Alternative methods for combining information about products, consumers and consumers' acceptance based on path modelling

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 142-155

  Menichelli, Elena ^a,b   Hersleth, Margrethe ^a,b   Almøy, Trygve ^b   Næs, Tormod ^a,c  

^a NOFIMA   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Acceptance study; Consumer characteristics; Multi block analysis; Path Modelling

Indexed keywords

THEOBROMA CACAO;

EID: 84885085788     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.08.011     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Addinsoft. (2012). XLSTAT 2012. Available at: http://www.xlstat.com/en/products-solutions/plspm.html.
2. Anderson J.C., Gerbin D.W. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 1988, 103(3):411-423.
3. Bech A.C., Juhl H.J., Hansen M., Martens M., Andersen L. Quality of peas modelled by a structural equation system. Food Quality and Preference 2000, 11(4):275-281.
4. Benton D., Greenfield K., Morgan M. The development of the attitudes to chocolate questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences 1998, 24(4):513-520.
5. Betzin J., Henseler J. Einführung in die funktionsweise des PLS-algorithmus. Handbuch PLS-pfadmodellierung: Methode, anwendung, praxisbeispiele 2005, 49-69. Schäffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart. F. Bliemel, A. Eggert, G. Fassott, J. Henseler (Eds.).
6. Bollen K.A. Total, direct, and indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological methodology 1987, 17:37-69.
7. Bollen K.A. Structural equations with latent variables 1989, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
8. Bollen K.A., Lennox R. Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin 1991, 110(2):305-314.
9. Campbell D. Willingness to pay for rural landscape improvements: combining mixed logit and random effects models. Journal of Agricultural Economics 2007, 58(3):467-483.
10. Cassel C.M., Hackl P., Westlund A.H. Robustness of partial least-squares method for estimating latent variable quality structures. Journal of Applied Statistics 1999, 26(4):435-446.
11. Cassel C.M., Hackl P., Westlund A.H. On measurement of intangible assets: a study of robustness of partial least squares. Total Quality Management 2000, 11(7):897-907.
12. Coltman T., Devinney T.M., Midgley D.F., Venaik S. Formative versus reflective measurement models: Two applications of formative measurement. Journal of Business Resesarch 2008, 61(12):1250-1262.
13. Diamantopoulos A., Siguaw J. Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational
14. Endrizzi I., Gasperi F., Calòb D.G., Vigneauc E. Two-step procedure for classifying consumers in a L-structured data context. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 21(3):270-277.
15. Endrizzi I., Menichelli E., Johansen S.B., Olsen N.V., Næs T. Handling of individual differences in rating-based conjoint analysis. Food Quality and Preference 2011, 22:241-254.
16. Enneking U., Neumann C., Henneberg S. How important intrinsic and extrinsic product attributes affect purchase decision. Food Quality and Preference 2007, 18(1):133-138.
17. Green P.E., Rao V.R. Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data. Journal of Marketing Research 1971, 8(3):355-363.
18. Green P.E., Srinivasan V. Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook. The Journal of Consumer Research 1978, 5(2):103-123.
19. Guinot C., Latreille J., Tenenhaus M. PLS Path modelling and multiple table analysis. Application to the cosmetic habits of women in Ile-de-France. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2001, 58:247-259.
20. Gustafsson A., Herrmann A., Huber F. Conjoint measurement. Methods and applications 2003, Springer, Berlin, Germany.
21. Hanafi M. PLS path modelling: Computation of latent variables with the estimation mode B. Computational Statistics 2007, 22(2):275-292.
22. Helgesen H., Solheim R., Næs T. Consumer preference mapping of dry fermented lamb sausages. Food Quality and Preference 1997, 8(2):97-109.
23. Henseler J. On the convergence of the partial least squares path modeling algorithm. Computational Statistics 2010, 25:107-120.
24. Høskuldsson A. Multi-block and path modelling procedures. Journal of Chemometrics 2008, 222:571-579.
25. Johansen S.B., Næs T., Øyaas J., Hersleth M. Acceptance of calorie-reduced yoghurt: Effects of sensory characteristics and product information. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21(1):13-21.
26. Jöreskog K.G. Structural analysis of covariance and correlation matrices. Psychometrika 1978, 43:443-477.
27. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications. Chicago: SPSS Publications.
28. Jørgensen K., Segtnan V., Thyholt K., Næs T. A comparison of methods for analysing regression models with both spectral and designed variables. Journal of Chemometrics 2004, 18:451-464.
29. Law K., Wong C. Multidimensional constructs in structural equation analysis: An illustration using the job perception and job satisfaction constructs. Journal of Management 1999, 25(2):143-160.
30. Lengard V., Kermit M. 3-Way and 3-block PLS regressions in consumer preference analysis. Food Quality and Preference 2006, 17:234-242.
31. Lohmöller J.-B. Latent variables path modeling with partial least squares 1989, Physica-Verlag, Heildelberg, Germany.
32. Louviere J.J. Analysing decision-making metric conjoint analysis 1988, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
33. MacKenzie S., Podsakoff P., Jarvis C. The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioural and organizationl research and some recommended solutions. Journal of Applied Psychology 2005, 90(4):710-730.
34. Måge I., Menichelli E., Næs T. Preference mapping by PO-PLS: Separating common and unique information in several data blocks. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 24(1):8-16.
35. Måge I., Mevik B.H., Næs T. Regression models with process variables and parallel blocks of raw material measurements. Journal of Chemometrics 2008, 22(7-8):443-456.
36. Martens H., Næs T. 1989, Chichester; John Wiley & Sons, Multivariate calibration.
37. Martens H., Anderssen E., Flatberg A., Gidskehaug L.H., Høy M., Westad F., et al. Regression of a data matrix on descriptors of both rows and of its columns via latent variables: L-PLSR. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 2005, 48:103-123.
38. Martens, M., Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., & Martens, H. (2007). The use of partial least squares methods in new food product development. In H. MacFie (Ed.), Consumer - led food product development (pp. 492-523). London: Woodhead Publishing Ltd.
39. McDonald R.P. Path analysis with composite variables. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1996, 31(2):239-270.
40. McEwan J.A. Preference mapping for product optimization. Multivariate analysis of data in sensory science 1996, 71-80. Elsevier, Amsterdam. T. Næs, E. Risvik (Eds.).
41. Menichelli E., Olsen N.V., Meyer C., Næs T. Combining extrinsic and intrinsic information in consumer acceptance studies. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 23(2):148-159.
42. Næs T., Aastveit A., Sahni N.S. Analysis of split-plot designs: An overview and comparison of methods. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2007, 23:801-820.
43. Næs T., Brockhoff P.B., Tomic O. Statistics for sensory and consumer science 2010, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
44. Næs T., Lengard V., Johansen S.B., Hersleth M. Alternative methods for combining design variables and consumer preference with information about attitudes and demographics in conjoint analysis. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21(4):368-378.
45. Næs T., Martens H. Principal component regression in NIR analysis: Viewpoints, background details and selection of components. Journal of Chemometrics 1988, 2(2):155-167.
46. Næs T., Tomic O., Mevik B.H., Martens H. Path modelling by sequential PLS regression. Journal of Chemometrics 2011, 25(1):28-40.
47. Olsen N.V., Menichelli E., Grunert K.G., Sonne A.M., Szabó E., Bánáti D., et al. Choice probability for apple juice based on novel processing techniques: Investigating the choice relevance of mean-end-chains. Food Quality and Preference 2011, 22(1):48-59.
48. Olsen N.V., Menichelli E., Sørheim O., Næs T. Likelihood of buying healthy convenience food: An at-home testing procedure for ready-to-heat meals. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 24:171-178.
49. Romano R., Brockhoff P.B., Hersleth M., Tomic O., Næs T. Correcting for different use of the scale and the need for further analysis of individual differences in sensory analysis. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19(2):197-209.
50. Schlich P., McEwan J.A. Preference mapping - A statistical tool for the food-industry. Sciences Des Aliments 1992, 12(3):339-355.
51. Tenenhaus M., Pagès J., Ambroisine L., Guinot C. PLS methodology to study relationships between hedonic judgements and product characteristics. Food Quality and Preference 2005, 16:315-325.
52. Tenenhaus A., Tenenhaus M. Regularized generalized canonical correlation analysis. Psychometrika 2011, 76(2):257-284.
53. Tenenhaus M., Vinzi V.E., Chatelin Y., Lauro C. PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 2005, 48:159-205.
54. Train, K. (2009). Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (2nd ed.).
55. Vinzi, V. E. (2009). A Joint Partial Least Squares Component-based Approach to Structural Equation Modeling and Multi-Block Data Analysis. In PLS'09-6th international conference on partial least squares and related methods. BeiHang University, Beijing, China.
56. Vinzi V.E., Guinot C., Squillacciotti S. Two-step PLS regression for L-structured data: an application in the cosmetic industry. Statistical Methods and Applications 2007, 16(2):263-278.
57. Vinzi V.E., Russolillo G. Partial least squares algorithms and methods. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics 2013, 5(1):1-19.
58. Vinzi V.E., Trinchera L., Amato S. PLS path modeling: From foundations to recent developments and open issues for model assessment and improvement. Handbook of partial least squares 2010, 47-82. Springer, Berlin. V.E. Vinzi, W.W. Chin, J. Henseler, H. Wang (Eds.).
59. Wold, H. (1979). Model Construction and Evaluation when Theoretical Knowledge is Scarce: an Example of the Use of Partial Least Squares. Cahier 79.06 du Département d'économétrie, Faculté des Sciences Économiques et Sociales.
60. Wold H. Partial least squares. Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences 1985, Vol. 6:581-591. Wiley, New York.
61. Wold S., Martens H., Wold H. The multivariate calibration problem in chemistry solved by the PLS method. Proceedings of the conference on matrix pencils. Lectures notes in mathematics 1983, 286-293. Springer, Heidelberg. B. Kågström, A. Ruhe (Eds.).
62. Wold S., Sjöström M., Eriksson L. PLS regression: A basic tool of chemometrics. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2001, 58:109-130.