Choice probability for apple juice based on novel processing techniques: Investigating the choice relevance of mean-end-chains

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 48-59

  Olsen, N V ^a   Menichelli, E ^a   Grunert, K G ^b   Sonne, A M ^b   Szabo E ^c   Bánáti, Diána ^c   Naes T ^a  

^a NOFIMA   (Norway)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^c CENTRAL FOOD RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

ANOVA; Apple juice; Conjoint analysis; HPP; PEF

Indexed keywords

MALUS X DOMESTICA;

EID: 78649950634     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.07.010     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Butz P., Needs E.C., Baron A., Bayer O., Geisel B., Gupta B., et al. Consumer attitudes to high pressure food processing. Food Agriculture and Environment 2003, 1(1):30-34.
2. Dunlap R.E., Van Liere K.D., Mertig A.C., Jones R.E. Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues 2000, 56(3):425-442.
3. Endrizzi, I., Menichelli, E., Johansen, S. B., Olsen, N. V., & Næs, T. (submitted for publication). Handling of individual differences in conjoint analysis. Food Quality and Preference.
4. Fornell C., Bookstein F.L. Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research 1982, XIX(November):440-452.
5. Fornell C., Cha J. Partial least squares. Advanced methods of marketing research 1994, 52-78. Blackwell, Cambridge.
6. Fornell C., Larcker D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 1981, 18(August):382-388.
7. Frewer L.J., Howard C., Hedderley D., Shepherd R. Consumer attitudes towards different food-processing technologies used in cheese production - the influence on consumer benefit. Food Quality and Preference 1997, 8:271-280.
8. Frewer L.J., Howards C., Shepherd R. The influence of realistic product exposure on attitudes towards genetic engineering of food. Food Quality and Preference 1996, 7:61-67.
9. Green P.E., Rao V.R. Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgemental data. Journal of Marketing Research 1971, 8:355-363.
10. Grunert K.G. Means-end chains - a means to which end?. Marketing - Journal of Research and Management 2010, 1:41-49.
11. Grunert K.G., Bech-Larsen T. Explaining choice option attractiveness by beliefs elicited by the laddering method. Journal of Economic Psychology 2005, 26(2):223-241.
12. Grunert K., Bech-Larsen T., Lähteemäki L., Ueland Ø., Åström A. Attitudes towards the use of GMOs in food production and their impact on buying intention: The role of positive sensory experience. Agribusiness 2004, 20:95-107.
13. Grunert K.G., Beckmann P.P.C., Sørensen E. Means-end chains and laddering: An inventory of problems and an agenda for research. In understanding consumer decision-making: The means-end approach to marketing and advertising strategy 2001, (pp. 63-90), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
14. Gutman J. A means-end chain model based on consumer categorisation processes. Journal of Marketing 1982, 46:60-72.
15. Hair J.R., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L., Black W.C. Multivariate data analysis 1998, Prentice-Hall International Inc., New Jersey. 5th ed.
16. Hulland J. Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal 1999, 20(2(February)):195-204.
17. Indrawati O., Lille M., Van Loey A., Hendrickx M. Effect of high-pressure processing on colour, texture and flavour of fruit- and vegetable-based food products: A review. Trends in Food Science and Technology 2008, 19(6):320-328.
18. Indrawati O., Plancken L., Van Loey A., Hendrickx M. Does high pressure processing influence nutritional aspects of plant based food systems?. Trends in Food Science and Technology 2008, 19(6):300-308.
19. Krystallis A., Maglaras G., Mamalis S. Motivation and cognitive structures of consumers in their purchasing of functional food. Food Quality and Preference 2007, 19:525-538.
20. Lyndhurst, B. (2009). An evidence review of public attitudes to emerging food technologies. Social Science Research Unit, Food Standards Agency.
21. Mireaux M., Cox D.N., Cotton A., Evans G. An adaptation of repertory grid methodology to evaluate Australian consumers' perceptions of food products produced by novel technologies. Food Quality and Preference 2007, 18:834-848.
22. Nielsen B.H., Sonne A.M., Grunert K.G., Banati D., Pollák-Tóth A., Lakner Z., et al. Consumer perception of the use of high-pressure processing and pulsed electric field technologies in food production. Appetite 2009, 52(1):115-126.
23. Næs T., Kubberød E., Sivertsen H. Identifying and interpreting market segments using conjoint analysis. Food Quality and Preference 2001, 12:133-143.
24. Næs T., Lengard V., Bølling Johannesen S., Hersleth M. Alternative methods for combining design variables and consumer preference with information about attitudes and demographics in conjoint analysis. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:368-378.
25. Olson J.C., Reynolds T.J. The means-end approach to understanding consumer decision making. Understanding consumer decision making: The means-end approach to marketing and advertising strategy 2001, 3-20. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. T.J. Reynolds, J.C. Olson (Eds.).
26. Page J., Tenenhaus M. Multiple factor analysis combined with PLS path modelling. Application to the analysis of relationships between physicochemical variables, sensory profiles and hedonic judgements. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2001, 58:261-273.
27. Roininen K., Lähteenmäki L., Tuorila H. Quantification of consumer attitudes to health and hedonic characteristics of foods. Appetite 1999, 33:71-88.
28. Schwartz S.H., Bilsky W. Personality processes and individual differences. Towards a theory of the univesal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1990, 58(5):878-891.
29. Siegrist M. Consumer attitudes to food innovation and technology. Understanding consumers of food products 2007, 236-274. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, England.
30. Schwartz S.H., Melech G., Lehmann A., Burgess S., Harris M. Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology 2001, 32:519-542.
31. Sonne, A-M., Grunert, K. G., Olsen, N. V., Granli, B.-S., Banati, D., Póllak-Tóth. A.-M. et al. (in press). Consumer perception of HPP and PEF food products. British Food Journal.
32. Soliva-Fortuny R., Balasa A., Knorr D., Martín-Belloso O. Effects of pulsed electric fields on bioactive compounds in food: A review. Trends in Food Science and Technology 2009, 20:544-556.
33. Steenkamp J.-B.E.M., van Trijp H.C.M. Quality guidance: A consumer-based approach to food quality improvement using partial least squares. European Review of Agricultural Economics 1996, 23:195-215.
34. Tenenhaus M., Vinzi V.E., Chatelin Y.-M., Lauro C. PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 2005, 48:159-205.
35. Vinson D.E., Scott J.E., Lamont L.M. The role of personal values in marketing and consumer behaviour. Journal of Marketing 1977, 2:44-50.
36. Walther E., Nagengast B., Trasselli C. Evaluative conditioning in social psychology: Facts and speculations. Cognition and Emotion 2005, 19:175-196.
37. Walker B.A., Olson J.C. Means-end chains: Connecting products with self. Journal of Business Research 1991, 22(2):111-118.