The spatial structure of antagonistic species affects coevolution in predictable ways

American Naturalist

Volumn 182, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 578-591

  Gibert, Jean P ^a,d   Pires, Mathias M ^b   Thompson, John N ^c   Guimarães, Paulo R ^b  

^a Laboratorio de Paleobiología   (Uruguay)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA   (United States)

Author keywords

Antagonistic coevolution; Coevolutionary hotspot; Gene flow; Geographic mosaic; Laplacian matrices; Spatial graphs; Subgraphs

Indexed keywords

COEVOLUTION; GENE FLOW; POLYMORPHISM; SELECTION; SPATIAL VARIATION;

ARTICLE; EVOLUTION; GENE FLOW; GENETIC SELECTION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; GENE FLOW; MODELS, THEORETICAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SELECTION, GENETIC; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84885220996     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/673257     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Allesina, S., and M. Pascual. 2009. Can an eigenvector measure species' importance for extinctions? PLoS Computational Biology 5: e1000494.
2. Altermatt, F., A. Bieger, F. Carrara, A. Rinaldo, and M. Holyoak. 2011. Effects of connectivity and recurrent local disturbances on community structure and population density in experimental metacommunities. PLoS ONE 6:e19525.
3. Amarasekare, P., M. F. Hoopes, N. Mouquet, and M. Holyoak. 2004. Mechanisms of coexistence in competitive metacommunities. American Naturalist 164:310-326.
4. Anderson, B., and S. D. Johnson. 2008. The geographical mosaic of coevolution in a plant-pollinator mutualism. Evolution 62:220-225.
5. Barrat, A., M. Bartheélemy, and A. Vespignani. 2008. Dynamical processes on complex networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
6. Benkman, C. W. 1999. The selection mosaic and diversifying coevolution between crossbills and lodgepole pine. American Naturalist 153(suppl.):S75-S91.
7. Bergerot, B., R. Julliard, and M. Baguette. 2010. Metacommunity dynamics: decline of functional relationship along a habitat fragmentation gradient. PLoS ONE 5:e11294.
8. Borgatti, S. 2005. Centrality and network flow. Social Networks 27: 55-71.
9. Brockhusrt, M. A., A. Buckling, V. Poullain, and M. E. Hochberg. 2007. The impact of migration from parasite-free patches on antagonistic host-parasite coevolution. Evolution 61:1238-1243.
10. Brodie, E. D., Jr., B. J. Ridenhour, and E. D. Brodie III. 2002. The evolutionary response of predators to dangerous prey: hotspots and coldspots in the geographic mosaic of coevolution between garter snakes and newts. Evolution 56:2067-2082.
11. Carrara, F., F. Altermatt, I. Rodríguez-Iturbe, and A. Rinaldo. 2012 Dendritic connectivity controls biodiversity patterns in experimental metacommunities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 109:5761-5766.
12. Chisholm, C., Z. Lindo, and A. Gonzalez. 2010. Metacommunity diversity depends on connectivity and patch arrangement in heterogeneous habitat networks. Ecography 34:415-424.
13. Dale, M. R. T., and M. J. Fortin. 2010. From graphs to spatial graphs. Annual Review in Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 41:21-38.
14. Dashiell, K. E., M. G. Meagher, and D. W. Gorget. 2001. Linkage between loci controlling nodulation and testa variegation in peanut. Journal of Heredity 92:509-511.
15. Dyer, R. J., and J. D. Nason. 2004. Population graphs: the graph theoretic shape of genetic structure. Molecular Ecology 13:1713-1727.
16. Economo, E. P., and T. H. Keitt. 2008. Species diversity in neutral metacommunities: a network approach. Ecology Letters 11:52-62.
17. Economo, E. P., and T. H. Keitt. 2010. Network isolation and local diversity in neutral metacommunities. Oikos 119:1355-1363.
18. Ferreri Cancho, R., and R. V. Solé. 2003. Optimization in complex networks. Lecture Notes in Physics 625:114-126.
19. Foitzik, S., A. Achenbach, and M. Brandt. 2009. Locally adapted social parasites affect density, social structure, and life history of its host. Ecology 90:1195-1206.
20. Forde, S. E., J. N. Thompson, R. D. Holt, and B. J. M. Bohannan. 2008. Coevolution drives temporal changes in fitness and diversity across environments in a bacteria-bacteriophage interaction. Evolution 62:1830-1839.
21. Fortuna, M. A., R. G. Albaladejo, L. Fernández, A. Aparicio, and J. Bascompte. 2009. Networks of spatial genetic variation across species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 106:19044-19049.
22. Fortuna, M. A., C. García, P. R. Guimarães Jr., and J. Bascompte. 2008. Spatial mating networks in insect-pollinated plants. Ecology Letters 11:490-498.
23. Gandon, S. 2002. Local adaptation and the geometry of host-parasite coevolution. Ecology Letters 5:246-256.
24. Gandon, S., A. Buckling, E. Decaestecker, and T. Day. 2008. Hostparasite coevolution and patterns of adaptation across time and space. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21:1861-1866.
25. Gandon, S., and Y. Michalakis. 2002. Local adaptation, evolutionary potential and host-parasite coevolution: interactions between migration, mutation, population size and generation time. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15:451-462.
26. Gandon, S., and S. Nuismer. 2009. Interactions between genetic drift, gene flow, and selection mosaics drive parasite local adaptation. American Naturalist 173:212-224.
27. Gavrilets, S., and A. Hastings. 1998. Coevolutionary chase in twospecies systems with applications to mimicry. Journal of Theoretical Biology 191:415-427.
28. Gavrilets, S., and Y. Michalakis. 2008. Effects of environmental heterogeneity in victim-exploiter coevolution. Evolution 62:3100-3116.
29. Gilpin, M. E., and I. A. Hanski. 1991. Metapopulation dynamics: empirical and theoretical investigations. Academic Press, London.
30. Gomulkiewicz, R., S. Nuismer, and J. N. Thompson. 2003. Coevolution in variable mutualisms. American Naturalist 162(suppl.): S80-S93.
31. Gomulkiewicz, R., J. N. Thompson, R. D. Holt, S. Nuismer, and M. E. Hochberg. 2000. Hot spots, cold spots, and the geographic mosaic theory of coevolution. American Naturalist 156:156-174.
32. Guimarães, P. R., Jr., P. Jordano, and J. N. Thompson. 2011. Evolution and coevolution in mutualistic networks. Ecology Letters 14:877-885.
33. Hanski, I., and O. Ovaskainen. 2000. The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Nature 404:755-758.
34. Hoeksema, J. D. 2010. Ongoing coevolution in mycorrhizal interactions. New Phytologist 187:286-300.
35. Holyoak, M., M. A. Leibold, and R. D. Holt. 2005. Metacommunities: spatial dynamics and ecological communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
36. Hubbell, S. P. 2001. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
37. King, K. C., L. F. Delph, J. Jokela, and C. M. Lively. 2009. The geographic mosaic of sex and the Red Queen. Current Biology 19: 1438-1441.
38. Laine, A.-L. 2009. Role of coevolution in generating biological diversity: spatially divergent selection trajectories. Journal of Experimental Botany 60:2957-2970.
39. Leibold, M. A., M. Holyoak, N. Mouquet, P. Amarasekare, J. M. Chase, M. F. Hoopes, R. D. Holt, et al. 2004. The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecology Letters 7:601-613.
40. Loeuille, N., and M. A. Liebold. 2008. Evolution in metacommunities: on the relative importance of species sorting and monopolization in structuring communities. American Naturalist 171:788-799.
41. Luque, S., S. Saura, and M. J. Fortin. 2012. Landscape connectivity analysis for conservation: insights from combining new methods with ecological and genetic data. Landscape Ecology 27:153-157.
42. Mezquida, E. T., and C. W. Benkman. 2005. The geographic selection mosaic for squirrels, crossbills and Aleppo pines. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18:348-357.
43. Nuismer, S. 2006. Parasite local adaptation in a geographic mosaic. Evolution 60:24-30.
44. Nuismer, S., J. N. Thompson, and R. Gomulkiewicz. 1999. Gene flow and geographically structured coevolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 266:605-609.
45. Nuismer, S., J. N. Thompson, and R. Gomulkiewicz. 2000. Coevolutionary clines across selection mosaics. Evolution 54:1102-1115.
46. Nuismer, S., J. N. Thompson, and R. Gomulkiewicz. 2003. Coevolution between hosts and parasites with partially overlapping geographic ranges. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16:1337-1345.
47. Nuismer, S., S. Otto, and F. Blanquart. 2008. When do host-parasite interactions drive the evolution of non-random mating? Ecology Letters 11:937-946.
48. Parchman, T. L., and C. W. Benkman. 2002. Diversifying coevolution between crossbills and black spruce on Newfoundland. Evolution 56:1663-1672.
49. Ricklefs, R. 2008. Disintegration of the ecological community. American Naturalist 172:741-750.
50. Seger, J. 1988. Dynamics of some simple host-parasite models with more than two genotypes in each species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 319:541-555.
51. Slatkin, M. 1985. Gene flow in natural populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16:393-430.
52. Slatkin, M., and N. H. Barton. 1989. A comparison of three indirect methods for estimating average levels of gene flow. Evolution 43: 1349-1368.
53. Solé, R. V., and J. Montoya. 2001. Complexity and fragility in ecological networks. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 268:2039-2045.
54. Solé, R. V., and S. Valverde. 2004. Information theory of complex networks: on evolution and architectural constraints. Lecture Notes in Physics 650:189-207.
55. Thompson, J. N. 1994. The coevolutionary process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
56. Thompson, J. N. 1999. Specific hypotheses on the geographic mosaic of coevolution. American Naturalist 153(suppl.):S1-S14.
57. Thompson, J. N. 2005. The geographic mosaic of coevolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
58. Thompson, J. N. 2009. The coevolving web of life. American Naturalist 42: 381-387.
59. Thompson, J. N., and B. Cunningham. 2002. Geographic structure and dynamics of coevolutionary selection. Nature 417:735-738.
60. Thompson, J. N., A. L. Laine, and J. F. Thompson. 2010. Retention of mutualism in a geographic diverging interaction. Ecology Letters 13:1368-1377.
61. Thrall, P. H., and J. J. Burdon. 2002. Evolution of gene-for-gene systems in metapopulations: the effect of spatial scale of host and pathogen dispersal. Plant Pathology 51:169-184.
62. Urban, M. 2011. The evolution of species interactions across natural landscapes. Ecology Letters 14:723-732.
63. Vogwill, T., A. Fenton, and M. A. Brockhurst. 2008. The impact of parasite dispersal on antagonistic host-parasite coevolution. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21:1252-1258.
64. Vogwill, T., A. Fenton, and M. A. Brockhurst. 2010. How does spatial dispersal network affect the evolution of parasite local adaptation? Evolution 64:1795-1801.