The metacommunity concept: A framework for multi-scale community ecology

Ecology Letters

Volumn 7, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 601-613

  Leibold, M A ^a   Holyoak, M ^b   Mouquet, N ^c,d   Amarasekare, P ^e   Chase, J M ^f   Hoopes, M F ^g   Holt, R D ^h   Shurin, J B ⁱ   Law, R ^j   Tilman, D ^k   Loreau, M ^l   Gonzalez, A ^m  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d INSTITUT DES SCIENCES DE L EVOLUTION   (France)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^f WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^h University of British Columbia ^*  (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^j UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^k UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^l ECOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE   (France)

^m MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

more..

Author keywords

Mass effects; Metacommunity; Neutral model; Patch dynamics; Species sorting

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY ECOLOGY; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DISPERSAL;

EID: 3042825322     PISSN: 1461023X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00608.x     Document Type: Review

References (118)

1. Abrams, P.A. (1993). Effect of increased productivity on the abundances of trophic levels. Am. Nat., 141, 351-371.
2. Abrams, P.A. (1999). Is predator-mediated coexistence possible in unstable systems? Ecology, 80, 608-621.
3. Abrams, P.A. & Walters, C.J. (1996). Invulnerable prey and the paradox of enrichment. Ecology, 77, 1125-1133.
4. Amarasekare, P. (2000). The geometry of coexistence. Biol. J. Linnean Soc., 71, 1-31.
5. Amarasekare, P. (2003). Competitive coexistence in spatially structure environments: a synthesis. Ecol. Lett., 6, 1109-1122.
6. Amarasekare, P. & Nisbet, R.M. (2001). Spatial heterogeneity, source - sink dynamics, and the local coexistence of competing species. Am. Nat., 158, 572-584.
7. Bell, G. (2000). The distribution of abundance in neutral communities. Am. Nat., 155, 606-617.
8. Bell, G. (2001). Neutral macroecology. Science (Washington DC), 293, 2413-2418.
9. Belyea, L.R. & Lancaster, J. (1999). Assembly rules within a contingent ecology. Oikos, 86, 402-416.
10. Bolker, B., Holyoak, M., Krivan, V., Rowe, L. & Schmitz, O. (2003). Connecting theoretical and empirical studies of trait-mediated interactions. Ecology, 84, 1101-1114.
11. Boorman, S.A. & Levitt, P.R. (1973). Group selection on the boundary of a stable population. Theor. Pop. Biol., 4, 85-128.
12. Brown, J.H. & Kodric-Brown, A. (1977). Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effect of immigration on extinction. Ecology, 58, 445-449.
13. Caswell, H. (1976). Community structure - neutral model analysis. Ecol. Monogr., 46, 327-354.
14. Caswell, H. (1978). Predator mediated co-existence: a non-equilibrium model. Am. Nat., 112, 127-154.
15. Caswell, H. & Cohen, J.E. (1993). Local and regional regulation of species-area relations: a patch-occupancy model. In: Species Diversity in Ecological Communities (eds Ricklefs, R.E. & Schluter, D.). Belknap, Cambridge, MA, pp. 99-107.
16. Chase, J.M. (2003). Community assembly: when does history matter? Oecologia, 136, 489-495.
17. Chase, J.M. & Leibold, M.A. (2002). Spatial scale dictates the productivity-biodiversity relationship. Nature, 416, 427-430.
18. Chase, J.M. & Leibold, M.A. (2003). Ecological Niches. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
19. Chase, J.M., Leibold, M.A., Downing, A. & Shurin, J.B. (2000). Effects of productivity, herbivory and plant species turnover in grassland food webs. Ecology, 81, 2485-2497.
20. Chesson, P.L. (1985). Coexistence of competitors in spatially and temporally varying environments - a look at the combined effects of different sorts of variability. Theor. Popul. Biol., 28, 263-287.
21. Chesson, P. & Huntly, N. (1997). The roles of harsh and fluctuating conditions in the dynamics of ecological communities. Am. Nat., 150, 519-553.
22. Cornell, H.V. & Karlson, R.H. (2000). Coral species richness: ecological versus biogeographical influences. Coral Reefs, 19, 37-49.
23. Cottenie, K., Michels, E., Nuytten, N. & De Meester, L. (2003). Zooplankton metacommunity structure: regional vs. local processes in highly interconnected ponds. Ecology, 84, 991-1000.
24. Crowley, P.H. (1981). Dispersal and the stability of predator-prey interactions. Am. Nat., 118, 673-701.
25. Danielson, B.J. (1991). Communities in a landscape: the influence of habitat heterogeneity on the interactions between species. Am. Nat., 138, 1105-1120.
26. Diamond, J.M. (1975). Assembly of species communities. In: Ecology and Evolution of Communities (eds Cody, M.L. & Diamond, J.M.). Belknap, Cambridge, MA, pp. 342-444.
27. Dobzhansky, T.G. (1951). Genetics and the Origin of Species, 3rd edn. Columbia University Press, New York.
28. Drake, J.A. (1991). Community-assembly mechanics and the structure of an experimental species ensemble. Am. Nat., 137, 1-26.
29. Forbes, A.E. & Chase, J.N. (2002). The role of habitat connectivity and landscape geometry in experimental zooplankton metacommunities. Oikos, 96, 433-440.
30. Gilbert, F., Gonzalez, A. & Evans-Freke, I. (1998). Corridors maintain species richness in the fragmented landscapes of a microecosystem. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B, 265, 577-582.
31. Gilpin, M.E. & Hanski, I.A. (1991). Metapopulation Dynamics: Empirical and Theoretical Investigations. Academic Press, London.
32. Gonzalez, A. & Chaneton, E.J. (2002). Heterotrophic species extinction, abundance and biomass dynamics in an experimentally fragmented microecosystem. J. Anim. Ecol., 71, 594-602.
33. Gonzalez, A., Lawton, J.H., Gilbert, F.S., Blackburn, T.M. & Evans-Freke, I. (1998). Metapopulation dynamics, abundance, and distribution in a microecosystem. Science, 281, 2045-2047.
34. Gotelli, N.J. & Graves, G.R. (1996). Null Models in Ecology. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
35. Grover, J.P. (1994). Assembly rules for communities of nutrient-limited plants and specialist herbivores. Am. Nat., 143, 258-282.
36. Hanski, I. (1998). Metapopulation Ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
37. Harrison, S. (1997). How natural habitat patchiness affects the distribution of diversity in Californian serpentine chaparral. Ecology, 78, 1898.
38. Harrison, S. & Taylor, A.D. 1997. Empirical evidence for metapopulation dynamics: a critical review. In: Metapopulation Dynamics: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution (eds Hanski, I. & Gilpin, A.D.). Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 27-42.
39. Hassell, M.P., Comins, H.N. & May, R.M. (1994). Species coexistence and self-organizing spatial dynamics. Nature, 370, 290-292.
40. Hastings, A. (1980). Disturbance, coexistence, history, and competition for space. Theor. Popul. Biol., 18, 363-373.
41. Holt, R.D. (1977). Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities. Theor. Popul. Biol., 12, 237-266.
42. Holt, R.D. (1985). Population dynamics in two-patch environments: some anomalous consequences of an optimal habitat distribution. Theor. Popul. Biol., 28, 181-208.
43. Holt, R.D. (1993). Ecology at the mesoscale: the influence of regional processes on local communities. In: Species Diversity in Ecological Communities (eds Ricklefs, R. & Schluter, D.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 77-88.
44. Holt, R.D. (1997). From metapopulation dynamics to community structure: some consequences of spatial heterogeneity. In: Metapopulation Dynamics: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution (eds Hanski, I.P. & Gilpin, M.E.).
45. Holt, R.D. (2002). Food webs in space: on the interplay of dynamic instability and spatial processes. Ecol. Res., 17, 261-273.
46. Holt, R.D. & Polis, G.A. (1997). A theoretical framework for intraguild predation. Am. Nat., 149, 745-764.
47. Holt, R.D., Grover, J. & Tilman, D. (1994). Simple rules for interspecific dominance in systems with exploitative and apparent competition. Am. Nat., 144, 741-771.
48. Holt, R.D., Barfield, M. & Gonzalez, A. (2003). Impacts of environmental variability in open populations and communities: 'inflation' in sink environments. Theor. Popul. Biol., 64, 315-330.
49. Holyoak, M. (2000). Habitat subdivision causes changes in food web structure. Ecol. Lett., 3, 509-515.
50. Holyoak, M. & Ray, C. (1999). A roadmap for metapopulation research. Ecol. Lett., 2, 273-275.
51. Hubbell, S.P. (2001). The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
52. Husband, B.C. & Barrett, S.C.H. (1996). A metapopulation perspective in plant population biology. J. Ecol., 84, 461-469.
53. Iwasa, Y. & Roughgarden, J. (1986). Interspecific competition among metapopulations with space-limited subpopulations. Theor. Popul. Biol., 30, 194-214.
54. Kareiva, P. (1990). Population dynamics in spatially complex environments: theory and data. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B, 330, 175-190.
55. Kessler, M. (2000). Upslope-directed mass effect in palms along an Andean elevational gradient: a cause for high diversity at mid-elevations? Biotropica, 32, 756-759.
56. Kitching, R.L. (2001). Food webs in phytotelmata: 'bottom-up' and 'top-down' explanations for community structure. Ann. Rev. Entomol., 46, 729-760.
57. Klausmeier, C.A. (2001). Habitat destruction and extinction in competitive and mutualistic metacommunities. Ecol. Lett., 4, 57-63.
58. Kneitel, J.M. & Chase, J.M. (2004). Trade-offs in community ecology: linking spatial scales and species coexistence. Ecol. Lett., 7, 69-80.
59. Kneitel, J.M. & Miller, T.E. (2002). Resource and top-predator regulation in the pitcher plant (Sarracenia purpurea) inquiline community. Ecology, 83, 680-688.
60. Kneitel, J.M. & Miller, T.E. (2003). Dispersal rates affect species composition in metacommunities of Sarracenia purpurea inquilines. Am. Nat., 162, 165-171.
61. Kuno, E. (1987). Principles of predator-prey interaction in theoretical, experimental, and natural population systems. Adv. Ecol. Res., 16, 250-331.
62. Law, R. & Leibold, M.A. (in press). Assembly dynamics in metacommunities. In: Metacommunity Ecology: Emerging Views of Community Structure and Dynamics Above the Local Scale (eds Holyoak, M., Leibold, M.A. & Holt, R.D.).
63. Law, R. & Morton, R.D. (1996). Permanence and the assembly of ecological communities. Ecology, 74, 1347-1361.
64. Leibold, M.A. (1996). A graphical model of keystone predators in food webs: trophic regulation of abundance, incidence and diversity patterns in communities. Am. Nat., 147, 784-812.
65. Leibold, M.A. (1998). Similarity and local co-existence of species in regional biotas. Evol. Ecol., 12, 95-110.
66. Leibold, M.A. (1999). Biodiversity and nutrient enrichment in pond plankton communities. Evol. Ecol. Res., 1, 73-95.
67. Leibold, M.A. & Miller, T.E. (2004). From metapopulations to metacommunities. In: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution of Metapopulations (eds Hanski, I. & Gaggiotti, O.E.). Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam, pp. 133-150.
68. Leibold, M.A. & Norberg, J. (in press). Plankton metacommunities as self-organized adaptive systems. Limnol. Oceanogr.
69. Leibold, M.A., Chase, J.M., Shurin, J.B. & Downing, A.L. (1997). Species turnover and the regulation of trophic structure. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 28, 467-494.
70. Levin, S.A. (1974). Dispersion and population interactions. Am. Nat., 108, 207-228.
71. Levin, S.A. (1992). The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology, 73, 1943-1967.
72. Levins, R. (1969). Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am., 15, 237-240.
73. Levins, R. & Culver, D. (1971). Regional coexistence of species and competition between rare species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 68, 1246-1248.
74. Loreau, M. (2000). Are communities saturated? On the relationship between alpha, beta and gamma diversity. Ecol. Lett., 3, 73-76.
75. MacArthur, R.H. (1958). Population ecology of some warblers of northeastern coniferous forests. Ecology, 39, 599-619.
76. MacArthur, R.H. & Wilson, E.O. (1967). The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
77. Maurer, B.A. (1999). Untangling Ecological Complexity: The Macroscopic Perspective. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
78. May, R.M. (1973). Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
79. McCann, K., Hastings, A. & Huxel, G.R. (1998). Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature. Nature, 395, 794-798.
80. McCauley, E., Wilson, W.G. & de Roos, A.M. (1993). Dynamics of age- and spatially-structured predator-prey interactions: individual-based models and population level formulations. Am. Nat., 142, 412-442.
81. McPeek, M.A. & Brown, J.M. (2000). Building a regional species pool: diversification of the Enallagma damselflies in eastern North America. Ecology, 81, 904-920.
82. Mehranvar, L. & Jackson, D.A. (2001). History and taxonomy: their roles in the core-satellite hypothesis. Oecologia, 127, 131-142.
83. Miller, T.E., Kneitel, J.M. & Burns, J.H. (2002). Effect of community structure on invasion success and rate. Ecology (Washington DC), 83, 898-905.
84. Mittelbach, G.G., Steiner, C.F., Scheiner, S.M., Gross, K.L., Reynolds, H.L., Waide, R.B. et al. (2001). What is the observed relationship between species richness and productivity? Ecology, 82, 2381-2396.
85. Mouquet, N. & Loreau, M. (2002). Coexistence in metacommunities: the regional similarity hypothesis. Am. Nat., 159, 420-426.
86. Mouquet, N. & Loreau, M. (2003). Community patterns in source-sink metacommunities. Am. Nat., 162, 544-557.
87. Mouquet, N., Moore, J.L. & Loreau, M. (2002). Plant species richness and community productivity: why the mechanism that promotes coexistence matters. Ecol. Lett., 5, 56-65.
88. Mumby, P.J. (1999). Can Caribbean coral populations be modelled at metapopulation scales? Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser., 180, 275-288.
89. Murdoch, W.W. & Oaten, A. (1975). Predation and population stability. Adv. Ecol. Res., 9, 1-31.
90. Oksanen, L., Fretwell, S., Arruda, A. & Niemela, P. (1981). Exploitation ecosystems in gradients of primary productivity. Am. Nat., 118, 240-261.
91. Pianka, E.R. (1966). Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: a review of concepts. Am. Nat., 100, 33-46.
92. Pimm, S.L. & Lawton, J.H. (1978). On feeding on more than one trophic level. Nature, 275, 542-544.
93. Pulliam, H.R. (1988). Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am. Nat., 132, 652-661.
94. Roberts, C.M. (1997). Connectivity and management of Caribbean coral reefs. Science (Washington DC), 278, 1454-1457.
95. Rosenzweig, M.L. (1995). Species Diversity in Space and Time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
96. Schoener, T.W. & Spiller, D.A. (1987). High population persistence in a system with high turnover. Nature, 330, 474-477.
97. Schoener, T.W. & Spiller, D.A. (1996). Devastation of prey diversity by experimentally introduced predators in the field. Nature, 381, 691-694.
98. Shmida, A. & Wilson, M.V. (1985). Biological determinants of species diversity. J. Biogeogr., 12, 1-20.
99. Shurin, J.B. (2000). Dispersal limitation, invasion resistance, and the structure of pond zooplankton communities. Ecology, 81, 3074-3086.
100. Shurin, J.B. (2001). Interactive effects of predation and dispersal on zooplankton communities. Ecology, 82, 3404-3416.
101. Shurin, J.B. & Allen, ?? (2001). Effects of competition, predation, and dispersal on species richness at local and regional scales. Am. Nat., 158, 624-637.
102. Shurin, J.B., Havel, J.E., Leibold, M.A. & Pinel-Alloul, B. (2000). Local and regional zooplankton species richness: a scale-independent test for saturation. Ecology, 81, 3062-3073.
103. Shurin, J.B., Amarasekare, P., Chase, J.M., Holt, R.D., Hoopes, M. & Leibold, M.A. (2003). Alternative stable states and regional community structure. J. Theor. Biol., 227, 359-368.
104. Skelly, D.K. (2002). Experimental venue and estimation of interaction strength. Ecology, 83, 2097-2101.
105. Steiner, C.F. & Leibold, M.A. (2004). Cyclic assembly trajectories and scale-dependent productivity-diversity relationships. Ecology, 85, 107-113.
106. Taylor, A.D. (1990). Metapopulations, dispersal, and predator-prey dynamics: an overview. Ecology, 71, 429-433.
107. Tilman, D. (1982). Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
108. Tilman, D. (1994). Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology, 75, 2-16.
109. Tilman, D. & Pacala, S. (1993). The maintenance of species richness in plant communities. In: Species Diversity in Ecological Communities (eds Ricklefs, R.E. & Schluter, D.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 13-25.
110. Van Nouhuys, S. & Hanski, I. (2002). Multitrophic interactions in space: metacommunity dynamics in fragmented landscapes. In: Multitrophic Level Interactions (eds Tscharntke, T. & Hawkins, B.A.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 124-147.
111. Vandermeer, J.H. (1973). On the regional stabilization of locally unstable predator-prey relationships. J. Theor. Biol., 41, 161-170.
112. Weiher, E. & Keddy, P. (eds.) (1999). Ecological Assembly Rules, Advances, Retreats: Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
113. Whittaker, R.H. (1962). Classification of natural communities. Bot. Rev., 28, 1-239.
114. Wiens, J.A. (1989). Spatial scaling in ecology. Fund. Ecol., 3, 385-397.
115. Wilson, D.S. (1992). Complex interactions in metacommunities, with implications for biodiversity and higher levels of selection. Ecology, 73, 1984-2000.
116. Worthen, W.B., Carswell, M.L. & Kelly, K.A. (1996). Nested subset structure of larval mycophagous fly assemblages: nestedness in a non-island system. Oecologia, 107, 257-264.
117. Yu, D.W. & Wilson, H.B. (2001). The competition-colonization trade-off is dead; long live the competition-colonization trade-off. Am. Nat., 158, 49-63.
118. Yu, D.W., Wilson, H.B. & Pierce, N.E. (2001). An empirical model of species coexistence in a spatially structured environment. Ecology (Washington DC), 82, 1761-1771.