The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape

Nature

Volumn 404, Issue 6779, 2000, Pages 755-758

  Hanski, Ilkka ^a   Ovaskainen, Otso ^a  

^a Department of Ecology and Systematics ^*  (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; HABITAT LOSS; LANDSCAPE; METAPOPULATION;

ARTICLE; BUTTERFLY; ECOLOGY; LANDSCAPING; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANIMALS; BUTTERFLIES; ECOLOGY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

EID: 0034643330     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/35008063     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Turner, M. G., O'Neill, R. V., Gardner, R. H. & Milne, B. T. Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecol. 3, 153-162 (1989).
2. Turner, M. G, & Gardner, R. H. (eds) Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology (Springer, New York, 1991).
3. Gardner, R. H., O'Neill, R. V. & Turner, M. G. in Humans as Components of Ecosystems: Subtle Human Effects and the Ecology of Population Areas (eds Pickett, S. T. A. & McDonnell, M. J.) 208-226 (Springer, New York, 1993).
4. Lavorel, S., Gardner, R. H. & O'Neill, R. V. Analysis of patterns in hierarchically structured landscapes. Oikos 67, 521-528 (1993).
5. Gustafsson, E. J. Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state of the art? Ecosystems 1, 143-156 (1998).
6. Bascompte, J. & Sole, R. V. Spatially induced bifurcations in single-species population dynamics. J. Anim. Ecol. 63, 256-264 (1994).
7. Gustafson, E. J. & Gardner, R. H. The effect of landscape heterogenity on the probability of patch colonization. Ecology 77, 94-107 (1996).
8. With, K. A., Gardner, R. H. & Turner, M. G. Landscape connectivity and population distributions in heterogeneous landscapes. Oikos 78, 151-169 (1997).
9. Hanki, I. Metapopulation Ecology (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1999).
10. Anderson, R. M. & May, R. M. Infectious Diseases of Humans: Dynamics and Control (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1991).
11. Levins, R. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 15, 237-240 (1969).
12. Lande, R. Extinction thresholds in demographic models of territorial populations. Am. Nat. 130, 624-635 (1987).
13. May, R. M. The role of ecological theory in planning reintroduction of endangered species. Symp. Zool. Soc. London 62, 145-163 (1991).
14. Nee, S. & May, R. M. Dynamics of metapopulations: habitat destruction and competitive coexistence. J. Anim. Ecol. 61, 37-40 (1992).
15. Lawton, J. H., Nee, S., Letcher, A. J. & Harvey, P. in Large-scale Ecology and Conservation Biology (eds Edwards, P. J., May, R. M. & Webb, N. R.) 41-58 (Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, 1994).
16. Hill, M. F. & Caswell, H. Habitat fragmentation and extinction thresholds on fractal landscapes. Ecol. Lett. 2, 121-127 (1999).
17. With, K. A. & King, A. W. Extinction thresholds for species in fractal landscapes. Conserv. Biol. 13, 314-326 (1999).
18. Hanski, I. & Gyllenberg, M. Uniting two general patterns in the distribution of species. Science 275, 397-400 (1997).
19. Hanski, I. A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. J. Anim. Ecol. 63, 151-162 (1994).
20. Grenfell, B. T. & Dobson, A. P. (eds) Ecology of Infectious Diseases in Natural Populations (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1995).
21. Adler, F. R. & Nüernberger, B. Persistence in patchy irregular landscapes. Theor. Pop. Biol. 45, 41-75 (1994).
22. Lindenmayer, D. B. & Possingham, H. P. The Risk Of Extinction: Ranking Management Options For Leadbeater's Possum Using Population Viability Analysis (Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Canberra, 1994).
23. Hanski, I. in The Ecological Basis of Conservation (eds Pickett, S. T. A., Ostfeld, R. S., Shachak, M. & Likens, G. E.) 217-227 (Chapman & Hall, New York, 1997).
24. Freitag, S. & van Jaarsveld, A. S. Sensitivity of selection procedures for priority conservation areas to survey extent, survey intensity and taxonomic knowledge. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 1475-1482 (1998).
25. Pressey, R. I., Possingham, H. P. & Margules, C. R. Optimality in reserve selection algorithms: when does it matter and how much? Biol. Conserv. 76, 259-267 (1996).
26. Nee, S. How populations persist. Nature 367, 123-124 (1994).
27. Hanski, I. Metapopulalion dynamics. Nature 396, 41-49 (1998).
28. Lande, R. Risks of population extinction from demographic and environmental stochasticity and random catastrophes. Am. Nat. 142, 911-927 (1993).
29. Foley, P. Predicting extinction times from environmental stochasticity and carrying capacity. Conserv. Biol. 8, 124-137 (1994).
30. Hanski, I., Moilanen, A., Pakkala, T. & Kuussaari, M. The quantitative incidence function model and persistence of an endangered butterfly metapopulation. Conserv. Biol. 10, 578-590 (1996).