Network isolation and local diversity in neutral metacommunities

Oikos

Volumn 119, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1355-1363

  Economo, Evan P ^a,b   Keitt, Timothy H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b 2004 Kraus Nat Sci Bldg ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; DISPERSAL; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

EID: 77955148861     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18272.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Aguiar et al. Global patterns of speciation and diversity. Nature 2009, 460:384-387.
2. Alonso D. The merits of neutral theory. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2006, 21:451-457.
3. Amarasekare P. Competitive coexistence in spatially structured environments: a synthesis. Ecol. Lett. 2003, 6:1109-1122.
4. Bell G. The distribution of abundance in neutral communities. Am. Nat. 2000, 155:606-617.
5. Bodin Ö, Norberg J. A network approach for analyzing spatially structured populations in fragmented landscape. Landscape Ecol. 2007, 22:31-44.
6. Bonacich P. Factoring and weighting approach to clique identification. J. Math. Sociol. 1972, 2:113-120.
7. Brown J H. Macroecology 1995, Univ. of Chicago Press
8. Chave J. Neutral theory and community ecology. Ecol. Lett. 2004, 7:241-253.
9. Chave J, Leigh E G. A spatially explicit neutral model of beta-diversity in tropical forests. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2002, 62:153-168.
10. Colwell R K, Lees D C. The mid-domain effect: geometric constraints on the geography of species richness. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2000, 15:70-76.
11. Condit R. Beta-diversity in tropical forest trees. Science 2002, 295:666-669.
12. Durrett R, Levin S. Spatial models for species-area curves. J. Theor. Biol. 1996, 179:119-127.
13. Economo E, Keitt T. Species diversity in neutral meta-communities: a network approach. Ecol. Lett. 2008, 11:52-62.
14. Estrada E, Bodin Ö. Using network centrality measures to manage landscape connectivity. Ecol. Appl. 2008, 18:1810-1825.
15. Etienne R. A new sampling formula for neutral biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:253-260.
16. Etienne R. A neutral sampling formula for multiple samples and an exact test of neutrality. Ecol. Lett. 2007, 10:608-618.
17. Etienne R. Modes of speciation and the neutral theory of biodiversity. Oikos 2007, 116:241-258.
18. Freeman L. Centrality in social networks. Conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1978, 1:215-239.
19. Girvan M, Newman M. Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99:7821-7826.
20. Hanski I. Metapopulation ecology 1999, Oxford Univ. Press
21. Hill M. Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 1973, 54:427-32.
22. Holt R D. Food webs in space: on the interplay of dynamic instability and spatial processes. Ecol. Res. 2002, 17:261-273.
23. Hubbell S. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography 2001, Princeton Univ. Press
24. Hubbell S P. The neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography and Stephen Jay Gould. Paleobiology 2005, 31:122-132.
25. Keitt T H. Detecting critical scales in fragmented landscapes. Conserv. Ecol. 1997, 1:4. (online)
26. Kingman J F C. On the genealogy of large populations. J. Appl. Prob. 1982, 19:27-43.
27. Leibold M, McPeek M. Coexistence of the niche and neutral perspectives in community ecology. Ecology 2006, 87:1399-1410.
28. Leibold M. The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol. Lett. 2004, 7:601-613.
29. Levin S. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology: the Robert H. MacArthur award lecture. Ecology 1992, 73:1943-1967.
30. MacArthur R H, Wilson E O. The theory of island biogeography 1967, Princeton Univ. Press
31. McGill B J. Empirical evaluation of neutral theory. Ecology 2006, 87:1411-1423.
32. McRae B H. Isolation by resistance. Evolution 2006, 60:1551-1561.
33. Minor E, Urban D. A graph-theory framework for evaluating landscape connectivity and conservation planning. Conserv. Biol. 2008, 22:297-307.
34. Mouillot D, Gaston K. Geographical range size heritability: what do neutral models with different modes of speciation predict? Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2007, 16:367-380.
35. Muneepeerakul R. A neutral metapopulation model of biodiversity in river networks. J. Theor. Biol. 2007, 245:351-363.
36. Muneepeerakul R. Neutral metacommunity models predict fish diversity patterns in Mississippi-Missouri basin. Nature 2008, 453:220-222.
37. Newman M E. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev. 2003, 45:167-256.
38. Olesen J. The modularity of pollination networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104:19891-19896.
39. Rangel T, Diniz-Filho J. Neutral community dynamics, the mid-domain effect and spatial patterns in species richness. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:783-790.
40. Ricklefs R. Community diversity: relative roles of local and regional processes. Science 1987, 235:167-171.
41. Rosenzweig M. Species diversity in space and time 1995, Cambridge Univ. Press
42. Rosindell J, Cornell S J. Species-area relationships from a spatially explicit neutral model in an infinite landscape. Ecol. Lett. 2007, 10:586-595.
43. Rosindell J. A coalescence approach to spatial neutral ecology. Ecol. Inf. 2008, 3:259-271.
44. Scott J. Social network analysis: a handbook 2000, Sage
45. Simpson E. Measurement of diversity. Nature 1949, 163:688.
46. Simpson G. Species density of North American recent mammals. Syst. Zool. 1964, 13:57-73.
47. Spector S. Biogeographic crossroads as priority areas for biodiversity conservation. Conserv. Biol. 2002, 16:1480-1487.
48. Strogatz S. Exploring complex networks. Nature 2001, 410:268-276.
49. Urban D, Keitt T. Landscape connectivity: a graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology 2001, 82:1205-1218.
50. Urban D. Graph models of habitat mosaics. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12:260-273.
51. Wasserman S, Faust K. Social network analysis: methods and applications 1994, Cambridge Univ. Press
52. Wilkins J, Wakeley J. The coalescent in a continuous, finite, linear population. Genetics 2002, 161:873-888.