Coevolution in Variable Mutualisms

American Naturalist

Volumn 162, Issue 4 SUPPL., 2003, Pages

  Gomulkiewicz, Richard ^a   Nuismer, Scott L ^b   Thompson, John N ^c  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Antagonism; Mutualism; Spatial variation; Temporal variation; Three species coevolution

Indexed keywords

ANTAGONISM; COEVOLUTION; MUTUALISM; SPATIAL VARIATION; TEMPORAL VARIATION;

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CONFERENCE PAPER; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SYMBIOSIS; TIME;

ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; MODELS, GENETIC; SELECTION (GENETICS); SPECIES SPECIFICITY; SYMBIOSIS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0041863063     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/378705     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (42)

1. Barton, A. 1986. Spatial variation in the effect of ants on an extrafloral nectary plant. Ecology 67:495-504.
2. Bronstein, J. L., and M. Hossaert-McKey. 1995. Hurricane Andrew and a Florida fig pollination mutualism: resilience of an obligate interaction. Biotropica 27:373-381.
3. Bronstein, J. L., W. G. Wilson, and W. F. Morris. 2003. Ecological dynamics of mutualist/antagonist communities. American Naturalist 162(suppl.):S24-S39.
4. Bull, J. J., and W. R. Rice. 1991. Distinguishing mechanisms for the evolution of cooperation. Journal of Theoretical Biology 149:64-74.
5. Christiansen, F. B. 1975. Hard and soft selection in a sub-divided population. American Naturalist 109:11-16.
6. Crow, J. F., and M. Kimura. 1970. Introduction to population genetics theory. Burgess, Minneapolis.
7. Cushman, H. J., and T. G. Whitham. 1989. Conditional mutualism in a membracid-ant association: temporal, age-specific, and density-dependent effects. Ecology 70: 1040-1047.
8. Dashiell, K. E., M. G. Meagher, and D. W. Gorget. 2001. Linkage between loci controlling nodulation and testa variegation in peanut. Journal of Heredity 92:509-511.
9. Del-Claro, K., and P. S. Oliveira. 2000. Conditional outcomes in a Neotropical treehopper-ant association: temporal and species-specific variation in ant protection and homopteran fecundity. Oecologia (Berlin) 124:156-165.
10. Dempster, E. R. 1955. Maintenance of genetic heterogeneity. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology 20:25-32.
11. Gavrilets, S., and A. H. Hastings. 1998. Coevolutionary chase in two-species systems with applications to mimicry. Journal of Theoretical Biology 191:415-427.
12. Gillespie, J. H. 1973. Natural selection with varying selection coefficients: a haploid model. Genetical Research of Cambridge 21:115-120.
13. Gomulkiewicz, R., J. N. Thompson, R. D. Holt, S. L. Nuismer, and M. E. Hochberg. 2000. Hot spots, cold spots, and the geographic mosaic theory of coevolution. American Naturalist 156:156-174.
14. Herre, E. A. 1987. Optimality, plasticity and selective regime in fig wasp sex ratios. Nature 329:627-629.
15. Hoeksema, J. D., and M. Kummel. 2003. Ecological persistence of the plant-mycorrhizal mutualism: a hypothesis from species coexistence theory. American Naturalist 162(suppl.):S40-S50.
16. Janz, N., and J. N. Thompson. 2002. Plant polyploidy and host expansion in an insect herbivore. Oecologia (Berlin) 130:570-575.
17. Kapan, D. D. 2001. Three-butterfly system provides field test of mullerian mimicry. Nature 409:338-340.
18. Kjellberg, F. E., J. L. Bronstein, A. Patel, J. Yokoyama, and J.-Y. Rasplus. 2001. Pollination mode in fig wasps: the predictive power of correlated traits. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 268: 1113-1121.
19. Nuismer, S. L., J. N. Thompson, and R. Gomulkiewicz. 1999. Gene flow and geographically structured coevolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 266:605-609.
20. _. 2000. Coevolutionary clines across selection mosaics. Evolution 54:1102-1115.
21. _. 2003 a. Coevolution between a host and parasite with partially overlapping geographic ranges. Journal of Evolutionary Biology (in press).
22. Nuismer, S. L., R. Gomulkiewicz, and M. T. Morgan. 2003b. Coevolution in temporally variable environments. American Naturalist 162:195-204.
23. Palmer, T. M., M. L. Stanton, and T. P. Young. 2003. Competition and coexistence: exploring mechanisms that restrict and maintain diversity within mutualist guilds. American Naturalist 162(suppl.):S63-S79.
24. Parker, M. A. 1999. Mutualism in metapopulations of legumes and rhizobia. American Naturalist 153(suppl.): S48-S60.
25. Parker, M. A., and H. H. Wilkinson. 1997. A locus controlling nodulation specificity in Amphicarpea bracteata (Leguminosae). Journal of Heredity 88:449-453.
26. Pellmyr, O., and C. J. Huth. 1994. Evolutionary stability of mutualism between yuccas and yucca moths. Nature 372:257-260.
27. Pellmyr, O., and H. W. Krenn. 2002. Origin of a complex key innovation in an obligate insect-plant mutualism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 99:5498-5502.
28. Pellmyr, O., and J. N. Thompson. 1996. Sources of variation in pollinator contribution within a guild: the effects of plant and pollinator factors. Oecologia (Berlin) 107:595-604.
29. Pellmyr, O., J. N. Thompson, J. M. Brown, and R. G. Harrison. 1996. Evolution of pollination and mutualism in the yucca moth lineage. American Naturalist 148: 827-847.
30. Peters, A. D., and C. M. Lively. 1999. The red queen and fluctuating epistasis: a population genetic analysis of antagonistic coevolution. American Naturalist 154:393-405.
31. Roughgarden, J. 1979. Theory of population genetics and evolutionary ecology: an introduction. Macmillan, New York.
32. Saikkonen, K., S. H. Faeth, M. Helander, and T. J. Sullivan. 1998. Fungal endophytes: a continuum of interactions with host plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29:319-343.
33. Seger, J. 1988. Dynamics of some simple host-parasite models with more than two genotypes in each species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 319:541-555.
34. Stanton, M. L. 2003. Interacting guilds: moving beyond the pairwise perspective on mutualisms. American Naturalist 162(suppl.):S10-S23.
35. Thompson, J. N. 1988. Variation in interspecific interactions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 19: 65-87.
36. _. 1994. The coevolutionary process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
37. _. 1999. The evolution of species interactions. Science 284:2116-2118.
38. Thompson, J. N., and J. J. Burdon. 1992. Gene-for-gene coevolution between plants and parasites. Nature 360: 121-125.
39. Thompson, J. N., and B. C. Cunningham. 2002. Geographic structure and dynamics of coevolutionary selection. Nature 417:735-738.
40. Thompson, J. N., and O. Pellmyr. 1992. Mutualism with pollinating seed parasites amid co-pollinators: constraints on specialization. Ecology 73:1780-1791.
41. Thrall, P. H., and J. J. Burdon. 1999. The spatial scale of pathogen dispersal: consequences for disease dynamics and persistence. Evolutionary Ecology Research 1:681-701.
42. van Ommeren, R. J., and T. G. Whitham. 2002. Changes in interactions between juniper and mistletoe mediated by shared avian frugivores: parasitism to potential mutualism. Oecologia (Berlin) 130:281-288.