The impact of migration from parasite-free patches on antagonistic host-parasite coevolution

Evolution

Volumn 61, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1238-1243

  Brockhurst, Michael A ^a,b   Buckling, Angus ^c   Poullain, Virginie ^b,d   Hochberg, Michael E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b INSTITUT DES SCIENCES DE L EVOLUTION   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

Arms race; Experimental evolution; Gene flow; Geographic mosaic; Local adaptation; Microbes

Indexed keywords

ANTAGONISM; BACTERIUM; COEVOLUTION; GENE FLOW; HOST RANGE; IMMIGRATION; LOCAL ADAPTATION;

ARTICLE; EVOLUTION; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; LOCOMOTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSEUDOMONAS FLUORESCENS; PSEUDOMONAS PHAGE; VIROLOGY;

EVOLUTION; HOST-PARASITE RELATIONS; LOCOMOTION; PSEUDOMONAS FLUORESCENS; PSEUDOMONAS PHAGES;

PSEUDOMONAS FLUORESCENS;

EID: 34247893839     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00087.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Agrawal, A. F., and C. M. Lively. 2002. Infection genetics: gene-for-gene versus matching alleles models and all points in between. Evol. Ecol. Res. 4: 79 90.
2. Agrawal, A. F., and C. M. Lively. 2003. Modelling infection as a two step process combining gene-for-gene and matching-allele genetics. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270: 323 334.
3. Alleaume-Benharira, M., I. R. Pen, and O. Ronce. 2006. Geographical patterns of adaptation within a species' range: interactions between drift and gene flow. J. Evol. Biol. 19: 203 215.
4. Bohannan, B. J. M., and R. E. Lenski. 2000. Linking genetic change to community evolution: insights from studies of bacteria and bacteriophage. Ecol. Lett. 3: 362 377.
5. Bonsall, M. B., D. R. French, and M. P. Hassell. 2002. Metapopulation structures affect persistence of predator-prey interactions. J. Anim. Ecol. 71: 1075 1084.
6. Boots, M., and A. Sasaki. 1999. "Small worlds" and the evolution of virulence: infection occurs locally and at a distance. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266: 1933 1938.
7. Brockhurst, M. A., A. Buckling, and P. B. Rainey. 2006. Spatial heterogeneity and the stability of host parasite coexistence. J. Evol. Biol. 19: 374 379.
8. Brockhurst, M. A., A. D. Morgan, P. B. Rainey, and A. Buckling. 2003. Population mixing accelerates coevolution. Ecol. Lett. 6: 975 979.
9. Brockhurst, M. A., P. B. Rainey, and A. Buckling. 2004. The effect of spatial heterogeneity and parasites on the evolution of host diversity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271: 107 111.
10. Buckling, A., and P. B. Rainey. 2002a. Antagonistic coevolution between a bacterium and a bacteriophage. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269: 931 936.
11. Buckling, A., and P. B. Rainey. 2002b. The role of parasites in sympatric and allopatric host diversification. Nature 420: 496 499.
12. Buckling, A., Y. Wei, R. C. Massey, M. A. Brockhurst, and M. E. Hochberg. 2006. Antagonistic coevolution with parasites increases the cost of host deleterious mutations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 273: 45 49.
13. Burdon, J. J., and P. H. Thrall. 1999. Spatial and temporal patterns in coevolving plant and pathogen associations. Am. Nat. 153: S15 S33.
14. Case, T. J., R. D. Holt, M. A. McPeek, and T. H. Keitt. 2005. The community context of species' borders: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Oikos 108: 28 46.
15. Damgaard, C. 1999. Coevolution of a plant host-pathogen gene-for-gene system in a metapopulation model without cost of resistance or cost of virulence. J. Theor. Biol. 201: 1 12.
16. Forde, S. E., J. N. Thompson, and B. J. Bohannan. 2004. Adaptation varies through space and time in a coevolving host-parasitoid interaction. Nature 431: 841 844.
17. Gandon, S. 2002. Local adaptation and the geometry of host-parasite coevolution. Ecol. Lett. 5: 246 256.
18. Gandon, S., Y. Capowiez, Y. Dubois, Y. Michalakis, and I. Olivieri. 1996. Local adaptation and gene for gene coevolution in a metapopulation model. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263:1003-1009.
19. Gandon, S., and Y. Michalakis. 2002. Local adaptation, evolutionary potential and host-parasite coevolution: interactions between migration, mutation, population size and generation time. J. Evol. Biol. 15: 451 462.
20. Ganz, H. H., and J. O. Washburn. 2006. Relative migration rates and local adaptation in a mosquito-protozoan interaction. J. Evol. Biol. 19: 816 824.
21. Gomulkiewicz, R., J. N. Thompson, R. D. Holt, S. L. Nuismer, and M. E. Hochberg. 2000. Hot spots, cold spots, and the geographic mosaic theory of coevolution. Am. Nat. 156: 156 174.
22. Hochberg, M. E., and A. P. Moller. 2001. Insularity and adaptation in coupled victim enemy associations. J. Evol. Biol. 14: 539 551.
23. Hochberg, M. E., and M. van Baalen. 1998. Antagonistic coevolution over productivity gradients. Am. Nat. 152: 620 634.
24. Holyoak, M., and S. P. Lawler. 1996. Persistence of an extinction-prone predator-prey interaction through metapopulation dynamics. Ecology 77: 1867 1879.
25. Lenormand, T. 2002. Gene flow and the limits to natural selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 183 189.
26. Lively, C. M. 1999. Migration, virulence and the geographic mosaic of adaptation by parasites. Am. Nat. 153: S34 S47.
27. Morgan, A. D., M. A. Brockhurst, L. Lopez Pascua, C. Pal, and A. Buckling. 2007. Differential impact of simultaneous migration on coevolving hosts and parasites. BMC Evol. Biol. 7: 10.
28. Morgan, A. D., S. Gandon, and A. Buckling. 2005. The effect of migration on local adaptation in a coevolving host-parasite system. Nature 437: 253 256.
29. Nuismer, S. L. 2006. Parasite local adaptation in a geographic mosaic. Evolution 60: 24 30.
30. Nuismer, S. L., R. Gomulkiewicz, and M. T. Morgan. 2003a. Coevolution in temporally variable environments. Am. Nat. 162: 195 204.
31. Nuismer, S. L., and J. N. Thompson. 1999. Gene flow and geographically structured coevolution. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266: 603 609.
32. Nuismer, S. L., J. N. Thompson, and R. Gomulkiewicz. 2003b. Coevolution between hosts and parasites with partially overlapping geographic ranges. J. Evol. Biol. 16: 1337 1345.
33. Rhodes, C. J., and R. M. Anderson. 1996. Persistence and dynamics in lattice models of epidemic spread. J. Theor. Biol. 180: 125 133.
34. Sasaki, A. 2000. Host-parasite coevolution in a multilocus gene-for-gene system. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267: 2183 21838.
35. Telfer, S., K. J. Bown, R. Sekules, M. Begon, T. Hayden, and R. Birtles. 2005. Disruption of a host-parasite system following the introduction of an exotic host species. Parasitology 130: 661 668.
36. Thompson, J. N. 2005. The geographic mosaic of coevolution. The Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
37. Thompson, J. N., and B. M. Cunningham. 2002. Geographic structure and dynamics of coevolutionary selection. Nature 417: 735 738.
38. Thrall, P. H., and J. J. Burdon. 2002. Evolution of gene-for-gene systems in metapopulations: the effect of spatial scale of host and pathogen dispersal. Plant Pathol. 51: 169 184.
39. Thrall, P. H., and J. J. Burdon. 2003. Evolution of virulence in a plant host-pathogen metapopulation. Science 299: 1735 1737.
40. Woolhouse, M. E., J. P. Webster, E. Domingo, B. Charlesworth, and B. R. Levin. 2002. Biological and biomedical implications of the co-evolution of pathogens and their hosts. Nat. Genet. 32: 569 577.