Analysis of split-plot designs: An overview and comparison of methods

Quality and Reliability Engineering International

Volumn 23, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 801-820

  Naes T ^a,b   Aastveit, A H ^c   Sahni, N S ^d  

^a NORWEGIAN FOOD RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^c NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^d Diagenic AS   (Norway)

Author keywords

ANOVA; Fractional factorial designs; Mixed models; Response surface models; Split plot designs

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUMERICAL METHODS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

FRACTIONAL FACTORIAL DESIGNS; MIXED MODELS; RESPONSE SURFACE MODELS; SPLIT-PLOT DESIGNS;

STATISTICAL METHODS;

EID: 35948962712     PISSN: 07488017     EISSN: 10991638     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/qre.841     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Box GEP, Hunter JS, Hunter W. Statistics for Experimenters. Wiley: New York, 1978.
2. Montgomery DC. Design and Analysis of Experiments (5th edn). Wiley: New York, 2001.
3. Letsinger JD, Myers RH, Lentner M. Response surface methods for bi-randomization structures. Journal of Quality Technology 1996; 28(4):381-397.
4. Bingham DR, Sitter RR. Design issues in fractional factorial split-plot experiments. Journal of Quality Technology 2001; 33(1):2-15.
5. Kowalski SM, Cornell JA, Vining GG. Split-plot designs and estimation methods for mixture experiments with process variables. Technometrics 2002; 44(1):72-79.
6. Box G, Jones S. Split-plot designs for robust product experimentation. Journal of Applied Statistics 1992; 19:3-26.
7. (q-r) split-plot experiments. Journal of Quality Technology 2000; 32(1):39-56.
8. Weber DC, Skillings JH. A First Course in the Design of Experiments. A Linear Models Approach. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2000.
9. Mead R, Curnow RN, Hasted AM. Statistical Methods in Agriculture and Experimental Biology. Chapman and Hall: London, 2002.
10. Næs T, Færgestad EM, Cornell J. A comparison of methods for analysing data from a three component mixture experiment in the presence of variation created by two process variables. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory systems 1998; 41:221-235.
11. Hersleth M, Mevik B-H, Næs T, Guinard J-X. Effects of contextual factors on liking for wine-use of robust design methodology. Food Quality and Preference 2003; 14:615-622.
12. Hand D, Crowder M. Practical Longitudinal Data Analysis. Chapman and Hall: London, 1996.
13. Little RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD. SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute: Cary, NC, 1996.
14. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT Users Guide, Version 8. SAS Institute: Cary, NC, 1999.
15. Satterwait FW. An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biometrical Bulletin 1946; 2:110-114.
16. Lenth RV. Quick and easy analysis of unreplicated factorials. Technometrics 1989; 31:469-473.
17. Loeppky JL, Sitter RR. Analyzing unreplicated blocked or split-plot fractional factorial designs. Journal of Quality Technology 2002; 34(3):229-243.
18. Davis CS. Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Repeated Measurements. Springer: Berlin, 2002.
19. Bjerke F, Stroup WW, Åstveit AH, Kirkhus B, Næs T. Design and analysis of storing experiments: A case study. Quality Engineering 2003; 16(4):591-661.
20. Cook RD, Weisberg S. Residuals and Influence in Regression. Chapman and Hall: London, 1992.
21. Sahni NS, Isaksson T, Næs T. The use of experimental design methodology and multivariate analysis to determine critical control points in a process. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2001; 56:105-121.
22. Sahni NS, Aastveit A, Næs T. In-line process and product control using spectroscopy and multivariate calibration. Journal of Quality Technology 2005; 37(1):1-20.
23. Cornell JA. Experiments with Mixtures. Wiley: New York, 1990.