B.Brewer (Eds.), Individual self, relational self, collective self (pp. 7-24). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
37. Sheldon, K. M., & Bettencourt, B. A. (2002). Psychological need-satisfaction and subjective well-being within social groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 25-38. doi:10.1348/014466602165036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/014466602165036
38. Shelton, J. N., & Richeson, J. (2005). Intergroup contact and pluralistic ignorance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 91-107. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.91 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.91
39. Simon, B. (1997). Self and group in modern society: Ten theses on the individual self and the collective self. In R.Spears, P. J.Oakes, N.Ellemers, & S. A.Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 318-335). Oxford,: Blackwell.
40. Simon, B., & Kampmeier, C. (2001). Revisiting the individual self: Toward a social psychological theory of the individual self and the collective self. In C.Sedikides & M. B.Brewer (Eds.), Individual self, relational self, collective self (pp. 199-218). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
41. Sperber, D. (1985). Anthropology and psychology: Towards an epidemiology of representations. Man, 20, 73-89.
42. Swann, W. B., Kwan, V. S. Y., Polzer, J. T., & Milton, L. P. (2003). Fostering group identification and creativity in diverse groups: The role of individuation and self-verification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1396-1406. doi:10.1177/0146167203256868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167203256868
43. Swann, W. B., Milton, L. P., & Polzer, J. T. (2000). Should we create a niche or fall in line? Identity negotiation and small group effectiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 238-250. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.2.238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.2.238
44. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S.Worchel & W. G.Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
45. Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks Cole.
46. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
47. Turner, J. C., & Onorato, R. S. (1999). Social identity, personality, and the self-concept: A self-categorization perspective. In T. R.Tyler, R. M.Kramer, & O. P.John (Eds.), The psychology of the self (pp. 11-46). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Vorauer, J. D., & Ratner, R. K. (1997). Who's going to make the first move? Pluralistic ignorance as an impediment to relationship formation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 483-506. doi:10.1177/0265407596134001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407596134001
49. Wohl, M. J. A., & Branscombe, N. R. (2005). Forgiveness and collective guilt assignment to historical perpetrator groups depend on level of social category inclusiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 288-303. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.288