Metaproteomics to unravel major microbial players in leaf litter and soil environments: Challenges and perspectives

Proteomics

Volumn 13, Issue 18-19, 2013, Pages 2895-2909

  Becher, Dörte ^a   Bernhardt, Jörg ^a   Fuchs, Stephan ^a   Riedel, Katharina ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GREIFSWALD   (Germany)

^b HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR INFECTION RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bioremediation; Decomposition; Leaf litter; Microbiology; Rhizosphere; Soil

Indexed keywords

BIOREMEDIATION; DATA ANALYSIS; LEAF LITTER; MASS SPECTROMETRY; METAPROTEOMICS; PLANT LEAF; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW; RHIZOSPHERE; SOIL ANALYSIS;

BIOREMEDIATION; DECOMPOSITION; LEAF LITTER; MICROBIOLOGY; RHIZOSPHERE; SOIL;

BACTERIA; HUMANS; METAGENOMICS; PLANT LEAVES; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS; SOIL MICROBIOLOGY;

EID: 84885082459     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201300095     Document Type: Review

References (118)

1. Matthews, E., Global litter production, pools, and turnover times: estimates from measurement data and regression models. J. Geophys. Res. 1997, 102, 18771-18800.
2. Smith, S. E., Smith, F. A., Roles of arbuscular mycorrhizas in plant nutrition and growth: new paradigms from cellular to ecosystem scales. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2011, 62, 227-250.
3. Berendsen, R. L., Pieterse, C. M., Bakker, P. A., The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health. Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17, 478-86.
4. Wardle, D. A., The influence of biotic interactions on soil biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 2006, 9, 870-886.
5. Torsvik, V., Goksøyr, J, Daae, F. L., Sørheim, R. et al., Beyond the biomass: compositional and functional analysis of soil microbial communities, in: Ritz, K., Dighton, J., Giller, K. E. (Eds.), Use of DNA to Determine the Diversity of Microbial Communities, Wiley, Chichester 1994, pp. 39-48.
6. Wardle, D. A., Communites and Ecosystems. Linking the Above-Ground and Below-Ground Components. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ 2002.
7. Amann, R. I., Ludwig, W., Schleifer, K. H., Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 1995, 59, 143-169.
8. Mocali, S., Benedetti, A., Exploring research frontiers in microbiology: the challenge of metagenomics in soil microbiology. Res. Microbiol. 2010, 161, 497-505.
9. Nannipieri, P., in: Nannipieri, P., Smalla, K. (Eds.). Role of Stabilised Enzymes in Microbial Ecology and Enzyme Extraction from Soil with Potential Applications in Soil Proteomics. Series: Soil Biology, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 2006, 8, pp. 75-94.
10. Schloss, P. D., Handelsman, J., Toward a census of bacteria in soil. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2006, 2, e92.
11. Simon, C., Daniel, R., Metagenomic analyses: past and future trends. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 1153-1161.
12. Lee, N., Nielsen, P. H., Andreasen, K. H., Juretschko, S. et al., Combination of fluorescent in situ hybridization and microautoradiography-a new tool for structure-function analyses in microbial ecology. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 1289-1297.
13. Kubota, K., CARD-FISH for environmental microorganisms: technical advancement and future applications. Microbes Environ. 2013, 28, 3-12.
14. Wellington, E. M., Berry, A., Krsek, M., Resolving functional diversity in relation to microbial community structure in soil: exploiting genomics and stable isotope probing. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2003, 6, 295-301.
15. Saleh-Lakha, S., Miller, M., Campbell, R. G., Schneider, K. et al., Microbial gene expression in soil: methods, applications and challenges. J. Microbiol. Methods 2005, 63, 1-19.
16. Carvalhais, L. C., Dennis, P. G., Tyson, G. W., Schenk, P. M., Application of metatranscriptomics to soil environments. J. Microbiol. Methods 2012, 91, 246-251.
17. Su, C., Lei, L., Duan, Y., Zhang, K. Q. et al., Culture-independent methods for studying environmental microorganisms: methods, application, and perspective. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 93, 993-1003.
18. Bastida, F., Moreno, J. L., Nicolas, C., Hernandez, T. et al., Soil metaproteomics: a review of an emerging environmental science. Significance, methodology and perspectives. Eur. J. Soil Science 2009, 60, 845-859.
19. Keller, M., Hettich, R., Environmental proteomics: a paradigm shift in characterizing microbial activities at the molecular level. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2009, 73, 62-70.
20. Siggins, A., Gunnigle, E., Abram, F., Exploring mixed microbial community functioning: recent advances in metaproteomics. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2012, 80, 265-280.
21. Schneider, T., Riedel, K., Environmental proteomics: analysis of structure and function of microbial communities. Proteomics 2010, 10, 785-798.
22. Wilmes, P., Bond, P. L., Microbial community proteomics: elucidating the catalysts and metabolic mechanisms that drive the Earth's biogeochemical cycles. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2009, 12, 310-317.
23. Chourey, K., Jansson, J., VerBerkmoes, N., Shah, M. et al., Direct cellular lysis/protein extraction protocol for soil metaproteomics. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 6615-6622.
24. Wang, W., Vignani, R., Scali, M., Cresti, M., A universal and rapid protocol for protein extraction from recalcitrant plant tissues for proteomic analysis. Electrophoresis 2006, 27, 2782-2786.
25. Keiblinger, K. M., Wilhartitz, I. C., Schneider, T., Roschitzki, B. et al., Soil metaproteomics-comparative evaluation of protein extraction protocols. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2012, 54, 14-24.
26. Taylor, E. B., Williams, M. A., Microbial protein in soil: influence of extraction method and C amendment on extraction and recovery. Microbiol. Ecol. 2010, 59, 390-399.
27. Benndorf, D., Balcke, G. U., Harms, H., von Bergen, M., Functional metaproteome analysis of protein extracts from contaminated soil and groundwater. ISME J. 2007, 1, 224-234.
28. Schulze, W. X., Gleixner, G., Kaiser, K., Guggenberger, G. et al., A proteomic fingerprint of dissolved organic carbon and of soil particles. Oecologia 2005, 142, 335-343.
29. Nielsen, K. M., Calamai, L., Pietramellara, G., in: Nannipieri, P., Smalla, K. (Eds.). Stabilization of Extracellular DNA and Proteins by Transient Binding to Various Soil Components. Series: Soil Biology, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 2006, 8, pp. 141-157.
30. Giagnoni, L., Magherini, F., Landi, L., Taghavie, S. et al., Soil solid phases effects on the proteomic analysis of Cupriavidus metallidurans CH34. Biol. Fert. Soils 2012, 48, 425-433.
31. Criquet, S., Farnet, A. M., Ferre, E., Protein measurement in forest litter. Biol. Fert. Soils 2002, 35, 307-313.
32. Murase, A., Yoneda, M., Ueno, R., Yonebayashi, K., Isolation of extracellular protein from greenhouse soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2003, 35, 733-736.
33. Carpentier, S. C., Witters, E., Laukens, K., Deckers, P. et al., Preparation of protein extracts from recalcitrant plant tissues: an evaluation of different methods for two-dimensional gel electrophoresis analysis. Proteomics 2005, 5, 2497-2507.
34. Chen, S., Rillig, M. C., Wang, W., Improving soil protein extraction for metaproteome analysis and glomalin-related soil protein detection. Proteomics 2009, 9, 4970-4973.
35. Benndorf, D., Vogt, C., Jehmlich, N., Schmidt, Y. et al., Improving protein extraction and separation methods for investigating the metaproteome of anaerobic benzene communities within sediments. Biodegradation 2009, 20, 737-750.
36. Bastida, F., Algora, C., Hernández, T., García, C., Feasibility of a cell separation-proteomic based method for soils with different edaphic properties and microbial biomass. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2012, 45, 136-138.
37. Schneider, T., Gerrits, B., Gassmann, R., Schmid, E. et al., Proteome analysis of fungal and bacterial involvement in leaf litter decomposition. Proteomics 2010, 10, 1819-1830.
38. Schneider, T., Keiblinger, K. M., Schmid, E., Sterflinger-Gleixner, K. et al., Who is who in litter decomposition? Metaproteomics reveals major microbial players and their biogeochemical functions. ISME J. 2012, 6, 1749-1762.
39. Giagnoni, L., Magherini, F., Landi, L., Taghavi, S. et al., Extraction of microbial proteome from soil: potential and limitations assessed through a model study. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2011, 62, 74-81.
40. ÓFarrel, P. H., High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 1975, 250, 4007-4021.
41. Weiss, W., Görg, A., High-resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis. Methods Mol. Biol. 2009, 564, 13-32.
42. Kan, J., Hanson, T. E., Ginter, J.M., Wang, K. et al., Metaproteomic analysis of Chesapeake Bay microbial communities. Saline Systems 2005, 1, 7-20.
43. Klaassens, E. S., de Vos, W. M., Vaughan, E. E., Metaproteomics approach to study the functionality of the microbiota in the human infant gastrointestinal tract. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 1388-1392.
44. Wilmes, P., Wexler, M., Bond, P. L., Metaproteomics provides functional insight into activated sludge wastewater treatment. PLoS One 2008, 3, e1778.
45. Wang, H. B., Zhang, Z. X., Li, H., He, H. B. et al., Characterization of metaproteomics in crop rhizospheric soil. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 932-940.
46. Wu, L., Wang, H., Zhang, Z., Lin, R. et al., Comparative metaproteomic analysis on consecutively Rehmannia glutinosa-monocultured rhizosphere soil. PLoS One 2011, 6, e20611.
47. Gygi, S. P., Rist, B., Aebersold, R., Measuring gene expression by quantitative proteome analysis. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2000, 11, 396-401.
48. Ong, S. E., Pandey, A., An evaluation of the use of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in proteomics. Biomol. Eng. 2001, 18, 195-205.
49. Moche, M., Albrecht, D., Maaß, S., Hecker, M. et al., The new horizon in 2D electrophoresis-new technology to increase resolution and sensitivity. Electrophoresis 2013, 34, 1510-1518.
50. Schneider, T., Schmid, E., de Castro, J. V. Jr., Cardinale, M. et al., Structure and function of the symbiosis partners of the lung lichen (Lobaria pulmonaria L. Hoffm.) analyzed by metaproteomics. Proteomics 2011, 11, 2752-2756.
51. Morris, R. M., Nunn, B. L., Frazar, C., Goodlett, D. R. et al., Comparative metaproteomics reveals ocean-scale shifts in microbial nutrient utilization and energy transduction. ISME J. 2010, 4, 673-685.
52. Leary, D. H., Hervey, W. J. 4th, Li, R. W., Deschamps, J. R. et al., Method development for metaproteomic analyses of marine biofilms. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 4006-4013.
53. Teeling, H., Fuchs, B. M., Becher, D., Klockow, C. et al., Substrate-controlled succession of marine bacterioplankton populations induced by a phytoplankton bloom. Science 2012, 336, 608-611.
54. Rudney, J. D., Xie, H., Rhodus, N. L., Ondrey, F. G. et al., A metaproteomic analysis of the human salivary microbiota by three-dimensional peptide fractionation and tandem mass spectrometry. Mol. Oral Microbiol. 2010, 25, 38-49.
55. Verberkmoes, N. C., Russell, A. L., Shah, M., Godzik, A. et al., Shotgun metaproteomics of the human distal gut microbiota. ISME J. 2009, 3, 179-189.
56. Kolmeder, C. A., de Been, M., Nikkilä, J., Ritamo, I. et al., Comparative metaproteomics and diversity analysis of human intestinal microbiota testifies for its temporal stability and expression of core functions. PLoS One 2012, 7, e29913.
57. Fang, Y., Robinson, D. P., Foster, L. J., Quantitative analysis of proteome coverage and recovery rates for upstream fractionation methods in proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 1902-1912.
58. Piersma, S. R., Fiedler, U., Span, S., Lingnau, A. et al., Workflow comparison for label-free, quantitative secretome proteomics for cancer biomarker discovery: method evaluation, differential analysis, and verification in serum. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 1913-1922.
59. Premstaller, A., Oberacher, H., Walcher, W., Timperio, A. M. et al., High-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry using monolithic capillary columns for proteomic studies. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 2390-2396.
60. Plumb, R., Castro-Perez, J., Granger, J., Beattie, I. et al., Ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole-orthogonal time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass. Spectrom. 2004, 18, 2331-2337.
61. Olsen, J. V., de Godoy, L. M., Li, G., Macek, B. et al., Parts per million mass accuracy on an Orbitrap mass spectrometer via lock mass injection into a C-trap. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4, 2010-2201.
62. Hu, Q., Noll, R. J., Li, H., Makarov, A. et al., The Orbitrap: a new mass spectrometer. J. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 40, 430-443.
63. Olsen, J. V., Schwartz, J. C., Griep-Raming, J., Nielsen, M. L. et al., A dual pressure linear ion trap Orbitrap instrument with very high sequencing speed. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2009, 8, 2759-2769.
64. Bateman, R. H., Carruthers, R., Hoyes, J. B., Jones, C. et al., A novel precursor ion discovery method on a hybrid quadrupole orthogonal acceleration time-of-flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometer for studying protein phosphorylation. J. Am. Soc. Mass. Spectrom. 2002, 13, 792-803.
65. Silva, J. C., Gorenstein, M. V., Li, G. Z., Vissers, J. P. et al., Absolute quantification of proteins by LCMSE: a virtue of parallel MS acquisition. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2006, 5, 144-156.
66. Panchaud, A., Scherl, A., Shaffer, S. A., von Haller, P. D. et al., Precursor acquisition independent from ion count: how to dive deeper into the proteomics ocean. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 6481-6488.
67. Panchaud, A., Jung, S., Shaffer, S. A., Aitchison, J. D. et al., Faster, quantitative, and accurate precursor acquisition independent from ion count. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 2250-2257.
68. Gillet, L. C., Navarro, P., Tate, S., Röst, H. et al., Targeted data extraction of the MS/MS spectra generated by data-independent acquisition: a new concept for consistent and accurate proteome analysis. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2012, 11, O111.016717.
69. Bensimon, A., Heck, A. J., Aebersold, R., Mass spectrometry-based proteomics and network biology. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2012, 81, 379-405.
70. Perkins, D. N., Pappin, D. J., Creasy, D. M., Cottrell, J. S., Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 1999, 20, 3551-3567.
71. Eng, J. K., McCormack, A. L., Yates, III J. R., An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1994, 5, 976-989.
72. Craig, R., Beavis, R. C., TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 2004, 20, 1466-1467.
73. Tabb, D. L., Fernando, C. G., Chambers, M. C., MyriMatch: highly accurate tandem mass spectral peptide identification by multivariate hypergeometric analysis. Proteome Res. 2007, 6, 654-661.
74. Nesvizhskii, A. I., Vitek, O., Aebersold, R., Analysis and validation of proteomic data generated by tandem mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 2007, 4, 787-797.
75. Neilson, K. A., Ali, N. A., Muralidharan, S., Mirzaei, M. et al., Less label, more free: approaches in label-free quantitative mass spectrometry. Proteomics 2011, 11, 535-553.
76. Graham, C., McMullan, G., Graham, R. L., Proteomics in the microbial sciences. Bioeng. Bugs 2011, 2, 17-30.
77. Bantscheff, M., Schirle, M., Sweetman, G., Rick, J. et al., Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: a critical review. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2007, 389, 1017-1031.
78. Ono, M., Shitashige, M., Honda, K., Isobe, T. et al., Label-free quantitative proteomics using large peptide data sets generated by nanoflow liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2006, 5, 1338-1347.
79. Choi, H., Fermin, D., Nesvizhskii, A. I., Significance analysis of spectral count data in label-free shotgun proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2008, 7, 2373-2385.
80. Nesvizhskii, A. I., Aebersold, R., Interpretation of shotgun proteomic data: the protein inference problem. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4, 1419-1440.
81. Webb-Robertson, B. J., Cannon, W. R., Current trends in computational inference from mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Brief. Bioinform. 2007, 8, 304-17.
82. Huang, T., Wang, J., Yu, W., He, Z., Protein inference: a review. Brief. Bioinform. 2012, 13, 586-614.
83. Boeckmann, B., Blatter, M. C., Famiglietti, L., Hinz, U. et al., Protein variety and functional diversity: Swiss-Prot annotation in its biological context. C. R. Biol. 2005, 328, 882-899.
84. Pruitt, K. D., Tatusova, T., Brown, G. R., Maglott, D. R., NCBI Reference Sequences (RefSeq): current status, new features and genome annotation policy. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, D130-D135.
85. Rentzsch, R., Orengo, C. A., Protein function prediction-the power of multiplicity. Trends Biotechnol. 2009, 27, 210-219.
86. Berth, M., Moser, F. M., Kolbe, M., Bernhardt, J., The state of the art in the analysis of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis images. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 76, 1223-43.
87. Linsen, L., Löcherbach, J., Berth, M., Becher, D. et al., Visual analysis of gel-free proteome data. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2006, 12, 497-508.
88. Kestler, H. A., Müller, A., Gress, T. M., Buchholz, M., Generalized Venn diagrams: a new method of visualizing complex genetic set relations. Bioinformatics 2005, 21, 1592-1595.
89. R Development Core Team, The. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2012, http://www.r-project.org/.
90. Jerry, L., Hintze, R. D. N., Violin plots: a box plot-density trace synergism. Am. Stat. 1998, 52, 181-184.
91. Potter, K., Kniss, J., Riesenfeld, R., Johhson, C., Visualizing summary statistics and uncertainty. Comput. Graph Forum 2010, 29, 823-832.
92. Shneiderman, B., Wattenberg, M., Ordered treemap layouts. In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2001, 2001, 73-78.
93. Balzer, M., Deussen, O., Voronoi treemaps. In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2005, 2005, 49-56.
94. Bernhardt, J., Funke, S., Hecker, M., Siebourg, J., Visualizing gene expression data via Voronoi treemaps. 6th International Symposium on Voronoi Diagrams in Science and Engineering, 2009 (ISVD'09). Copenhagen, Denmark: Computer Society Digital Library (CSDL); 2009, 233-241.
95. McDonnell K. T., Mueller, K., Illustrative parallel coordinates. Comput. Graphics Forum 2008, 27, 1031-1038.
96. Wen, X., Fuhrman, S., Michaels, G. S., Carr, D. B. et al., Large-scale temporal gene expression mapping of central nervous system development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 334-339.
97. Eisen, M. B., Spellman, P. T., Brown, P. O., Botstein, D., Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 14863-14868.
98. Byron, L., Wattenberg, M., Stacked graphs-geometry & aesthetics. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2008, 14, 1245-1252
99. Chapin, F. S., Matson, P. A., Mooney, H. A., Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology. Springer, New York, NY, 2002.
100. Zhang, D., Hui, D., Luo, Y., Zhou, G., Rates of litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: global patterns and controlling factors. J. Plant Ecol. 2008, 1, 85-93.
101. Prescott, C. E., Litter decomposition: what controls it and how can we alter it to sequester more carbon in forest soils? Biogeochemistry 2010, 101, 133-149.
102. Baldrian, P., Kolarik, M., Stursova, M., Kopecky, J. et al., Active and total microbial communities in forest soil are largely different and highly stratified during decomposition. ISME J. 2012, 6, 248-258.
103. Schimel, J. P., Weintraub, M. N., The implications of exoenzyme activity on microbial carbon and nitrogen limitation in soil: a theoretical model. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2003, 35, 549-563.
104. Badri, D. V., Weir, T. L., van der Lelie, D., Vivanco, J. M., Rhizosphere chemical dialogues: plant-microbe interactions. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2009, 20, 642-650.
105. Lugtenberg, B., Kamilova, F., Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 63, 541-56.
106. Mathesius, U., Comparative proteomic studies of root-microbe interactions. J. Proteomics 2009, 72, 353-366.
107. Harms, H., Schlosser, D., Wick, L. Y., Untapped potential: exploiting fungi in bioremediation of hazardous chemicals. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2011, 9, 177-92.
108. Ramos, J. L., Marqués, S., van Dillewijn, P., Espinosa-Urgel, M. et al., Laboratory research aimed at closing the gaps in microbial bioremediation. Trends Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 641-647.
109. Rojo, F., Degradation of alkanes by bacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 11, 2477-2490.
110. Bini, E., Archaeal transformation of metals in the environment. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2010, 1, 1-16.
111. Singleton, I., Merrington, G., Colvan, S., Delahunty, J. S., The potential of soil protein-based methods to indicate metal contamination. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2003, 23, 25-32.
112. Bastida, F., Nicolas, C., Moreno, J. L., Hernandez, T. et al., Tracing changes in the microbial community of a hydrocarbon-polluted soil by culture-dependent. Pedosphere 2010, 20, 479-485.
113. Williams, M. A., Taylor, E. B., Mula, H. P., Metaproteomic characterization of a soil microbial community following carbon amendment. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2010, 42, 1148-1156.
114. Delmotte, N., Knief, C., Chaffron, S., Innerebner, G. et al., Community proteogenomics reveals insights into the physiology of phyllosphere bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106, 16428-16433.
115. Vogel, T. M., Simonet, P., Jansson, J. K., Hirsch, P. R. et al., TerraGenome: a consortium for the sequencing of a soil metagenome. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 7, 252.
116. Altelaar, A. F., Munoz, J., Heck, A. J., Next-generation proteomics: towards an integrative view of proteome dynamics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2013, 14, 35-48.
117. Seifert, J., Taubert, M., Jehmlich, N., Schmidt, F. et al., Protein-based stable isotope probing (protein-SIP) in functional metaproteomics. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2012, 31, 683-697.
118. Burns, R. G., DeForest, J. L., Marxsen, J., Sinsabaugh, R. L. et al., Soil enzymes in a changing environment: Current knowledge and future directions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2013, 58, 216-234.